Could Trump and Company Destroy Us?

[seeds]

...you're very fortunate to have a horrendous flood of stupid still on the way from Mr. Trump and his admirers to examine.

The video was, I’d say, merely typical. Just more TDS. That’s fine, I suppose, but not the way I roll.

It is The Maga Movement that is more to be paid attention to.

I feel a bit — what is the word? — embarrassed that I feel glee to watch people freak out about Trump & Co.’s radical actions. I wonder: Who ultimately will benefit, and am 65% sure it will not be The Common Man, but I am uncertain.

As I intoned with prophetic wisdom to sobby Gary I don’t have a very good feeling about what is on the horizon.

And I have some theories as to why …

I thought Musk with his child in the Oval office was priceless!

(Are you going to get a chip installed when they come out?)

Do you mean the "Mark of the Beast"?

Aren't you?

I mean, how else are you going to sell your 14-Week Email Course? Or buy or sell anything on eBay or Amazon?

(Hmm, seeing how Elon, with his brain chip technology, is now in cahoots with he who might actually be the "Antichrist," it suggests that the ol' "Mark of the Beast" myth might not be as far-fetched as it sounds.)
_______

[henry quirk]

Do you think tax dollars should go to things like the relief of victims all over the world, or to making bombs and wars that destroy, wound, maim, kill, and murder?

Tending to other nations or war aren't the only choices on the table for America.

Me, I want American resources (in part, that's what dollars place-hold for) spent on and for Americans first and the world last (if at all).

[Age]

Trump has the authority.
The Dems never thought so. The whole executive level is appointed or hired, not voted in. They have no more right to their place at the public trough than anybody.

Trump appears to be making the Democrats look pretty tame by comparison.

On the contrary: he's chopping down the forest of grift, corruption and theft that has existed while the Dems were in power.

LOL
LOL
LOL

'This one' speaks as though it ACTUALLY BELIEVES that "donald trump", "itself, is NOT CORRUPT and NOT A THIEF, "itself".

He's making government less, not more, and more efficient, not more expensive. As an American taxpayer, you should be cheering wildly. Why would you want to have to fund insane projects abroad when so much need exists in America?

You said:
Does DOGE have the authority to shut down government agencies and cancel specific programs that are being funded by congress?

This is exactly what I said. Trump has the authority. Did you miss the part about "executive action by the President"?

So, if "donald trump" has the authority to do 'these things', then WHY does it NOT just rid the "united states of america" of 'gun ownership', which WILL OBVIOUSLY HELP IN REDUCING the UNFATHOMABLE AMOUNT OF citizen, including children of ALL things, KILLINGS and MURDERS?

Of course, helping flood victims and victims of the fires in California takes priority. How much of the budget is going to these other odd programs.

In total? Billions. And it's not all uncovered yet.

HOW MANY 'billions'?

And, OUT OF HOW MANY 'trillions'?

Let 'us' NOT FORGET the ACTUAL COMPARISON of spending one dollar in relation to a thousand dollars, or of spending ten thousand dollars in relation to one million dollars.

$15 million for condoms to the Taliban through USAID.

COMPARED TO HOW MUCH MONEY WAS SPENT on WEAPONS on TRYING TO EXTERMINATE ALL of those human beings?

WHY NOT JUST TRY TO make 'them' EXTINCT through birth control, instead?

$446,700 to promote the expansion of atheism in Nepal through the State Department.

OH NO, let there NEVER be one cent spent on what "immanuel can" and some people do NOT BELIEVE IS TRUE.

ALL the money in the WHOLE world SHOULD ONLY EVER be spent ON the TEACHING that God HAS 'male genitalia' AND DID CREATE the WHOLE Universe, all by its own 'self'.

$1 million to boost French-speaking LGBTQ groups in West and Central Africa through the State Department.

$14 million in cash vouchers for migrants at the southern border through the State Department.

$20,600 for a drag show in Ecuador through the State Department.

$47,020 for a transgender opera in Colombia through the State Department.

$32,000 for an LGBTQ-centered comic book in Peru through the State Department.

$55,750 for a climate change presentation warning about the impact of climate change in Argentina to be led by female and LGBT journalists through the StateDepartment.

What would it MATTER if it was led by "female" or "male" "journalists", EXACTLY?

Would you have even MENTIONED if it was "male journalists", "immanuel can"?

Second thoughts there is NO NEED for you to CLARIFY 'this question', here. The ANSWER IS ALREADY BLATANTLY OBVIOUS.

