Donald Trump

[FlashDangerpants]

A near but not quite there understanding of Frege-Geach should be held against no honest man.

He did the holding, for dear life. He needed something to place between himself and his ugly woman's hairy tits.

[Fairy]

Regarding Trumps definition of a woman, I simply agreed with his on the fly answer to the question.
Did Trump know beforehand that he was going to be asked that question? Did he already have an answer ready, was it all pre-scripted prior to the press conference? Who knows!

Whether the definition he gave was poor, inadequate, false, or misleading, or whatever, I couldn’t care less. It’s not important at all, to me it was enough, and that’s all I care about.

If you imbeciles choose to disagree with me just for agreeing with something someone said, then that’s your problem, not mine. Nothing you say about my choice to agree is going to change my mind, nor will I question my own judgement about why I agreed. I simply agreed, and that’s it.

There’s nothing failed or unsuccessful about my agreement, in my mind. Maybe in you’re mind, but what you think,that’s not my problem. I only care about what I think. I create my own reality.

[accelafine]

I am the one who thinks you are a psycho that Harbal shouldn't have touched even with age's dick.

No...

If Harbal blew your mind before he blew his load all over your back then perhaps you shouldn't have done whatever you did to make him leave you. Given that you are back to reply a second time to a post you first replied to yesterday, I assume you nagged him until he put his trousers back on and fucked off forever.

I don't care if you argued with him about your boring opinion on non-dualism or his near but never quite there ability to understand Frege-Geach. You think you argued with him about philosophy, but for the last couple of days you have been failing to grasp why your attempts to define womanhood didn't succeed even with multiple attempts made to patiently explain the problem to you. You have no ability at all.

You are truly a disgusting littly nonentity. A nothing. You have no arguments. I've never seen you make a single interesting or insightful comment. Your absurd scarecrow avatar would be painfully appropriate if not for the fact that the scarecrow had charm despite the fact that he had no brain.
Your hatred for women is palpable. Women don't need to define themselves, and certainly not to creeps like you, and they need definitions from men in the same way that they need a prostate exam.

[FlashDangerpants]

I create my own reality.

No you don't. You just live in a bubble of delusion.

[Fairy]

If Harbal blew your mind before he blew his load all over your back then perhaps you shouldn't have done whatever you did to make him leave you. Given that you are back to reply a second time to a post you first replied to yesterday, I assume you nagged him until he put his trousers back on and fucked off forever.

I don't care if you argued with him about your boring opinion on non-dualism or his near but never quite there ability to understand Frege-Geach. You think you argued with him about philosophy, but for the last couple of days you have been failing to grasp why your attempts to define womanhood didn't succeed even with multiple attempts made to patiently explain the problem to you. You have no ability at all.

You simply speculate, all you have is your own personal interpretation of me. But only I know what’s true about me, not you.

Only I know the truth about Harbal and myself, not you.

I only carried on the convo just to brag about how marvellous Harbal was, unlike you, who ….well,

I know much more about you than I really care to tbh. But you were stupid enough to believe Veggie when she spitefully led you on by suggesting I was flirting with you, and you were dumb enough to never understand the basic issue with a rigid definition of a woman based on a single activity. So the only relevant information is that you are truly, abysmally, dense.

I’ve just run out of words.

Then you should probably stop.

Well that would only be your interpretation, but only I know the truth about me, not you.

You can keep bashing me all you like, only I know the real and true me, not you.

And yes, I’m very gullible, naive, easy target, easy to take the piss out of, yes, I’m used to it. But none of this reality bothers me, because only I know who I really am, not others.

[Fairy]

I create my own reality.

No you don't. You just live in a bubble of delusion.

Yes, and it’s my bubble of delusion, that I’m happy to live in. I created it, so I should know what’s best for me.

[FlashDangerpants]

I've never seen you make a single interesting or insightful comment

I generally ignore you.

Make your mind up.

I don't really care about you, you have an obvious personality disorder and I don't like you. Manipulate and abuse Fairy if you want to, she loves the attention, but I don't have any need of you.

[accelafine]

I've never seen you make a single interesting or insightful comment

I generally ignore you.

Make your mind up.

I don't really care about you, you have an obvious personality disorder and I don't like you. Manipulate and abuse Fairy if you want to, she loves the attention, but I don't have any need of you.

Some things need to be said. Arseholes like you need to be called out. You 'don't like me'? Oh my. I never would have guessed Incels hate women. That's the very definition of them sweetie.

[FlashDangerpants]

Regarding Trumps definition of a woman, I simply agreed with his on the fly answer to the question.

Why are you lying? You wrote this...

