Why do guys who dress as girls get so much hate but not the other way around?

[accelafine]

Men have more strength, longer reach and faster-twitch muscles that make it easier to execute many shots (especially power shots like the break and power draw) with more accuracy, control, and consistency.

[accelafine]

The mere fact that this even needs to be said shows how far down the rabbit hole of insanity we have gone. Even if women were physically equal to men it wouldn't make any difference. Women would still be entitled to have women's sports if that's what they want. No explanation needed.
Men just can't bear women to have some things to themselves.

[iambiguous]

Like I'm going to click links posted by an insane person. If you think it's ok for grown men to 'compete' with and play with ten year old girls in sports then argue it yourself instead of hiding behind stupid links.

The fact that you use the pathetic 'cis' slur says everything anyone needs to know about you (as if they didn't already). Kindly shove that American bs in the furthest orifice from the walnut rattling around in your skull. Now go back to hijacking and wrecking other people's threads with your narcissistic garbage.

ps. Men can't turn into women.

Here we go again. If she wants to make this all about me, then, okay, I'll make it all about her as well.

...what, in my opinion, is always most intriguing about these at times "arrogant, autocratic, authoritarian" pontificators is not what they argue but the way they bully those who dare not to share their own insufferable dogmas.

So, perhaps, someday she might finally confront whatever or whoever turned her into this Satyrean caricature. Something has clearly pissed her off in life. Something that brings her into places like this in order to vent. And to accumulate scapegoats.

It seems [to me] that she needs to make scapegoats of those she construes to be part of whatever she is outraged about. But what is it? And how did it come about?

Wouldn't that be far more fascinating to explore?

In the interim, as with posters like AJ and Satyr, I can't help but wonder what the fate of those who infuriate her might be if she were ever in a position of power in any particular community. Would transgenders be arrested, imprisoned, quarantined, "disappeared"...?

Or might that be applicable to all men?

As for cis being a slur, again, others don't agree: https://www.google.com/search?q=is+cis+ ... URT-reRWmz

And once again, here and now, I do not believe it is reasonable for transgendered "women" to compete against cis women. It's just that unlike any number of "arrogant, autocratic, authoritarian" pontificators here, I recognize that other arguments can be made. Arguments that, in my view, are no less rooted existentially in dasein.

[accelafine]

Poor little man cries about the 'big bad bully'.

Shove your pathetic links and argue yourself you coward. You know you can't because you are incapable of thinking for yourself. You are just as much of a woman-hater as Satyr, so I wouldn't be pointing the finger in that direction if I were you.

Women are not a subcategory of themselves. The word needs no prefix.

[accelafine]

To be fair the only thing you CAN do is post links to ridiculous, self-serving, highly-paid academics because there is no rational argument possible to support this garbage 'ideology' (for want of a better word. Garbage would suffice). This is why their poorly-written rants consist of buzzwords, newspeak, double-speak, accusations of 'wrongthink', gaslighting, outright lies and manipulation. It's all they have and they know it.

''Ooh, you awful 'ciswimin'. How could you 'exclude' those poor 'transwimin' (i.e. men) from everything they demand that you include them in? They are ENTITLED to everything they want because they are the most 'vulnerable and oppressed' people in society today. You are LITERALLY 'genociding' them. Their suicide rate will go through the roof. They are DYING because of you...''

War is peace
Freedom is slavery
Ignorance is strength
Men are women

There's little hope now that AI is also immersed in the cult of woke, since people have lost the ability to think critically and for themselves. This at least proves that it's far from sentient or 'conscious'. It's just another tool for brainwashing the idiocracy.

[iambiguous]

Poor little man cries about the 'big bad bully'.

Shove your pathetic links and argue yourself you coward. You know you can't because you are incapable of thinking for yourself. You are just as much of a woman-hater as Satyr, so I wouldn't be pointing the finger in that direction if I were you.

Women are not a subcategory of themselves. The word needs no prefix.

Absolutely shameless!

You know, for a woman.

[Immanuel Can]

Men just can't bear women to have some things to themselves.

Quite the opposite: most men want women's sports to be for women. It's only the failed men, the mentally-ill men, the autogynepheliac men, and the Leftist caterers who think a man should be in women's sports. But it's primarily the Feminist lobby that's keeping up the chant "Trans-women are women."

There's no logical account on which that makes sense -- trans ideology is inherently self-contradictiong in that respect. If "trans-women" were women, it would not need saying. And if they were women, they would be able to explain precisely what they mean by "a woman." But they can't.

What we should all stop doing is lying about it. Time to speak truth.

[iambiguous]

Men just can't bear women to have some things to themselves.

Quite the opposite: most men want women's sports to be for women. It's only the failed men, the mentally-ill men, the autogynepheliac men, and the Leftist caterers who think a man should be in women's sports. But it's primarily the Feminist lobby that's keeping up the chant "Trans-women are women."

There's no logical account on which that makes sense -- trans ideology is inherently self-contradictiong in that respect. If "trans-women" were women, it would not need saying. And if they were women, they would be able to explain precisely what they mean by "a woman." But they can't.

What we should all stop doing is lying about it. Time to speak truth.

Absolutely shameless!

You know, for a Christian.

[accelafine]

Men just can't bear women to have some things to themselves.

Quite the opposite: most men want women's sports to be for women. It's only the failed men, the mentally-ill men, the autogynepheliac men, and the Leftist caterers who think a man should be in women's sports. But it's primarily the Feminist lobby that's keeping up the chant "Trans-women are women."

There's no logical account on which that makes sense -- trans ideology is inherently self-contradictiong in that respect. If "trans-women" were women, it would not need saying. And if they were women, they would be able to explain precisely what they mean by "a woman." But they can't.

What we should all stop doing is lying about it. Time to speak truth.

