FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Fri Apr 04, 2025 6:45 pm
Why are you lying? You wrote this...
You got into the game of defining things, you called people names for criticising your definition, and then you lied to yourself that everyone was just being mean to you when you didn't really say anything.
You are not a victim, your wounds are self-inflicted.
I really don’t know what the problem is, I simply agreed with Trump’s definition of a woman. That’s all there is to it.
If I got into the game, that’s because other players joined the thread and started to challenge my agreement. So I chose to participate in the game. That doesn’t mean anything changed for me, I still agreed with Trump’s definition.
Of course Trump's 'definition' is bollocks. Any 'definition' is going to be bollocks. Stop playing their little game. A woman is just a woman which, as every human who has ever lived knows, is an adult female human. It doesn't need defining.
Yes, I understand that now.
I think the problem was using the word “define” okay no probs. It’s just human language at the end of the day, it can be triggering.
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Fri Apr 04, 2025 6:45 pm
Why are you lying? You wrote this...
You got into the game of defining things, you called people names for criticising your definition, and then you lied to yourself that everyone was just being mean to you when you didn't really say anything.
You are not a victim, your wounds are self-inflicted.
You would reject and pull apart 'any' kind of definition because it suits your political agenda to do that and because you are a misogynistic little coward. Women don't need a definition. They just 'are' and you *****ng know it. The whole 'definition' thing is bollocks cooked up by woman-hating men with perverted sexual agendas.
Cool. So you are now lined up with myself and FJ against Trump's and DAM's crass and trivialising definition of a woman. Welcome to the winning team. Don't get cozy though you utter loon.
Seriously, are you really stupid to have noticed that both me and FJ were highlighting that rigid descriptions don't work out too well?
accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Apr 04, 2025 6:37 pm
You are truly a disgusting littly nonentity.
I think "Have you been snorting the maple-flavored Canadian fentanyl again?" is a much better comeback.
She hates you, it won't change, she lives for vituperous conflict on the internet and hates virtually everybody so don't take it personally. She accuses me of mysoginy but I genuinely don't think there is a single female user of this site that she doesn't totally fucking hate. Don't bother trying to butter her up.
Fairy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 04, 2025 7:04 pm
I think the problem was using the word “define” okay no probs. It’s just human language at the end of the day, it can be triggering.
You're missing the real point. The people who want to have the rigid definition need it, they want to have control over the concept and to be able to say that their own opinion is true and every conflicting one is false.
To be able to do that, you have to be able to define. If you accept that no complete defenition is possible, you automatically have to accept what is entailed by that - there will be grey area and ambiguity.
Trump wants to have a definition of womanhood because he wants to determine that people who aren't in agreement with him are wrong, mentally retarded, and slaves to an evil ideology.
accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Apr 04, 2025 6:37 pm
You are truly a disgusting littly nonentity.
I think "Have you been snorting the maple-flavored Canadian fentanyl again?" is a much better comeback.
She hates you, it won't change, she lives for vituperous conflict on the internet and hates virtually everybody so don't take it personally. She accuses me of mysoginy but I genuinely don't think there is a single female user of this site that she doesn't totally fucking hate. Don't bother trying to butter her up.
Oh look, a man speaking for me. That's never going to go well for you, incel. You hate me because you can't argue with me. That's par for the course on this site. Carla's 'arguments' consist of bizarre, one sentence insults about something called 'fentanyl' that she seems to be obsessed with.
And you are correct in that treacherous handmaidens are not exactly my favourite kind of humans. I didn't know I was obliged to love everyone. I take each comment on here at face value, as words on a screen and respond accordingly.
Fairy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 04, 2025 7:04 pm
I think the problem was using the word “define” okay no probs. It’s just human language at the end of the day, it can be triggering.
You're missing the real point. The people who want to have the rigid definition need it, they want to have control over the concept and to be able to say that their own opinion is true and every conflicting one is false.
To be able to do that, you have to be able to define. If you accept that no complete defenition is possible, you automatically have to accept what is entailed by that - there will be grey area and ambiguity.
Trump wants to have a definition of womanhood because he wants to determine that people who aren't in agreement with him are wrong, mentally retarded, and slaves to an evil ideology.
I certainly don't hate fairy and I'm pretty sure she knows that. We've definitly had our 'moments' though. She can be really annoying at times
I can hate what people write on the screen. In fact the few women who've been regulars on here would probably be the people on here I like the most, with a couple of exceptions. You are so far off it's embarrassing. Don't even try to get inside my head little man.
Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Apr 02, 2025 9:28 pm
My God ace is on fire right now.
I just accused her of hating every woman on this site. She didn't bother citing you as a counterexample.
We’re all capable of hating, capable of anger. It’s just normal human emotion.
No big deal.
Some women just refuse to be told to be good girls, they refuse to repress their real feelings and emotions. Some women are not afraid to speak their minds, much to the annoyance of men. But who gives a fuck what men think. Women are stronger and smarter than men. It’s just a fact.
accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Apr 04, 2025 7:29 pm
'Interesting' that you don't seem to have any trouble getting on this site...
You should have just fishpie help you. Your "site can't be reached" problem is DNS related and I'm sure he could have guided you through fixing it ages ago if you weren't so angry about a man helping you.
Fairy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 04, 2025 7:04 pm
I think the problem was using the word “define” okay no probs. It’s just human language at the end of the day, it can be triggering.
You're missing the real point. The people who want to have the rigid definition need it, they want to have control over the concept and to be able to say that their own opinion is true and every conflicting one is false.
To be able to do that, you have to be able to define. If you accept that no complete defenition is possible, you automatically have to accept what is entailed by that - there will be grey area and ambiguity.
Trump wants to have a definition of womanhood because he wants to determine that people who aren't in agreement with him are wrong, mentally retarded, and slaves to an evil ideology.
Okay
So the real question is which end of that discussion are you really at? You often imply that you are ok with ambiguity and everyone having their own reality, but if you are, that places you at odds with Trump in a way that you kind of didn't seem to notice for yourself.
accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Apr 04, 2025 7:29 pm
'Interesting' that you don't seem to have any trouble getting on this site...
You should have just fishpie help you. Your "site can't be reached" problem is DNS related and I'm sure he could have guided you through fixing it ages ago if you weren't so angry about a man helping you.
Wrong again. I love PEOPLE who are helpful. Fishpi wasn't being helpful. He thought it was hilarious. I did all the things he suggested, which I knew about anyway. It doesn't matter what browser I use either. He didn't say anything about DNS, so perhaps you know more than he does.
Atla wrote: ↑Fri Apr 04, 2025 4:17 pm
I've been wondering, could Trump be a KGB agent? But he already has everything, maybe the Russians helped him out in the past but what could they possibly offer him now?
Epstein was their guy, Trump's bouncing ass is in his video collection.
He's working really, really hard to make that Simpsons prediction about him come true.
right now.
