Again, it can not and will not answer, openly and honestly, because if it did, then it would end up proving its own claim False, and Wrong.Walker wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 11:02 pmNow you're just being silly, which is distinct from humour, and a tired old act although under right conditions, there is some perhaps inadvertent humour, in fact, hilarity.
With the Mexican cartels in charge of immigration, thanks to the Democrats Who Hate America, all kinds of mean and nasty things happened on both sides of the border.
Is it "stealing" for the government to tax people for social services?
Re: Is it "stealing" for the government to tax people for social services?
Re: Is it "stealing" for the government to tax people for social services?
Oh come on, Age.
Who else is going to dialogue with you, or with me for that matter.
Age, here is what is important in this latest episode of PN, that began with The Last of the Mohicans.
For a man, rage is an often available, accessible source of energy, in fact, tremendous energy.
In this civilized culture, where energy is not used so much for killing as it is for living, the proper path for the energy of rage … is jnana. Not emotion.
Eventually, the flames of rage subside but the jnani remains, Perfect.
Question for Age to ask of AI: AI, what is jnana and jnani?
Last edited by Walker on Mon Nov 17, 2025 11:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Is it "stealing" for the government to tax people for social services?
LOL
LOL
LOL
Obviously, females get raped in that so called, 'greatest country on the face of the earth'.
And, just as obvious is the amount of people wanting to and trying to get out of 'that country'. Which, some might wonder, 'Why, if 'that is, supposedly, the greatest country on the face of earth'.
Re: Is it "stealing" for the government to tax people for social services?
Notice and see when 'these people' are not able to back up and support 'their claim' with absolutely any thing, at all, then they resort to deflection, and deception.Walker wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 11:34 pmOh come on, Age.
Who else is going to dialogue with you, or with me for that matter.
![]()
Age, here is what is important in this latest episode of PN, that began with The Last of the Mohicans.
For a man, rage is an often available, accessible source of energy, in fact, tremendous energy.
In this civilized culture, where energy is not used so much for killing as it is for living, the proper path for the energy of rage … is jnana. Not emotion.
Eventually, the flames of rage subside but the jnani remains, Perfect.
Question for Age to ask of AI: AI, what is jnana and jnani?
LOL Imagine claiming 'this is the greatest', but when asked to explain how and why, you can not even think of just one thing, at all.
Which, is obviously, further proof that 'that country' is certainly not 'the greatest' at all.
Re: Is it "stealing" for the government to tax people for social services?
It would be modern-day sarcasm along the lines of hey ... I like that hairdo ... to a big ol' gendered gal with a beehive and an Olympic sized back, or hey, I like those socks (from those who care about such things.)
- Immanuel Can
- Posts: 27604
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm
Re: Is it "stealing" for the government to tax people for social services?
You'd better learn to count, Gary. If Socialism were instituted $10,000 is all you'd have!Gary Childress wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 9:04 pmThat's why we tax the rich who take all the money, moron!Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 8:54 pmObviously not you, either. How are you going to pay other people's bills on $10,000 a year or less yourself?
Welcome to Socialism: everybody suffers, nobody's needs are met, and nobody adds value to the economy, so there's no hope for the future, either.
There's no more to tax. It's all gone. Nobody is rich from then on. Or ever again.
Re: Is it "stealing" for the government to tax people for social services?
There would be some way to blame Trump, because that is what's important for the Left.
(Couldn't resist)
(Couldn't resist)
- Immanuel Can
- Posts: 27604
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm
Re: Is it "stealing" for the government to tax people for social services?
Oh. So no "rule Britannia" and "God save the king," "I Vow to Thee, My Country," and "Jerusalem" for you, I guess.
- accelafine
- Posts: 5042
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: Is it "stealing" for the government to tax people for social services?
What does any of that have to do with the price of haddock?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Tue Nov 18, 2025 2:45 amOh. So no "rule Britannia" and "God save the king," "I Vow to Thee, My Country," and "Jerusalem" for you, I guess.![]()
- Immanuel Can
- Posts: 27604
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm
Re: Is it "stealing" for the government to tax people for social services?
The price of haddock is the same, whether in US dollars or British pounds.accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Nov 18, 2025 3:19 amWhat does any of that have to do with the price of haddock?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Tue Nov 18, 2025 2:45 amOh. So no "rule Britannia" and "God save the king," "I Vow to Thee, My Country," and "Jerusalem" for you, I guess.![]()
The English, whom I know very well indeed, are less ostentatious than the Americans, but every bit as prone to nationalism, not less xenophobic, and in their "stiff upper lip" way, every bit as convinced of the superiority of English culture. Hence, their fondness for shows of state, for the Union Jack or the Cross of St. George, and their nostalgia about the days of the British Empire.
They just don't say it the way the Americans do. However, even their sense of superiority to the Americans is born of the same grudgy nationalism that England has always had.
Anybody who knows the English knows that, at least. And I like the English...and participate in their history myself.
However, this I will say for the Americans: they're much more open-hearted, ingenuous, unselfish and enthusiastic about other people's success than the Brits are. The English resent anybody who tries to improve his station in life, or who fails to hold his place. In America, if you move up in life, the Americans' attitude is, "Yay for you, pal: go for it." The English attitude is, "He's a fellow who doesn't know his place."
America may be brash, but England is still heirarchical and snobby. America's not. So that's a point for the Americans.
Re: Is it "stealing" for the government to tax people for social services?
But, finding out that the thing that is called "your" 'heart', pumps blood, has absolutely nothing at all to do with 'your claim'.
you, obviously, have absolutely nothing, here, and all 'we' have, really, learned, here, is you refusing to acknowledge the irrefutable Truth, and Fact, that females are getting raped in that 'one little insignificant country'.
Re: Is it "stealing" for the government to tax people for social services?
you are the 'only one' telling 'others' only what you think and believe is important. However, there is absolutely no one, here, who thinks nor believes what you obviously delusionally do.
LOL you could not even say one important thing, here.
What you wish for is not important.
The only 'act', here, is you 'acting' like the country you are in is, LOL, great. LOL you could not even provide just one thing that could back up and support such an obvious ridiculous belief.
Re: Is it "stealing" for the government to tax people for social services?
LOLImmanuel Can wrote: ↑Tue Nov 18, 2025 12:07 amYou'd better learn to count, Gary. If Socialism were instituted $10,000 is all you'd have!Gary Childress wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 9:04 pmThat's why we tax the rich who take all the money, moron!Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 8:54 pm
Obviously not you, either. How are you going to pay other people's bills on $10,000 a year or less yourself?
Welcome to Socialism: everybody suffers, nobody's needs are met, and nobody adds value to the economy, so there's no hope for the future, either.![]()
![]()
![]()
LOL
LOL
'This one' is like "veritas aequitas", in that they pick a figure, 'out of the air', as some call it, and then, laughably, claim that 'that figure' is the one and only true and right figure.
One could not get any more closed and stupid. But, this is 'the result' of belief, itself.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Tue Nov 18, 2025 12:07 am There's no more to tax. It's all gone. Nobody is rich from then on. Or ever again.
Imagine believing that the figure that you just dreamed up and imagined is the one and only figure. Which is in one's own one and only dreamed up and imagined situation, as well.
'This one' just keeps on 'trying' and 'trying' to deflect away from the Fact that it, actually, believes, absolutely, that taxed money used to help the so-called 'less fortunate' is 'stealing'. But, taxed money used to buy more and more weapons, to protect "itself", is, laughably, 'not stealing'.
The one known as "immanuel can" could not come across any more greedy, nor any more selfish, here.