People express anger when they see others commit terrible crimes. That's pretty much what Accelafine was doing. Should she not be outraged at some of the really bad stuff that happens in our world. Is she guilty of something terrible for expressing outrage even if it's at a 17 year old's conduct, Age?Age wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 3:37 amIF I am causing so-called GRIEVE, here, then this is BECAUSE I am JUST POINTING OUT your Falsehoods, JUST SHOWING your INABILITY TO back up and support your CLAIMS, while ALSO EXPOSING HOW 'you' ARE, EXACTLY.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 3:26 amThe only one causing grief on this forum is you, Age. Now go on your merry way and leave others alone.Age wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 3:20 am
EXCEPT you ones, here, are NOT 'children'. Or, are 'you'?
Are you RESPONSIBLE ADULT human beings? Or, are 'you' CHILDREN? And, if you FEEL like you are being put through so-called 'guilt hell', then WHY is 'this', EXACTLY?
Obviously, if one has done NOTHING Wrong AT ALL, then WHY would they being feeling GUILTY, AT ALL.
And, 'TRYING TO' BLAME ANOTHER for what 'you', adult human beings, DO is NOT HELPING 'you' NOR ANY one ELSE, here.
AGAIN, I WILL SUGGEST that ANY and EVERY one, here, ONLY MAKES A CLAIM AFTER they have the ACTUAL IRREFUTABLE PROOF that CAN and WILL back up AND support the CLAIM.
REALLY, it does NOT GET MUCH SIMPLER, EASIER, and CLEARER than this.
Bots
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11746
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: Bots
Re: Bots
OBVIOUSLY, and SO WHAT?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 3:46 amPeople express anger when they see others commit terrible crimes.Age wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 3:37 amIF I am causing so-called GRIEVE, here, then this is BECAUSE I am JUST POINTING OUT your Falsehoods, JUST SHOWING your INABILITY TO back up and support your CLAIMS, while ALSO EXPOSING HOW 'you' ARE, EXACTLY.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 3:26 am
The only one causing grief on this forum is you, Age. Now go on your merry way and leave others alone.
AGAIN, I WILL SUGGEST that ANY and EVERY one, here, ONLY MAKES A CLAIM AFTER they have the ACTUAL IRREFUTABLE PROOF that CAN and WILL back up AND support the CLAIM.
REALLY, it does NOT GET MUCH SIMPLER, EASIER, and CLEARER than this.
Are 'those people' who are EXPRESSING 'anger', EXPRESSING 'anger' Appropriately OR Inappropriately?
Also, what is a so-called 'terrible crime', TO you, is NOT necessarily a 'terrible crime', TO another, and vice-versa. So, BEFORE ANY one even BEGINS TO just THINK ABOUT EXPRESSING A 'feeling' I SUGGEST that they OBTAIN ACTUAL CLARITY, FIRST.
Now, "gary childress" WHY ARE so-called 'terrible crimes', TO you, NOT 'terrible crimes', TO others? And, do NOT FORGET that even what you might call A 'terrible crime' ARE 'justified' as BEING what is GOOD and/or RIGHT, in Life, TO another, okay?
AND, what I was just, pretty much, DOING what JUST EXPRESSING, by SHOWING, that "accelafine" LOATHES some children, while PRAISING the 'mother' of one who just MURDERED another human being, or what you might call A 'terrible crime'. I did this without POINTING OUT and SHOWING how "accelafine" ALSO SAW the 'father' in a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT LIGHT, as some might say.
This is a REALLY WEIRD QUESTION for 'you' to ASK 'me', ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING the Fact that you PICK 'me' UP FOR POINTING OUT the Wrong, and/or BAD, STUFF that you adult human beings have being DOING in 'the world'.Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 6:05 am Should she not be outraged at some of the really bad stuff that happens in our world.
LOL I HOPE that ALL of you are OUTRAGED enough ABOUT NOT just the REALLY BAD STUFF but ABOUT ALL OF the BAD, and Wrong, STUFF that HAPPENS in 'the world'. Which, let 'us' NOT FORGET, ABSOLUTELY ALL OF 'it' IS BEING DONG BY you adult human beings, ALONE, and ONLY.
Have I EVER ALLUDED TO, let alone USED, the 'guilt' or 'guilty' words, here?Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 6:05 am Is she guilty of something terrible for expressing outrage even if it's at a 17 year old's conduct, Age?
