Biden Crime Family

[Sculptor]

Even before Biden was elected MTG has been trying to get him impeached. Now Broaebert and MTG are in a cat fight to show who is the most keen to bring this about.
THey are being egged on buy the man who has currently 4 criminal indictments involving 91 charges against him, and has inented the phrase "Biden Crime Family".

Sadly for MTG there is something you need to bring about an impeachment. There has to be a crime or misdemeanor, for which evidence can be organised into an indictment. Sadly nothing of the sort seems to be present.

[Sculptor]

What conspiracy nuttery is that?

Hey, that's Pelosi.

What's she doing in a kente cloth, kneeling like a loon? She's virtue signalling in solidarity with the Commies at BLM, actually. Doesn't it gall you to see an old, white, capitalist crone using African symbols and Kaepernicking for the cameras, with $144 million dollars in her back pocket?

I wonder how much of that got to the Floyd family, or to restore the neighbourhoods set aflame by the "peaceful protests" she supported.

Actually, I think I can guess the number. And I'll bet you can, too.

Jesus was a socialist, and if he contributed anything to human civilisation it was to inspire the refermers of the 19thC in the matter of emancipation.
I'm pretty sure, were he alive today, he's be taking the knee too.

[Immanuel Can]

According to the caption she's kneeling to protest the police murder of a black guy. I don't see how this act commits her to a life of Socialism?

Yeah, I knew you were going to make excuses for her.

I don't think more even needs to be said.

It very much does. You are baselessly asserting that somebody who publicly says they are not a Socialist is secrectly a fake not-Socialist who doesn't do Socialist things that believe shge is secretly commited to but even more secretly double crossing. Your best evidence... some other thing where you baselessly assert that anyone who protests the police murder of a citizen must be a Communist. Your position is clearly absurd.

Is Pelosi a hypocrite and not a real Socialist? Absolutely. Is she rich? Abundantly. But does she use Socialist causes as an excuse to grab power? Manifestly. Here, in the picture, you see her using BLM and the "social justice" racism cause, created by people who call themselves "trained Marxists and who advocate extremist Socialist politics, to boost her own political career.

Trust your eyes. This is her, pandering not to mere Socialists, but to outright race-Marxists.

[Immanuel Can]

Jesus was a socialist...

Nope. You'll look in vain for any evidence He was anything of the kind. That's pure imagination.

[FlashDangerpants]

Yeah, I knew you were going to make excuses for her.

I don't think more even needs to be said.

It very much does. You are baselessly asserting that somebody who publicly says they are not a Socialist is secrectly a fake not-Socialist who doesn't do Socialist things that believe shge is secretly commited to but even more secretly double crossing. Your best evidence... some other thing where you baselessly assert that anyone who protests the police murder of a citizen must be a Communist. Your position is clearly absurd.

Is Pelosi a hypocrite and not a real Socialist? Absolutely. Is she rich? Abundantly. But does she use Socialist causes as an excuse to grab power? Manifestly. Here, in the picture, you see her using BLM and the "social justice" racism cause, created by people who call themselves "trained Marxists and who advocate extremist Socialist politics, to boost her own political career.

Trust your eyes. This is her, pandering not to mere Socialists, but to outright race-Marxists.

Bunch more weird conspiracy shit in there. But let's stick to what started it eh? It's not hypocritical for somebody who says they aren't a Socialist to not be a real Socialist. You see hypocrisy is when you say you believe something but then don't act like you do, so when you don't believe something and then you don't act like you believe it, that's just being consistent.

[Immanuel Can]

It's not hypocritical for somebody who says they aren't a Socialist to not be a real Socialist.

Pelosi kneels to outright Marxists. You can't get more hypocritical than that.

[FlashDangerpants]

Pelosi isn't a socialist. Nor does she say she is.

The Dems rarely explicitly say they are, outside of their own lunatic fringe, like "the Pack" or Bernie.

So she doesn't say she is, but you hold a conspiracy theory that she secretly is, and now you are accusing her of hypocrisy for not living by the rules you say she secretly believes in but wouldn't live by anyway, because she secretly doesn't believe in the rules that she only secretly believes in.

Now you say she is a hypocrite for a new reason, something to do with kneeling to protest against the police murdering a citizen. But that doesn't explain any better than your previous efforts why she is supposed to take a vow of poverty.

[Immanuel Can]

Pelosi isn't a socialist. Nor does she say she is.

The Dems rarely explicitly say they are, outside of their own lunatic fringe, like "the Pack" or Bernie.

So she doesn't say she is, but you hold a conspiracy theory that she secretly is...

No, I point out that she's gaming Socialists. You're being played. This is somebody who wants you to believe she's sympathetic even to outright Marxist causes, but who also wants to keep the moderate Democrats happy, so won't declare for Socialism, and also wants to keep her vast fortune while she does it.

And you can't miss that. Just use your eyes.

