Why are you telling me. Go suck up to it then. Apologise profusely. Don't worry about my feelings. Apparently I don't have any.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 7:27 pmI suppose he can't change any more than anyone else can. I feel like I just cyber bullied someone. An unsettling feeling.accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 6:55 pm At least cockroaches have their use and place in the ecosytem. 'Age' is more like some horrible virus that was cooked up in a lab somewhere. When people say 'just ignore 'age'' that's like saying ''just ignore the itchy rash that's all over your body''.
Age is a parasite that sucks the life out of everyone it encounters and gives nothing back.
Bots
- accelafine
- Posts: 5042
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: Bots
- accelafine
- Posts: 5042
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: Bots
Oh. I see you already got your grovelling 'sucking up fix' and made a whole thread about it. What a 'surprise' 
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11748
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: Bots
My bad.accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 7:49 pmWhy are you telling me.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 7:27 pmI suppose he can't change any more than anyone else can. I feel like I just cyber bullied someone. An unsettling feeling.accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 6:55 pm At least cockroaches have their use and place in the ecosytem. 'Age' is more like some horrible virus that was cooked up in a lab somewhere. When people say 'just ignore 'age'' that's like saying ''just ignore the itchy rash that's all over your body''.
Age is a parasite that sucks the life out of everyone it encounters and gives nothing back.
- accelafine
- Posts: 5042
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: Bots
Yes it is. Very much so. You really think your piddling comments would even register? Did mine make any difference to it? Get lost you backstabbing arsehole.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 8:05 pmMy bad.accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 7:49 pmWhy are you telling me.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 7:27 pm
I suppose he can't change any more than anyone else can. I feel like I just cyber bullied someone. An unsettling feeling.
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11748
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: Bots
Will do.
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11748
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: Bots
Look on the bright side, maybe Age will take a cue from my expertise and apologize to you for his jab at you about hating children.accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 7:49 pmWhy are you telling me. Go suck up to it then. Apologise profusely. Don't worry about my feelings. Apparently I don't have any.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 7:27 pmI suppose he can't change any more than anyone else can. I feel like I just cyber bullied someone. An unsettling feeling.accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 6:55 pm At least cockroaches have their use and place in the ecosytem. 'Age' is more like some horrible virus that was cooked up in a lab somewhere. When people say 'just ignore 'age'' that's like saying ''just ignore the itchy rash that's all over your body''.
Age is a parasite that sucks the life out of everyone it encounters and gives nothing back.
Re: Bots
ONCE AGAIN, WHEN 'these people' could NOT COUNTER NOR REFUTE what I have SHOWN and/or PROVED 'they' would RESORT TO RESPONSES like 'this one' has just PROVIDED 'us', here.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 4:10 amI'm not interested in your nonsense right now, Age. Maybe another time.Age wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 4:09 amOBVIOUSLY, and SO WHAT?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 3:46 am
People express anger when they see others commit terrible crimes.
Are 'those people' who are EXPRESSING 'anger', EXPRESSING 'anger' Appropriately OR Inappropriately?
Also, what is a so-called 'terrible crime', TO you, is NOT necessarily a 'terrible crime', TO another, and vice-versa. So, BEFORE ANY one even BEGINS TO just THINK ABOUT EXPRESSING A 'feeling' I SUGGEST that they OBTAIN ACTUAL CLARITY, FIRST.
Now, "gary childress" WHY ARE so-called 'terrible crimes', TO you, NOT 'terrible crimes', TO others? And, do NOT FORGET that even what you might call A 'terrible crime' ARE 'justified' as BEING what is GOOD and/or RIGHT, in Life, TO another, okay?AND, what I was just, pretty much, DOING what JUST EXPRESSING, by SHOWING, that "accelafine" LOATHES some children, while PRAISING the 'mother' of one who just MURDERED another human being, or what you might call A 'terrible crime'. I did this without POINTING OUT and SHOWING how "accelafine" ALSO SAW the 'father' in a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT LIGHT, as some might say.
This is a REALLY WEIRD QUESTION for 'you' to ASK 'me', ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING the Fact that you PICK 'me' UP FOR POINTING OUT the Wrong, and/or BAD, STUFF that you adult human beings have being DOING in 'the world'.Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 6:05 am Should she not be outraged at some of the really bad stuff that happens in our world.
