LuckyR wrote: ↑Fri Mar 14, 2025 3:43 pm
Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 12, 2025 6:20 am
LuckyR wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 6:45 am
Those against assisted suicide like to imply that death can be avoided, when everyone who thinks about it for a moment knows it is inevitable.
But, 'death' in 'the way' you people envision or imagine it is NOT inevitable, AT ALL.
LuckyR wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 6:45 am
Thus the issue isn't life vs death, rather it's death at time #1 vs at time #2. Doesn't seem like the OP's friend didn't change the time much. Everyone else (including the government) should just butt out.
What happens if 'the partner' was 'convincing' 'that one' 'to go' earlier, so that they could 'get' some thing earlier?
Should ANY one or A government so-call 'butt in', 'then'?
In regards to your first paragraph: extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. I'm waiting. (and until provided, ignoring your comment).
If you ACCEPT things based on 'evidence' ALONE, then this EXPLAINS WHY people like "yourself" are STILL LOOKING FOR and SEEKING Truth and/or ANSWERS.
If by, 'In regards to your first paragraph', words, you are referring to just 'my sentence',
'But, 'death' in 'the way' you people envision or imagine it is NOT inevitable, AT ALL.'
Then,
1. To me there is absolutely NOTING so-called 'extraordinary', here, AT ALL.
2. What even is so-called 'extraordinary evidence', EXACTLY?
3. If you are REALLY WAITING FOR 'extraordinary evidence', then WHY have you NEVER ASKED FOR ANY, AT ALL?
Now,
1. I do NOT DO 'evidence', extraordinary NOR ordinary.
2. If you, REALLY, would like some thing CLARIFIED, EXPLAINED, and/or PROVED, TO and/or FOR you, then I suggest you JUST ASK FOR 'such'.
3. AGAIN, I STAND BY EVERY word I SAY and WRITE, here, and I WAIT, PATIENTLY, FOR 'those' who SHOW CURIOSITY and/or INTEREST.
By the way, and ONCE MORE,
1. What visible physical human bodies are made up of do NOT 'decease', NOR 'die', it just CHANGES in shape and/or form.
2. What people are made up of although STOP existing in a human body that is NOT breathing/pumping blood anymore, they also do NOT 'decease', NOR 'die', as they LIVE ON in other breathing/blood pumping human bodies.
3. 'you', and what 'the human bodies', which 'you' all were living in, HAVE DONE, leaves an everlasting effect.
4. Which MEANS that 'you', human beings, do NOT 'die', and so 'death', in 'the way' you people envision or imagine it, is NOT inevitable, AT ALL.
LuckyR wrote: ↑Fri Mar 14, 2025 3:43 pm
I'm prepared to address your second comment, please clarify what you mean, exactly.
Why CLAIM that you ARE PREPARED TO ADDRESS some 'thing', when you do NOT YET KNOW 'the meaning' OF?
After all and obviously AFTER you HEAR or SEE 'the meaning', there may well be NOTHING TO address.
It appears that, at the moment, you have some sort of PRESUMPTION OF what 'the meaning' COULD BE.
If by, 'your second comment', words, you are referring to,
What happens if 'the partner' was 'convincing' 'that one' 'to go' earlier, so that they could 'get' some thing earlier? And, or
Should ANY one or A government so-call 'butt in', 'then'?
Then, they are NOT comments. They are QUESTIONS, ASKED FOR CLARITY SAKE.
And, what I MEAN, EXACTLY, by those two CLARIFYING QUESTIONS IS, If a person is CONVINCING another to 'commit suicide' BEFORE they are REALLY READY and WANTING TO, then SHOULD ABSOLUTELY ANY one be ABLE TO 'step in or but in'?