Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 10:03 am
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 1:25 amWell, if Fairy IS God, because all is non-dual, then how can Fairy have a god?

Come on now IC... Fairy can have a God, in the exact same way Jesus can have a God.
Don't forget, it was Jesus the man, who is reported to have spoken to other men and women, of his Father being God. So was Jesus talking about his biological Father, his actual physical Father, or was he talking about some other Father?

See the problem, which God is which?
Considering that there, really, is only One, there can only, really, only ever be One God.
Now, God exists as One, but can be described in two forms, one being the 'visible', and, the other being the 'invisible'. And, because the word God is synonymous with the word Universe, and since the Universe, Itself, is infinite and eternal, and is made up of the 'visible' and the 'invisible', and is the Creator of absolutely all, 'perceived', things, which combined make up, and are just parts of, the Universe, Itself, then there is not a contradiction nor inconsistency absolutely anywhere here.
The 'visible' part of the One universal God is just the 'matter' that can be 'seen', with human eyes, and, the 'invisible' part of the One universal God is just the 'Mind' that cannot be 'seen', with human eyes. This 'invisible' part is also known as the 'Spirit', and the 'visible' and 'invisible' parts are also known as the 'Creator'.
Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 10:03 am
which is the real God, and which is the illusory God?
This would absolutely all depend on how 'you' are defining the words 'real', and, 'illusory'.
When, and if, 'you' clarify this fully and Correctly, then 'the answer', which 'you' are asking for can then be provided, and/or brought to light.
Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 10:03 am
Or, are they both the same God.

How does that work? unless the contradiction/paradox is all part of the same knowing knowledge?
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 1:25 amDo you really anticipate that I, or you, or anyone is going to be able to attribute a "how" to the existence of the eternal Supreme Being?
No one knows 'How' except God, but then does God even know 'HOW'
God/I do not just 'know' 'how', but also 'why', 'when', 'what', and 'where', exactly.
Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 10:03 am
That's the begging question. Any 'How' question can only be answered if there is a sense of separation.
The very reason 'why' you human beings are, ever so very, very slowly, evolving while making 'more sense' and obtaining 'more of an understanding' of God/the Universe, Itself, is because you human beings do 'look at' and 'see' things from a 'separated' or 'divided' 'sense'.
The human brain, literally, needed, and needs, to do 'this' to 'make sense', and 'understand', of ALL-OF-THIS.
Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 10:03 am
But One and only God can never be separated from himself can he.
Here is another who wants to, and seemingly likes to, refer to God as a "him". Now, let 'us' see if this one can explain why it does 'this', when, obviously, it is a complete and utter logical and physical impossibility to 'be so'.
Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 10:03 am
And so who would be asking How?
you human beings ask inquisitive questions, that is; when there is 'curiosity' anyway. However, because of a so-called 'education system', the natural 'curiosity' that exists within all young children slowly, or very quickly, depending on who's perspective, deteriorates, and can become no more.
Although there is always 'curiosity', and even 'intelligence', itself, always existing, within. Both are, sadly, lost and become no more, again because of an 'ill-gotten', and very Wrongly taught 'education-system'. Through ridicule and humiliation children 'learn' to stop asking questions, and thus to stop being 'intelligent' and 'inquisitive'. Which is 'why' younger human beings 'want to' ask far more questions than you adult human beings do.
For example, if a young child hears some thing like, 'God created every thing', then that child will ponder, and, will want to anyway, ask some thing like, 'How can God do this? and/or, 'Who created God?'
To which that child will get a reply along the lines of, 'There are some things that we are not meant to know'. To which that child, being told, and thus 'taught', from the very one/s that they, literally, 'look up to', 'admire', and 'follow', just like 'a God', that is; you adult human beings, then 'that child' has and is 'now', slowly learning, way to quickly, that it is better that it stops asking questions, and thus just stops seeking clarity and understanding.
And, this process is sped up, exponentially, if 'that child' is laughed at or ridiculed for just not yet 'knowing' some thing.
This 'fear' of not yet 'knowing' some thing, which stops one from just being Truly open and honest, can be clearly seen here throughout this forum, when these posters here are just questioned over the things and claims that they say and make here.
Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 10:03 am
..would that be the one God asking that question, that can only arise to the sense of separation.
God 'knows' absolutely any thing. This is irrefutable, and provable.
If, and when, God asks you human beings questions, then this is because It wants to 'see' how 'you' will respond.
Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 10:03 am
Which would mean God is separating himself from himself,
Just the word 'himself' is an impossible separation in and of itself.
Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 10:03 am
to ask his other self the question of HOW he exists.
God 'knows', exactly, who 'It' is, what 'It' is, how 'It' exists, where 'It' exists, when 'It' exists, and even, exactly, why 'It' exists. 'I/God' also 'know' the exact same things for you human beings, as well.
Only you human beings ask questions like these, because and when you do not, yet, 'know'.
Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 10:03 am
So this would mean that God would have had to have had 'two selves' one to ask the question of how, and the other to answer the question.
Again, 'you' are just confusing "your" 'self", and creating 'contradictions' here, because when 'you' use your own 'past experiences' to 'try to' explain things here, 'you' are missing or misunderstanding the actual and irrefutable Truth.
Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 10:03 am
See how these attributes start to get very messy when attempting to point to an actual causer of cause, when all that can be known are the unknown causer's effects?
Once again, 'we' have here another one who believes, absolutely, that if 'it' has not yet come-to-learn and know some thing, then absolutely no one else could have, nor would have.
Which is just so very, very Wrong.
Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 10:03 am
So all in all, I guess that how will never be answered except in a story perhaps, a fictional story, in the same context of why it's very difficult for Cinderella to know her biological Father, could she ever know, or will she forever remain a lone bastard child. Poor girl.
See the problem, of claiming to have or know a God? that is like saying yes, there is a God, but I have no idea how God is God, I just know that God is.
So, 'you' are criticizing the 'very thing' that 'you', "yourself", are doing here.
Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 10:03 am
No created being has any idea of how God is, can a machine ever know it's maker.
Just because 'you', "fairy", do not have absolutely any idea how 'you' were created, through and by evolution, does not mean that no one else, nor already has.
'I' 'know', exactly, the irrefutable answers to all of the questions here. However, because of 'the belief' within all of you posters here, none of you have absolutely any real interest, nor curiosity, here, left.
Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 10:03 am
So the creator, must be all alone, forever one with himself eternally one without a second. I mean gosh, if that's the truth, then even God himself doesn't know how he is God.
Why do you, continually, believe that what you believe is true and right, then God, Itself, must also believe, and/or know, the 'exact same thing'?
Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2024 10:03 am
What a dilemma, wouldn't you agree?
What an imaginary dilemma, that 'you', "yourself", have created here, do you not mean?