Hello

[Age]

Funny how there is a general consensus on here that you are an annoying, arrogant twat, apart from your single fan who must have the patience of a saint.

What is also very funny is that so many of you people, here, who a lot claim to have ignore me and not read 'my words' keep on just talking and talking 'about' 'me'.

What 'we' have, here, is another thread that has been turned into being 'about' 'me'.

That's rich.

If you say, and believe, so.

There's no point in having you on ignore.

If you say and believe so, then this might explain why you, "yourself", just can not ignore 'me'.

I gave up after coming on here and finding 42 red dot 'quote' notifications from you per day, and that was after I had asked you to stop quoting me multiple times.

But,

1. I do not recall you ever asking me to stop quoting you. But, obviously, you may have, do you have any proof of where you, supposedly, ask this? What I recall you asking is for me to stop replying, to you.

2. you, obviously, do not have to open 'your notifications', at all. And, even if you did, then you do not 'have to' read 'the words', before you.

3. Like "flannel jesus" 'I' am not, here, to 'please you'.

[Age]

You really can never admit to any mistake or lie, can you, God?

'I' am, still, waiting, patiently, for 'you' to present an actual case of where 'I' have lied, here. Will you present any, this time?

I have also, already, admitted all of 'the mistakes', which I have noticed, or which have been brought forth, here.

I presented the case where you lied. You are saying I didn't, that's another lie.

= 2 lies today so far

This' 'making claims', without providing absolutely any thing at all that could even begin to substantiate your claim, while claiming that it is 'I' who is lying, here, is just about the only thing that you end up 'resorting to', with 'me', here.

Once more, you never presented any case where I actually lied. you only presented where you believed, absolutely, that I lied.

you, obviously, still have a lot more to learn, comprehend, and understand, here, "atla".

Also, your attempts at deflecting, and 'trying to' deceive 'the readers', here, are becoming more and more obvious to 'the readers', here.

[Age]

I've literally told you what will make me happy. You didn't even try it.

Yes I did.

you just did not recognize and see it, once more.

Finally in the last two posts you are! I appreciate it.

It is great to see that you are still happy, even though I am proving your own claims, here, Wrong and Incorrect.

[Flannel Jesus]

I do not recall you ever asking me to stop quoting you. But, obviously, you may have, do you have any proof of where you, supposedly, ask this? What I recall you asking is for me to stop replying, to you.

Asking for proof is stupid. Just accept now that she doens't want you to quote her. The proof that she doesn't want you to is in the post you're quoting, regardless of if she has ever said it before.

[Atla]

This' 'making claims', without providing absolutely any thing at all that could even begin to substantiate your claim

3rd lie

while claiming that it is 'I' who is lying, here, is just about the only thing that you end up 'resorting to', with 'me', here.

4th

Once more, you never presented any case where I actually lied.

5th

you only presented where you believed, absolutely, that I lied.

6th

you, obviously, still have a lot more to learn, comprehend, and understand, here, "atla".

7th

Also, your attempts at deflecting,

8th

and 'trying to' deceive 'the readers', here

9th

are becoming more and more obvious to 'the readers', here.

10th

Some God you are

[Flannel Jesus]

Yes I did.

you just did not recognize and see it, once more.

Finally in the last two posts you are! I appreciate it.

It is great to see that you are still happy

Huh? Still happy? You just went from saying nothing will make me happy, to saying I'm still happy. Once again, you don't have a coherent idea of things, you're just saying whatever random crap you feel like at the time, just like when you said I balk at your ideas but don't know what your ideas are.

I think you may be insane, or in some way mentally incompetent.

[accelafine]

What is also very funny is that so many of you people, here, who a lot claim to have ignore me and not read 'my words' keep on just talking and talking 'about' 'me'.

What 'we' have, here, is another thread that has been turned into being 'about' 'me'.

That's rich.

If you say, and believe, so.

There's no point in having you on ignore.

If you say and believe so, then this might explain why you, "yourself", just can not ignore 'me'.

