When and where, exactly?accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Apr 09, 2025 8:10 pmTalk about projecting. People stopped buying on the same scale because it became cheaper to rent after the interest rate hike, landlords were given all kinds of tax breaks.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Wed Apr 09, 2025 7:58 pmUh huh. So you are referring to a local house price slump that was accompanied by the obvious recession, and as usual you are trying to convert the issue into an ad hominem assault on me because the facts don't agree with your story and your pride won't let you address that in the way a sane person would.accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Apr 09, 2025 7:45 pm
Ooh, someone's been busy on google and AII'm sure you, as a man on a different part of the planet, knows far more about where I live and what happens there than I do, so feel free to give me the benefit of your great male wisdom and mansplanations
I go by what's going on, not what bloated 'experts' say when they drival on about GDP and 'growth'. Why does an economy have to be permanently in 'growth mode' anyway? That's just political bullshit-speak. A low unemployment rate does not scream to me 'imploding economy', great depression number 2, devastatiion and mass starvation blah blah blah. It's the same when they rant about mass homelessness. I've never seen one single homeless person ANYWHERE. Now the US really does have mass homelessness. The homeless are everywhere. It's not as if the homeless can just make themselves invisible.
Asking 'general questions', while only 'speaking about' very, very particular situations, is never ever going to provide you with 'the answer/s' that you are wanting and looking for, here.
1. It could, but the chance of a permanently growing economy happening is obviously very remote.accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Apr 09, 2025 8:10 pm It was multi-faceted. 'Recession' is political bullshit-speak. Obviously an 'economy' can't just be permanently growing.
2. An economy just not permanently growing is also not automatically a recession. Other things are needed as well.
So, why are you commenting on it, here, for exactly?accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Apr 09, 2025 8:10 pm It's more like a wave, with gentle crests and troughs for the most part. Nothing to even comment on.
Which probably explains, in of itself, exactly, why it is not considered a 'bad thing', when 'house prices' so-call 'plummet'.accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Apr 09, 2025 8:10 pm That's the way it's supposed to be. Very occasionally something happens to disturb that balance--eg the Great Depression. That's not something that can just go unnoticed, and which we need bloated economic 'experts' to tell us is happening. Same with the housing market. It can't just be permanently in a state of frenzied growth. 'Buyers' and 'sellers' markets ebb and flow.
See, what is 'a plummet' to one is not to another, and this is just because absolutely every thing is 'relative', to, 'the observer'.
So, if people already know that so-called 'buyers' and 'sellers' markets 'ebb' and 'flow', then there is nothing really to be talking about nor concerned about, here.
Obviously the 'logic' and 'reasoning', here, is absolutely faulty, once again.accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Apr 09, 2025 8:10 pm If there were really any 'experts' in these things then we would all be rich.
Obviously so-called "experts" would not reveal what they 'know' about getting 'monetary richer' to everyone else, for not every one can become so-called 'rich'. 'Being rich' can and does only exist because 'some are poor'.
Once again, 'always'.
It is just about always 'one' OR 'the other' with you. There is hardly ever 'any middle ground' with you, as some would say.
I am not sure. Are 'you' an 'ordinary person', "accelafine"?accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Apr 09, 2025 8:10 pm 'GDP' is more bullshit political-speak. Mass immigration can artificially raise it, hence the keenness of politicians to promote it. What does the term even mean to ordinary people?
If yes, then what 'the term' even mean, to 'you', exactly?