Philosophy Now Forum

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:21 am

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 8:18 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 7:07 am

That has been quite apparent, for some time now,

I also wanted to respond to this. First of all, too many commas. Lay off the commas.

I was not, previously, aware that there was an 'accurate' number of commas that are to be used, anywhere.

You, are, using, too, many, commas, here, too.

You don't need to wrap previously in commas.

"I was not previously aware that there was an 'accurate' number of commas that are to be used."

That reads much better.

I didn't read the rest of your post, too long.

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:36 am Funny how there is a general consensus on here that you are an annoying, arrogant twat, apart from your single fan who must have the patience of a saint.

Who is his fan?

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:00 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 8:49 am

Way too many unnecessary words, I'm not reading all of that.

Great.

That means I can say whatever 'I' like 'about' 'you'.

What you also say, here, is what some people 'try to' use as an 'excuse' to not acknowledge what is 'pointed out' and 'highlighted', and/or because people like "yourself" can not even 'counter' nor 'refute' what is being said.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:00 am Focus on brevity. Get to the point faster. Even if the point is asking for clarity, that's still a point, and you can get to that faster.

Make it your focus to give your readers an easier time. I guarantee I'm not the only one avoiding your posts because it's just so hard to trudge through all that shit.

I did not read all of what you wrote, here, because there are too many words.

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:36 am Funny how there is a general consensus on here that you are an annoying, arrogant twat, apart from your single fan who must have the patience of a saint.

What is also very funny is that so many of you people, here, who a lot claim to have ignore me and not read 'my words' keep on just talking and talking 'about' 'me'.

What 'we' have, here, is another thread that has been turned into being 'about' 'me'.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:41 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:36 am Funny how there is a general consensus on here that you are an annoying, arrogant twat, apart from your single fan who must have the patience of a saint.

What is also very funny is that so many of you people, here, who a lot claim to have ignore me and not read 'my words' keep on just talking and talking 'about' 'me'.

What 'we' have, here, is another thread that has been turned into being 'about' 'me'.

Yes, it's called ADS, Age Derangement Syndrome. It is so common for people on this forum to dislike you passionately so much that they'll talk about how obnoxious you are whenever they get the chance.

If you want people to have conservations with people, instead of... this... then I really recommend you take my advice seriously. Write in a way that isn't painful to read. Get to the point faster.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:37 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:21 am

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 8:18 am

I also wanted to respond to this. First of all, too many commas. Lay off the commas.

I was not, previously, aware that there was an 'accurate' number of commas that are to be used, anywhere.

You, are, using, too, many, commas, here, too.

Once more what 'we' have, here, is another one who, actually, believes that what its own views and beliefs are, are the only true, right, accurate, and correct ones, which everyone else should follow and/or abide by.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:37 am You don't need to wrap previously in commas.

And, you, obviously, do not need to say and write what you are, here. But, yet, here you are, still doing it.

Also, and by the way, if you did not recognize why I put that word, in commas, then this is just more 'evidence', here.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:37 am "I was not previously aware that there was an 'accurate' number of commas that are to be used."

In case you are not yet aware "flannel jesus" 'I' am not, here, to please 'you', nor to make 'you' happy.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:37 am That reads much better.

For 'you', obviously. But, are you aware that absolutely every thing is relative, to, 'the observer'?

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:37 am I didn't read the rest of your post, too long.

Okay.

Seems like nothing will really please 'you', and make 'you' happy.

Are you also aware that saying things like, 'There are many minds', and/or 'you have your mind', some people will say and claim, 'reads much better than writing', 'you do not have your mind', and/or 'There is only One Mind'. But, again, 'I' am not, here, to please you adult human beings.

I find the actual Truth to be much more important than pleasing you adult human beings.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:39 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:36 am Funny how there is a general consensus on here that you are an annoying, arrogant twat, apart from your single fan who must have the patience of a saint.

Who is his fan?

I was wondering the same thing, but, considering I rarely get answers and clarifications to my clarifying questions, I did not ask.

Hopefully, you will.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:52 am
Seems like nothing will really please 'you', and make 'you' happy.

I've literally told you what will make me happy. You didn't even try it.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 6:59 am

Atla wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 4:41 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 4:35 am

'I' could quote 'you', if 'I' was to go back through all of what you have said and written, here. However, 'I' will let 'others' find 'it', if they so cared to.

As for 'now', if you really want to believe that 'I' am 'lying', again, then please do. I enjoy having proof provided, for me, in relation to how the brain works, in conjunction with the belief-system.

