Hello

[Age]

Age is a man who believes he's channeling the conscious universe. His comments are all the same--an insanity-inducing stream of pointless questions and condescending put-downs. He has driven several members to nervous breakdowns. Engage at your peril.

1. I do not believe what this one just claimed I do.

2. My comments are obviously not all the same.

3. My questions are very 'point' driven.

4. I have never put any one down, here.

5. Who are these, supposed and alleged, 'several members', here, that I have, supposedly and allegedly, driven to nervous breakdowns, exactly?

If 'this one' does not provide clarity to the point driven clarifying question, here, then this shows that each and every comment 'this one' made about 'me' are just pure Falsehoods, and thus just LIES.

I'm sure that's what you said when you changed from being just plain 'Ken', or words to that effect.

If 'this' is what you are 'sure of', then 'this' will remain 'the truth', well to you alone.

But, what the actual Truth is, exactly, may well be very, very different.

How else would you know what's in the minds of every other person?

Once again, for those with beliefs, which they do not want to get rid of, there are no 'minds', plural.

And yes, putting a row of 'LOLs' after quoting someone else's perfectly reasonable comment would be considered a 'condescending put down'.

Of course any thing can be 'considered' any thing. But, what is 'considered' never every has to be even remotely close to what was/is actually intended and/or meant.

One day 'you' might just come close to recognizing, accepting, and agreeing with this irrefutable Fact.

You do it all the time.

Again, 'all the time', which, besides being more attempts of 'deflecting', here, is also obviously not even close to the actual Truth of things.

You don't seem to have any empathy whatsoever.

Yet, you have even been informed that what you have been assuming and believing, here, is not what is actually True and Right, you, still do not want to hear and accept 'this', and, still, just keep believing and accepting your own made up assumption, beliefs, and conclusions, only. Which, combined with your absolute lack of seeking out clarity and understanding, shows who here lacks real and true 'empathy', here.

'I' just showed and proved how 'you' made up five claims, based upon nothing at all other than your own pre-existing beliefs and assumptions, and how each and every one of them was and still is 'a lie', but instead of acknowledging this fact you 'tried' your hardest to deflect, and in doing so were 'trying to' deceive others, here. Again, showing a complete 'lack of empathy', and understanding, here, for anyone else.

[Age]

Don't know...ask them.

I find you adorable.

Once more, who you are addressing is not yet known, nor is what you are even talking about.

I think he was referring to you. You have a fan.

I can 'think' 'the same', also. But, as I just pointed out and said, ' who you are addressing is not yet 'known' '.

[accelafine]

1. I do not believe what this one just claimed I do.

2. My comments are obviously not all the same.

3. My questions are very 'point' driven.

4. I have never put any one down, here.

5. Who are these, supposed and alleged, 'several members', here, that I have, supposedly and allegedly, driven to nervous breakdowns, exactly?

If 'this one' does not provide clarity to the point driven clarifying question, here, then this shows that each and every comment 'this one' made about 'me' are just pure Falsehoods, and thus just LIES.

I'm sure that's what you said when you changed from being just plain 'Ken', or words to that effect.

If 'this' is what you are 'sure of', then 'this' will remain 'the truth', well to you alone.

But, what the actual Truth is, exactly, may well be very, very different.

How else would you know what's in the minds of every other person?

Once again, for those with beliefs, which they do not want to get rid of, there are no 'minds', plural.

And yes, putting a row of 'LOLs' after quoting someone else's perfectly reasonable comment would be considered a 'condescending put down'.

Of course any thing can be 'considered' any thing. But, what is 'considered' never every has to be even remotely close to what was/is actually intended and/or meant.

One day 'you' might just come close to recognizing, accepting, and agreeing with this irrefutable Fact.

You do it all the time.

Again, 'all the time', which, besides being more attempts of 'deflecting', here, is also obviously not even close to the actual Truth of things.

You don't seem to have any empathy whatsoever.