There is no 'feminist lobby' and there are also pretty much NO men standing up for women in this. The women who are simpering and fawning over these men are the opposite of 'feminists'. They are pathetic handmaidens. I don't want to get into an argument about it. There's nothing to argue. It's pretty obvious that women who throw other women under the bus for men are NOT FEMINISTS.

[Immanuel Can]

Men just can't bear women to have some things to themselves.

Quite the opposite: most men want women's sports to be for women. It's only the failed men, the mentally-ill men, the autogynepheliac men, and the Leftist caterers who think a man should be in women's sports. But it's primarily the Feminist lobby that's keeping up the chant "Trans-women are women."

There's no logical account on which that makes sense -- trans ideology is inherently self-contradictiong in that respect. If "trans-women" were women, it would not need saying. And if they were women, they would be able to explain precisely what they mean by "a woman." But they can't.

What we should all stop doing is lying about it. Time to speak truth.

Absolutely shameless!

You know I'm right. Try to explain it. What is a woman?

[Immanuel Can]

Men just can't bear women to have some things to themselves.

Quite the opposite: most men want women's sports to be for women. It's only the failed men, the mentally-ill men, the autogynepheliac men, and the Leftist caterers who think a man should be in women's sports. But it's primarily the Feminist lobby that's keeping up the chant "Trans-women are women."

There's no logical account on which that makes sense -- trans ideology is inherently self-contradictiong in that respect. If "trans-women" were women, it would not need saying. And if they were women, they would be able to explain precisely what they mean by "a woman." But they can't.

What we should all stop doing is lying about it. Time to speak truth.

There is no 'feminist lobby'

and there are also pretty much NO men standing up for women in this.

See above: you wrote, "Men just can't bear women to have some things to themselves." Now it seems "men" and "NO" mean the same thing.

The women who are simpering and fawning over these men are the opposite of 'feminists'.

Au contraire: they're the Neo-Marxist, third-wave Feminists, which is what we see most of today.

It's pretty obvious that women who throw other women under the bus for men are NOT FEMINISTS.

They think they're being "inclusive" and "tolerant." And they sure do call themselves "Feminists." https://www.hrc.org/resources/5-things- ... -inclusive

[accelafine]

Quite the opposite: most men want women's sports to be for women. It's only the failed men, the mentally-ill men, the autogynepheliac men, and the Leftist caterers who think a man should be in women's sports. But it's primarily the Feminist lobby that's keeping up the chant "Trans-women are women."

There's no logical account on which that makes sense -- trans ideology is inherently self-contradictiong in that respect. If "trans-women" were women, it would not need saying. And if they were women, they would be able to explain precisely what they mean by "a woman." But they can't.

What we should all stop doing is lying about it. Time to speak truth.

There is no 'feminist lobby'

and there are also pretty much NO men standing up for women in this.

See above: you wrote, "Men just can't bear women to have some things to themselves." Now it seems "men" and "NO" mean the same thing.

The women who are simpering and fawning over these men are the opposite of 'feminists'.

Au contraire: they're the Neo-Marxist, third-wave Feminists, which is what we see most of today.

It's pretty obvious that women who throw other women under the bus for men are NOT FEMINISTS.

They think they're being "inclusive" and "tolerant." And they sure do call themselves "Feminists." https://www.hrc.org/resources/5-things- ... -inclusive

Who cares what they call themselves? Who cares what men think a 'feminist' is? It's true that there are almost no men standing up for women in this. The ones who do are usually gay, and they aren't really standing up for women; they are upset about how 'homophobic' the whole 'trans' movement is. They don't give a crap about women and this whole mess was started by them the second they added 'T' to LGB back in the 80s. The others are religious maniacs who are just as misogynistic as the trannies--but in a different way. I don't know what you can find to argue about there.

[Immanuel Can]

There is no 'feminist lobby'

and there are also pretty much NO men standing up for women in this.

See above: you wrote, "Men just can't bear women to have some things to themselves." Now it seems "men" and "NO" mean the same thing.

The women who are simpering and fawning over these men are the opposite of 'feminists'.

Au contraire: they're the Neo-Marxist, third-wave Feminists, which is what we see most of today.

It's pretty obvious that women who throw other women under the bus for men are NOT FEMINISTS.

They think they're being "inclusive" and "tolerant." And they sure do call themselves "Feminists." https://www.hrc.org/resources/5-things- ... -inclusive

Who cares what they call themselves?

Of course, they have as much justification to call themselves "Feminists" as anybody else does, obviously. And they do, as you can see. So they're defining the Feminist movement on their terms.

It's true that there are almost no men standing up for women in this.

Actually, there are quite a lot. But if Feminists keep admitting "trans-women" as women, then that's what the Feminists will do. Nobody can stop them. It's a "women's" sport: so it's the women who get to say who's in and who's out. Men find the whole things completely contemptible, actually. I've never met even one man who admired one of those clowns.

But I have met Feminists who do. They call the trans-men "courageous" or "brave," or "strong, beautiful women." Emma Watson is a famous one who does this, for example. And they call people like you or J.K. Rowling "TERFs" and "bigots."

Apparently, the best sorts of "women" are effeminate men. The Feminist movement is truly a wonder these days.

[accelafine]

Whatever. Think what you like. It makes no difference to anything. I'm sure women can manage without your 'help'.

[accelafine]

There are a lot of powerful forces behind this so-call 'trans' movement, and with VERY deep pockets. The reason so many well known men are silent or actively supporting the 'trans' is out of fear. It's hardly a secret what celebrity men get up to. 'Trans' has vast resources to dig into their private lives and gather 'victims' from over the years.
Trump can say what he likes because he doesn't give a crap. He has nothing to lose. It doesn't matter what they dig up about him, he just flicks it off like an annoying gnat