LOL I HOPE that ALL of you are OUTRAGED enough ABOUT NOT just the REALLY BAD STUFF but ABOUT ALL OF the BAD, and Wrong, STUFF that HAPPENS in 'the world'. Which, let 'us' NOT FORGET, ABSOLUTELY ALL OF 'it' IS BEING DONG BY you adult human beings, ALONE, and ONLY.
Have I EVER ALLUDED TO, let alone USED, the 'guilt' or 'guilty' words, here?Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 6:05 am Is she guilty of something terrible for expressing outrage even if it's at a 17 year old's conduct, Age?
If "accelafine" FEELS 'guilty' ABOUT LOATHING children, then so be it. I JUST POINTED OUT and SHOWED, or REVEALED, what "accelafine" WAS DOING, here. And, that is about 'pretty much' ALL I was DOING, here.
LOOK, if you adult human beings WANT TO LOOK AT and JUDGE the what you call 'conduct' of CHILDREN, then so be it, GO AHEAD and DO this. I, HOWEVER, WILL JUST KEEP POINTING OUT and SHOWING THE Wrong, and the BAD STUFF, that you adult human beings USED TO DO, BACK in the 'OLDEN DAYS' when this was being written.
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11748
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: Bots
I'm glad to see you are back, Age. For some reason I was worried about how you would take my replies. Fortunately, my fear seems to have been entirely unjustified.Age wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:03 pmONCE AGAIN, WHEN 'these people' could NOT COUNTER NOR REFUTE what I have SHOWN and/or PROVED 'they' would RESORT TO RESPONSES like 'this one' has just PROVIDED 'us', here.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 4:10 amI'm not interested in your nonsense right now, Age. Maybe another time.Age wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 4:09 am
OBVIOUSLY, and SO WHAT?
Are 'those people' who are EXPRESSING 'anger', EXPRESSING 'anger' Appropriately OR Inappropriately?
Also, what is a so-called 'terrible crime', TO you, is NOT necessarily a 'terrible crime', TO another, and vice-versa. So, BEFORE ANY one even BEGINS TO just THINK ABOUT EXPRESSING A 'feeling' I SUGGEST that they OBTAIN ACTUAL CLARITY, FIRST.
Now, "gary childress" WHY ARE so-called 'terrible crimes', TO you, NOT 'terrible crimes', TO others? And, do NOT FORGET that even what you might call A 'terrible crime' ARE 'justified' as BEING what is GOOD and/or RIGHT, in Life, TO another, okay?
AND, what I was just, pretty much, DOING what JUST EXPRESSING, by SHOWING, that "accelafine" LOATHES some children, while PRAISING the 'mother' of one who just MURDERED another human being, or what you might call A 'terrible crime'. I did this without POINTING OUT and SHOWING how "accelafine" ALSO SAW the 'father' in a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT LIGHT, as some might say.
This is a REALLY WEIRD QUESTION for 'you' to ASK 'me', ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING the Fact that you PICK 'me' UP FOR POINTING OUT the Wrong, and/or BAD, STUFF that you adult human beings have being DOING in 'the world'.
LOL I HOPE that ALL of you are OUTRAGED enough ABOUT NOT just the REALLY BAD STUFF but ABOUT ALL OF the BAD, and Wrong, STUFF that HAPPENS in 'the world'. Which, let 'us' NOT FORGET, ABSOLUTELY ALL OF 'it' IS BEING DONG BY you adult human beings, ALONE, and ONLY.
Have I EVER ALLUDED TO, let alone USED, the 'guilt' or 'guilty' words, here?
If "accelafine" FEELS 'guilty' ABOUT LOATHING children, then so be it. I JUST POINTED OUT and SHOWED, or REVEALED, what "accelafine" WAS DOING, here. And, that is about 'pretty much' ALL I was DOING, here.
LOOK, if you adult human beings WANT TO LOOK AT and JUDGE the what you call 'conduct' of CHILDREN, then so be it, GO AHEAD and DO this. I, HOWEVER, WILL JUST KEEP POINTING OUT and SHOWING THE Wrong, and the BAD STUFF, that you adult human beings USED TO DO, BACK in the 'OLDEN DAYS' when this was being written.