Yet, you have even been informed that what you have been assuming and believing, here, is not what is actually True and Right, you, still do not want to hear and accept 'this', and, still, just keep believing and accepting your own made up assumption, beliefs, and conclusions, only. Which, combined with your absolute lack of seeking out clarity and understanding, shows who here lacks real and true 'empathy', here.

I can only go by what I see on the screen. When you are right it's with the focus of a laser beam. A supernova in the vacuum of philosophical space. Unfortunately those episodes only appear now and then amongst the detritus of your responses.

[Age]

I'm sure that's what you said when you changed from being just plain 'Ken', or words to that effect.

If 'this' is what you are 'sure of', then 'this' will remain 'the truth', well to you alone.

But, what the actual Truth is, exactly, may well be very, very different.

How else would you know what's in the minds of every other person?

Once again, for those with beliefs, which they do not want to get rid of, there are no 'minds', plural.

And yes, putting a row of 'LOLs' after quoting someone else's perfectly reasonable comment would be considered a 'condescending put down'.

Of course any thing can be 'considered' any thing. But, what is 'considered' never every has to be even remotely close to what was/is actually intended and/or meant.

One day 'you' might just come close to recognizing, accepting, and agreeing with this irrefutable Fact.

You do it all the time.

Again, 'all the time', which, besides being more attempts of 'deflecting', here, is also obviously not even close to the actual Truth of things.

You don't seem to have any empathy whatsoever.

Yet, you have even been informed that what you have been assuming and believing, here, is not what is actually True and Right, you, still do not want to hear and accept 'this', and, still, just keep believing and accepting your own made up assumption, beliefs, and conclusions, only. Which, combined with your absolute lack of seeking out clarity and understanding, shows who here lacks real and true 'empathy', here.

I can only go by what I see on the screen. When you are right it's with the focus of a laser beam. A supernova in the vacuum of philosophical space. Unfortunately those episodes only appear now and then amongst the detritus.

That you do not challenge nor question me on what I say and claim, here, nor elsewhere, goes to show and prove that you are not able to.

I just showed and proved how your five claims above, about me, are Falsehoods, and thus just lies, only. And, the fact that you have not shown nor proved otherwise, have even attempted to, nor have challenged and/or questioned me on my claims, in and of itself, proves that you can not and will not. And, why you will not is because you can not.

And, once again, for your claim that 'you can only go by what you see on a screen' only reinforces my claim that you human beings, here, are 'blinded', 'deafened', and 'influenced' by your pre-existing beliefs and assumptions 'in ways' that you have, very clearly, not yet even recognized and noticed.

[accelafine]

If 'this' is what you are 'sure of', then 'this' will remain 'the truth', well to you alone.

But, what the actual Truth is, exactly, may well be very, very different.



Once again, for those with beliefs, which they do not want to get rid of, there are no 'minds', plural.



Of course any thing can be 'considered' any thing. But, what is 'considered' never every has to be even remotely close to what was/is actually intended and/or meant.

One day 'you' might just come close to recognizing, accepting, and agreeing with this irrefutable Fact.



Again, 'all the time', which, besides being more attempts of 'deflecting', here, is also obviously not even close to the actual Truth of things.


Yet, you have even been informed that what you have been assuming and believing, here, is not what is actually True and Right, you, still do not want to hear and accept 'this', and, still, just keep believing and accepting your own made up assumption, beliefs, and conclusions, only. Which, combined with your absolute lack of seeking out clarity and understanding, shows who here lacks real and true 'empathy', here.

I can only go by what I see on the screen. When you are right it's with the focus of a laser beam. A supernova in the vacuum of philosophical space. Unfortunately those episodes only appear now and then amongst the detritus.

That you do not challenge nor question me on what I say and claim, here, nor elsewhere, goes to show and prove that you are not able to.

It says no such thing. It says that I'm not interested.