$3,315,446 for “being LGBTQ in the Caribbean” through USAID.

$7,071.58 for a BIPOC speaker series in Canada through the State Department.

$80,000 for an LGBTQ community center in Bratislava, Slovakia through the State Department.

$3.2 million to help Tunisian migrants readjust to life in Tunisia after deportation through the State Department.

$16,500 to foster a “united and equal queer-feminist discourse in Albanian society” through the State Department.

$10,000 to pressure Lithuanian corporations to promote “DEI values” through the State Department.

$8,000 to promote DEI among LGBTQ groups in Cyprus through the State Department.

OH NO, A WHOLE eight thousand dollars OUT OF HOW MANY 'trillions' of dollars, EXACTLY?

$1.5 million to promote job opportunities for LGBTQ individuals in Serbia through USAID.

$70,884 to create a U.S.-Irish musical to promote DEI in Ireland through the State Department.

$39,652 to host seminars at the Edinburgh International Book Festival on gender identity and racial equality through the State Department.

$425,622 to help Indonesian coffee companies become more climate and gender friendly through USAID.

Has ANY or ALL of 'these allegations' been backed up, supported, and corroborated by ACTUAL PROOF? Or, is 'this one' just ACCEPTING EACH and EVERY thing, here, on NOTHING MORE than just that 'one' of its CHOSEN people to LISTEN TO, and TO BELIEVE, has said 'it'.

After all, "immanuel can" has PROVED, over and over again, that it does NOT matter one iota if one of its CHOSEN 'ones' just SAYS or WRITES some thing, which also has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING AT ALL backing up and supporting 'it' AT ALL, then "immanuel can" WILL JUST CHOOSE TO BELIEVE and ACCEPT 'it' NO MATTER WHAT. LOL Even 'scientific Facts and proof' does NOT even, and WILL NOT even, OVERRIDE 'those' who "immanel can" has CHOSEN TO BELIEVE and ACCEPT.

How much are you personally willing to donate to Guatemalan trans surgeries? I'm sure they'll take your donation, if you send one. But if you wouldn't, then why would you subject your fellow American tax payer to having his/her money stolen to do it?

LOL 'This one' just SAID and WROTE, 'If you would not, then why would you subject your fellow country person to', as though 'this' CORRELATES some howl

[Age]

That's sad.

I ACKNOWLEDGE that you have REPEATEDLY asked ME to stop commenting to YOU, that YOU NEVER INITIATE discourse with ME, and that I have disrespectfully ignored YOUR requests because annoying you is a big turn-on for ME, but I'm a 65 year old virgin and we have to get our jollies where we can. I'm afraid I've fallen desperately in LOVE with you.

Leave me alone you stalking freak.

ONCE AGAIN, 'this one' IS FORGING LIES and ATTEMPTING TO DECEIVE others, here.

Also, and by the way, I AM NOT commenting TO 'this one'.

I have been QUOTING 'this ones' Inaccuracies, and then just Correcting things, like AGAIN 'now'.

Also, would 'this one' even KNOW that EVERY time 'it' QUOTES 'me', then i, ALSO, get A NOTIFICATION. And, if 'this one' is going to CRY and/or WHINGE and COMPLAIN ABOUT 'this', then WHEN WILL 'this one' STOP DOING 'the EXACT SAME' TO 'me'?

It is like 'this one' is ABSOLUTELY BLIND and OBLIVIOUS TO what it is even DOING, here.

[Age]

Yes, you can. And so can anybody. So long as the writer doesn't get so wild with it that he/she isn't able to communicate, and so long as one doesn't mind appearing to be a bumpkin.

True. And you can spell "color" "colour" and theater "theatre" if you don't mind appearing like you love the French.

De temps en temps, s'elle est belle.

'This one' WRITES,
'So long as the writer doesn't get so wild with it that he/she isn't able to communicate, and so long as one doesn't mind appearing to be a bumpkin.'

And then, LOL, WRITES,
'De temps en temps, s'elle est belle.'

in an "english" speaking forum, of all places.

[accelafine]

I ACKNOWLEDGE that you have REPEATEDLY asked ME to stop commenting to YOU, that YOU NEVER INITIATE discourse with ME, and that I have disrespectfully ignored YOUR requests because annoying you is a big turn-on for ME, but I'm a 65 year old virgin and we have to get our jollies where we can. I'm afraid I've fallen desperately in LOVE with you.

Leave me alone you stalking freak.