Oh, and by the way, I have not lied ever, here, in this forum, but if you really want to continue to believe I have, then let 'us' see if you can quote me saying a 'lie' anywhere, here, in this forum.

You are lying once again and I have just proven it for all to see.

If this is what you really want to believe is true, then by, following 'your own logic', here, then if you have just proven that I am lying, once again, for 'the reason' you are believing and concluding, here, then this means that I have, also, proved that I have never lied anywhere, here, in the forum, for the exact same reason as you believe, absolutely, that you have proven 'it'.

And, if absolutely any one would like the full explanation, and/or absolute proof for this claim, then by all means let 'us' have a discussion.

You really can never admit to any mistake or lie, can you, God?

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:41 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:36 am Funny how there is a general consensus on here that you are an annoying, arrogant twat, apart from your single fan who must have the patience of a saint.

What is also very funny is that so many of you people, here, who a lot claim to have ignore me and not read 'my words' keep on just talking and talking 'about' 'me'.

What 'we' have, here, is another thread that has been turned into being 'about' 'me'.

That's rich. There's no point in having you on ignore. I gave up after coming on here and finding 42 red dot 'quote' notifications from you per day, and that was after I had asked you to stop quoting me multiple times.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:46 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:41 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:36 am Funny how there is a general consensus on here that you are an annoying, arrogant twat, apart from your single fan who must have the patience of a saint.

What is also very funny is that so many of you people, here, who a lot claim to have ignore me and not read 'my words' keep on just talking and talking 'about' 'me'.

What 'we' have, here, is another thread that has been turned into being 'about' 'me'.

Yes, it's called ADS, Age Derangement Syndrome.

But, this thread is called, 'Hello'.

Besides within 'that head', only, where else is this thread called, 'ADS, Age Derangement Syndrome'.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:46 am It is so common for people on this forum to dislike you passionately so much that they'll talk about how obnoxious you are whenever they get the chance.

Which fits in perfectly with, exactly, what I have set out to achieve, and am achieving, here.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:46 am If you want people to have conservations with people, instead of... this... then I really recommend you take my advice seriously.

Okay, so if I speak and write with 'more brevity', and with 'less commas', then you people will have conversations with you people, correct?

'This' is what you are saying, and meaning, right?

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:46 am Write in a way that isn't painful to read. Get to the point faster.

'The point' in relation to 'what', exactly?

If you can not find, nor work out, 'the point', then why is 'this' my fault, only?

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:54 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:52 am
Seems like nothing will really please 'you', and make 'you' happy.

I've literally told you what will make me happy. You didn't even try it.

Yes I did.

you just did not recognize and see it, once more.

Atla wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:56 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 6:59 am

Atla wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 4:41 am
You are lying once again and I have just proven it for all to see.

If this is what you really want to believe is true, then by, following 'your own logic', here, then if you have just proven that I am lying, once again, for 'the reason' you are believing and concluding, here, then this means that I have, also, proved that I have never lied anywhere, here, in the forum, for the exact same reason as you believe, absolutely, that you have proven 'it'.

And, if absolutely any one would like the full explanation, and/or absolute proof for this claim, then by all means let 'us' have a discussion.

You really can never admit to any mistake or lie, can you, God?

'I' am, still, waiting, patiently, for 'you' to present an actual case of where 'I' have lied, here. Will you present any, this time?

I have also, already, admitted all of 'the mistakes', which I have noticed, or which have been brought forth, here.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 10:04 am

Atla wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:56 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 6:59 am

If this is what you really want to believe is true, then by, following 'your own logic', here, then if you have just proven that I am lying, once again, for 'the reason' you are believing and concluding, here, then this means that I have, also, proved that I have never lied anywhere, here, in the forum, for the exact same reason as you believe, absolutely, that you have proven 'it'.

And, if absolutely any one would like the full explanation, and/or absolute proof for this claim, then by all means let 'us' have a discussion.

You really can never admit to any mistake or lie, can you, God?

'I' am, still, waiting, patiently, for 'you' to present an actual case of where 'I' have lied, here. Will you present any, this time?

I have also, already, admitted all of 'the mistakes', which I have noticed, or which have been brought forth, here.

I presented the case where you lied. You are saying I didn't, that's another lie.

= 2 lies today so far

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 10:01 am

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:54 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:52 am
Seems like nothing will really please 'you', and make 'you' happy.

I've literally told you what will make me happy. You didn't even try it.

Yes I did.

you just did not recognize and see it, once more.

Finally in the last two posts you are! I appreciate it.