If "accelafine" FEELS 'guilty' ABOUT LOATHING children, then so be it. I JUST POINTED OUT and SHOWED, or REVEALED, what "accelafine" WAS DOING, here. And, that is about 'pretty much' ALL I was DOING, here.
LOOK, if you adult human beings WANT TO LOOK AT and JUDGE the what you call 'conduct' of CHILDREN, then so be it, GO AHEAD and DO this. I, HOWEVER, WILL JUST KEEP POINTING OUT and SHOWING THE Wrong, and the BAD STUFF, that you adult human beings USED TO DO, BACK in the 'OLDEN DAYS' when this was being written.
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11746
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: Bots
I'm not interested in your nonsense right now, Age. Maybe another time.Age wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 4:09 amOBVIOUSLY, and SO WHAT?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 3:46 amPeople express anger when they see others commit terrible crimes.Age wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 3:37 am
IF I am causing so-called GRIEVE, here, then this is BECAUSE I am JUST POINTING OUT your Falsehoods, JUST SHOWING your INABILITY TO back up and support your CLAIMS, while ALSO EXPOSING HOW 'you' ARE, EXACTLY.
AGAIN, I WILL SUGGEST that ANY and EVERY one, here, ONLY MAKES A CLAIM AFTER they have the ACTUAL IRREFUTABLE PROOF that CAN and WILL back up AND support the CLAIM.
REALLY, it does NOT GET MUCH SIMPLER, EASIER, and CLEARER than this.
Are 'those people' who are EXPRESSING 'anger', EXPRESSING 'anger' Appropriately OR Inappropriately?
Also, what is a so-called 'terrible crime', TO you, is NOT necessarily a 'terrible crime', TO another, and vice-versa. So, BEFORE ANY one even BEGINS TO just THINK ABOUT EXPRESSING A 'feeling' I SUGGEST that they OBTAIN ACTUAL CLARITY, FIRST.
Now, "gary childress" WHY ARE so-called 'terrible crimes', TO you, NOT 'terrible crimes', TO others? And, do NOT FORGET that even what you might call A 'terrible crime' ARE 'justified' as BEING what is GOOD and/or RIGHT, in Life, TO another, okay?AND, what I was just, pretty much, DOING what JUST EXPRESSING, by SHOWING, that "accelafine" LOATHES some children, while PRAISING the 'mother' of one who just MURDERED another human being, or what you might call A 'terrible crime'. I did this without POINTING OUT and SHOWING how "accelafine" ALSO SAW the 'father' in a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT LIGHT, as some might say.
This is a REALLY WEIRD QUESTION for 'you' to ASK 'me', ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING the Fact that you PICK 'me' UP FOR POINTING OUT the Wrong, and/or BAD, STUFF that you adult human beings have being DOING in 'the world'.Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 6:05 am Should she not be outraged at some of the really bad stuff that happens in our world.
LOL I HOPE that ALL of you are OUTRAGED enough ABOUT NOT just the REALLY BAD STUFF but ABOUT ALL OF the BAD, and Wrong, STUFF that HAPPENS in 'the world'. Which, let 'us' NOT FORGET, ABSOLUTELY ALL OF 'it' IS BEING DONG BY you adult human beings, ALONE, and ONLY.
Have I EVER ALLUDED TO, let alone USED, the 'guilt' or 'guilty' words, here?Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Fri Jan 31, 2025 6:05 am Is she guilty of something terrible for expressing outrage even if it's at a 17 year old's conduct, Age?
If "accelafine" FEELS 'guilty' ABOUT LOATHING children, then so be it. I JUST POINTED OUT and SHOWED, or REVEALED, what "accelafine" WAS DOING, here. And, that is about 'pretty much' ALL I was DOING, here.
LOOK, if you adult human beings WANT TO LOOK AT and JUDGE the what you call 'conduct' of CHILDREN, then so be it, GO AHEAD and DO this. I, HOWEVER, WILL JUST KEEP POINTING OUT and SHOWING THE Wrong, and the BAD STUFF, that you adult human beings USED TO DO, BACK in the 'OLDEN DAYS' when this was being written.