I'm a lying cvnt.

Yes, you are.

[Age]

The IMMATURITY, here, makes one WONDER if 'this one' even KNOWS 'THE CONSEQUENCES' FOR LYING, PRODUCING FRAUDULENT WRITINGS, and FOR 'TRY TO' DECEIVE readers.

...claims the most IMMATURE and DECEIVING one of all.

He's just trying to get me banned, otherwise he would simply stop 'quoting' practically every comment I make.

HOW am 'I', SUPPOSEDLY, trying to get you banned, "accelafine"? Are you DOING some thing that IS 'ban worthy', or WOULD BE HIGHLY CRITICIZED and even CONDEMNED, and PUNISHABLE outside of 'this forum'?

And, LOL is 'this one' REALLY 'TRYING TO' BLAME 'me', here, FOR 'the way' that it WRITES and RESPONDS, here?

I wonder how many times he's gone whining to Rick.

Now, what would MAKE 'this one' WONDER 'this', exactly?

Unless, OF COURSE, if 'whining' TO others, is some thing that 'this one' is ALREADY KNOWN for.

[accelafine]

...claims the most IMMATURE and DECEIVING one of all.

He's just trying to get me banned, otherwise he would simply stop 'quoting' practically every comment I make.

Thank the lord. I've been waiting for 'age's for you to come back.

[Age]

...but now he seems to be inadvertently implying that any tithings that a "Christian" might make to organizations such as, say, the "World Food Program USA," or "World Vision International," or "Feed the Children," etc., are a waste of a Christian's money and need a billionaire's crew of waste investigators to set the Christian straight.
_______

It's a waste of 'anyone's' money.

So, programs that involve providing food, feeding children, and/or repairing sight, for those without, is a WASTE OF ANY one's money, well according to "accelafine", anyway.

Or, was it REFERRING TO, something else, entirely?

[accelafine]

...but now he seems to be inadvertently implying that any tithings that a "Christian" might make to organizations such as, say, the "World Food Program USA," or "World Vision International," or "Feed the Children," etc., are a waste of a Christian's money and need a billionaire's crew of waste investigators to set the Christian straight.
_______

It's a waste of 'anyone's' money.

I agree. Essentially NONE of the money donated to those corrupt organisations gets to the people they claim it does. The donations go directly into the pockets of the fat-cats who run them--as 'administration costs'. UN 'aid' workers participated in the Oct 7 rape and slaughter.

I'm glad you agree.

[Alexis Jacobi]

I mean, how else are you going to sell your 14-Week Email Course? Or buy or sell anything on eBay or Amazon?

It’s now at 15 weeks …

(Hmm, seeing how Elon, with his brain chip technology, is now in cahoots with he who might actually be the "Antichrist," it suggests that the ol' "Mark of the Beast" myth might not be as far-fetched as it sounds.)

I’ll defer to Gary. Gary?

[Age]

However,...

...considering that America is often referred to as being a "Christian Nation"...

Of course, there's no such thing. A "nation" is a collective noun, and as such, not personal, not individual. Only persons can choose a creed. Some person in the US are actually Christian, but most are not.

What even is an actual 'christian', to you, EXACTLY?

...don't you find it somewhat ironic (if not brazenly hypocritical) that the main "Christian" on the forum (IC) has no problem with the attack that is taking place on one of the very few American agencies that even remotely resembles the Christian exhortation to "tithe" a portion of one's wealth to help others?

Oh, so much to say about that.

Let's start with the very obvious observation that there's one heck of a difference between inviting ethical persons to be voluntarily charitable, and appropriating the legitimate property of citizens by fiat. Then there's the difference between taking those funds to do good, and taking them to enrich the leeches in one's bureaucracy, or to subsidize the sterilization and castration of children in another country.

Nobody's objecting to aid. What they're objecting to is the latter. And any Christian worthy of the name will not mistake the latter for the former, nor allow the later to become a substitute for the former. To do so would be totally unchristian.

YES. To ALLOW 'another' to MAKE their OWN CHOICES, is TOTALLY "unchristian".

And why you'd want to defend it, or to criticize those who want to stop the grift, the corruption and castrating of children...well, I really can't say.

your ATTEMPTS of TRICKERY and DECEIVING "immanuel can" are NOT FOOLING ANy one, here.