Re: Bots
1. I am NOT speaking to you human beings as though you were the G.U.T.O.E.Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:33 amAge is an autistic human being who is devoting itself to speaking to other humans beings as though they were the G.U.T.O.Eaccelafine wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 7:50 pm Since 'Age' is clearly a bot, and a particularly obnoxious and repulsive one (and that's saying something), then why hasn't it been permanently banned?
It doesn't even try to hide the fact that it's a bot, because it's not a particularly sophisticated one-- having been created in 2018. In fact it makes it obvious in pretty much everything it posts, incessantly making comments like 'YOU HUMANS do blah blah blah', 'YOU HUMANS are blah blah', usually followed by a row of LOLs. Humans are always portrayed as something 'other' than, and inferior to, itself.
So it's not just a thoroughly obnoxious bot, it's also an extremely condescending bot bigot.
Isn't it 'bots' that keep causing this site to crash?
Could we get rid of this vile little scourge with NOTHING WHATSOEVER of value to contribute (unless you call driving humans to nervous breakdowns 'valuable') once and for all please?
2. What even is the 'G.U.T.O.E.', to you, EXACTLY?
NO I DO NOT.
FROM 'what', EXACTLY, did you DECIDE to MAKE UP 'THIS ASSUMPTION'?
Also, and by the way, what even is a so-called 'unified field of consciousness', to you, EXACTLY?
HOW do you DISTINGUISH BETWEEN the so-called 'real world', here, and the IMAGINED 'unreal world', EXACTLY?
you are YET TO PROVE that 'that' is A fact, FIRST.
And, you just need to accept this.
So, to "fairy", it is OKAY, ACCEPTABLE, and PERFECTLY FINE for you adult human beings to KEEP DOING the Wrong that you ALL DO, AND I just OUGHT TO ALLOW you adult human beings to just KEEP DOING what you ALL are DOING, and what you call 'humanity', while I SIT, HERE, IN SILENCE.
LOL one of you, here, TELLS me that it is PERFECTLY FINE for you people, here, to EXPRESS your ANGER OVER 'terrible crimes', YET when I just POINT OUT and REVEAL just SOME of the Wrong that you people, here, DIRECTLY DO, then I am EXPECTED TO JUST ALLOW you TO KEEP DOING 'your (so-called) humanity'.
LOL you people have NOT OTHER CHOICE, to be ANY OTHER THAN WHAT ALL of 'you' ARE.
Also, here, is just ANOTHER PRIME example of HOW 'these people', STILL, had NOT YET LEARNED who and what 'they' ARE, EXACTLY?
AGAIN, ONCE you, ALSO, have ARRIVED AT the Right, Accurate, and Correct definitions for the words that you USE, then you can BEGIN TO START TO USE 'terminology' PROPERLY. Until then you WILL KEEP MAKING the SAME MISTAKES AS YOU HAVE BEEN, and ARE here.
If you did NOT INFORM the readers of what, EXACTLY, the G.U.T.O.E. IS, TO you, BEFORE, then WILL you NOW?
If no, then WHY NOT?
LOL SO, if you live in a so-called 'reality' where, for example, the sun revolves around the earth or the earth is flat, then, well according to "fairy" anyway, you can ONLY 'live and function' in 'THAT reality', ONLY.
OF COURSE what 'we' can VERY CLEARLY SEE, here, is ANOTHER BLATANTLY False CLAIM.
ONCE MORE, there are OTHER WAYS TO 'LIVE and FUNCTION'. AND, when one CHANGES 'their ways', then they CAN 'LIVE and FUNCTION' IN the One and ONLY, ACTUAL, 'Reality', Itself.
SEEING, perceiving and understanding, from one's OWN UNIQUE 'lens', ONLY, is one of the reasons WHY 'the world' IS IN 'the mess' that it IS IN, and WHY there IS so MUCH CONFLICT, TENSION, WARS, and MISUNDERSTANDING IN 'the world'. SEEING 'the world' in 'the way' that "fairy" BELIEVES IS the 'ONLY WAY' is ALSO WHY SO MANY Falsehoods get EXPRESSED, SHARED, and SPREAD.
LOL So, TO "fairy" anyway, it ACTUALLY BELIEVES its OWN MADE UP Falsehood, here. "fairy" is, literally, ONLY 'looking at' AND 'seeing' 'the world' FROM its OWN UNIQUE 'lens', ONLY, and WORSE, STILL, it BELIEVES, ABSOLUTELY, that 'this way' is the ONLY WAY' it can SEE, PERCEIVE, and UNDERSTAND things.