Re: Bots
Age is an autistic human being who is devoting itself to speaking to other humans beings as though they were the G.U.T.O.Eaccelafine wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 7:50 pm Since 'Age' is clearly a bot, and a particularly obnoxious and repulsive one (and that's saying something), then why hasn't it been permanently banned?
It doesn't even try to hide the fact that it's a bot, because it's not a particularly sophisticated one-- having been created in 2018. In fact it makes it obvious in pretty much everything it posts, incessantly making comments like 'YOU HUMANS do blah blah blah', 'YOU HUMANS are blah blah', usually followed by a row of LOLs. Humans are always portrayed as something 'other' than, and inferior to, itself.
So it's not just a thoroughly obnoxious bot, it's also an extremely condescending bot bigot.
Isn't it 'bots' that keep causing this site to crash?
Could we get rid of this vile little scourge with NOTHING WHATSOEVER of value to contribute (unless you call driving humans to nervous breakdowns 'valuable') once and for all please?
in other words, it talks to people as if they were the “unified field of consciousness” itself. However, in the real world people identify themselves as finite humans, they do not identify themselves as being the “universal field of eternal consciousness”
Age just needs to accept that fact, and I agree Age ought to allow people their humanity for arguments sake.
Most people have already given themselves permission to be human. So it’s irrelevant when Age speaks from the position of the GUTOE
As finite humans, we can only live and function in a reality as we uniquely see it, according to our own unique lens of perception and understanding. Regardless of whether Age likes it or not. Regardless of whether Age thinks its wrong or right or contrary to its own worldview. How each person sees their reality is their own business, and no one else’s.
Age continues to flog dead horses. And that’s its problem, it has to work out for itself. Nobody should concern themselves with someone else’s theory, especially if that theory is not in alignment with their own.
- accelafine
- Posts: 5042
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: Bots
I have no clue what you are talking about and don't care.Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:33 amAge is an autistic human being who is devoting itself to speaking to other humans beings as though they were the G.U.T.O.Eaccelafine wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 7:50 pm Since 'Age' is clearly a bot, and a particularly obnoxious and repulsive one (and that's saying something), then why hasn't it been permanently banned?
It doesn't even try to hide the fact that it's a bot, because it's not a particularly sophisticated one-- having been created in 2018. In fact it makes it obvious in pretty much everything it posts, incessantly making comments like 'YOU HUMANS do blah blah blah', 'YOU HUMANS are blah blah', usually followed by a row of LOLs. Humans are always portrayed as something 'other' than, and inferior to, itself.
So it's not just a thoroughly obnoxious bot, it's also an extremely condescending bot bigot.
Isn't it 'bots' that keep causing this site to crash?
Could we get rid of this vile little scourge with NOTHING WHATSOEVER of value to contribute (unless you call driving humans to nervous breakdowns 'valuable') once and for all please?
in other words, it talks to people as if they were the “unified field of consciousness” itself. However, in the real world people identify themselves as finite humans, they do not identify themselves as being the “universal field of eternal consciousness”
Age just needs to accept that fact, and I agree Age ought to allow people their humanity for arguments sake.
Most people have already given themselves permission to be human. So it’s irrelevant when Age speaks from the position of the GUTOE
As finite humans, we can only live and function in a reality as we uniquely see it, according to our own unique lens of perception and understanding. Regardless of whether Age likes it or not. Regardless of whether Age thinks its wrong or right or contrary to its own worldview. How each person sees their reality is their own business, and no one else’s.
Age continues to flog dead horses. And that’s its problem, it has to work out for itself. Nobody should concern themselves with someone else’s theory, especially if that theory is not in alignment with their own.
Re: Bots
You care enough to create a thread that will attract responses.accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:42 amI have no clue what you are talking about and don't care.Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:33 amAge is an autistic human being who is devoting itself to speaking to other humans beings as though they were the G.U.T.O.Eaccelafine wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 7:50 pm Since 'Age' is clearly a bot, and a particularly obnoxious and repulsive one (and that's saying something), then why hasn't it been permanently banned?
It doesn't even try to hide the fact that it's a bot, because it's not a particularly sophisticated one-- having been created in 2018. In fact it makes it obvious in pretty much everything it posts, incessantly making comments like 'YOU HUMANS do blah blah blah', 'YOU HUMANS are blah blah', usually followed by a row of LOLs. Humans are always portrayed as something 'other' than, and inferior to, itself.