[FlashDangerpants]

The Dems rarely explicitly say they are, outside of their own lunatic fringe, like "the Pack" or Bernie.

So she doesn't say she is, but you hold a conspiracy theory that she secretly is...

No, I point out that she's gaming Socialists. You're being played. This is somebody who wants you to believe she's sympathetic even to outright Marxist causes, but who also wants to keep the moderate Democrats happy, so won't declare for Socialism, and also wants to keep her vast fortune while she does it.

And you can't miss that. Just use your eyes.

But you prevously wrote that

Pelosi isn't a socialist. Nor does she say she is.

The Dems rarely explicitly say they are, outside of their own lunatic fringe, like "the Pack" or Bernie. But everthing they sell you on is designed along the lines of Socialism. And the reason is simple: the "Socialism" bit is for you. It's not for them. They get to keep all they have, and you get to live in a pseudo-socialist state, ruled by corrupt oligarchs.

So they're not Socialists. They Socialist-salesman. That's the point with Pelosi: she talks about "oppression" and "racism" and "social justice" and all the other Leftist tropes. She pulls them out for the crowd. She'll kneel down on her old knees to support the BLM Communists, even if she needs a crane to get back up.

But where is her real commitment to Socialism?

So now your claim is that ... She doesn't say she is a Socialist because Dems rarely explicitly say they are but the unsaid thing is that they are Socialists? But then comes the first of the many switcheroos... they are fake Socialists who only pretend to be the Socialists they say they aren't while secretly meaning that they aren't actually Socialists they say they aren't... but we have to be Socialist for some reason even though the policies of the party aren't Socialist and the platform they campaign for and their legislative agenda aren't Socialism... anyway this is all in service of a conspiracy to maintain a corrupt oligarchy of secret Socialists who aren't Socialists and say they aren't Socialists... but now... on top of all that ... It's all a game because her message when she says she isn't a Socialist and that her party isn't Socialist is for us to believe that they are actually Socialist without them declaring for Socialism.

Apparently this is all obvious to anyone with eyes.

Fake_Socialists.JPG

Your conspiracy theories get madder and madder every day.

[commonsense]

Yeah, I knew you were going to make excuses for her.

I don't think more even needs to be said.

It very much does. You are baselessly asserting that somebody who publicly says they are not a Socialist is secrectly a fake not-Socialist who doesn't do Socialist things that believe shge is secretly commited to but even more secretly double crossing. Your best evidence... some other thing where you baselessly assert that anyone who protests the police murder of a citizen must be a Communist. Your position is clearly absurd.

Is Pelosi a hypocrite and not a real Socialist? Absolutely. Is she rich? Abundantly. But does she use Socialist causes as an excuse to grab power? Manifestly. Here, in the picture, you see her using BLM and the "social justice" racism cause, created by people who call themselves "trained Marxists and who advocate extremist Socialist politics, to boost her own political career.

Trust your eyes. This is her, pandering not to mere Socialists, but to outright race-Marxists.

You actually can’t assign intentions, like to boost her own political career, to the actions of others. Slow down and think about what you are saying.

[Immanuel Can]

So she doesn't say she is, but you hold a conspiracy theory that she secretly is...

No, I point out that she's gaming Socialists. You're being played. This is somebody who wants you to believe she's sympathetic even to outright Marxist causes, but who also wants to keep the moderate Democrats happy, so won't declare for Socialism, and also wants to keep her vast fortune while she does it.

And you can't miss that. Just use your eyes.

But you prevously wrote that...

You're not confused. Rather, you're trying to obscure the obvious. But it's not working.

[Immanuel Can]

You actually can’t assign intentions, like to boost her own political career, to the actions of others. Slow down and think about what you are saying.

I don't assign them at all. You can see what she's trying to do for yourself. Her actions are quite obviously devious, self-serving and inauthentic. Why she is that way, none of us can say, it's true. But she's very clearly that way, because of the absurd inconsistencies.

[FlashDangerpants]

No, I point out that she's gaming Socialists. You're being played. This is somebody who wants you to believe she's sympathetic even to outright Marxist causes, but who also wants to keep the moderate Democrats happy, so won't declare for Socialism, and also wants to keep her vast fortune while she does it.

And you can't miss that. Just use your eyes.

But you prevously wrote that...

You're not confused. Rather, you're trying to obscure the obvious. But it's not working.

The obvious is that you are spouting insane conspiracy theories.

Fake_Socialists.JPG

[Immanuel Can]

The obvious is that you are spouting insane conspiracy theories.

I guess you don't know what "conspiracy" or "ad hominem" mean.

Oh well.

[FlashDangerpants]

The obvious is that you are spouting insane conspiracy theories.

I guess you don't know what "conspiracy" or "ad hominem" mean.

Oh well.

Like_a_Huuman_Centipede_of_Paranoia.JPG