No, you don't.
The Existential Crisis
Re: L'Age B'Or encore.
Take out the words 'space' and 'time' and I agree with you here. I would also love to see an argument against constant-change. Until one is given, then I would say ALL agree that 'Everything is in constant-change'.surreptitious57 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 05, 2020 1:08 amI think one actual truth is that everything is in a constant state of motion as nothing is ever the same at any two points in space or timeAge wrote:
There is ONLY One actual Truth but there is at least as many perceived truths as there are old enough perceiving human beings
But if there is an actual Truth, then it would be One Truth, which ALL could agree with, and, if more than two are agreeing on the exact same thing, then there are more than two perspectives which are the EXACTLY same perspective. Therefore, there ARE two perspectives, from at least two different people, which are EXACTLY the SAME. So, there can be two perspectives, which are EXACTLY the SAME.surreptitious57 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 05, 2020 1:08 am This is not the only actual truth I know as another is that no two perspectives are ever exactly the same so there is more than one truth
One actual Truth IS there are many actual Truths, which ALL could agree with. How many of them there are is NOT up to 'me' to decide, but obviously up to EVERY one to decide.surreptitious57 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 05, 2020 1:08 am But from your perspective what is the one actual truth and how do you know there is only one ?
I think you may have misinterpreted or misconstrued my, There is ONLY One actual Truth, ....', statement. I did NOT mean that there is One Truth ONLY, but rather there can NOT logically be many different truths on the one same issue. Therefore, there is ONLY One actual Truth in regards to each one of many separate and different issues.
How I KNOW this is because whenever there is some 'thing', which ALL are in agreement upon, and accept, then that is 'what' VERIFIES this One actual Truth, for me.
Yes they all could be just 'approximations' of the One actual Truth. But, as long as we KNOW there is One actual Truth, then the rest are just that 'approximations', or, in other words, just individual's views and perspectives.surreptitious57 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 05, 2020 1:08 am And also could all of the perceived truths not simply be approximations of the one actual truth ?
Re: The Myth of the Existential Crisis
Do NOT ever tell me 'what to do', and think or expect that I am going to do it. I, purposely, wrote a longer reply than I would have, last time, solely because you told me to; "Keep it short", last time.Atla wrote: ↑Sun Jul 05, 2020 3:00 amKeep it short retardAge wrote: ↑Sat Jul 04, 2020 11:49 pm You supposedly will not read this from a "mentally ill fucktard" but you read all of the other posts of the "mentally ill fucktard" and which you have spend some time communicating with.
BLA BLA BLA BLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAA
BLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAA
Also, if you had any actual insight, then you would realize that the MORE I give 'you', then the MORE 'you' have to do your, so called, "psychologically testing", me on.
And, Some find it Truly amazing that you will repeat and quote some of what I say, AND respond to that, although you made the claim that you will NOT read "the blathering from a "mentally ill fucktard", but anyway as clearly evidenced you will quote some of what I write and respond to it, but, as soon as when I write things asking you to clarify what you actually mean, provide evidence for what you say, and/or back up and support your claims with at least SOME thing, you leave ALL OF THAT out, and just make the absurd claim that you will not read what I write.
To be able to SEE straight through 'you' is like looking through crystal CLEAR air. 'You' are as transparent as empty space IS.
Re: The Myth of the Existential Crisis
And you KNOW this how?Atla wrote: ↑Sun Jul 05, 2020 3:02 amYes. It's a cesspool of insanity, all the retards that ended up being banned from other sites ended up here.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:08 am Is this REALLY what the purpose of this 'philosophy' forum is?
BLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAA
Through experience?
Also, how has your response here got anything at all to do with your claim that "The main purpose of this "philosophy" "forum" is to, so call, "psychologically test" the retards that ended up here."?
1. I asked you; 'Is this REALLY what the purpose of this 'philosophy' forum is?'
You answer this, but then quickly went down some other completely different line of thinking, which had absolutely nothing at all to do with my question, and ended up completely adrift from what the question asked of you. It was like that 'you' were asking your 'self' some further question, and then replying to your own 'self', all by 'your' 'self'.