So it's not just a thoroughly obnoxious bot, it's also an extremely condescending bot bigot.
Isn't it 'bots' that keep causing this site to crash?
Could we get rid of this vile little scourge with NOTHING WHATSOEVER of value to contribute (unless you call driving humans to nervous breakdowns 'valuable') once and for all please?
in other words, it talks to people as if they were the “unified field of consciousness” itself. However, in the real world people identify themselves as finite humans, they do not identify themselves as being the “universal field of eternal consciousness”
Age just needs to accept that fact, and I agree Age ought to allow people their humanity for arguments sake.
Most people have already given themselves permission to be human. So it’s irrelevant when Age speaks from the position of the GUTOE
As finite humans, we can only live and function in a reality as we uniquely see it, according to our own unique lens of perception and understanding. Regardless of whether Age likes it or not. Regardless of whether Age thinks its wrong or right or contrary to its own worldview. How each person sees their reality is their own business, and no one else’s.
Age continues to flog dead horses. And that’s its problem, it has to work out for itself. Nobody should concern themselves with someone else’s theory, especially if that theory is not in alignment with their own.
That you don’t care about responses you don’t understand is understandable.
I don’t care whether you know what I’m talking about or not, I’m just responding.
Re: Bots
Oh and by the way. Age is a human being, not a bot.accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:42 amI have no clue what you are talking about and don't care.Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:33 amAge is an autistic human being who is devoting itself to speaking to other humans beings as though they were the G.U.T.O.Eaccelafine wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 7:50 pm Since 'Age' is clearly a bot, and a particularly obnoxious and repulsive one (and that's saying something), then why hasn't it been permanently banned?
It doesn't even try to hide the fact that it's a bot, because it's not a particularly sophisticated one-- having been created in 2018. In fact it makes it obvious in pretty much everything it posts, incessantly making comments like 'YOU HUMANS do blah blah blah', 'YOU HUMANS are blah blah', usually followed by a row of LOLs. Humans are always portrayed as something 'other' than, and inferior to, itself.
So it's not just a thoroughly obnoxious bot, it's also an extremely condescending bot bigot.
Isn't it 'bots' that keep causing this site to crash?
Could we get rid of this vile little scourge with NOTHING WHATSOEVER of value to contribute (unless you call driving humans to nervous breakdowns 'valuable') once and for all please?
in other words, it talks to people as if they were the “unified field of consciousness” itself. However, in the real world people identify themselves as finite humans, they do not identify themselves as being the “universal field of eternal consciousness”
Age just needs to accept that fact, and I agree Age ought to allow people their humanity for arguments sake.
Most people have already given themselves permission to be human. So it’s irrelevant when Age speaks from the position of the GUTOE
As finite humans, we can only live and function in a reality as we uniquely see it, according to our own unique lens of perception and understanding. Regardless of whether Age likes it or not. Regardless of whether Age thinks its wrong or right or contrary to its own worldview. How each person sees their reality is their own business, and no one else’s.
Age continues to flog dead horses. And that’s its problem, it has to work out for itself. Nobody should concern themselves with someone else’s theory, especially if that theory is not in alignment with their own.
If you can’t simply ignore this human beings theory, which is obviously the case, then you need to practice harder with much more effort and patience and stop putting someone who you clearly want to ignore forever in the spotlight. Just practice what you preach is a good idea
It’s fine, you don’t have to be crazy to write on this forum, but if you are, it helps.
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11746
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: Bots
If Age is a human being, then s/he probably shouldn't be referred to as "it", though of course, I've seen Age refer to others as "its".Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:33 amAge is an autistic human being who is devoting itself to speaking to other humans beings as though they were the G.U.T.O.Eaccelafine wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 7:50 pm Since 'Age' is clearly a bot, and a particularly obnoxious and repulsive one (and that's saying something), then why hasn't it been permanently banned?
It doesn't even try to hide the fact that it's a bot, because it's not a particularly sophisticated one-- having been created in 2018. In fact it makes it obvious in pretty much everything it posts, incessantly making comments like 'YOU HUMANS do blah blah blah', 'YOU HUMANS are blah blah', usually followed by a row of LOLs. Humans are always portrayed as something 'other' than, and inferior to, itself.
So it's not just a thoroughly obnoxious bot, it's also an extremely condescending bot bigot.
Isn't it 'bots' that keep causing this site to crash?
