Apparently, you don't think so. Were you not just begging for men to intervene on behalf of women's own sports, and complaining that too few of them would?
Hey, ladies...fix the problem you created.
Apparently, you don't think so. Were you not just begging for men to intervene on behalf of women's own sports, and complaining that too few of them would?
Ooh yes, I was 'begging'Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Tue Apr 08, 2025 12:35 amApparently, you don't think so. Were you not just begging for men to intervene on behalf of women's own sports, and complaining that too few of them would?
Hey, ladies...fix the problem you created.![]()
Then you had nothing to complain about. You'll handle it, right? You're a strong, independent, powerful woman...you don't need help.accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Apr 08, 2025 12:41 amI've always thought that men don't belong in this fight.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Tue Apr 08, 2025 12:35 amApparently, you don't think so. Were you not just begging for men to intervene on behalf of women's own sports, and complaining that too few of them would?
Hey, ladies...fix the problem you created.![]()
Not according to me: according to the "non-TERF Feminists." You clicked the link, right? Then you know.accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Apr 08, 2025 1:46 am Just a woman. According to IC the word 'feminist' means 'men's rights activist'.
It might surprise you to learn that I actually agree!accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Apr 08, 2025 12:41 amOoh yes, I was 'begging'Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Tue Apr 08, 2025 12:35 amApparently, you don't think so. Were you not just begging for men to intervene on behalf of women's own sports, and complaining that too few of them would?
Hey, ladies...fix the problem you created.![]()
Stating facts isn't 'begging' sweet pea. I'm sure you will be able to find these 'begging, pleading' comments of mine. They don't exist because I've always thought that men don't belong in this fight.
There is no such thing as 'transwimmin'. What's wrong with the word men? 'Use the correct word and it's easy to see how preposterous your proposals are. Double-speak' and Newspeak have messed society up to the point where communication is almost impossible now. 'Self ID' has made it so that ANY man can go in ANY woman-only space/sport/anywhere, thanks to language mangling double-speak. We are living in George Orwell's dystopian nightmare. These predatory men are men when it suits them to be men--like when they are raping/assaulting/intimidating women, or winning lucrative prizes in sports. Women don't have the option to 'change sex' back and forth when it suits themFlannel Jesus wrote: ↑Tue Apr 08, 2025 2:25 pmIt might surprise you to learn that I actually agree!accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Apr 08, 2025 12:41 amOoh yes, I was 'begging'Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Tue Apr 08, 2025 12:35 am
Apparently, you don't think so. Were you not just begging for men to intervene on behalf of women's own sports, and complaining that too few of them would?
Hey, ladies...fix the problem you created.![]()
Stating facts isn't 'begging' sweet pea. I'm sure you will be able to find these 'begging, pleading' comments of mine. They don't exist because I've always thought that men don't belong in this fight.
Trans women in womens' toilets? In womens' sports? I think everything should be up to women to vote for, in each state, and they should even be allowed to change their mind in, say, 5 years (or maybe after a petitioned referendum or something).
So the state of California, for example, could have women vote on this, and maybe they choose to not have trans women banned from womens' bathrooms. Then, maybe that works out and they're happy with that decision, or maybe not and maybe they come to regret it. If they regret it, there'll be an opportunity to reverse, and it will be exclusively up to women as a group.
And each sport individually should have the same thing. Maybe womens volleyball votes to ban trans women, but womens table tennis votes to keep them. I think it should be up to the women competing in the sport to decide.
I'm sure there will be objections to this, but at least this puts women's spaces into the hands of those who they were created for. If a state full of women decide they want to allow trans into their toilets, then I think, so be it.
Preposterous that women be allowed to choose their own fate?
Why should they have to be voting for spaces and sports that they THEMSELVES have set up, to be SEPARATE from men's? We all know how it would be worded, in a way to guilt shame women as much as possible. I've seen the 'polls'. You would also have all the transmaidens voting to support the men they idolise. Plus, with self ID it would be meaningless, because these men can LEGALLY call themselves women so they would also be allowed to vote. Do you really think women's rights should be up for special voting? How many women would throw other women under the bus because they think it doesn't immediately affect THEM? That's not what rights are about. Scientific facts aren't decided by votes. Women's rights are already written into law, but everything has fallen apart thanks to the absurd 'self ID' bs-- and deliberately so. This has been in the making for decades and the internet has realised the fantasies of every cheating, predatory, misogynistic pervert on the planet.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Tue Apr 08, 2025 8:27 pmPreposterous that women be allowed to choose their own fate?
I thought you were supposed to be some kind of feminist. You don't think women can be trusted to choose?
Actually, "wimmen" is a spelling first proposed and advocated by Feminists, in order to eliminate the word "man" from "woman." See https://floodmagazine.com/35458/go-your ... a-robbins/. And it's Feminists who are campaigning for the inclusion of "trans-women" (which as you note, are really nothing other than men) in the Feminist fold. https://www.aclu.org/news/lgbtq-rights/ ... ens-rights.accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Apr 08, 2025 8:34 pm Women are fighting this and making good progress in their own way.
Are you suggesting free-will is not an illusion?Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Tue Apr 08, 2025 8:27 pmPreposterous that women be allowed to choose their own fate?
I thought you were supposed to be some kind of feminist. You don't think women can be trusted to choose?
Are you, here, suggesting that you know what the words 'free-will' mean and/or what they are referring to, exactly?Pistolero wrote: ↑Wed Apr 09, 2025 12:50 amAre you suggesting free-will is not an illusion?Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Tue Apr 08, 2025 8:27 pmPreposterous that women be allowed to choose their own fate?
I thought you were supposed to be some kind of feminist. You don't think women can be trusted to choose?