2. I also did ask you seven other clarifying questions as well.
But, you have totally REFUSED to answer any of them at all.
3. Do NOT forget the very reason WHY you ended up here.
4. You are here now, and you ended up here AFTER this 'philosophy forum' was formed, unless you can prove otherwise. So, if this forum was formed for the very reason, which you claim it was, then do NOT forget that you are now just ANOTHER 'one' of the now, so called, "insane retards", who are actually being "psychologically tested" on, RIGHT NOW, in fact.
5. From the way you are NOT able to just remain on one line of thinking, NOR are you at all able to clarify or back up and support absolutely any of your thoughts, then who the one IS, which is actually 'insane', is becoming far MORE CLEARER here NOW, all of the time, to those who are actually doing the 'psychological testing', that is; the readers.
Now, how does your 'new' claim that; "This forum is a cesspool of insanity, all the retards that ended up being banned from other sites ended up here." have absolutely any thing at all to do with your claim that; "The purpose of this 'philosophy' forum was created to "psychologically test" people"?
What actually evidence and/or proof have you actually got to back up and support 'your claim' that the very reason WHY this forum was set up and created is to "psychologically test" human beings?
Have you actually got absolutely ANY thing to support this claim? Or, is this claim just coming from some sort of paranoia, or from some thing else?
Oh, and by the way, I Truly HOPE, and would LOVE, that 'your claim' here is ABSOLUTELY True, Right, AND Correct.
Re: The Myth of the Existential Crisis
If this is what you BELIEVE, then this MUST BE absolutely TRUE and RIGHT, correct?
Re: The Myth of the Existential Crisis
Do you have a job?Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 05, 2020 4:50 amDo NOT ever tell me 'what to do', and think or expect that I am going to do it. I, purposely, wrote a longer reply than I would have, last time, solely because you told me to; "Keep it short", last time.Atla wrote: ↑Sun Jul 05, 2020 3:00 amKeep it short retardAge wrote: ↑Sat Jul 04, 2020 11:49 pm You supposedly will not read this from a "mentally ill fucktard" but you read all of the other posts of the "mentally ill fucktard" and which you have spend some time communicating with.
BLA BLA BLA BLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAA
BLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAABLLLLLLLLLLLLLLAA
Also, if you had any actual insight, then you would realize that the MORE I give 'you', then the MORE 'you' have to do your, so called, "psychologically testing", me on.
And, Some find it Truly amazing that you will repeat and quote some of what I say, AND respond to that, although you made the claim that you will NOT read "the blathering from a "mentally ill fucktard", but anyway as clearly evidenced you will quote some of what I write and respond to it, but, as soon as when I write things asking you to clarify what you actually mean, provide evidence for what you say, and/or back up and support your claims with at least SOME thing, you leave ALL OF THAT out, and just make the absurd claim that you will not read what I write.
To be able to SEE straight through 'you' is like looking through crystal CLEAR air. 'You' are as transparent as empty space IS.
Re: The Myth of the Existential Crisis
Do you REALLY 'expect' me to answer your clarifying question here, especially when you RARELY EVER answer mine?Atla wrote: ↑Sun Jul 05, 2020 5:32 amDo you have a job?Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 05, 2020 4:50 amDo NOT ever tell me 'what to do', and think or expect that I am going to do it. I, purposely, wrote a longer reply than I would have, last time, solely because you told me to; "Keep it short", last time.
Also, if you had any actual insight, then you would realize that the MORE I give 'you', then the MORE 'you' have to do your, so called, "psychologically testing", me on.
And, Some find it Truly amazing that you will repeat and quote some of what I say, AND respond to that, although you made the claim that you will NOT read "the blathering from a "mentally ill fucktard", but anyway as clearly evidenced you will quote some of what I write and respond to it, but, as soon as when I write things asking you to clarify what you actually mean, provide evidence for what you say, and/or back up and support your claims with at least SOME thing, you leave ALL OF THAT out, and just make the absurd claim that you will not read what I write.
To be able to SEE straight through 'you' is like looking through crystal CLEAR air. 'You' are as transparent as empty space IS.
