That argument goes back before the invention of formal grammar idiot. You do not even know your history.Pistolero wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 4:53 pm There is no 'atom'. i.e., no indivisible, immutable, thing....no god-particle....no point in space/time.
All is in a state of agitation, imbecile.
What does the mind symbolize with words, numbers.
It's own abstractions. No singularity in existence....it only exists in the brain as a representation of a perceived pattern..
Perceived patterns become 'things'...particles...points.....connected by lines.....
Equality
Re: Equality
Re: Equality
The mind can synthesize all its perceived patterns into complex unities.
This si where the trouble begins, because retards can then mistake them for real things.
The mind, moron, can take part of what it perceives and re-synthesize it....creating unities that do not exist in reality....like centaurs....or it can invert them, and imagine the opposite of what it perceives....like non-existence....or god....
This si where the trouble begins, because retards can then mistake them for real things.
The mind, moron, can take part of what it perceives and re-synthesize it....creating unities that do not exist in reality....like centaurs....or it can invert them, and imagine the opposite of what it perceives....like non-existence....or god....
Re: Equality
Better go wash up, that resynthesized material is gathering on your chin.Pistolero wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 4:56 pm The mind can synthesize all its perceived patterns into complex unities.
This si where the trouble begins, because retards can then mistake them for real things.
The mind, moron, can take part of what it perceives and re-synthesize it....creating unities that do not exist in reality....like centaurs....or it can invert them, and imagine the opposite of what it perceives....like non-existence....or god....
You are not even capable of a rational thought.
Re: Equality
No "stuff"....no thing-in-itself.Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 4:54 pmEnergy is classically only an attribute of matter. Stuff. Energy is an attribute of stuff. A more inclusive model is of fields. As per the standard model.
Only Energy.
Patterned energy (order) and non-patterned energy (chaos).
An energy pattern is what the mind interprets as a thing.
Re: Equality
Okay, let us try this. You mix two frequencies. What do you get as the product?Pistolero wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 4:58 pmNo "stuff"....no thing-in-itself.Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 4:54 pmEnergy is classically only an attribute of matter. Stuff. Energy is an attribute of stuff. A more inclusive model is of fields. As per the standard model.
Only Energy.
Patterned energy (order) and non-patterned energy (chaos).
An energy pattern is what the mind interprets as a thing.
Re: Equality
Semiotics represent these perceived patterns.
So, the organism a piori, translates a pattern to a form it can transmit to the brain, where it can be synthesized into unities.
It can then return this synthesis back into reality, through action.
Will.
So, the organism a piori, translates a pattern to a form it can transmit to the brain, where it can be synthesized into unities.
It can then return this synthesis back into reality, through action.
Will.
Re: Equality
Wrong answer, You get the sum, the Difference and the original two frequencies.
So how can you have even one frequency if limits did not exist over the material energy? Stupid.
Re: Equality
Abstraction is what we call this translation of dynamic patters, interacting with a sense organ, converted into neural pulses, transmitted to the brain, where they are synthesized into a unity.
Like an image.
I perceive a cow, via light energy, interacting with a phenomenon and then with my sense organ.
The image is in my head, referring to something outside my head.....but /I can break the pattern apart, into pieces, and recombine it in a image that does not refer to anything outside my head.
Like an image.
I perceive a cow, via light energy, interacting with a phenomenon and then with my sense organ.
The image is in my head, referring to something outside my head.....but /I can break the pattern apart, into pieces, and recombine it in a image that does not refer to anything outside my head.
Re: Equality
Very good, like every illiterate blowhard you always deflect and do not answer events clearly perceived for centuries.Pistolero wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 5:05 pm Abstraction is what we call this translation of dynamic patters, incinerating with a sense organ, synthesized into a larger unity.
Like an image.
I perceive a cow, via light energy, interacting with a phenomenon and then with my sense organ.
The image is in my head, referring to something outside my head.....but /I can break the pattern apart, into pieces, and recombine it in a image that does not refer to anything outside my head.
Re: Equality
Frequency,m rhythms, sequence...etc....are all attributes of energy.
Different energy frequencies, sequences, rhythms, are interpreted as different hues, textures, forms, sounds, tastes etc.....depending on the sense organ and its acuity...and depending on the species, and what a pirori methods it naturally selected to use.
The world looks different to a bee, than it does for an ass, like this nonintellectual moron.
Different patterns becomes interpreted as different kinds of phenomena.
Different energy frequencies, sequences, rhythms, are interpreted as different hues, textures, forms, sounds, tastes etc.....depending on the sense organ and its acuity...and depending on the species, and what a pirori methods it naturally selected to use.
The world looks different to a bee, than it does for an ass, like this nonintellectual moron.
Different patterns becomes interpreted as different kinds of phenomena.
Last edited by Pistolero on Thu May 01, 2025 5:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Equality
How can you interpret anything when you start by denying the ability to do so, and are too stupid to realize it. You paste words together like every fool does.Pistolero wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 5:08 pm Frequency,m rhythms, sequence...etc....are all attributes of energy.
Different energy frequencies, sequences, rhythms, are interpreted as different hues, textures, forms, sounds, tastes etc.....depending no the sense organ.
Different patterns becomes interpreted as different kinds of phenomena.
Re: Equality
Moron...your inability to comprehend is your problem.
Where, hypocrite, have I ever denied the ability to interpret?
Where?
Are you that desperate?
You thought you stumbled upon an epiphany, when it came to grammar...but you didn't.
Where, hypocrite, have I ever denied the ability to interpret?
Where?
Are you that desperate?
You thought you stumbled upon an epiphany, when it came to grammar...but you didn't.
Re: Equality
Hey stupid, just to write your words, you are parsing information. Why are you not spiraling down to your infinity of quite solitude? Why are you contradicting yourself with every letter you type.
Does anyone need an epiphany to see what you are clearly doing? You are the only idiot who does not see your own self contradiction.
Re: Equality
You mistake the interpretation for the interpreted.
There is no point in space/time, imbecile....never was....never will be.
There is no 1 nor 0 in existence outside the human brain.
Math is the most useful linguistic form, imbecile, because it is the most abstract. It can refer to any pattern....and any gradation.
There is no point in space/time, imbecile....never was....never will be.
There is no 1 nor 0 in existence outside the human brain.
Math is the most useful linguistic form, imbecile, because it is the most abstract. It can refer to any pattern....and any gradation.
Re: Equality
Idiot, when did I say that? A point is just another synonym for limit or boundary. So you claim there is none and cannot even remember that a point is no more than a limit.Pistolero wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 5:15 pm You mistake the interpretation for the interpreted.
There is no point in space/time, imbecile....never was....never will be.
There is no 1 nor 0 in existence outside the human brain.
Math is the most useful linguistic form, imbecile, because it is the most abstract. It can refer to any pattern....and any gradation.