[accelafine]

Wow. Talk about not being able to recognise a compliment when it punches you in the head

[Age]

I can only go by what I see on the screen. When you are right it's with the focus of a laser beam. A supernova in the vacuum of philosophical space. Unfortunately those episodes only appear now and then amongst the detritus.

That you do not challenge nor question me on what I say and claim, here, nor elsewhere, goes to show and prove that you are not able to.

It says no such thing. It says that I'm not interested.

So, you, supposedly, have no interest at all in even just trying to show and prove your own beliefs and claims, and/or disprove claims made about you, here, right and true, correct?

[accelafine]

I don't have any beliefs. Which 'claims' don't you agree with and why?

[Age]

Wow. Talk about not being able to recognise a compliment when it punches you in the head

Any so-called 'compliment' when saying and claiming some thing like;

'When another is right it is with the focus of a laser beam. A supernova in the vacuum of philosophical space',

very quickly 'diminishes' in the saying and writing of,

'Unfortunately those episodes only appear now and then amongst the detritus.'

Which was 'your purpose', and 'intent', here, correct?

Also, and you, obviously, have not yet recognized this fact, that just saying and claiming that 'when another is right', (for whatever reason), 'but only when what is being said and claimed, (with the focus of a laser beam, or not), just 'happens' to align with your own belief or claim, only, is really not a so-called 'compliment' at all.

What you are, really, showing and proving is just how "one sided", 'closed', 'blind', and/or 'deaf' to not 'seeing' some thing but 'seeing' only 'some things' only'. you are, more or less, just showing and proving what you 'focus' on, only.

See, "accelafine" 'I' might actually be 'Right', about any or many 'other things', which the exact same 'focus of a laser beam', as well, but just because you have beliefs or presumptions otherwise, you are not actually able to see just how Correct, and Right, I am being 'there', also.

By the way, just like I do not do, beliefs, theories, guesses, nor debates I also do not do 'compliments', neither.

So, just like you do not respond when you are shown and proved to have lied, once again, because you, supposedly, are not interested, I also did not respond to your 'comment' and 'remark', in 'a way' you might have been expecting or presuming is not necessarily because I was not able to recognize what you are calling a 'compliment' but may well just be because I am 'not interested' in so-called 'compliments' at all, and especially ones in 'the way' you present them.

[Age]

I don't have any beliefs.

That is great.

And, when you say, and claim, that you do not have any beliefs, do you mean that there is absolutely nothing in the whole Universe that you do not believe, nor believe in?

Which 'claims' don't you agree with and why?

Are 'you' asking 'me' 'this question'?

If yes, then, firstly, it helps in you quote me, so then I get a notification, which then means I am far less likely to respond to what is being asked, to me.

Now, the claims, which you made, which I do not agree with are the four claims you made, which I have already explained why to, and to the one other claim you made, which, if you did not answer and clarify, which you did not, would show is just another Falsehood and thus lie.

When and where these very clearly five claims, which you made, which I do not agree with, and I explained why I do not agree with them, is about seven posts before this one, in this very thread, and which I presented very clearly in 'point form' number from 1 through to 5.

[accelafine]

Which 'claims' don't you agree with and why?

Are 'you' asking 'me' 'this question'?

If yes, then, firstly, it helps in you quote me, so then I get a notification, which then means I am far less likely to respond to what is being asked, to me.

Now, the claims, which you made, which I do not agree with are the four claims you made, which I have already explained why to, and to the one other claim you made, which, if you did not answer and clarify, which you did not, would show is just another Falsehood and thus lie.

When and where these very clearly five claims, which you made, which I do not agree with, and I explained why I do not agree with them, is about seven posts before this one, in this very thread, and which I presented very clearly in 'point form' number from 1 through to 5.

Duh! And the rest? LOLLOLLOLLOLLOL.

[Atla]

There's broadly speaking two types of person who could end up here. One set are people with some sort of actual interest in philosophy as a field of study that covers questions about what we can know about some X, and what a certain type of proposition in regards to X could mean if we aren't in agreement on the prior question etc...