Also, WHY do you appear to enjoy discussing with what you acknowledge and BELIEVE are the "mentally ill insanely idiot fucktards", like 'me'.
You appear to enjoy this so much that you are now wanting to get to KNOW 'me' EVEN MORE, and on a far more personal or deeper level.
Why do you ask this question? Would you be surprised if a, so called, "mentally ill insane fucktard" had a job, or because you are wondering how a "mentally ill fucktard" has the time to NOT "keep replies short" if they have a job, or is there some other reason WHY you want to know the answer to this question?
Considering this is a 'philosophy forum', which, despite your BELIEF, usually do center around the views ONLY of those who engage, what a human being does or does not DO actually usually has absolutely NO bearing NOR is of any interest nor concern in what the discussion is centered around. However, you seem to have a completely DIFFERENT view regarding what happens in discussions, in philosophy forums.
So, until you explain WHY you want to KNOW if 'I' have a 'job' or not I will NOT be answering this, once again, completely drifted off line of thinking.
Re: The Myth of the Existential Crisis
You just spent another 10 minutes not answering.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 05, 2020 6:35 amDo you REALLY 'expect' me to answer your clarifying question here, especially when you RARELY EVER answer mine?Atla wrote: ↑Sun Jul 05, 2020 5:32 amDo you have a job?Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 05, 2020 4:50 am
Do NOT ever tell me 'what to do', and think or expect that I am going to do it. I, purposely, wrote a longer reply than I would have, last time, solely because you told me to; "Keep it short", last time.
Also, if you had any actual insight, then you would realize that the MORE I give 'you', then the MORE 'you' have to do your, so called, "psychologically testing", me on.
And, Some find it Truly amazing that you will repeat and quote some of what I say, AND respond to that, although you made the claim that you will NOT read "the blathering from a "mentally ill fucktard", but anyway as clearly evidenced you will quote some of what I write and respond to it, but, as soon as when I write things asking you to clarify what you actually mean, provide evidence for what you say, and/or back up and support your claims with at least SOME thing, you leave ALL OF THAT out, and just make the absurd claim that you will not read what I write.
To be able to SEE straight through 'you' is like looking through crystal CLEAR air. 'You' are as transparent as empty space IS.
Also, WHY do you appear to enjoy discussing with what you acknowledge and BELIEVE are the "mentally ill insanely idiot fucktards", like 'me'.
You appear to enjoy this so much that you are now wanting to get to KNOW 'me' EVEN MORE, and on a far more personal or deeper level.
Why do you ask this question? Would you be surprised if a, so called, "mentally ill insane fucktard" had a job, or because you are wondering how a "mentally ill fucktard" has the time to NOT "keep replies short" if they have a job, or is there some other reason WHY you want to know the answer to this question?
Considering this is a 'philosophy forum', which, despite your BELIEF, usually do center around the views ONLY of those who engage, what a human being does or does not DO actually usually has absolutely NO bearing NOR is of any interest nor concern in what the discussion is centered around. However, you seem to have a completely DIFFERENT view regarding what happens in discussions, in philosophy forums.
So, until you explain WHY you want to KNOW if 'I' have a 'job' or not I will NOT be answering this, once again, completely drifted off line of thinking.
I'm not really interested in you. You are just confirming my sad conclusion that there is no hope for humanity and it's mainly your fault.
Re: The Myth of the Existential Crisis
As I said, I make my posts longer now because you told me to, "keep them short".Atla wrote: ↑Sun Jul 05, 2020 6:45 amYou just spent another 10 minutes not answering.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jul 05, 2020 6:35 amDo you REALLY 'expect' me to answer your clarifying question here, especially when you RARELY EVER answer mine?
Also, WHY do you appear to enjoy discussing with what you acknowledge and BELIEVE are the "mentally ill insanely idiot fucktards", like 'me'.
You appear to enjoy this so much that you are now wanting to get to KNOW 'me' EVEN MORE, and on a far more personal or deeper level.
