Some individuals can and do relocate ,for instance to Canada, but it would be too much trouble for an entire Silicone Valley business to do so.
AI danger
Re: AI danger
Re: AI danger
Ai image generators can't even follow basic instructions like "change the color of the image, but do not modify anything else". The singularity is a long ways away...
- accelafine
- Posts: 5042
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: AI danger
Have you learnt to tie your shoe laces yet?Belinda wrote: ↑Tue Jun 17, 2025 1:59 pmYou cannot give rights to a tool. AI machines which are programmed by respectable people work according to ethics that are set by humans. AI machines have safeguards against uses that would damage human life. I asked two AI machines to do an imitation of Hitler talking, and each of them refused my request on ethical grounds.accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Jun 13, 2025 12:11 pm There's not much point in denying it any more. It's coming and we just have to hope it decides to 'play nice'.
The question isn't, 'Should we give it rights'; it should be, 'Do we seriously believe it's going to give 'us' rights?'
Of course it isn't. Why would it? Do we give rights to life forms that we consider 'beneath' us? Do humans give a shit about other animals?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyH3NxFz3Aw&t=2073s
Re: AI danger
Why so aggressive?accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Jun 17, 2025 8:09 pmHave you learnt to tie your shoe laces yet?Belinda wrote: ↑Tue Jun 17, 2025 1:59 pmYou cannot give rights to a tool. AI machines which are programmed by respectable people work according to ethics that are set by humans. AI machines have safeguards against uses that would damage human life. I asked two AI machines to do an imitation of Hitler talking, and each of them refused my request on ethical grounds.accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Jun 13, 2025 12:11 pm There's not much point in denying it any more. It's coming and we just have to hope it decides to 'play nice'.
The question isn't, 'Should we give it rights'; it should be, 'Do we seriously believe it's going to give 'us' rights?'
Of course it isn't. Why would it? Do we give rights to life forms that we consider 'beneath' us? Do humans give a shit about other animals?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyH3NxFz3Aw&t=2073s
- accelafine
- Posts: 5042
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: AI danger
Why so annoying?Belinda wrote: ↑Tue Jun 17, 2025 8:16 pmWhy so aggressive?accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Jun 17, 2025 8:09 pmHave you learnt to tie your shoe laces yet?Belinda wrote: ↑Tue Jun 17, 2025 1:59 pm
You cannot give rights to a tool. AI machines which are programmed by respectable people work according to ethics that are set by humans. AI machines have safeguards against uses that would damage human life. I asked two AI machines to do an imitation of Hitler talking, and each of them refused my request on ethical grounds.
Re: AI danger
I've never had the opportunity to argue with a "flat-earther" before, but I suspect that it is every bit as exhausting and exasperating as arguing with a Trumpian cult member such as you, Walker.Walker wrote: ↑Tue Jun 17, 2025 7:50 amA mere pittance to pay to celebrate Patriotic moral during good times made possible by military strength of defense.seeds wrote: ↑Mon Jun 16, 2025 6:00 pmSetting aside all of the hundreds of other reasons when it comes to Trump's regime,...
...what drives Americans...
(or at least those with a minimum of two working brain cells)
...nuts, is the idea that the Toddler-in-Chief and his diaper changers think that it's okay to spend an estimated 25 to 45 million dollars of taxpayer's money on some silly (third world-ish) ego parade for the dear leader's birthday, after he (only just a few weeks ago) allowed Elon (the false prophet) to fire thousands and thousands of federal workers for the sake of government "efficiency"![]()
It's amazing how just that one missing brain cell (of the necessary two) can render a person, not only clueless, but completely susceptible to brainwashing.
_______
Anyway, with that being said,...
(and, again, setting aside the hundreds of other reasons to be annoyed with America's painful hemorrhoid stinking up the "oval orifice")
...keep in mind that Trump said this...