The others are the people who think that there is some relationship between philosophy and wisdom that goes beyond a mere etymological accident (a demonstrable falsehood) and are here to explain how massively wise they are. This population is highly varied. Some are autistic like age whom you have already met. Some have narcissistic personality disorders and consider themselves the greatest philosopher of all time (currently we have around 7 of the world's single greatest ever philosopher, they don't argue with each other as much as you might expect). More than one show signs of psychopathy and at least one is most certainly a serial killer with an entire collection of beheaded truck stop prostitutes.

To complete your induction, somebody with Oppositional Defiance disorder will be along presently to start an argument with you over nothing. After that we will assign one of the multiple people we keep on staff whose deep and personal relationship with either a deity or the entire cosmos makes them the only possible source of THEE TrooTH, and then one final autist can tell you about something you urgently need to understand called an "FSK".

Only then will you be fully able to engage in important conversations about wokeness.

Every year this list gets longer and funnier

Coming from the one who has been psychologically diagnosed with disorder/s, but who spends their time trying, here, 'trying to' diagnose others with disorders, and sometimes with the same disorders that it has be verified and diagnosed as having, is even more funnier, to some.

I haven't been diagnosed with psychological disorder/s. Let's see if you can quote me saying that, or are you just lying again?

[Age]

Which 'claims' don't you agree with and why?

Are 'you' asking 'me' 'this question'?

If yes, then, firstly, it helps in you quote me, so then I get a notification, which then means I am far less likely to respond to what is being asked, to me.

Now, the claims, which you made, which I do not agree with are the four claims you made, which I have already explained why to, and to the one other claim you made, which, if you did not answer and clarify, which you did not, would show is just another Falsehood and thus lie.

When and where these very clearly five claims, which you made, which I do not agree with, and I explained why I do not agree with them, is about seven posts before this one, in this very thread, and which I presented very clearly in 'point form' number from 1 through to 5.

Duh! And the rest? LOLLOLLOLLOLLOL.

So, either 'this one' just has no interest at all in showing and proving that I am wrong and incorrect, here, or it just knows that it could not because I am actually Right and Correct, here.

[accelafine]

Are 'you' asking 'me' 'this question'?

If yes, then, firstly, it helps in you quote me, so then I get a notification, which then means I am far less likely to respond to what is being asked, to me.

Now, the claims, which you made, which I do not agree with are the four claims you made, which I have already explained why to, and to the one other claim you made, which, if you did not answer and clarify, which you did not, would show is just another Falsehood and thus lie.

When and where these very clearly five claims, which you made, which I do not agree with, and I explained why I do not agree with them, is about seven posts before this one, in this very thread, and which I presented very clearly in 'point form' number from 1 through to 5.

Duh! And the rest? LOLLOLLOLLOLLOL.

So, either 'this one' just has no interest at all in showing and proving that I am wrong and incorrect, here, or it just knows that it could not because I am actually Right and Correct, here.

About what? You haven't made any points. LOLLOLLOLLOLLOL

[Age]

Every year this list gets longer and funnier

Coming from the one who has been psychologically diagnosed with disorder/s, but who spends their time trying, here, 'trying to' diagnose others with disorders, and sometimes with the same disorders that it has be verified and diagnosed as having, is even more funnier, to some.

I haven't been diagnosed with psychological disorder/s. Let's see if you can quote me saying that, or are you just lying again?

'I' could quote 'you', if 'I' was to go back through all of what you have said and written, here. However, 'I' will let 'others' find 'it', if they so cared to.

As for 'now', if you really want to believe that 'I' am 'lying', again, then please do. I enjoy having proof provided, for me, in relation to how the brain works, in conjunction with the belief-system.

Oh, and by the way, I have not lied ever, here, in this forum, but if you really want to continue to believe I have, then let 'us' see if you can quote me saying a 'lie' anywhere, here, in this forum.