I gave up after coming on here and finding 42 red dot 'quote' notifications from you per day, and that was after I had asked you to stop quoting me multiple times.

But,

1. I do not recall you ever asking me to stop quoting you. But, obviously, you may have, do you have any proof of where you, supposedly, ask this? What I recall you asking is for me to stop replying, to you.

2. you, obviously, do not have to open 'your notifications', at all. And, even if you did, then you do not 'have to' read 'the words', before you.

3. Like "flannel jesus" 'I' am not, here, to 'please you'.

Correct, because you are an inconsiderate arsehole who doesn't give a crap about anyone but himself. You are also a shameless liar. You know how the notification system works and you know damn well I repeatedly asked you to stop you little prik. I would have thought that lying would be beneath an omnicient entity such as yourself.

[Age]

This' 'making claims', without providing absolutely any thing at all that could even begin to substantiate your claim

3rd lie

while claiming that it is 'I' who is lying, here, is just about the only thing that you end up 'resorting to', with 'me', here.

4th

Once more, you never presented any case where I actually lied.

5th

you only presented where you believed, absolutely, that I lied.

6th

you, obviously, still have a lot more to learn, comprehend, and understand, here, "atla".

7th

Also, your attempts at deflecting,

8th

and 'trying to' deceive 'the readers', here

9th

are becoming more and more obvious to 'the readers', here.

10th

Some God you are

So, once again, you never back up and support your first claim of me lying, then when I just point this out you, laughingly, call this lying, as well.

Which is about the only thing you can do, and do resort to, when I question and challenge you on your claims.

[Atla]

So, once again, you never back up and support your first claim of me lying,

11th lie

then when I just point this out you,

12th

laughingly, call this lying, as well.

13th

Which is about the only thing you can do,

14th

and do resort to, when I question and challenge you on your claims.

15th

[Age]

I do not recall you ever asking me to stop quoting you. But, obviously, you may have, do you have any proof of where you, supposedly, ask this? What I recall you asking is for me to stop replying, to you.

Asking for proof is stupid.

How and why, exactly?

If some one makes a claim, then, unlike you, I like to see and/or hear the actual proof for the claim.

Just accept now that she doens't want you to quote her.

Now that "accelafine" has actually used the 'quote' word, and I have seen it used, then of course I accept, 'now', that "accelafine" does not want me to quote it.

But, as I have explained before, this is an public forum, and I will respond how and when I want to.

The proof that she doesn't want you to is in the post you're quoting, regardless of if she has ever said it before.

The proof that it does not want me to respond to what it says and writes, here, was very clearly noticed the first time I saw that written.

That it 'now' does not want me to quote it, was also very clearly noticed, the first time I saw that written, here, in this post.

But, again, if absolutely any one says and writes things, here, in the publicly open forum, then I will respond how, and when, I want to.

Do you comprehend and understand this?

[Flannel Jesus]

Why bother asking her to prove something that happened long ago then? If you're just going to ignore her request, then... why waste her time asking her to prove it?

[Age]

Finally in the last two posts you are! I appreciate it.

It is great to see that you are still happy

Huh? Still happy? You just went from saying nothing will make me happy, to saying I'm still happy.

Reading the first half of a sentence, only, and then replying, especially in 'the way' you have, here, is not very wise at all.

Or, maybe you purposely left out the second half of the sentence to 'try to' deceive and fool 'the readers', here.

What I actually, and obviously, said and wrote above, here, is:

It is great to see that you are still happy, even though I am proving your own claims, here, Wrong and Incorrect.

So, for those who do not read all of what I say and write, here, and/or for those who 'try to' fool and deceive others, here, what I am actually saying, and meaning, is that although I was proving what 'this one' was claiming, is actually Wrong and Incorrect 'this one' was 'still happy'.

I was certainly not saying, claiming, and meaning what 'this one' presumed Wrongly, here.

But, this is just further proof of what actually happens when people do not hear and/or read all of what is said and written.

Once again, you don't have a coherent idea of things, you're just saying whatever random crap you feel like at the time, just like when you said I balk at your ideas but don't know what your ideas are.