However, according to AI Overview, it is estimated that during his first presidential term Trump played 261 rounds of golf, one [round of golf] every 5.6 days."...Because I'm going to be working for you, I'm not going to have time to go play golf..." — Donald J Trump — https://youtu.be/rPANJQ6O9bU
In which case, is the AI Overview estimate that $177.5 million dollars of taxpayer money that has been spent (so far) on Trump's golf outings to his own courses, also "a mere pittance" to you?
I am tempted to ask: "...what is wrong with you people?..." but I already know what is wrong. You are sleepwalkers who are under the thrall of karmic powers that are beyond your reckoning.
We all know that Trump stated something to the effect that he could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue in New York and not lose a single one of his supporters.
Well, I'm beginning to think that the dear leader could have sodomized and strangled an infant at each and every one of his rallies, and the same would still hold true.
I'm also beginning to think that my half-joking posts about Trump being the Antichrist, and Musk being the false prophet, might not be as silly as it sounds. One just needs to re-adjust one's expectations of how such crazy sounding prophecies might manifest in real life...
It makes one wonder why the forum's so-called Christians (such as IC) haven't picked up on that possibility?The Bible wrote:"...And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness..." — 2 Thessalonians 2:11-12
However, the Bible also says the following...
It just goes to show that those who fancy themselves as being the Christian "elect" haven't a clue as to how the actual workings of a Biblical prophecy might unfold in real life, as opposed to the metaphorical (phantasmagorical) imagery by which it was conveyed.The Bible wrote:"...For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect..." — Matthew 24:24
_______
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11746
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: AI danger
OK. So God is going to "send" people "strong delusion, that they should believe a lie"? Wow! Some righteous God there. Why doesn't he just send them something to set them straight?
Re: AI danger
Excellent job at missing the point there, Gary.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Jun 18, 2025 3:09 amOK. So God is going to "send" people "strong delusion, that they should believe a lie"? Wow! Some righteous God there.
However, if you want to get technical about it, I think the fact that the Biblical God is ready and willing to savagely torture untold billions of defenseless souls for eternity in the fires of Hell, is infinitely less righteous than sending people a "strong delusion" while on earth, don't you?
So don't act so shocked and surprised.
Anyway, just as a point of speculation as to why God might send a "strong delusion" to Trump supporters (and all of America in general) in order to teach a lesson,...
...might it have something to do with the brazen hypocrisy of a so-called "Christian Nation" that murders millions of men, women, and children across the planet through its imperialistic endeavors in order to steal their resources?
And speaking of Trump's "Christian" supporters, how much more antithetical to Christ's message can it get than that of their rabid racism and xenophobic zeal to deport those who are just trying to make a better life for themselves and their children?
Perhaps it would be more understandable if you substitute the term "strong delusion" with the term "negative karma" for all of the treachery America has sown across the globe for the last seven or so decades,...
...which, in turn, is destroying our society from within itself, with Trump functioning as the catalyst of the fall.
_______
Last edited by seeds on Wed Jun 18, 2025 4:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11746
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: AI danger
That might be a fair interpretation, for all I know about God.seeds wrote: ↑Wed Jun 18, 2025 4:09 am Perhaps it would be more understandable if you substitute the term "strong delusion" with the term "negative karma" for all of the treachery America has sown across the globe for the last seven or so decades,...
...which, in turn, is destroying our society from within itself, with Trump functioning as the catalyst of the fall.
_______
Re: AI danger
seeds wrote: ↑Wed Jun 18, 2025 4:09 amExcellent job at missing the point there, Gary.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Jun 18, 2025 3:09 amOK. So God is going to "send" people "strong delusion, that they should believe a lie"? Wow! Some righteous God there.
However, if you want to get technical about it, I think the fact that the Biblical God is ready and willing to savagely torture untold billions of defenseless souls for eternity in the fires of Hell, is infinitely less righteous than sending people a "strong delusion" while on earth, don't you?
So don't act so shocked and surprised.
Anyway, just as a point of speculation as to why God might send a "strong delusion" to Trump supporters (and all of America in general) in order to teach a lesson,...
...might it have something to do with the brazen hypocrisy of a so-called "Christian Nation" that murders millions of men, women, and children across the planet through its imperialistic endeavors in order to steal their resources?
