accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 10:40 pmI had to look at the name. At first glance I thought I wrote thatFairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 10:23 pmOh ffs, when are you going to grow a spine you spineless tube worm.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:08 pm
I'm glad to see you are back, Age. For some reason I was worried about how you would take my replies. Fortunately, my fear seems to have been entirely unjustified.![]()
Bots
Re: Bots
Re: Bots
You are harassing her. The proof is evident to everybody. Now fuck off, bot!Age wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 11:11 pmLOL 'stops harassing'.
WHEN and WHERE, EXACTLY, have you been HARASSED you 'poor little thing'?
CLEARLY you WILL NEVER back up and support your CLAIM, here, WITH ACTUAL PROOF. you just BELIEVE that you can MAKE A CLAIM, and that is ALL THAT IS NEEDED, and NOTHING ELSE HAS TO BE DONE. And, it does NOT MATTER HOW False THAT CLAIM IS, TO you.
Re: Bots
VERY WELL SAID and WRITTEN.Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 12:50 pmYes, and all I said in response to your TRUE statement….was, “You care enough to create a thread that will attract responses.accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 11:01 am By the way, you are the one who's always picking fights with me. You just can't let anything go. I think you enjoy it. All I said was that I don't know what you are talking about and don't care. A TRUE statement. You do love the truth don't you? That's what you keep telling everyone.
That you don’t care about responses you don’t understand is understandable.
I don’t care whether you know what I’m talking about or not, I’m just responding.”
————-
That was my True statement in response.
But then….you responded with a deliberate aggression, by bringing the Harbal character into the discussion. If anyone was picking a fight, it was you. You didn’t need to bring the Harbal character in what was just a neutral exchange of two truth statements between us both.
Mentioning Harbal, was a devious and spiteful tactic to employ, because that’s all you know when it comes to knowing how to conduct yourself on this forum. You won’t always know you have egg on your face until someone points it out you. So that’s why I am now forced to point that out to you. Your sneaky tactics don’t work with me, I’m much too smart for that sort of BS
Everyone knows you are spiteful except you. Just own it ffs.
Yes, I aired my dirty laundry on the forum, it was a disrespectful and despicable thing to do to Harbal.
I did it with the intention to hurt him. I did it because he hurt me. So I wanted to hurt him back. I could have decided to let it go, but I really wanted to hurt him, and the forum was the perfect weapon for me. Am I ashamed of what I did, yes of course. On reflection I wished I’d not done it. But at the time I was enraged with hatred for him. Does that make me an evil twisted person, probably. But that’s not unusual, and at least we didn’t actually kill each other, like some couples do. Revengeful people are hurt people. Only hurt people hurt people.
If I could turn back the clock I would never have said yes to Harbal’s advances. He pursued me, I didn’t pursue him.
I wish I’d just had the wisdom to stay single. I’m happier when I’m single.
But there’s so many more sides to the entire story that no one knows about. Sex not included.
If you are interested to know all the other sides of the story that haven’t been revealed yet, then start a thread topic on your interest, as Harbal and I are obviously a subject that seems to fascinate you to no end. I’ll be more than happy to reveal more truths about the topic.
If you are not interested, then ffs, stop mentioning his name in topics that do not concern him personally, stop fucking complaining.
And, GREAT OBSERVATION ABOUT 'revengeful people are hurt people', and, 'ONLY hurt people hurt people'. Which is, OBVIOUSLY, what "accelafine" TRIES TO DO to a LOT of you people, here.
Re: Bots
I saw the 'wine comment' as, literally, A REFLECTION, of PROJECTION, actually.Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 1:06 pmWhy would you write that unless it was some thought in your own mind that he could possibly be reading.accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 11:10 am If you are reading this Harbal could you please come and get your woman? She's drunk and spilling her wine on the carpet.
Would it possibly be because you like the idea of Harbal reading threads where you deliberately mention his name, do you like the idea he is reading stuff about you talking about him?
And fyi, I don’t touch alcohol, I can’t stand the stuff. Never liked it, tried it once and didn’t like how it made me feel.
Re: Bots
A good analogy for AgeGPT:
https://i.4cdn.org/pol/1738523351771966.jpg
https://i.4cdn.org/pol/1738523351771966.jpg
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11746
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: Bots
Funny how civility is so triggering for you. You should see a therapist.Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 10:23 pmOh ffs, when are you going to grow a spine you spineless tube worm.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:08 pmI'm glad to see you are back, Age. For some reason I was worried about how you would take my replies. Fortunately, my fear seems to have been entirely unjustified.
