The impact of democracy on the nuclear family

[godelian]

I'm not generalizing at all. I'm pointing out indisputable facts

There are no indisputable facts about the physical universe.

Ah yes...the refuge of a rogue...total relativism.

Well, you can see the film yourself. You can see the statistics yourself. But I know you know I'm telling you the truth, and that's why you're so hopping mad. It's your own people who are ruining your case.

You use the term "statistics" but you clearly do not understand what the term means or how they are computed.

Have you ever had even a single class on statistics?

We know for a fact that liberal-arts Mongols quickly drop out of the class because they do not understand the math. You have absolutely no ability to understand these things. You only try to abuse them.

I am not mad at all. I just think that you are dumb as fuck. You behave like somebody with Down Syndrome. You sound like a Mongol.

And then you use the term "your own people" ... but who exactly is that? Do I know these people? Have I ever met them? I have absolutely no clue who you are referring to. I have never met these people!

You are a born retard!

[Immanuel Can]

There are no indisputable facts about the physical universe.

Ah yes...the refuge of a rogue...total relativism.

Well, you can see the film yourself. You can see the statistics yourself. But I know you know I'm telling you the truth, and that's why you're so hopping mad. It's your own people who are ruining your case.

I am not mad at all.

Yeah, you are. The gratuitous abuse and denial of the facts are obvious clues.

But we're to the point where a) I know you know I'm right, and b) I know you won't even admit the facts you know to be true. So I think we're at a point where nothing more can be said.

[godelian]

But we're to the point where a) I know you know I'm right, and b) I know you won't even admit the facts you know to be true. So I think we're at a point where nothing more can be said.

There is only one thing that became clear out of this exchange, which is, that you are dumb as fuck. You are a complete imbecile. You are a Mongol with Down Syndrome. That is how stupid you are.

You do not even acknowledge the very basics of the very basics:

There are no indisputable facts about the physical universe.

You cannot grasp that.

That is why you are a dangerously retarded, utterly stupid, and born imbecile Mongol.

[Immanuel Can]

...you are a dangerously retarded, utterly stupid, and born imbecile Mongol.

Have a nice day.

[Gary Childress]

There are no indisputable facts about the physical universe.

Ah yes...the refuge of a rogue...total relativism.

Well, you can see the film yourself. You can see the statistics yourself. But I know you know I'm telling you the truth, and that's why you're so hopping mad. It's your own people who are ruining your case.

You use the term "statistics" but you clearly do not understand what the term means or how they are computed.

Have you ever had even a single class on statistics?

We know for a fact that liberal-arts Mongols quickly drop out of the class because they do not understand the math. You have absolutely no ability to understand these things. You only try to abuse them.

I am not mad at all. I just think that you are dumb as fuck. You behave like somebody with Down Syndrome. You sound like a Mongol.

And then you use the term "your own people" ... but who exactly is that? Do I know these people? Have I ever met them? I have absolutely no clue who you are referring to. I have never met these people!

You are a born retard!

It seems to me that an advantage of a liberal arts education is the acquisition of a broader knowledge base of culture, which makes one less easily manipulated by charlatans.

[godelian]

It seems to me that an advantage of a liberal arts education is the acquisition of a broader knowledge base of culture, which makes one less easily manipulated by charlatans.

The main disadvantage is that it revolves around claims that lack a solid justification. In the end, it's just a collection of word salads. Hence, it is about believing in charlatans in order to become one too.

[Gary Childress]

It seems to me that an advantage of a liberal arts education is the acquisition of a broader knowledge base of culture, which makes one less easily manipulated by charlatans.

The main disadvantage is that it revolves around claims that lack a solid justification. In the end, it's just a collection of word salads. Hence, it is about believing in charlatans in order to become one too.

Many claims lack solid justification. Skepticism is healthy.

[godelian]

Many claims lack solid justification. Skepticism is healthy.

Skepticism is exactly about claims that lack solid justification. Nobody is skeptical about claims that are clearly irrefutable.

[Gary Childress]

Many claims lack solid justification. Skepticism is healthy.

Skepticism is exactly about claims that lack solid justification. Nobody is skeptical about claims that are clearly irrefutable.

What would be an example of a claim you have made which is irrefutable?

[godelian]

Many claims lack solid justification. Skepticism is healthy.

Skepticism is exactly about claims that lack solid justification. Nobody is skeptical about claims that are clearly irrefutable.

What would be an example of a claim you have made which is irrefutable?

I have never claimed to make irrefutable claims about social situations.

[Gary Childress]

Skepticism is exactly about claims that lack solid justification. Nobody is skeptical about claims that are clearly irrefutable.

What would be an example of a claim you have made which is irrefutable?

I have never claimed to make irrefutable claims about social situations.

So all your claims are refutable, then?

[godelian]

What would be an example of a claim you have made which is irrefutable?

I have never claimed to make irrefutable claims about social situations.

So all your claims are refutable, then?

That depends what the claim is about. Irrefutable claims only exist in mathematics.

[Gary Childress]

Irrefutable claims only exist in mathematics.

And in first-hand experience. But only to the person who experienced it--and maybe God (if there is one).

[promethean75]

"Irrefutable claims only exist in mathematics."

I say, sir... if this claim is true, it may be false because the claim is not mathematical and, therefore, may not be irrefutable.

[promethean75]

Moreover, if one were to express that claim in mathematical terms (somehow) in order to avoid the problem, the claim would be circular. You'd need something other than mathematics to substatiate the conclusion that mathematics produces irrefutable claims. Like saying God exists because the word of God (the bible) says God exists.

This is one fucked up epistemological pickle, G.