Hello

[Age]

Duh! And the rest? LOLLOLLOLLOLLOL.

So, either 'this one' just has no interest at all in showing and proving that I am wrong and incorrect, here, or it just knows that it could not because I am actually Right and Correct, here.

About what? You haven't made any points. LOLLOLLOLLOLLOL

About what 'I' informed 'you', last time. To which 'you' said and wrote, 'Duh!', and even with the quotation mark.

And, for the others, here, it was and is about your five claims, which I claim are all lies. Which I have already given and provide the actual reasons for.

[Atla]

Coming from the one who has been psychologically diagnosed with disorder/s, but who spends their time trying, here, 'trying to' diagnose others with disorders, and sometimes with the same disorders that it has be verified and diagnosed as having, is even more funnier, to some.

I haven't been diagnosed with psychological disorder/s. Let's see if you can quote me saying that, or are you just lying again?

'I' could quote 'you', if 'I' was to go back through all of what you have said and written, here. However, 'I' will let 'others' find 'it', if they so cared to.

As for 'now', if you really want to believe that 'I' am 'lying', again, then please do. I enjoy having proof provided, for me, in relation to how the brain works, in conjunction with the belief-system.

Oh, and by the way, I have not lied ever, here, in this forum, but if you really want to continue to believe I have, then let 'us' see if you can quote me saying a 'lie' anywhere, here, in this forum.

You are lying once again and I have just proven it for all to see. Btw, did you finally break all the caps and shift keys on your keyboard?

[accelafine]

So, either 'this one' just has no interest at all in showing and proving that I am wrong and incorrect, here, or it just knows that it could not because I am actually Right and Correct, here.

About what? You haven't made any points. LOLLOLLOLLOLLOL

About what 'I' informed 'you', last time. To which 'you' said and wrote, 'Duh!', and even with the quotation mark.

And, for the others, here, it was and is about your five claims, which I claim are all lies. Which I have already given and provide the actual reasons for.

LOLLOLLOLLOLLOL

[Flannel Jesus]

I wasn't sniping at Veggie that time, but rather at Vestible Arquebus, who is, like age, happy to just do the same conversation over and over and over again. Also quite incapable of reading other people's writings with any intent of finding out what that other person is attempting to communicate.

Oh Sorry, of course, it would be VT if it were veggie.

You're right actually though about VA, VA is remarkably close to Age. A different style, but similar destination.

Age's style is, and will forever be, unmatched. The amount of energy it takes to behave like Age could power a small city.

Veggie's not wrong though, this is pistolero guy is obviously one of the nutters you didn't keep properly locked up at ILP right?

I don't know, who would be be at ilp?

[Flannel Jesus]

Yet it is people like you "flannel jesus" who baulk at my views and challenges and do not just clarify your positions and claims. Which obviously says and shows far more about 'you' and your inabilities, than it does 'me'.

I don't even know what your views are. I wonder if you'll ever figure out why most people don't even bother reading your posts.

[Age]

I haven't been diagnosed with psychological disorder/s. Let's see if you can quote me saying that, or are you just lying again?

'I' could quote 'you', if 'I' was to go back through all of what you have said and written, here. However, 'I' will let 'others' find 'it', if they so cared to.

As for 'now', if you really want to believe that 'I' am 'lying', again, then please do. I enjoy having proof provided, for me, in relation to how the brain works, in conjunction with the belief-system.

Oh, and by the way, I have not lied ever, here, in this forum, but if you really want to continue to believe I have, then let 'us' see if you can quote me saying a 'lie' anywhere, here, in this forum.

You are lying once again and I have just proven it for all to see.

If this is what you really want to believe is true, then by, following 'your own logic', here, then if you have just proven that I am lying, once again, for 'the reason' you are believing and concluding, here, then this means that I have, also, proved that I have never lied anywhere, here, in the forum, for the exact same reason as you believe, absolutely, that you have proven 'it'.

