Biden Crime Family

[FlashDangerpants]

the pdf link is misleading...

It's the official document. It reflects what she, herself, is willing to admit to.

But please, just explain why the "Democrat" and "Socialist" Pelosi has sooooo much money. Is luxury ice cream that expensive?

By the way, during her time in office, from 2008 to the present, the Pelosi fortunes have gone from $33 million dollars (rather a lot for a Socialist, really) to over $144 million dollars. You will not find a single legal investment firm that can yield results even a fraction that good. Somehow, the Pelosis have done better than all those wise investment bankers on Wall Street.

Any guesses as to how?

Do you think she's in the masses? Or is she in the famed "1%"?

Pretty easy to tell, isn't it?

You are a lazy incompetent idiot sometimes IC.
https://www.officialdata.org/us/stocks/ ... dYear=2023

$144 million is pretty much exactly what you would get for dumping $33 million straight into any S&P 500 tracker fund in 2008.
You would get more if you put it there late in 2008.
.

Lazy_idiot.JPG

.

There are many funds which have outperformed the S&P 500 over a sustained period.
https://www.ii.co.uk/analysis-commentar ... 0-ii515904

Easily_found_list_of_overperforming_funds.JPG

[Immanuel Can]

You are a lazy incompetent idiot sometimes IC.

"You...you...you...Trump...Trump...Trump..."

You don't know how "insider trading" works. It shows up as "savvy investments" of a regular kind, not as something extraodinary. If it shows up as insider trading, then somebody gets arrested.

Nobody announces their own insider trading. So it appears on the books as just extraordinary good investing by somebody clever. The question is, can an honest person, operating without any insider information, reproduce those results on a regular basis, or are they extraordindary results; and how extraordinary are they? And if they're extraodinary, did Pelosi just get really, really lucky, or did her position have something to do with how she, as an alleged "public servant" allegedly divested herself of her investments and never passing on any information to investors, managed to make a killing while promoting Socialism and "serving the public interest"?

One thing for sure: anybody who has $144 million in their bank account has got some 'splainin' to do about how they manage to be a "Socialist" passionately concerned about the public welfare.

[FlashDangerpants]

the pdf link is misleading...

It's the official document. It reflects what she, herself, is willing to admit to.

But please, just explain why the "Democrat" and "Socialist" Pelosi has sooooo much money. Is luxury ice cream that expensive?

By the way, during her time in office, from 2008 to the present, the Pelosi fortunes have gone from $33 million dollars (rather a lot for a Socialist, really) to over $144 million dollars. You will not find a single legal investment firm that can yield results even a fraction that good. Somehow, the Pelosis have done better than all those wise investment bankers on Wall Street.

Any guesses as to how?

Do you think she's in the masses? Or is she in the famed "1%"?

Pretty easy to tell, isn't it?

You are a lazy incompetent idiot sometimes IC.
https://www.officialdata.org/us/stocks/ ... dYear=2023

$144 million is pretty much exactly what you would get for dumping $33 million straight into any S&P 500 tracker fund in 2008.
You would get more if you put it there late in 2008.

Just admit you fucked up.
For one time in your wretched life, demonstrate the Christian virtue of humility

[Immanuel Can]

$144 million is pretty much exactly what you would get for dumping $33 million straight into any S&P 500 tracker fund in 2008.

Let's say you're right, then, and this fund...and all funds, are pure.

Why would ANY "Socialist" have $33 million or $144 million, ill-gotten or fairly-gotten? Are there no desperate immigrants to be helped? Are there no inner city slums to be renovated? Are there no ordinary folks who need health care, or relief from their taxes? Are there no Ukranian wars to be fought, instead of bilking the American people?

So when Pelosi puts down her luxury ice cream long enough to shed a tear for the oppressed, might we have a question to ask her?

[FlashDangerpants]

$144 million is pretty much exactly what you would get for dumping $33 million straight into any S&P 500 tracker fund in 2008.

Let's say you're right, then

It's a stone cold fact that I am very obviously right, and I've given tyou the proof already.

Show some Christian humility, if you have access to that resource, and deal with a basic mistake you made out of laziness.

To turn 33 mil in 144 mil from 2008 to 2023 you only needed to put the funds into the basic S&P 500
Just follow this link and put the numers in yourself if you don't believe me
https://www.officialdata.org/us/stocks/ ... dYear=2023
.

Lazy_idiot.JPG

[FlashDangerpants]

By the way, during her time in office, from 2008 to the present, the Pelosi fortunes have gone from $33 million dollars (rather a lot for a Socialist, really) to over $144 million dollars. You will not find a single legal investment firm that can yield results even a fraction that good.