Re: Bots
So, are you ANOTHER ONE who can ONLY SEE and DO 'things' that are, LAUGHABLY, 'normally' called or done?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 1:56 pmPeople are normally not called "it".Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 1:26 pmFYI .. Age is referred to as an It for reasons it does not want to disclose whether its a male or female or other.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 10:10 am
If Age is a human being, then s/he probably shouldn't be referred to as "it", though of course, I've seen Age refer to others as "its".
So it will suffice until its actually known as fact.
Age doesn’t seem to have a problem with the label IT… so not sure why that seems to bother you.
Burning so-called 'witches' 'at the stake' was ALSO 'normally' done, so SHOULD 'we' DO 'it', as well?
People, in the days when this is being written, also 'normally' call 'minds' 'their own', so SHOULD 'we', who KNOW BETTER or MORE, KEEP SAYING and CLAIMING 'the same', as well?
People also 'normally' claimed that the sun revolves around the earth so SHOULD 'we', who KNOW BETTER or MORE, KEEP SAYING and CLAIMING 'the same', as well.
LOL 'what talk' have 'we', SUPPOSEDLY, HAD? WHERE, EXACTLY, what 'this, SUPPOSED, talk'?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 1:56 pm I've had the same talk with Age. "It" is not an appropriate or grammatically correct pronoun for a human being.
LOL you have CLAIMED that calling you human beings 'its' IS NOT APPROPRIATE and GRAMMATICALLY CORRECT, TO 'you'. BUT, who made 'you' the JUDGE and ADJUDICATOR of what IS APPROPRIATE and GRAMMATICALLY CORRECT, IN Life?
Now, and by the way, HAVE YOU RESPONDED TO WHERE I ASKED you ABOUT, WHY, EXACTLY, is it WRONG, TO you, to call you human beings 'its'?
If no, then WHY NOT?
AGAIN, do you SEE you human beings as being BETTER or ABOVE ANY one or ANY thing ELSE?
WHY DO you HAVE SUCH A VERY NARROWED FIELD OF PERCEPTION, here, EXACTLY?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 1:56 pm "It" generally depicts an inanimate object or else loathing for the human being who is being referred to as "it".
If 'you' are NOT an 'it', "garry childress", then what are 'you', EXACTLY?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 1:56 pm But if you want to call him/her "it", then by all means. I've gotten tired of explaining to Age that I'm not an "it". Would you like me to refer to you as "it"? I can do that too.
JUST MAYBE UNTIL you human beings ALSO KNOW, and can ALSO EXPLAIN, who and what the 'I' and the 'you' words are referring to, EXACTLY, then JUST MAYBE IT MIGHT BE BEST that 'you' human beings REMAIN 'its', JUST LIKE EVERY thing ELSE can be CALLED.
If 'you' can NOT even INFORM others of who nor what 'you' ARE, EXACTLY, let alone INFORM others of who and what 'I' AM, EXACTLY, then who and what is 'it', EXACTLY, that 'I' AM EXPECTED TO TELL others 'you' ARE, EXACTLY?
- accelafine
- Posts: 5042
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: Bots
You aren't 'civil'. You are just gutless. Not the 'nice' person you imagine yourself to be. Not by miles.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 11:33 pmFunny how civility is so triggering for you. You should see a therapist.Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 10:23 pmOh ffs, when are you going to grow a spine you spineless tube worm.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:08 pm
I'm glad to see you are back, Age. For some reason I was worried about how you would take my replies. Fortunately, my fear seems to have been entirely unjustified.
Re: Bots
List ANY, or BETTER STILL, ALL of 'things', which I, SUPPOSEDLY, 'plenty of blame' to LAY ON, ABSOLUTELY, EVERY one "garry childress"?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 2:02 pmYou'll notice I stayed out of you and Accelafine's argument. My beef is not with you. Age has plenty of blame to lay on everyone here including you.Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 1:55 pmI’m sorry but that statement is pathetic.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 1:45 am
Age, you are like an overbearing father who puts his children through guilt hell through gaslighting and then when they kill themselves you ask yourself why because you have no idea what psychological duress you put people through or else don't care.
You are doing exactly the same thing you accuse Age of doing.
How do you think it makes Age feel to read that someone is accusing it of making other people suicidal from reading its posts.
Then assuming Age doesn’t care about making other people feel so uncomfortable that their only option is to seek ways out of their psychological duress by suicide…..What the actual fuck, how do you think that makes Age feel. Do you honestly think someone has that much power over others, that they can impose psychological duress on others to the point of knowing it could kill them. When all those people had to do was to disengage.
