Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Disable your ad blocker to continue using our website.
Why assume nothing exists in the first place? The law of identity says nothing is nothing. The law of noncontradiction says it can't be something. The law of the excluded middle says it can't be both while it's changing from nothing to something.
Erk wrote: ↑Tue Jul 24, 2018 4:37 pm
Why assume nothing exists in the first place?
Because it's a concept, and concepts exist as concepts.
Erk wrote: ↑Tue Jul 24, 2018 4:37 pmThe law of identity says nothing is nothing. The law of noncontradiction says it can't be something. The law of the excluded middle says it can't be both while it's changing from nothing to something.
The law of identity is a known concept, a mental construction..in that the mind knows itself. There is nothing outside of that mentally constructed arena.
That word nothing cannot be excluded from the knowledge which conceives it. There is no contradiction since there is here only concepts known.
So nothing is changing as no thing made a law, it's just a concept.
Erk wrote: ↑Tue Jul 24, 2018 4:37 pm
Why assume nothing exists in the first place?
To use reductio ad absurdum and show that we end up with a contradiction.
Erk wrote: ↑Tue Jul 24, 2018 4:37 pm
The law of identity says nothing is nothing. The law of noncontradiction says it can't be something. The law of the excluded middle says it can't be both while it's changing from nothing to something.
Erk wrote: ↑Tue Jul 24, 2018 4:37 pm
Why assume nothing exists in the first place?
To use reductio ad absurdum and show that we end up with a contradiction.
Erk wrote: ↑Tue Jul 24, 2018 4:37 pm
The law of identity says nothing is nothing. The law of noncontradiction says it can't be something. The law of the excluded middle says it can't be both while it's changing from nothing to something.