It goes without saying that you woldn't have bothered to see what the 15 year return on Apple stock would have been when making that incredibly stupid claim

Ahem....
.
.


https://compound.mywallst.com/compound- ... 000000/15/

Better_returns.JPG

[Sculptor]

Most Politicians are a bit dodgy, and many Trumpers keep trying to point the figner at Biden and others and away from Trump.

But amongst Trumps many crimes and misdemeanours here is the pinnacle. He is no longer allowed to run a charity in NY, because of the many charities he stole money from one of them was A CHILDREN'S CANCER charity.

=So Trumpers, when you can find a crime of that magnitude done by Biden, I'll listen but until then STFU.

Stealing from a cancer charity is bad. Stealing from children with cancer is beyond evil

https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexand ... -business/

[Immanuel Can]

$144 million is pretty much exactly what you would get for dumping $33 million straight into any S&P 500 tracker fund in 2008.

Let's say you're right, then

It's a stone cold fact that I am very obviously right, and I've given tyou the proof already.

All you did is put the number into a neutral S&P calculator, based on the assumption that all profits were immediately plowed back into the S&P. That seems rather convenient, to say the least.

But I'm not even concerned to argue that point, either way. Let's say she did plow everything back into S&P. We're still left with the larger question of what an alleged "public servant" who is so positive about Socialism, welfare, oppression, and so on, is doing with $144 millon, about living up to her own declared principles.

[FlashDangerpants]

By the way, during her time in office, from 2008 to the present, the Pelosi fortunes have gone from $33 million dollars (rather a lot for a Socialist, really) to over $144 million dollars. You will not find a single legal investment firm that can yield results even a fraction that good. Somehow, the Pelosis have done better than all those wise investment bankers on Wall Street.

She could have got twice as great a return by just dumping the cash into Facebook.
And they didn't even IPO until 2012 so that's waaaaaay better than your impossible returns.
.

Facebook_returns_15years.JPG

.

Admit you fucked up.
Demonstrate the basic Christian virtue of humility if you have any.

[Immanuel Can]

Admit you fucked up.

I've given you the point anyway. Using a neutral calculator doesn't tell us whether or not Pelosi's investments are on the up-and-up, because for that, we'd need her details...which she doesn't make public, and the law says she doesn't have to. But since it's possible to imagine she plowed all her investments back into S&P and took nothing out, as unlikely as that might seem, I'll concede it.

But you haven't addressed the question of what a purported arch-advocate of Socialism for the masses is doing with $144 million dollars. And I'd sure like to see you explain that.

[FlashDangerpants]

Admit you fucked up.

I've given you the point anyway. Using a neutral calculator doesn't tell us whether or not Pelosi's investments are on the up-and-up, because for that, we'd need her details...which she doesn't make public, and the law says she doesn't have to. But since it's possible to imagine she plowed all her investments back into S&P and took nothing out, as unlikely as that might seem, I'll concede it.

But you haven't addressed the question of what a purported arch-advocate of Socialism for the masses is doing with $144 million dollars. And I'd sure like to see you explain that.

There's nothing at all suspicious about turning 33 of something into 144 in the space of 15 years, the rate of return required is not that special. Your accusation was baseless and if you were honest you would just withdraw it instead of cloaking it unreformed innuendo.

Pelosi isn't a socialist. Nor does she say she is.

[Immanuel Can]

Pelosi isn't a socialist. Nor does she say she is.

The Dems rarely explicitly say they are, outside of their own lunatic fringe, like "the Pack" or Bernie. But everthing they sell you on is designed along the lines of Socialism. And the reason is simple: the "Socialism" bit is for you. It's not for them. They get to keep all they have, and you get to live in a pseudo-socialist state, ruled by corrupt oligarchs.

So they're not Socialists. They Socialist-salesman. That's the point with Pelosi: she talks about "oppression" and "racism" and "social justice" and all the other Leftist tropes. She pulls them out for the crowd. She'll kneel down on her old knees to support the BLM Communists, even if she needs a crane to get back up.

But where is her real commitment to Socialism?

[FlashDangerpants]

Pelosi isn't a socialist. Nor does she say she is.

The Dems rarely explicitly say they are, outside of their own lunatic fringe, like "the Pack" or Bernie.

So she doesn't say she is, but you hold a conspiracy theory that she secretly is, and now you are accusing her of hypocrisy for not living by the rules you say she secretly believes in but wouldn't live by anyway, because she secretly doesn't believe in the rules that she only secretly believes in.

What a soap opera.

[mickthinks]

lol Manny has his soap opera jump the shark in every episode. We laugh! How we laugh!

But dishonesty like his is no joke.

[Immanuel Can]

...you hold a conspiracy theory...

Nullification...and ad hominem.

But you're missing your usual reference to Trump, anyway.