Nuclear War

[Age]

There’s only two options for humanity. War or Peace.

Islam desire to takeover the entire world.

The word 'islam' refers to 'peace'. So, is there any wrong with 'peace's' desire to takeover the 'entire world'? Or, with any desire to takeover the 'entire world' with or through 'peace', or 'peaceful means'?

The West desire to takeover the entire world.

Now 'this' is a whole different story.

What could possibly go right?

That’s right folks.

Endgame. One cannot serve two masters. God warned you about that.

Even a child knew this.

Even every child knows/knew 'this'.

[Age]

Relax. Mankind will never destroy itself because it's too clever and crafty.

But, it was because of humankind's cleverness and craftiness, together, how and why you human beings are in 'the mess' that you are in, here, now, when this is being written.

It is because of 'intelligence', itself, how and why you human beings will stop, before you wipe out the last ones of you.

There may be a breakdown in law and order and bombs dropping everywhere, but that'll just reduce the population at worst.

And, as you pointed out earlier, and as "chernobyl" proved, a 'nuclear fallout' is not the extinction claim, which it is made out to be.

Although, a species dropping 'nuclear bombs' on "themselves" may well, finally, prove once and for all that a species with 'the ability' to be the most intelligent one can also be the absolutely most stupid one, as well.

Here's the thing... but you won't comprehende unless you are a historical materialist. The entire history and every possible future of/for the human species is gonna involve some kind of class warfare and battle over property rights. That's all it can be about and all it ever was about.

If one really believes that 'past behavior' is the 'only indicator' of 'the future', then the narrowedness and closedness of 'that one' is all that they are capable of in the future, also.

Even the 'best indicator' of 'future behavior' is completely annihilated and destroyed, with 'change'. And, obviously there is absolutely nothing at all that can stop 'change'. Except, of course, for 'belief', itself.

During this endless conflict, there is a failsafe that keeps the ball rolling and doesn't allow the wealthy to destroy the world or the wage worker because the wealthy can't survive without em. There's a master/slave union where each depends on the other. That's why you can't fuck with the people too hard. Without them, the wheels stop turning. In turn, the people can't fuck with the wealthy too hard because without them they'd have to spontaneously organize and rearrange everything, how everything is done. And we all know how that would turn out. It's easier to just take the $17.50 per hour and live with it. Your friends do, so why not. It's just what you do. Don't rock the fuckin boat man.

'This one' actually believes that what has only been happening, for a relatively nothing amount of 'time', is what will happen forever more.

Which is a prime example of being short-sighted, closed, and confirmation bias, all in one.

[Age]

Endgame meaning the beginning of a new game for those who do the work of ascension . ( The transcendence of ego )

The word 'endgame', with this definition and meaning, and not meaning the 'end of all', makes far more sense, and works in perfectly with G.U.T.O.E. and with what actually happens and takes place.

It is possible for one to pass through the inner “I” into the innermost “I Am”. In the Far East such profound experience is called ‘Samadhi” or “Nirvana’, and in Western religion a oneness with the Godhead.

It means to expand our vision beyond our finite egos alone to become merged with a purpose greater than ourselves great enough to live for and die for.

'Finite egos' only 'look at' and 'look from' a short, narrowed, and/or closed view and perspective of things.

So, once removed, then 'you' are One, with God.

One cannot serve two masters. Love and Truth always wins.

When 'you' say and write, 'always', do 'you' actually mean always? Or, did 'you' actually mean, 'will eventually', win?

Because as far as I can observe, and see, in the days when this is being written, Love and Truth are not really 'winning out', here.

God is a universal Self.

Self is a universe within.

'I' would change the 'a' word, above here, to the 'the' word. But, as always, 'each to their own'.

Blessed be the fruit. Under his eye.

Just as a forewarning, using gender words in relation to God, Itself, does not and has not helped in clearing up and clarifying things, here, along the way.