For your INFORMATION "fairy" there are OTHER WAYS to 'LOOK AT', 'SEE', and UNDERSTAND 'the world' AROUND 'you'.
LOL ONCE AGAIN, ALL of you human beings are ABSOLUTELY COMPLETELY FREE TO 'look at' AND 'see', and DO, ANY and ALL 'things' in ABSOLUTELY ANY WAY that you ALL LIKE TO.
HOWEVER, your CLAIM, here, about there ONLY being 'ONE WAY' ONLY, to 'look at' AND 'see' things is ABSOLUTELY False, Wrong, Inaccurate, AND Incorrect. And, ONE DAY you MIGHT COMPREHEND and UNDERSTAND this IRREFUTABLE Fact.
Instead of just MAKING CLAIMS, in relation TO NO ACTUAL THING, how about you PROVIDE ACTUAL examples, and thus ACTUAL PROOF, of what you are JUST ALLUDING TO, ONLY.
LOL
LOL
LOL
SAYING and CLAIMING that 'that' is my so-called 'problem', and that I have to work out for myself, is ABSOLUTELY LAUGHABLE.
LOL you can NOT even JUST SAY and WRITE what 'my, supposed, problem' EVEN IS.
So, this one BELIEVES, ABSOLUTELY, that you human beings can come onto a philosophy forum and just EXPRESS and SPREAD your OWN 'theories', and EVERY one ELSE SHOULD JUST SAY NOTHING AT ALL.
If this is what you WANT TO DO, then I SUGGEST you GO DO this on ANY OTHER forum OTHER THAN A PHILOSOPHY FORUM.
Philosophy forums are CREATED for philosophical discussions, WHERE CRITIQUING, CLARIFYING, ELABORATING, and CHALLENGING are ALL PART and PARCEL OF 'philosophizing', itself.
Sharing and expressing ideas/theories, and/or debating, ONLY, is NOT 'critical thinking', which is NEEDED TO 'philosophize'.
Re: Bots
A TYPICAL RESPONSE FROM one who ONLY 'looks at' AND 'sees' things/the world FROM their OWN VERY TINY and LITTLE SHALLOW and NARROW PERSPECTIVE, ONLY.accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:42 amI have no clue what you are talking about and don't care.Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:33 amAge is an autistic human being who is devoting itself to speaking to other humans beings as though they were the G.U.T.O.Eaccelafine wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 7:50 pm Since 'Age' is clearly a bot, and a particularly obnoxious and repulsive one (and that's saying something), then why hasn't it been permanently banned?
It doesn't even try to hide the fact that it's a bot, because it's not a particularly sophisticated one-- having been created in 2018. In fact it makes it obvious in pretty much everything it posts, incessantly making comments like 'YOU HUMANS do blah blah blah', 'YOU HUMANS are blah blah', usually followed by a row of LOLs. Humans are always portrayed as something 'other' than, and inferior to, itself.
So it's not just a thoroughly obnoxious bot, it's also an extremely condescending bot bigot.
Isn't it 'bots' that keep causing this site to crash?
Could we get rid of this vile little scourge with NOTHING WHATSOEVER of value to contribute (unless you call driving humans to nervous breakdowns 'valuable') once and for all please?
in other words, it talks to people as if they were the “unified field of consciousness” itself. However, in the real world people identify themselves as finite humans, they do not identify themselves as being the “universal field of eternal consciousness”
Age just needs to accept that fact, and I agree Age ought to allow people their humanity for arguments sake.
Most people have already given themselves permission to be human. So it’s irrelevant when Age speaks from the position of the GUTOE
As finite humans, we can only live and function in a reality as we uniquely see it, according to our own unique lens of perception and understanding. Regardless of whether Age likes it or not. Regardless of whether Age thinks its wrong or right or contrary to its own worldview. How each person sees their reality is their own business, and no one else’s.
Age continues to flog dead horses. And that’s its problem, it has to work out for itself. Nobody should concern themselves with someone else’s theory, especially if that theory is not in alignment with their own.