And speaking of Trump's "Christian" supporters, how much more antithetical to Christ's message can it get than that of their rabid racism and xenophobic zeal to deport those who are just trying to make a better life for themselves and their children?
Perhaps it would be more understandable if you substitute the term "strong delusion" with the term "negative karma" for all of the treachery America has sown across the globe for the last seven or so decades,...
...which, in turn, is destroying our society from within itself, with Trump functioning as the catalyst of the fall.
_______
Regarding And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness..." — 2 Thessalonians 2:11-12
Gary missed your point,Seeds. However he raised another good point . To interpret The Bible one has to set the various bits of it in their time and place. As I understand that verse and without recourse to AI, it was Paul who said the bit Seeds quoted. He was trying to persuade the Thessalonian folk he was in touch with, not Seeds or Gary or me. Paul was motivated was to take the teachings of Jesus, far beyond Palestine ,to the Gentiles. Paul was not JC despite that he was made a saint.
However, I myself do think Paul's advice to his Thessalonian friends may be generalised to include folk alive in 2025. It's true that the God of whom Paul speaks is 'Karma'. I don't have Paul's faith that 'Karma' is effective.
from AI :
God is not Karma, but Paul's God acts with karmic-like justice, personally and purposefully.
Last edited by Belinda on Wed Jun 18, 2025 9:55 am, edited 2 times in total.
- accelafine
- Posts: 5042
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: AI danger
Can you take your god-bothering to another thread?
Re: AI danger
All that blather didn't even touch the statement that caused such a jumbled, confused bleat that sounded a lot like, "Get off my lawn!"
A mere pittance to pay to celebrate Patriotic moral during good times made possible by military strength of defense.
Try again, but this time don't get distracted by your bigotry that you prop up with memory scraps of this and that, as you stumble off the launching pad of refutation.
(Golfers call that offering you a mulligan for shanking your drive, which Clinton is famous for.)
Last edited by Walker on Wed Jun 18, 2025 10:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: AI danger
Gary wrote "why does God not send them something to set them straight?" God did. He became incarnated in Jesus for that purpose. He revealed Himself in the Koran for that purpose.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Jun 18, 2025 3:09 amOK. So God is going to "send" people "strong delusion, that they should believe a lie"? Wow! Some righteous God there. Why doesn't he just send them something to set them straight?
Re: AI danger
What does that have to do with AI danger?Belinda wrote: ↑Wed Jun 18, 2025 10:01 amGary wrote "why does God not send them something to set them straight?" God did. He became incarnated in Jesus for that purpose. He revealed Himself in the Koran for that purpose.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Jun 18, 2025 3:09 amOK. So God is going to "send" people "strong delusion, that they should believe a lie"? Wow! Some righteous God there. Why doesn't he just send them something to set them straight?
Just in case it went unnoticed, since the thread-originator just asked: “Can you take your god-bothering to another thread?” this would be an opportune time to spell out the connection.
Probably wouldn't be too difficult.
(Lime doesn't emphasize very well, purple is an improvement)
Re: AI danger
I understand your objection, and Accelafine's.Walker wrote: ↑Wed Jun 18, 2025 10:05 amWhat does that have to do with AI danger?Belinda wrote: ↑Wed Jun 18, 2025 10:01 amGary wrote "why does God not send them something to set them straight?" God did. He became incarnated in Jesus for that purpose. He revealed Himself in the Koran for that purpose.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Wed Jun 18, 2025 3:09 am
OK. So God is going to "send" people "strong delusion, that they should believe a lie"? Wow! Some righteous God there. Why doesn't he just send them something to set them straight?
Just in case it went unnoticed, since the thread-originator just asked: “Can you take your god-bothering to another thread?” this would be an opportune time to spell out the connection.
Probably wouldn't be too difficult.
(Lime doesn't emphasize very well, purple is an improvement)
Once you have published your original Post you have no control over the conversation. Nor should you control the substance of the conversation. If the substance of a post is entirely irrelevant simply ignore it, which is what people normally do in the real world and on online forums.