compatibilism
Re: compatibilism
Danger Will Robinson,
He's going to take that to mean libertarian free-will.
He's going to take that to mean libertarian free-will.
-
Flannel Jesus
- Posts: 4302
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm
Re: compatibilism
Hope not, that would be a terribly obvious mistake that's terribly easy to avoid. Just by looking at the words I've said, and not adding words I didn't say, it could be easily avoided.
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: compatibilism
Compatibilist free will. You're kinda, sorta creatively and causally active while, at the same time, you're kinda, sorta creatively and causally impotent and therefore are only kinda, sorta responsible.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 8:08 pmYeah sure, which is why I say the words "I believe in free will".
That he intuits self-responsibility? I certainly do take that as libertarian free will. He knows the buck starts and stops with him. That he sez I believe in free will? No. His notion of free will is not mine.
No. I really do think you're a libertarian free will. And I can't see how it's a mistake to point this out or treat you as such.
I've read your words. I think you're mistaken, just as you think I'm mistaken.Just by looking at the words I've said
I think you're a libertarian free will, you think I have compatibilist free will, biggy thinks we're all meat machines (disclaimers aside). We each think we're right and the other guy is wrong. This is SOP.
-
Flannel Jesus
- Posts: 4302
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm
Re: compatibilism
Seems like there wasn't all that much point in you asking me about my intuition.
-
Flannel Jesus
- Posts: 4302
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm
Re: compatibilism
You don't understand what I was calling a mistake.henry quirk wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 9:41 pmNo. I really do think you're a libertarian free will. And I can't see how it's a mistake to point this out or treat you as such.
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: compatibilism
Okay.
-
Flannel Jesus
- Posts: 4302
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm
Re: compatibilism
If you took the words I said, and interpreted them to think I mean that I believe in libertarian free will, that would be a mistake. That's what the exchange between phyllo and I was about. You started talking about how you believe that I'm "a libertarian free will", which has literally nothing to do with the words exchanged between phyllo and I, and is not what I was calling a mistake.
You have to get your bearings on what the level of conversation is. Am I talking about a belief? Am I talking about your belief? Am I talking about your belief about what I believe? If you don't understand the nesting level of the conversation, you're going to rant about irrelevant stuff.
Last edited by Flannel Jesus on Thu Aug 29, 2024 10:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: compatibilism
There was to me.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 9:50 pm Seems like there wasn't all that much point in you asking me about my intuition.
-
Flannel Jesus
- Posts: 4302
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm
Re: compatibilism
Did you learn something?henry quirk wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 10:03 pmThere was to me.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 9:50 pm Seems like there wasn't all that much point in you asking me about my intuition.
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: compatibilism
I know this.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 10:02 pmIf you took the words I said, and interpreted them to think I mean that I believe in libertarian free will, that would be a mistake.
That's what I figured.That's what the exchange between phyllo and I was about
I take my jumping off points where I find them.You started talking about how you believe that I'm "a libertarian free will", which has literally nothing to do with the words exchanged between phyllo and I
I know.and is not what I was calling a mistake.
-
Flannel Jesus
- Posts: 4302
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm
Re: compatibilism
So you know you were saying irrelevant nonsense as if it was in response to the words exchanged between phyllo and I, and you posted it as if it was relevant... knowing it wasn't relevant.henry quirk wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 10:07 pmI know this.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 10:02 pmIf you took the words I said, and interpreted them to think I mean that I believe in libertarian free will, that would be a mistake.
That's what I figured.That's what the exchange between phyllo and I was about
I take my jumping off points where I find them.You started talking about how you believe that I'm "a libertarian free will", which has literally nothing to do with the words exchanged between phyllo and I
I know.and is not what I was calling a mistake.
Fucking fascinating.
Now I feel more vindicated than ever about what I said to iwannaplato. You obviously have no intention of moving any kind of conversation forward towards any understanding. Who knows what you're doing?
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: compatibilism
It was relevant, if only to me.
Yes, I'm sure.Fucking fascinating
Projection, I think.You obviously have no intention of moving any kind of conversation forward towards any understanding.
Anyway we done wasting time? Can we get back to the subject?
Last edited by henry quirk on Thu Aug 29, 2024 10:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Flannel Jesus
- Posts: 4302
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm
Re: compatibilism
You could have decided not to waste time at any point. That's entirely up to you how long you'd like to keep wasting everyone else's time.henry quirk wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 10:12 pmIt was relevant, if only to me.
Yes, I'm sure.Fucking fascinating
Are we done wasting time? Can we get back to the subject?
-
Flannel Jesus
- Posts: 4302
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: compatibilism
1- If necessitarianism holds, then: no, it's not up to me.
2- If libertarian free will holds, then: absolutely, it's up to me.
3- If compatibilism holds, then: kinda, sorta it's up to me and kinda, sorta it's not.
I, of course, go with 2. Surprisingly, so do you.