I was taught that the anatomically correct definition of a woman is a biological conscious body able to give birth to babies coupled with the natural capacity to feed that baby once born from it’s engorged milk nipples. This defines a woman quite correctly, in my humble opinion. There’s nothing complicated about that obviousness.

You got into the game of defining things, you called people names for criticising your definition, and then you lied to yourself that everyone was just being mean to you when you didn't really say anything.

You are not a victim, your wounds are self-inflicted.

[Fairy]

Regarding Trumps definition of a woman, I simply agreed with his on the fly answer to the question.

Why are you lying? You wrote this...

I was taught that the anatomically correct definition of a woman is a biological conscious body able to give birth to babies coupled with the natural capacity to feed that baby once born from it’s engorged milk nipples. This defines a woman quite correctly, in my humble opinion. There’s nothing complicated about that obviousness.

You got into the game of defining things, you called people names for criticising your definition, and then you lied to yourself that everyone was just being mean to you when you didn't really say anything.

You are not a victim, your wounds are self-inflicted.

I really don’t know what the problem is, I simply agreed with Trump’s definition of a woman. That’s all there is to it.

If I got into the game, that’s because other players joined the thread and started to challenge my agreement. So I chose to participate in the game. That doesn’t mean anything changed for me, I still agreed with Trump’s definition.

[accelafine]

Regarding Trumps definition of a woman, I simply agreed with his on the fly answer to the question.

Why are you lying? You wrote this...

I was taught that the anatomically correct definition of a woman is a biological conscious body able to give birth to babies coupled with the natural capacity to feed that baby once born from it’s engorged milk nipples. This defines a woman quite correctly, in my humble opinion. There’s nothing complicated about that obviousness.

You got into the game of defining things, you called people names for criticising your definition, and then you lied to yourself that everyone was just being mean to you when you didn't really say anything.

You are not a victim, your wounds are self-inflicted.

You would reject and pull apart 'any' kind of definition because it suits your political agenda to do that and because you are a misogynistic little coward. Women don't need a definition. They just 'are' and you *****ng know it. The whole 'definition' thing is bollocks cooked up by woman-hating men with perverted sexual agendas.

[carlafeit]

You are truly a disgusting littly nonentity.

I think "Have you been snorting the maple-flavored Canadian fentanyl again?" is a much better comeback.

[accelafine]

Regarding Trumps definition of a woman, I simply agreed with his on the fly answer to the question.

Why are you lying? You wrote this...

I was taught that the anatomically correct definition of a woman is a biological conscious body able to give birth to babies coupled with the natural capacity to feed that baby once born from it’s engorged milk nipples. This defines a woman quite correctly, in my humble opinion. There’s nothing complicated about that obviousness.

You got into the game of defining things, you called people names for criticising your definition, and then you lied to yourself that everyone was just being mean to you when you didn't really say anything.

You are not a victim, your wounds are self-inflicted.

I really don’t know what the problem is, I simply agreed with Trump’s definition of a woman. That’s all there is to it.

If I got into the game, that’s because other players joined the thread and started to challenge my agreement. So I chose to participate in the game. That doesn’t mean anything changed for me, I still agreed with Trump’s definition.

Of course Trump's 'definition' is bollocks. Any 'definition' is going to be bollocks. Stop playing their little game. A woman is just a woman which, as every human who has ever lived knows, is an adult female human. It doesn't need defining.

[accelafine]

You are truly a disgusting littly nonentity.

I think "Have you been snorting the maple-flavored Canadian fentanyl again?" is a much better comeback.

Oh lookee, here's the little handmaiden again with her brilliant counterarguments. I don't even know what the f 'fentanyl' is you arrogant little American twit.

[FlashDangerpants]

Regarding Trumps definition of a woman, I simply agreed with his on the fly answer to the question.

Why are you lying? You wrote this...

I was taught that the anatomically correct definition of a woman is a biological conscious body able to give birth to babies coupled with the natural capacity to feed that baby once born from it’s engorged milk nipples. This defines a woman quite correctly, in my humble opinion. There’s nothing complicated about that obviousness.

You got into the game of defining things, you called people names for criticising your definition, and then you lied to yourself that everyone was just being mean to you when you didn't really say anything.

You are not a victim, your wounds are self-inflicted.

You would reject and pull apart 'any' kind of definition because it suits your political agenda to do that and because you are a misogynistic little coward. Women don't need a definition. They just 'are' and you *****ng know it. The whole 'definition' thing is bollocks cooked up by woman-hating men with perverted sexual agendas.

Cool. So you are now lined up with myself and FJ against Trump's and DAM's crass and trivialising definition of a woman. Welcome to the winning team. Don't get cozy though you utter loon.

Seriously, are you really stupid to have noticed that both me and FJ were highlighting that rigid descriptions don't work out too well?