Equality

[Phil8659]

There are no lines nor points in space/time, simpleton.
Nor forks, nor computers...

What, therefore, is geometry and mathematics?

It helps man create forks and computers....but what are they?
Do they exist independently from human brains?

They are representations of what?

You are a complete moron for real? So you think that relative and correlatives, quality and quantity which are presented to your mind, as information, is a great waste of time, because you are too stupid to know what it means? Do you take medication, or do they let you roam the streets in your condition?

A representation represents a representation, which is represented by a my drug dealer, who makes everything just right!

I completely agree with you. Your body is wasting your time. It might run away from you and try to buy a brain on eBay.

[Pistolero]

I never said that, simpleton, did I?
Like all language it is useful.
A reduction of fluid space/time to a form the mind can use.

But the concepts themselves can never exist anywhere, moron, but in the mind.

So they represent how human brains conceptualize fluid existence.

[Phil8659]

I never said that, simpleton, did I?
Like all language it is useful.
A reduction of fluid space/time to a form the mind can use.

But the concepts themselves can never exist anywhere, moron, but in the mind.

So they represent how human brains conceptualize fluid existence.

That is the lamest bull shit in the world. Try reading something. A relative and correlative define a thing. One can never be the other, so why is it you insist that it is rational to claim you can argue that because one of them is never the other, that nothing exists? You are so stupid. You only have two concepts. They are always paired.

[Pistolero]

How long is a piece of String?

I didn't say 'nothing exists' hypocrite...did I?

[Phil8659]

How long is a piece of String?

I didn't say 'nothing exists' hypocrite...did I?

Liar, everyone can read what you said.

Or did you not say we do no all live in space and time?

[Pistolero]

There are no 'things,' retard.
The closer you look, the more everything dissipates into what....energy, imbecile.
All is energy....Flux.

[Pistolero]

Existence, moron, is not a thing.....not a unity....it is energy.....fluid.....dynamic.
Your mathematics and geometry freezes this fluidity and converts it into pieces.
It presents these noetic pieces using symbols....

[Phil8659]

There are no 'things,' retard.
The closer you look, the more everything dissipates into what....energy, imbecile.
All is energy....Flux.

Okay, so you are too illiterate to comprehend simple grammar. I agree with you.

So, you claim that because you can parse things, i.e. make them smaller and smaller, they are not things you parse, because they did not exist before or after you parsed them.

Do you have a hard time keeping spit in your mouth?

[Pistolero]

Existence = dynamic, interactivity - Energy.
What the ancients called 'fire' or 'water' using their metaphors.
I think 'fire' is a more apt metaphor.

[Phil8659]

Existence = dynamic, interactivity - Energy.
What the ancients called 'fire' or 'water' using their metaphors.
I think 'fire' is a more apt metaphor.

So, it is okay, if someone put everyone out of their misery by hurling a rock at your head?

[Pistolero]

Moron...your mathematics and geometry, represents how your mind conceptualizes existence....and so does your language which represents your mental abstractions.

But you are too thick to comprehend this.

Why is everything divisible, moron....because that's how mathematics deals with fluidity, having adopted, a priori, the method of reducing fluidity to a form it can process and use.

[Pistolero]

Studying language, moron, is a study of how the brain conceptualizes existence.

[Phil8659]

Studying language, moron, is a study of how the brain conceptualizes existence.

See what I mean, how stupid you are. You actually believe that you can contradict the grammar you use to express anything. And you call everyone a moron because your too stupid to realize a blatant self referential fallacy in your use of grammar.

A thing can be either intelligible or perceptible. One is as real as the other. Try reading Aristotle and Plato.

[Pistolero]

There is no 'atom'. i.e., no indivisible, immutable, thing....no god-particle....no point in space/time.
All is in a state of agitation, imbecile.

What does the mind symbolize with words, numbers.
It's own abstractions. No singularity in existence....it only exists in the brain as a representation of a perceived pattern..
Perceived patterns become 'things'...particles...points.....connected by lines.....

[Martin Peter Clarke]

There are no 'things,' retard.
The closer you look, the more everything dissipates into what....energy, imbecile.
All is energy....Flux.

Energy is classically only an attribute of matter. Stuff. Energy is an attribute of stuff. A more inclusive model is of fields. As per the standard model.

So no, nothing dissipates to energy, that's meaningless.

So you owe Phil8659 an apology.