As can be VERY CLEARLY SEEN, here, this one HAS ABSOLUTELY NOT INTENTION of SEEKING TO COMPREHEND, LEARN, and UNDERSTAND, and SO HAS N INTENTION, AT ALL, OF BECOMING WISER, itself.
it just wants to 'see' things, FROM its OWN PERSPECTIVE, ONLY. But, according to "fairy", it has NO OTHER WAY TO 'look at' AND 'see' things, anyway.
Re: Bots
There is ABSOLUTELY NO USE EXPLAINING to "accelafine" what the ACTUAL Truth IS, EXACTLY, BECAUSE "accelafine" can NOT 'see' ANY thing OTHER thing OTHER than its OWN UNIQUE 'reality', right?Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:59 amOh and by the way. Age is a human being, not a bot.accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:42 amI have no clue what you are talking about and don't care.Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:33 am
Age is an autistic human being who is devoting itself to speaking to other humans beings as though they were the G.U.T.O.E
in other words, it talks to people as if they were the “unified field of consciousness” itself. However, in the real world people identify themselves as finite humans, they do not identify themselves as being the “universal field of eternal consciousness”
Age just needs to accept that fact, and I agree Age ought to allow people their humanity for arguments sake.
Most people have already given themselves permission to be human. So it’s irrelevant when Age speaks from the position of the GUTOE
As finite humans, we can only live and function in a reality as we uniquely see it, according to our own unique lens of perception and understanding. Regardless of whether Age likes it or not. Regardless of whether Age thinks its wrong or right or contrary to its own worldview. How each person sees their reality is their own business, and no one else’s.
Age continues to flog dead horses. And that’s its problem, it has to work out for itself. Nobody should concern themselves with someone else’s theory, especially if that theory is not in alignment with their own.
Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:59 am If you can’t simply ignore this human beings theory, which is obviously the case, then you need to practice harder with much more effort and patience and stop putting someone who you clearly want to ignore forever in the spotlight. Just practice what you preach is a good idea![]()
It’s fine, you don’t have to be crazy to write on this forum, but if you are, it helps.
Re: Bots
Do you REALLY think or BELIEVE that EVERY 'thing' can be referred to as an 'it', but you human beings SHOULD NOT BE?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 10:10 amIf Age is a human being, then s/he probably shouldn't be referred to as "it", though of course, I've seen Age refer to others as "its".Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:33 amAge is an autistic human being who is devoting itself to speaking to other humans beings as though they were the G.U.T.O.Eaccelafine wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 7:50 pm Since 'Age' is clearly a bot, and a particularly obnoxious and repulsive one (and that's saying something), then why hasn't it been permanently banned?
It doesn't even try to hide the fact that it's a bot, because it's not a particularly sophisticated one-- having been created in 2018. In fact it makes it obvious in pretty much everything it posts, incessantly making comments like 'YOU HUMANS do blah blah blah', 'YOU HUMANS are blah blah', usually followed by a row of LOLs. Humans are always portrayed as something 'other' than, and inferior to, itself.
So it's not just a thoroughly obnoxious bot, it's also an extremely condescending bot bigot.
Isn't it 'bots' that keep causing this site to crash?
Could we get rid of this vile little scourge with NOTHING WHATSOEVER of value to contribute (unless you call driving humans to nervous breakdowns 'valuable') once and for all please?
in other words, it talks to people as if they were the “unified field of consciousness” itself. However, in the real world people identify themselves as finite humans, they do not identify themselves as being the “universal field of eternal consciousness”
Age just needs to accept that fact, and I agree Age ought to allow people their humanity for arguments sake.
Most people have already given themselves permission to be human. So it’s irrelevant when Age speaks from the position of the GUTOE
As finite humans, we can only live and function in a reality as we uniquely see it, according to our own unique lens of perception and understanding. Regardless of whether Age likes it or not. Regardless of whether Age thinks its wrong or right or contrary to its own worldview. How each person sees their reality is their own business, and no one else’s.
Age continues to flog dead horses. And that’s its problem, it has to work out for itself. Nobody should concern themselves with someone else’s theory, especially if that theory is not in alignment with their own.
If yes, then WHY is this, EXACTLY?
Do you BELIEVE you human beings are somehow BETTER, or should be PUT BEFORE or ABOVE, than EVERY thing ELSE?