1. If you ever 'looked up' the definition of the 'balk' word, where I did, then it can be clearly seen who is contradicting "them" 'self" and does not have an actual coherent idea of what is happening and occurring, here.

2. you only reading some things, only, is obviously not helping you, here, at all.

3. you attempting to deceive and fool 'the readers', here, is also not helping you, at all.

4. Quite simply, I never never meant that you are 'still happy' because you previously were. I was meaning that although I proved you Wrong you were 'still happy'. Are you at least able to recognize and see 'the difference', now?

5. Quite simply, a definition of the 'balk' word is; hesitate or be unwilling to accept an idea or undertaking. Therefore, because you hesitate and/or are unwilling to accept my ideas/views you are, literally, 'balking' at my ideas and/or views.

I think you may be insane, or in some way mentally incompetent.

Finally, 'we' 'get to' what you have been thinking, or believing, for quite some time now, which explains, exactly, why you do not read what I write, and only 'see', and 'hear', what you want to see, and hear, here.

I have, again, just proved how and why your own interpretations have been False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and/or Incorrect.

But, you will not see, and not hear, any of this, right?

[Flannel Jesus]

Back to your incoherent yapping i see. K.

[Age]

That's rich.

If you say, and believe, so.

There's no point in having you on ignore.

If you say and believe so, then this might explain why you, "yourself", just can not ignore 'me'.

I gave up after coming on here and finding 42 red dot 'quote' notifications from you per day, and that was after I had asked you to stop quoting me multiple times.

But,

1. I do not recall you ever asking me to stop quoting you. But, obviously, you may have, do you have any proof of where you, supposedly, ask this? What I recall you asking is for me to stop replying, to you.

2. you, obviously, do not have to open 'your notifications', at all. And, even if you did, then you do not 'have to' read 'the words', before you.

3. Like "flannel jesus" 'I' am not, here, to 'please you'.

Correct, because you are an inconsiderate arsehole who doesn't give a crap about anyone but himself.

And, besides your very own beliefs and presumptions, what have I actually done, in Life, that has led you to this conclusion, exactly?

Do you, really, expect others to say, and write 'things', and/or speak, and write, 'in ways', that you want to hear, and see?

If yes, then you will never be 'pleased', nor 'happy', in Life.

You are also a shameless liar.

I have asked you before to list any or all of the, alleged, lies, which I have, supposedly, made.

'We' are still waiting, patiently, for 'you'.

Just believing and/or just saying and claiming that 'another' is any type of 'liar' never ever means that 'they' actually are.

Obviously actual proof is needed, and just as obviously you, like "atla", have provided absolutely none.

However, I will, still, give you two 'a chance' to prove "yourselves". If either or both of you, still, want to say and claim that, ' 'I' am 'a liar' ', then just present the actual and irrefutable proof.

How hard or complicated could that actually be. If 'I' have actually 'lied' anywhere, here, then, obviously, the actual and irrefutable proof would exist.

You know how the notification system works and you know damn well I repeatedly asked you to stop you little prik.

I recall you asked me to stop responding to you.

And, as I have said previously I am not going to stop responding to words, in this forum, if and when I want to respond.

I would have thought that lying would be beneath an omnicient entity such as yourself.

A lot of what you have thought has turned out to be absolutely False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and/or Incorrect. Which is a sure sign that a change is very much needed.

Now, I will 'quote you' and respond whenever I want to. And, if 'you' really do not want 'me' to quote and respond to 'your words', then use and write words in 'a way', which expresses what is actually irrefutably True, Right, Accurate, and/or Correct, only.

Do you comprehend and understand this?

[Age]

So, once again, you never back up and support your first claim of me lying,

11th lie

then when I just point this out you,

12th

laughingly, call this lying, as well.

13th

Which is about the only thing you can do,

14th

and do resort to, when I question and challenge you on your claims.

15th

The absolute immaturity of 'this one' continues.

And, these claims of 'me' 'lying' is what 'this one' ends up resorting to, only. Obviously because that is all 'this one' is capable of doing, here.