Why do you ask this question? Would you be surprised if a, so called, "mentally ill insane fucktard" had a job, or because you are wondering how a "mentally ill fucktard" has the time to NOT "keep replies short" if they have a job, or is there some other reason WHY you want to know the answer to this question?
Considering this is a 'philosophy forum', which, despite your BELIEF, usually do center around the views ONLY of those who engage, what a human being does or does not DO actually usually has absolutely NO bearing NOR is of any interest nor concern in what the discussion is centered around. However, you seem to have a completely DIFFERENT view regarding what happens in discussions, in philosophy forums.
So, until you explain WHY you want to KNOW if 'I' have a 'job' or not I will NOT be answering this, once again, completely drifted off line of thinking.![]()
Two things here;
1. I NEVER said I would do that. Instead I asked you a clarifying question about IF I did that, then would that make you happy? And, as usual you NEVER answered this question.
And,
2. Although you NEVER answered that question, I still let you have the final word, which was; "More bullshit". And, I left you with that, and hopefully happy in 'that'.
I ALSO did actually leave you with those last words, in relation to that conversation. It was not until you decided to join in later, to a conversation that I was having with someone else, that 'you' and 'I' then began ANOTHER discussion, about SOMETHING ELSE.
In fact, it was about 27 posts between when I let you have the 'last word' and before I started replying to you, AFTER it was YOU who STARTED again by commenting about me and "another", in a completely different discussion, which you were NOT originally involved in anyway.
Okay, then how about PROVING IT, by NOT corresponding with me and NOR asking questions about what 'I' do. You can NOT even clarify WHY you ask such meaningless questions, so that implies that you have NO real reason nor purpose for doing so.
When thee actual Truth is discovered, then it will be KNOWN HOW ALL-OF-THIS is all of my fault.
If you SEE 'no hope', then that, sadly, is literally exactly what you have, and will get.
And, if it is mainly my fault that you have jumped to the conclusion that have here, then that means I have far more CONTROL over 'you', then some would have first thought, and which you probably do detest. If I can make you conclude that, then there are other things that can make 'you' do and have control over, in regards to, 'you'.
Re: The Myth of the Existential Crisis
The only knowing of what is consciousness is..is that it is a word, and also any attempt to describe consciousness would also be words.
It's made up of the same IT as in ''IT's'' raining.
It exists the same way a word exists.
it's a word.
It comes from the word.
No man, you are not listening to what I've said are you..I said the character ''dontaskme'' is known, and so that which is known cannot know anything....
But oh yes I did clarify that for you..I clearly stated that ALL knowing is known by the only there is which is CONSCIOUSNESS.
But why are you now saying this when it is obvious the character ''dontaskme'' knows nothing? why do you then assume the character could know the facts? here you are still assuming that it is the character that knows, when in fact I have repeatedly informed you that no character is NOT able to know anything. It's not a ''someone'' that knows - the ''someone'' is the KNOWN that cannot be known. Knowing is ONE...IT'S A VERB.
This is just banter, it's a communication of consciousness with itself.
Yes, but only conceived as and through the word, in this conception. Prior to which it is not known to exist.
I've already been over this with you several times explaining and answering and giving clarification to you, but if you are too dumb to see what has been said to you, then there is nothing I can do about that...and is why WE will both continue to go through the same old endless wash cycle, as though we are both trapped inside a washing machine and cannot get out...it seems that for you and I there is NO HOPE of our discussion ever coming out in the WASH.
But hey ho, it is what it is...I've got nothing better to do with my time, so here I am yet again, stuck with you, again!!
Well of course, knower and known have to exist in the exact same instantaneous moment..that knowing is who you are, you are right here now...as this one knowing. This oneness is everywhere at once. ONCE means one, and one means everything and nothing simultaneously.
No thing at all can only exist in relation to every thing. This knowing Oneness does not require an explanation as to how it can be, for that would be like the contents of consciousness trying to explain consciousness...it's an absurd idea.
Because discussion involves language which is knowledge on repeat, which arises on demand when that knowledge is in flow, being shared within the knowing consciousness...it's just what appears to happen, it's no big deal.Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 04, 2020 12:03 pmI thought this was SO OBVIOUS a fact that it just goes 'without saying', except of course the KNOWN, Knower can and does KNOW EVERY 'thing' anyway.