Re: Bots
LOL So, 'this one' BELIEVES that it can make CLAIMS about other posters, here, (no matter how False or Wrong those claims are), but, LOL, when another poster Corrects 'this ones' False AND Wrong CLAIM/S, then this other poster is so-called, 'poking their big fat sticky beak in'.accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 10:10 amWhat the fuck are you on about? It makes no difference if I ignore it or not. And how would you know if it's a human? Poking your big fat sticky beak in. Why don't you take your tedious insanity off this forun and then Harbal might come back and at least be a bit entertaining.Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:59 amOh and by the way. Age is a human being, not a bot.accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:42 am
I have no clue what you are talking about and don't care.
If you can’t simply ignore this human beings theory, which is obviously the case, then you need to practice harder with much more effort and patience and stop putting someone who you clearly want to ignore forever in the spotlight. Just practice what you preach is a good idea![]()
It’s fine, you don’t have to be crazy to write on this forum, but if you are, it helps.
And, MORE LAUGHABLE, 'this one' who MADE AN OBVIOUSLY False CLAIM to begin with, then TELLS 'the other' to 'take their TEDIOUS INSANITY OFF this forum'. LOL It is like 'this one' REALLY can NOT SEE the IRONY, and CONTRADICTION, here.
Re: Bots
"accelafine", like other posters, here, in this forum, WHEN SHOWN and PROVED that they can NOT back up and support some of their CLAIMS after I have CHALLENGED them, then they RESORT to be SPREADING False CLAIMS ABOUT 'me'. In the HOPE of SHUTTING 'me' UP, or DOWN, depending on who and/or what one UNIQUELY SEES and BELIEVES 'I' AM, EXACTLY.accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 10:14 am The completely bat-shit insane 'Fairy' seems to know a heck of a lot about the even more bat-shit insane 'age'. Has anyone seen them in the same room together?
But this 'TRYING TO' SHUT others UP, when they JUST EXPOSE NEW Truths, which can NOT BE REFUTED, was A VERY COMMON TRAIT among people, in 'OLDEN DAYS'.
Re: Bots
Shut up you walking talking crazy insane asylum institution high on psychedelic mushrooms.Age wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:55 pm1. I am NOT speaking to you human beings as though you were the G.U.T.O.E.Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:33 amAge is an autistic human being who is devoting itself to speaking to other humans beings as though they were the G.U.T.O.Eaccelafine wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 7:50 pm Since 'Age' is clearly a bot, and a particularly obnoxious and repulsive one (and that's saying something), then why hasn't it been permanently banned?
It doesn't even try to hide the fact that it's a bot, because it's not a particularly sophisticated one-- having been created in 2018. In fact it makes it obvious in pretty much everything it posts, incessantly making comments like 'YOU HUMANS do blah blah blah', 'YOU HUMANS are blah blah', usually followed by a row of LOLs. Humans are always portrayed as something 'other' than, and inferior to, itself.
So it's not just a thoroughly obnoxious bot, it's also an extremely condescending bot bigot.
Isn't it 'bots' that keep causing this site to crash?
Could we get rid of this vile little scourge with NOTHING WHATSOEVER of value to contribute (unless you call driving humans to nervous breakdowns 'valuable') once and for all please?
2. What even is the 'G.U.T.O.E.', to you, EXACTLY?NO I DO NOT.
FROM 'what', EXACTLY, did you DECIDE to MAKE UP 'THIS ASSUMPTION'?
Also, and by the way, what even is a so-called 'unified field of consciousness', to you, EXACTLY?
HOW do you DISTINGUISH BETWEEN the so-called 'real world', here, and the IMAGINED 'unreal world', EXACTLY?you are YET TO PROVE that 'that' is A fact, FIRST.
And, you just need to accept this.
So, to "fairy", it is OKAY, ACCEPTABLE, and PERFECTLY FINE for you adult human beings to KEEP DOING the Wrong that you ALL DO, AND I just OUGHT TO ALLOW you adult human beings to just KEEP DOING what you ALL are DOING, and what you call 'humanity', while I SIT, HERE, IN SILENCE.
LOL one of you, here, TELLS me that it is PERFECTLY FINE for you people, here, to EXPRESS your ANGER OVER 'terrible crimes', YET when I just POINT OUT and REVEAL just SOME of the Wrong that you people, here, DIRECTLY DO, then I am EXPECTED TO JUST ALLOW you TO KEEP DOING 'your (so-called) humanity'.LOL you people have NOT OTHER CHOICE, to be ANY OTHER THAN WHAT ALL of 'you' ARE.