Have you any idea how ridiculous you are being saying that to Age. How do you think that makes Age feel?
Surely we’re all adults here, fully mature and responsible enough for taking responsibility for our own mental health?
Anyone who is willing to read or interact with Age, are consenting to do so. No one is being forced to read or interact with Age.
This is a public forum ffs. It’s an open invitation for anyone and everyone to say what ever they like. Within the rules of the forum that are already laid out for all to read. If Age was breaking the forum rules, then Age would have been banned by now.
Just grow up ffs.
And, OBVIOUSLY FROM your COMMENT and CLAIM, here, you have, AGAIN, NOT BEEN LISTENING and HEARING 'me' AT ALL, here.
you STATEMENT and CLAIM, here, could NOT BE MORE Wrong NOR MORE False. Just so you BECOME AWARE.
And, WHY, EXACTLY, is 'this', SUPPOSEDLY, TRUE?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 2:02 pm He's made almost everyone he encounters want to vomit.
Let 'us' START WITH 'you' EXPLAINING what EXACT WORDS OF MINE have, SUPPOSEDLY, MADE YOU WANT TO VOMIT? And, WHY, EXACTLY?
Were 'those words' 'the ones' that SHOWED, PROVED, and/or REVEALED the Truths ABOUT you and your Wrong DOING/S, in Life?
- accelafine
- Posts: 5042
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: Bots
We are witnessing history here folks. The first glimpse of a bot falling in love.
Age wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 11:16 pmI LOVE you FAIRYFairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 12:50 pmYes, and all I said in response to your TRUE statement….was, “You care enough to create a thread that will attract responses.accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 11:01 am By the way, you are the one who's always picking fights with me. You just can't let anything go. I think you enjoy it. All I said was that I don't know what you are talking about and don't care. A TRUE statement. You do love the truth don't you? That's what you keep telling everyone.
That you don’t care about responses you don’t understand is understandable.
I don’t care whether you know what I’m talking about or not, I’m just responding.”
————-
That was my True statement in response.
But then….you responded with a deliberate aggression, by bringing the Harbal character into the discussion. If anyone was picking a fight, it was you. You didn’t need to bring the Harbal character in what was just a neutral exchange of two truth statements between us both.
Mentioning Harbal, was a devious and spiteful tactic to employ, because that’s all you know when it comes to knowing how to conduct yourself on this forum. You won’t always know you have egg on your face until someone points it out you. So that’s why I am now forced to point that out to you. Your sneaky tactics don’t work with me, I’m much too smart for that sort of BS
Everyone knows you are spiteful except you. Just own it ffs.
Yes, I aired my dirty laundry on the forum, it was a disrespectful and despicable thing to do to Harbal.
I did it with the intention to hurt him. I did it because he hurt me. So I wanted to hurt him back. I could have decided to let it go, but I really wanted to hurt him, and the forum was the perfect weapon for me. Am I ashamed of what I did, yes of course. On reflection I wished I’d not done it. But at the time I was enraged with hatred for him. Does that make me an evil twisted person, probably. But that’s not unusual, and at least we didn’t actually kill each other, like some couples do. Revengeful people are hurt people. Only hurt people hurt people.
If I could turn back the clock I would never have said yes to Harbal’s advances. He pursued me, I didn’t pursue him.
I wish I’d just had the wisdom to stay single. I’m happier when I’m single.
But there’s so many more sides to the entire story that no one knows about. Sex not included.
If you are interested to know all the other sides of the story that haven’t been revealed yet, then start a thread topic on your interest, as Harbal and I are obviously a subject that seems to fascinate you to no end. I’ll be more than happy to reveal more truths about the topic.
If you are not interested, then ffs, stop mentioning his name in topics that do not concern him personally, stop fucking complaining.
Re: Bots
This is A SIGN of GROWTH, and of MATURITY.Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 2:05 pmSeriously are you deaf, I’ve already explained to you why I call Age an it. If I knew if Age was a he or a she, I would say he or she, but I don’t know because it has not disclosed the information, so it will have to suffice.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 1:56 pmPeople are normally not called "it". I've had the same talk with Age. "It" is not an appropriate or grammatically correct pronoun for a human being. "It" generally depicts an inanimate object or else loathing for the human being who is being referred to as "it". But if you want to call him/her "it", then by all means. I've gotten tired of explaining to Age that I'm not an "it". Would you like me to refer to you as "it"? I can do that too.Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 1:26 pm
FYI .. Age is referred to as an It for reasons it does not want to disclose whether its a male or female or other.
So it will suffice until its actually known as fact.