ABSOLUTELY NO one, here, is defending, NOR criticizing those who want to stop, corruption and unnecessary castrating of children. So, your ABSOLUTE and OBVIOUSLY False CLAIM, here, is UNWARRANTED and NEEDS NO EXPLANATION FROM you as to WHY. However, WHY you, REALLY, are 'TRYING TO' DEFLECT, FOOL and DECEIVE the readers is VERY OBVIOUS.

you 'TRY TO' DO SO as you NEED TO 'RUN AWAY' and 'HIDE' FROM the ACTUAL Truth, here. That is; you are 'TRYING TO HIDE FROM your OWN Truly UNCHRISTIAN WAYS of VIEWING and SEEING things.

ONCE AGAIN 'this one' 'TRIED' its HARDEST TO DEFLECT, and DECEIVE, here.

In light of the fact that much of America's wealth came from the exploitation of other people's lands and resources across the planet along with the death and destruction that often accompanies America's imperialistic endeavors,...

Woke nonsense. It's not a fact at all.

LOL
LOL
LOL

Talk about ANOTHER PRIME example of 'TRYING TO' 'RUN AWAY' AND 'HIDE' FROM one's OWN OBVIOUSLY Wrong thinking AND Wrong doing.

You need a history class or two, and not from some blue-haired, Leftist harpy...a real history class.

Is this JUDGING others, and GIVING 'them' ATTEMPTED INSULTING words, what you REALLY LEARNED in YOUR "christian" TEACHINGS and UPBRINGING?

For A self-claimed "christian" and God "believer", here, you are, at time, the MOST "unchristian" and MOST UNGOD like person, here, "immanuel can".

And then you'd find out that nobody "owned" North America at all, and the tribes that roamed across it didn't even have a conception of land ownership.

LOL
LOL
LOL

HOW MANY, BLATANTLY, Wrong DOINGS, in LIfe, by one's of 'this one's ilk' is 'this one' GOING TO 'TRY TO' 'justify'.

LOOK "Immanuel can" what WAS DONE can NOT BE JUSTIFIED in ABSOLUTELY ANY way AT ALL.

LOL people who do not have a 'conception' of 'land ownership' can NOT OWN the 'very land' that they have LIVED WITH for COUNTLESS MILLENNIA, therefore BECAUSE 'i' HAVE A 'concept' of 'land ownership', then 'i' CANT TAKE AWAY 'ANY land', on earth, and then do WHATEVER 'i' LIKE WITH 'the land' that 'i' have just 'self-claimed' IS 'MY LAND'.

you "immanuel can" would be SEEN AS BEING COMPLETELY BLIND, DISTORT, and TWISTED BEYOND BELIEF, that is; IF you had NOT WRITTEN the 'VERY WORDS' that you HAVE BEEN, here.

And maybe you could take a course in economics as well, and find out that value can be created by ingenuity, invention, improvements in technology, and free trade.

And then, maybe, you'd have something to say. Today, not so much, apparently.

'This one', who CLAIMS TO BE A "christian" could not be MORE OF A CONDESCENDING HYPOCRITE, here, even if it WANTED TO BE and TRIED TO BE.

[Age]

Leave me alone you stalking freak.

I'm a lying cvnt.

Yes, you are.

If ANY one would like the ACTUAL Truth of things, here, then they just have to READ what WAS ACTUALLY SAID and WRITTEN.

WRITING WORDS 'under another's name or label', and 'TRYING TO' PASS 'those words' OFF as 'some one ELSE's', is considered by some to be one of the WORST TYPES OF FRAUD.

But, PLEASE FEEL ABSOLUTELY FREE to KEEP DOING what you OBVIOUSLY ARE, here, "accelafine".

you are FOOLING NO one but "yourself", here.

[Age]

He's just trying to get me banned, otherwise he would simply stop 'quoting' practically every comment I make.

Thank the lord. I've been waiting for 'age's for you to come back.

QUOTING 'me', which then sends 'notifications' TO 'me', WHILE WHINING and WHINGEING ABOUT 'you' getting 'notifications' and 'you' WANTING 'me' TO STOP is, REALLY, NOT the MOST INTELLIGENT thing to KEEP DOING.

[seeds]

I mean, how else are you going to sell your 14-Week Email Course? Or buy or sell anything on eBay or Amazon?

It’s now at 15 weeks …

(Hmm, seeing how Elon, with his brain chip technology, is now in cahoots with he who might actually be the "Antichrist," it suggests that the ol' "Mark of the Beast" myth might not be as far-fetched as it sounds.)

I’ll defer to Gary. Gary?

Why Gary?
_______