Also, here, is just ANOTHER PRIME example of HOW 'these people', STILL, had NOT YET LEARNED who and what 'they' ARE, EXACTLY?
AGAIN, ONCE you, ALSO, have ARRIVED AT the Right, Accurate, and Correct definitions for the words that you USE, then you can BEGIN TO START TO USE 'terminology' PROPERLY. Until then you WILL KEEP MAKING the SAME MISTAKES AS YOU HAVE BEEN, and ARE here.
If you did NOT INFORM the readers of what, EXACTLY, the G.U.T.O.E. IS, TO you, BEFORE, then WILL you NOW?
If no, then WHY NOT?LOL SO, if you live in a so-called 'reality' where, for example, the sun revolves around the earth or the earth is flat, then, well according to "fairy" anyway, you can ONLY 'live and function' in 'THAT reality', ONLY.
OF COURSE what 'we' can VERY CLEARLY SEE, here, is ANOTHER BLATANTLY False CLAIM.
ONCE MORE, there are OTHER WAYS TO 'LIVE and FUNCTION'. AND, when one CHANGES 'their ways', then they CAN 'LIVE and FUNCTION' IN the One and ONLY, ACTUAL, 'Reality', Itself.
SEEING, perceiving and understanding, from one's OWN UNIQUE 'lens', ONLY, is one of the reasons WHY 'the world' IS IN 'the mess' that it IS IN, and WHY there IS so MUCH CONFLICT, TENSION, WARS, and MISUNDERSTANDING IN 'the world'. SEEING 'the world' in 'the way' that "fairy" BELIEVES IS the 'ONLY WAY' is ALSO WHY SO MANY Falsehoods get EXPRESSED, SHARED, and SPREAD.
LOL So, TO "fairy" anyway, it ACTUALLY BELIEVES its OWN MADE UP Falsehood, here. "fairy" is, literally, ONLY 'looking at' AND 'seeing' 'the world' FROM its OWN UNIQUE 'lens', ONLY, and WORSE, STILL, it BELIEVES, ABSOLUTELY, that 'this way' is the ONLY WAY' it can SEE, PERCEIVE, and UNDERSTAND things.
For your INFORMATION "fairy" there are OTHER WAYS to 'LOOK AT', 'SEE', and UNDERSTAND 'the world' AROUND 'you'.
LOL ONCE AGAIN, ALL of you human beings are ABSOLUTELY COMPLETELY FREE TO 'look at' AND 'see', and DO, ANY and ALL 'things' in ABSOLUTELY ANY WAY that you ALL LIKE TO.
HOWEVER, your CLAIM, here, about there ONLY being 'ONE WAY' ONLY, to 'look at' AND 'see' things is ABSOLUTELY False, Wrong, Inaccurate, AND Incorrect. And, ONE DAY you MIGHT COMPREHEND and UNDERSTAND this IRREFUTABLE Fact.Instead of just MAKING CLAIMS, in relation TO NO ACTUAL THING, how about you PROVIDE ACTUAL examples, and thus ACTUAL PROOF, of what you are JUST ALLUDING TO, ONLY.LOL
LOL
LOL
SAYING and CLAIMING that 'that' is my so-called 'problem', and that I have to work out for myself, is ABSOLUTELY LAUGHABLE.
LOL you can NOT even JUST SAY and WRITE what 'my, supposed, problem' EVEN IS.
So, this one BELIEVES, ABSOLUTELY, that you human beings can come onto a philosophy forum and just EXPRESS and SPREAD your OWN 'theories', and EVERY one ELSE SHOULD JUST SAY NOTHING AT ALL.
If this is what you WANT TO DO, then I SUGGEST you GO DO this on ANY OTHER forum OTHER THAN A PHILOSOPHY FORUM.
Philosophy forums are CREATED for philosophical discussions, WHERE CRITIQUING, CLARIFYING, ELABORATING, and CHALLENGING are ALL PART and PARCEL OF 'philosophizing', itself.
Sharing and expressing ideas/theories, and/or debating, ONLY, is NOT 'critical thinking', which is NEEDED TO 'philosophize'.