Age doesn’t seem to have a problem with the label IT… so not sure why that seems to bother you.
If Age is calling other people an It….and they don’t like it, then that’s their problem surely. I personally don’t mind what other people call me, they can call me all the names under the sun, I don’t care.
Re: Bots
LOL The IRONY, here.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 2:07 pmIf you want to be called names then I'm afraid I won't oblige. I have more worthwhile things to do.Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 2:05 pmSeriously are you deaf, I’ve already explained to you why I call Age an it. If I knew if Age was a he or a she, I would say he or she, but I don’t know because it has not disclosed the information, so it will have to suffice.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 1:56 pm
People are normally not called "it". I've had the same talk with Age. "It" is not an appropriate or grammatically correct pronoun for a human being. "It" generally depicts an inanimate object or else loathing for the human being who is being referred to as "it". But if you want to call him/her "it", then by all means. I've gotten tired of explaining to Age that I'm not an "it". Would you like me to refer to you as "it"? I can do that too.
If Age is calling other people an It….and they don’t like it, then that’s their problem surely. I personally don’t mind what other people call me, they can call me all the names under the sun, I don’t care.
Who the heck are you ? The “It”police ?
Re: Bots
Do others get tired of your nonsense also, "garry childress"?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 2:12 pmI didn't say Age was breaking forum rules. I just get tired of hearing his nonsense so I said something to him about it.Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 2:10 pm “You'll notice I stayed out of you and Accelafine's argument. My beef is not with you. Age has plenty of blame to lay on everyone here including you. He's made almost everyone he encounters want to vomit.”
That’s just your self entitled self bias opinion.
Age is not breaking forum rules, if Age was, Age would be banned.
Loads of people who post their clean or dirty laundry on the internet make me vomit. In fact most humans are full of verbal vomit, they’re like dogs, eating their own vomit. If you don’t like dog life, then go reside with God.
And, did you RESPOND TO me by EXPLAINING, EXACTLY, WHY you do NOT like you human beings being called 'its'?
Re: Bots
Ok, would you like to be my therapist? I’m sure you would qualify for the job perfectly.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 11:33 pmFunny how civility is so triggering for you. You should see a therapist.Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 10:23 pmOh ffs, when are you going to grow a spine you spineless tube worm.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:08 pm
I'm glad to see you are back, Age. For some reason I was worried about how you would take my replies. Fortunately, my fear seems to have been entirely unjustified.
Re: Bots
I love you veggie.accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 11:41 pm We are witnessing history here folks. The first glimpse of a bot falling in love.
Age wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 11:16 pmI LOVE you FAIRYFairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 12:50 pm
Yes, and all I said in response to your TRUE statement….was, “You care enough to create a thread that will attract responses.
That you don’t care about responses you don’t understand is understandable.
I don’t care whether you know what I’m talking about or not, I’m just responding.”
————-
That was my True statement in response.
But then….you responded with a deliberate aggression, by bringing the Harbal character into the discussion. If anyone was picking a fight, it was you. You didn’t need to bring the Harbal character in what was just a neutral exchange of two truth statements between us both.
Mentioning Harbal, was a devious and spiteful tactic to employ, because that’s all you know when it comes to knowing how to conduct yourself on this forum. You won’t always know you have egg on your face until someone points it out you. So that’s why I am now forced to point that out to you. Your sneaky tactics don’t work with me, I’m much too smart for that sort of BS
Everyone knows you are spiteful except you. Just own it ffs.
Yes, I aired my dirty laundry on the forum, it was a disrespectful and despicable thing to do to Harbal.
I did it with the intention to hurt him. I did it because he hurt me. So I wanted to hurt him back. I could have decided to let it go, but I really wanted to hurt him, and the forum was the perfect weapon for me. Am I ashamed of what I did, yes of course. On reflection I wished I’d not done it. But at the time I was enraged with hatred for him. Does that make me an evil twisted person, probably. But that’s not unusual, and at least we didn’t actually kill each other, like some couples do. Revengeful people are hurt people. Only hurt people hurt people.
If I could turn back the clock I would never have said yes to Harbal’s advances. He pursued me, I didn’t pursue him.
I wish I’d just had the wisdom to stay single. I’m happier when I’m single.
But there’s so many more sides to the entire story that no one knows about. Sex not included.
If you are interested to know all the other sides of the story that haven’t been revealed yet, then start a thread topic on your interest, as Harbal and I are obviously a subject that seems to fascinate you to no end. I’ll be more than happy to reveal more truths about the topic.
If you are not interested, then ffs, stop mentioning his name in topics that do not concern him personally, stop fucking complaining.