And, if absolutely any one would like the full explanation, and/or absolute proof for this claim, then by all means let 'us' have a discussion.

Btw, did you finally break all the caps and shift keys on your keyboard?

No. Where you presuming I had?

[Age]

Yet it is people like you "flannel jesus" who baulk at my views and challenges and do not just clarify your positions and claims. Which obviously says and shows far more about 'you' and your inabilities, than it does 'me'.

I don't even know what your views are.

That has been quite apparent, for some time now, besides the 'very fact', which 'this' was and is, exactly, what I was referring to in 'my post' above, here, which you are replying to.

That you, still, do not yet know what 'my actual views' are, exactly, is very, very clear, and obvious.

I wonder if you'll ever figure out why most people don't even bother reading your posts.

Yet, here you are, reading my posts, again, along with some others who claim to have me on their ignore lists and/or who have claimed to never read my posts, and/nor reply to me, ever again. Though, here 'we' are.

Now, what you wrote, here, implies that you have, already, 'figured out' why 'most people' do not even bother reading my posts, which encourages me to ask you, 'Why do most people not even bother reading my posts, "flannel jesus"?

Are you, at least, able to show 'the readers', here, that you can back up and support this one little claim, of yours, here?

[Flannel Jesus]

Now, what you wrote, here, implies that you have, already, 'figured out' why 'most people' do not even bother reading my posts, which encourages me to ask you, 'Why do most people not even bother reading my posts, "flannel jesus"?

Are you, at least, able to show 'the readers', here, that you can back up and support this one little claim, of yours, here?

I think probably the biggest part of it is how much you struggle to get to the point. Getting you to clearly state your position, and why you believe your position is correct, is like pulling teeth. I mean, even this post of yours that I'm replying to is full of unnecessary bloviation.

[Flannel Jesus]

I don't even know what your views are.

That has been quite apparent, for some time now,

I also wanted to respond to this. First of all, too many commas. Lay off the commas. Your communication style would benefit from a focus on brevity.

Secondly, you can't say I balk at your views and also say it's apparent that I don't know what your views are. Only one of those two things can be true. So the contradictory things you've said here just make it sound like you're saying whatever random thing you can think of to get at me.

Make up your mind, be consistent.

[Age]

Now, what you wrote, here, implies that you have, already, 'figured out' why 'most people' do not even bother reading my posts, which encourages me to ask you, 'Why do most people not even bother reading my posts, "flannel jesus"?

Are you, at least, able to show 'the readers', here, that you can back up and support this one little claim, of yours, here?

I think probably the biggest part of it is how much you struggle to get to the point.

But, most of the time I do not necessarily have 'a' point, to even get to. A lot of the time I have just wanting to 'understand' the other's actual view and/or point, exactly. Thus, the more than others asking of 'clarifying questions'.

Also, and by the way your use of the 'think', 'probably', and 'the biggest part' implies that you really are not yet actually sure at all, correct?

Getting you to clearly state your position, and why you believe your position is correct, is like pulling teeth.

Once again, for the very, very, very slow of learning, comprehending, and understanding I believe one thing, only, and do not disbelieve any thing, which only further goes to show and prove that even when I make 'a' point, very, very clear, there are people like "yourself" "flannel jesus" who never ever get to see and recognize 'it'.

See, you did not even know 'this view', of mine. Which, as I highlighted earlier, here, it has been quite apparent, for some time now, that you do not even know what 'my views', here, are, exactly.

Also, if you just want me to 'state my position', then all you have to do is just ask me to 'state your position', in relation to some thing, of course.

Are you able to provide absolutely anywhere in this forum where you have even tried to get me to 'state my position', and which to you is it like, so-called, 'pulling teeth'?

If no, then why not?

But, if yes, then will you do it?

I mean, even this post of yours that I'm replying to is full of unnecessary bloviation.

If this is what you believe, then this is what you will see, and/or hear.

Now, do you have an actual position, in this thread?

