Walker wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 1:52 pm
On a side note, it’s interesting that The Democrats who indiscriminately flooded the country with illegals by the millions, now want a careful, case-by-case review of each individual who is being deported, to the extent that a US senator from Maryland went to El Salvador to petition for the return of a MS13, non-citizen illegal back to the US. He must ostensibly consider all of humanity to be his constituency, but in reality he is likely owned by MS13, which has a notable presence in Maryland due to the policies of The Democrats Who Hate America.
… and given the Biden administration’s sterling example of corruption by Democrat SOP in DC.
Are you supporting a decision to make due process and equal protection under the law conditional on the goodwill of some guy at ICE rather than enforceable by court order in line with the demands of the constitution with its checks and balances?
The executive branch is in charge of immigration control, not the courts, not the activist judges, and the guy is not a citizen. He is now back in his home country where he belongs.
The MS13 gangster, who is being passed off as a "Maryland Man" by the idiotic, propagandizing Leftist media, got his due process.
The rest is just Lefty noise grasping for obstructionist straws.
Walker wrote: ↑Sat Apr 19, 2025 12:06 am
The executive branch is in charge of immigration control, not the courts
There are laws to follow either way, and having not followed them, the state is required to remedy that error.
Unless you have ceased to be a nation bound under a constitution and goverened in accordance with legal due process. You have the option to choose dictatorship instead if that's really what you want.
Walker wrote: ↑Sat Apr 19, 2025 12:06 am
The executive branch is in charge of immigration control, not the courts
There are laws to follow either way, and having not followed them, the state is required to remedy that error.
Unless you have ceased to be a nation bound under a constitution and goverened in accordance with legal due process. You have the option to choose dictatorship instead if that's really what you want.
The laws have been followed. The judicial branch of the USA govt. has no legal authority to kidnap the citizen of another sovereign nation, El Salvador. Can't really see the Pres. going to bat diplomatically for a non-citizen gang-banger.
Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) is in too deep now: he must continue this circus act that’s been obliterated, as new Justice Department documents prove that Abrego Garcia is an MS-13 member. His wife filed a protection order against him as well; the man is a gangbanger and a domestic abuser. He’s also the poster child for the resistance for Democrats, who walked right into a trap when they went all-in defending this man.
Garcia has gone through the legal process*, which is how we know so much about him, a fact that whizzes over the heads of liberals. He’s gone, and never coming back.
Comment: The Democrat Party That Hates America has collaborated to speak as one voice for this border jumper, setting its own so-called “trap,” which instead of a trap will likely be a badge of honor for The Democrat Party That Hates America, and any voter who disagrees will be a deplorable.
The Supreme Court ordered the facilitation of his return because he had been denied due process in the illegal deportation. Getting the foreign dictator to refuse to send him back with a nod a wink was their way of "accidentally" failing to facilitate in blatant violation of the duly issued order.
Civilised nations are ones where the government can and routinely does lose cases in its own law courts and then obeys the orders of the courts because the rule of law is critically important. For most of the last 250 years, that has been the case in America as it has been over here. Giving up law and order happens in two sorts of circumstance, the failed state or the tyrannical dictatorship. Sort it out or you will be on one of those paths.
- The Trump administration has not denied that the return would be facilitated, should that be desired by El Salvador.
- However it is not up to the Supreme Court if the man should be returned.
- The Supreme Court does not have authority over the world.
- Whether or not he should be returned is up to El Salvador.
- El Salvador says he should not be returned, and will not not be returned, and that's the name of that tune.
Last edited by Walker on Sat Apr 19, 2025 3:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Apr 19, 2025 12:33 pm
Civilised nations are ones where the government can and routinely does lose cases in its own law courts and then obeys the orders of the courts because the rule of law is critically important. For most of the last 250 years, that has been the case in America as it has been over here. Giving up law and order happens in two sorts of circumstance, the failed state or the tyrannical dictatorship. Sort it out or you will be on one of those paths.
This is why the Trump administration is following the laws on the books and the constitution that was ignored by the Biden administration.
The judicial branch of the federal government is not all powerful.
- The Trump administration has not denied that the return would be facilitated, should that be desired by El Salvador.
- However it is not up to the Supreme Court if the man should be returned.
- The Supreme Court does not have authority over the world.
- Whether or not he should be returned is up to El Salvador.
- El Salvador says he should not be returned, and will not not be returned, and that's the name of that tune.
The man was denied due process and illegally sent abroad without ever getting an opportunity to face his accusers in court. This must be remedied by returning him and handling the matter according to the law. You pay for the guy to be in that El Salvadorian death camp, so you must have a contract that allows you to reclaim any sent in error.
You are a collaborator in the collapse of America's rule of law and the erosion of its right to consider itself a civilised nation. Later on you will want to say that nobody could see it coming and none of it was your fault. But it was clearly visible, and you joined in quite willingly.
- The Trump administration has not denied that the return would be facilitated, should that be desired by El Salvador.
- However it is not up to the Supreme Court if the man should be returned.
- The Supreme Court does not have authority over the world.
- Whether or not he should be returned is up to El Salvador.
- El Salvador says he should not be returned, and will not not be returned, and that's the name of that tune.
The man was denied due process and illegally sent abroad without ever getting an opportunity to face his accusers in court. This must be remedied by returning him and handling the matter according to the law. You pay for the guy to be in that El Salvadorian death camp, so you must have a contract that allows you to reclaim any sent in error.
You are a collaborator in the collapse of America's rule of law and the erosion of its right to consider itself a civilised nation. Later on you will want to say that nobody could see it coming and none of it was your fault. But it was clearly visible, and you joined in quite willingly.
No. You just don't understand the separation of powers in the constitution because the Left has corrupted them, for so long.
Walker wrote: ↑Sat Apr 19, 2025 3:35 pm
- The Trump administration has not denied that the return would be facilitated, should that be desired by El Salvador.
- However it is not up to the Supreme Court if the man should be returned.
- The Supreme Court does not have authority over the world.
- Whether or not he should be returned is up to El Salvador.
- El Salvador says he should not be returned, and will not not be returned, and that's the name of that tune.
The man was denied due process and illegally sent abroad without ever getting an opportunity to face his accusers in court. This must be remedied by returning him and handling the matter according to the law. You pay for the guy to be in that El Salvadorian death camp, so you must have a contract that allows you to reclaim any sent in error.
You are a collaborator in the collapse of America's rule of law and the erosion of its right to consider itself a civilised nation. Later on you will want to say that nobody could see it coming and none of it was your fault. But it was clearly visible, and you joined in quite willingly.
No. You just don't understand the separation of powers in the constitution because the Left has corrupted them, for so long.
Plenary Power.
There is no power, plenary or otherwise, that is granted to the president of the USA to just ignore the fourteenth amendment because he thinks some guy might be a bad man. Due process was denied, the situation must be remedied.