Why do you think and/or feel that 'you' would 'need' to keep telling 'us', or 'you', this same thing repeatedly, which I do NOT see how any one would even disagree with, let alone would 'try' to dispute and refute?
Yep, it's the only knowing there is, like I keep repeating to you.
Yep, that's right.
Yep, the questions keep arising and demanding clarification because that's just what happens, because it can.
Yep, the ''someone else'' is just a figment within the mind of consciousness, it's only ever self talking to itself. It can only communicate to itself as and through the conceptual word...which manifests as and through the human mind brain organism, the only instrument available.
If that is what is arising at the time, the energetic movement to want to express itself better with itself, aka others, then there is nothing wrong with that, but for this one here, from the perspective of the consciousness here, it has no desire to better express itself, for it has no such desire to do so, as it couldn't careless about such activity.Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 04, 2020 12:03 pmAlso, just maybe I am hoping to engage with "another" in the hope of finding "another" who will question me in the same way I question them, and then together these two, so called, "sages" will discover a way to SHOW and REVEAL the underlying True message, which is within us ALL, and which is wanting to be SHARED among ALL.
Well good luck with that then, whatever floats your boat. I'm personally not interested in that desire, I'm just here talking to you for entertainment value only, something to do so to speak. It's kind of a fun thing to do to be honest. But I do not care about how what I write or post is perceived or reacted to, I'm just here to entertain myself only, even if that means I am negatively attacked for being misunderstood, it makes no difference to me, for I always know what I am talking about 100% of the time anyway...so I don't really care about what others think of me or what I write about.Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 04, 2020 12:03 pmI am looking for those who think that they could be able to get me to contradict what I have previously said, by questioning and/or challenging me, like I do to them. Or, I am looking for those that think they can get me to NOT be able to soundly and valid explain my views in argument form, or get me to NOT be able to back up and support my views and claims.
Except that no one on this forum seems to be in harmony with you, so you can't be doing a good job of explaining what you seem to think needs explaining...but I do not care about that either.
Have a nice day...bye for now, until the next thrilling installment.
.
Re: Meanwhile...
Nope, colours are NOT seen.
Colours are KNOWN...and that which is KNOWN cannot see or know anything. Colours are KNOWN by the only knowing there is which is consciousness. Consciousness is NOT SEEN/KNOWN...CONSCIOUSNESS is the seeing/knowing..
Reality is a VERB...there is here only verb world that manifests as ''seeing'' and ''knowing'' ..two concepts that basically means the same ONE mysterious NOT-KNOWING known phenomena that is this immediate presence...aka awareness.
.
-
surreptitious57
- Posts: 4257
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 6:09 am
Re: Meanwhile...
Thats a bit confusing because if Reality is a phenomena then it must be a noun rather than a verbDontaskme wrote:
Reality is a VERB ... there is here only verb world that manifests as seeing and knowing ... two concepts that basically
means the same ONE mysterious NOT KNOWING known phenomena that is this immediate presence ... aka awareness
Because it is not something that does anything but merely exists because it is literally ALL THERE IS
Things inside Reality do things but Reality itself which is the totality of everything does nothing at all
Last edited by surreptitious57 on Sun Jul 05, 2020 12:30 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Re: The Myth of the Existential Crisis
No. I do NOT think any such thing AT ALL.
I am just SHOWING how 'I' am NOT controlled by 'you' AT ALL, while 'I' am REVEALING how 'I' am actually controlling 'you'.
-
surreptitious57
- Posts: 4257
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 6:09 am
Re: Meanwhile...
Thats a bit confusing because if Reality is a phenomena then it must be a noun rather than a verbDontaskme wrote:
Reality is a VERB ... there is here only verb world that manifests as seeing and knowing ... two concepts that basically
means the same ONE mysterious NOT KNOWING known phenomena that is this immediate presence ... aka awareness
Because it is not something that does anything but merely exists because it is literally ALL THERE IS
Things inside Reality do things but Reality itself which is the totality of everything does nothing at all