If yes, then will you 'state your position'?

If no, then why not?

But, if yes, then great, 'we' will, finally, get to see what 'your position' is, here.

And then, will you state why you believe 'your position' is correct?

If no, then why not?

But, if yes, then great, 'we' can then see if it is like so-called 'pulling teeth', with 'you'.

[accelafine]

Age doesn give 'views'. That's beneath him. He accidentally asks the right question occasionally and that's about as good as it gets. When you ask that many pointless, annoying questions statistically there has to be one every now and then that hits some kind of mark anyway.

[Flannel Jesus]

Way too many unnecessary words, I'm not reading all of that. Focus on brevity. Get to the point faster. Even if the point is asking for clarity, that's still a point, and you can get to that faster.

Make it your focus to give your readers an easier time. I guarantee I'm not the only one avoiding your posts because it's just so hard to trudge through all that shit.

[Age]

I don't even know what your views are.

That has been quite apparent, for some time now,

I also wanted to respond to this. First of all, too many commas. Lay off the commas.

I was not, previously, aware that there was an 'accurate' number of commas that are to be used, anywhere.

Will you inform 'the readers', here, of what the 'accurate' number of commas are, exactly?

If no, then why not?

But, if yes, then great. This will be something else 'we' can learn, from 'you'.

Until then, I will use as many commas as I want to, here.

Are you aware that 'your number' of commas in a sentence can be different, to another?

Also, will 'you' lay off telling 'me' what to do, here?

Your communication style would benefit from a focus on brevity.

Okay, thank you. But, absolute Honesty, and Truth, can not be expressed, fully, in what is called 'brevity', all of the 'time'.

Secondly, you can't say I balk at your views and also say it's apparent that I don't know what your views are. Only one of those two things can be true.

Not if you 'look up' the 'balk' word, in one of the many dictionaries. If you do, then you can and will see differently. See, even 'I' thought 'the same' as what you are, here, that is, until I 'looked in' a dictionary what the definitions are for the 'balk' word. And, as can be clearly seen the 'balk' word worked 'perfectly', there.

So the contradictory things you've said here just make it sound like you're saying whatever random thing you can think of to get at me.
Make up your mind, be consistent.

1. 'I' am certainly not trying to 'get at' 'you'. Do you try to 'get to' others, here?

If yes, then this would explain why you jumped to 'the conclusion', which you just did, here.

2. Once again you have shown that you believe some thing is true, before you have even shown that you want to seek out and obtain any actual clarity first.

3. Could there be other definitions of the 'balk' word, other than the one and one you have and are using, here?

4. Did you even consider seeking out what I was actually meaning, before you jumped to a conclusion that I meant something else, only?

5. If absolutely any one would like to actually 'check' if I have been 'consistent', here, or not, then, by 'now', you as most, here, would surely already know that seeking out actual clarification is needed, first.

[Age]

Age doesn give 'views'.

So, when I say things like,

There are no minds.
There is One Mind, only.
The Universe never began, is not expanding.
I have one belief, only.
Absolutely every thing is relative to the observer.
Among other things.

These, to you "accelafine" are not 'views', right?

That's beneath him.

Consider how much I have said and written, here, that 'giving views' is some thing that I do not do, because 'doing so' is beneath me, seems like 'quite the claim'.

He accidentally asks the right question occasionally and that's about as good as it gets.

And, I only, accidentally, ask the so-called 'right questions', when 'they', coincidentally, align with your own views and beliefs, exactly, correctly?

When you ask that many pointless, annoying questions statistically there has to be one every now and then that hits some kind of mark anyway.

And, once more, because absolutely every thing is relative to the observer, what you consider are 'many pointless and annoying questions' others do not.

By the way, all of what you call the 'many pointless, annoying questions', coincidentally, do not align with your views and beliefs, right?

[accelafine]

Funny how there is a general consensus on here that you are an annoying, arrogant twat, apart from your single fan who must have the patience of a saint.