Could we get rid of this vile little scourge with NOTHING WHATSOEVER of value to contribute (unless you call driving humans to nervous breakdowns 'valuable') once and for all please?
in other words, it talks to people as if they were the “unified field of consciousness” itself. However, in the real world people identify themselves as finite humans, they do not identify themselves as being the “universal field of eternal consciousness”
Age just needs to accept that fact, and I agree Age ought to allow people their humanity for arguments sake.
Most people have already given themselves permission to be human. So it’s irrelevant when Age speaks from the position of the GUTOE
As finite humans, we can only live and function in a reality as we uniquely see it, according to our own unique lens of perception and understanding. Regardless of whether Age likes it or not. Regardless of whether Age thinks its wrong or right or contrary to its own worldview. How each person sees their reality is their own business, and no one else’s.
Age continues to flog dead horses. And that’s its problem, it has to work out for itself. Nobody should concern themselves with someone else’s theory, especially if that theory is not in alignment with their own.
- accelafine
- Posts: 5042
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: Bots
What the fuck are you on about? It makes no difference if I ignore it or not. And how would you know if it's a human? Poking your big fat sticky beak in. Why don't you take your tedious insanity off this forun and then Harbal might come back and at least be a bit entertaining.Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:59 amOh and by the way. Age is a human being, not a bot.accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:42 amI have no clue what you are talking about and don't care.Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:33 am
Age is an autistic human being who is devoting itself to speaking to other humans beings as though they were the G.U.T.O.E
in other words, it talks to people as if they were the “unified field of consciousness” itself. However, in the real world people identify themselves as finite humans, they do not identify themselves as being the “universal field of eternal consciousness”
Age just needs to accept that fact, and I agree Age ought to allow people their humanity for arguments sake.
Most people have already given themselves permission to be human. So it’s irrelevant when Age speaks from the position of the GUTOE
As finite humans, we can only live and function in a reality as we uniquely see it, according to our own unique lens of perception and understanding. Regardless of whether Age likes it or not. Regardless of whether Age thinks its wrong or right or contrary to its own worldview. How each person sees their reality is their own business, and no one else’s.
Age continues to flog dead horses. And that’s its problem, it has to work out for itself. Nobody should concern themselves with someone else’s theory, especially if that theory is not in alignment with their own.
If you can’t simply ignore this human beings theory, which is obviously the case, then you need to practice harder with much more effort and patience and stop putting someone who you clearly want to ignore forever in the spotlight. Just practice what you preach is a good idea![]()
It’s fine, you don’t have to be crazy to write on this forum, but if you are, it helps.
Re: Bots
If Age is a bot, then Age could also be a human who has potentially written its own bot program.
Forum spambots surf the web looking for guestbooks, wikis, blogs, forums and any other web forms to submit spam links to. These spambots often use OCR technology to bypass CAPTCHAs present.
If this forum lacks the technological capacity or capability to eradicate spambots. Then I suggest you find a more suitable forum , preferably one that doesn’t have the capacity to render you of experiencing a mental breakdown.
If Age is a bot, then the problem is not Age, the problem is with the founder of the actual forum.
Forum spambots surf the web looking for guestbooks, wikis, blogs, forums and any other web forms to submit spam links to. These spambots often use OCR technology to bypass CAPTCHAs present.
If this forum lacks the technological capacity or capability to eradicate spambots. Then I suggest you find a more suitable forum , preferably one that doesn’t have the capacity to render you of experiencing a mental breakdown.
If Age is a bot, then the problem is not Age, the problem is with the founder of the actual forum.
- accelafine
- Posts: 5042
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: Bots
The completely bat-shit insane 'Fairy' seems to know a heck of a lot about the even more bat-shit insane 'age'. Has anyone seen them in the same room together?
- accelafine
- Posts: 5042
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: Bots
You just claimed that it's a human. Make up your mind you freakshow. And I don't see why I should leave because I'm being harassed by a rogue bot.Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 10:12 am If Age is a bot, then Age could also be a human who has potentially written its own bot program.
Forum spambots surf the web looking for guestbooks, wikis, blogs, forums and any other web forms to submit spam links to. These spambots often use OCR technology to bypass CAPTCHAs present.
If this forum lacks the technological capacity or capability to eradicate spambots. Then I suggest you find a more suitable forum , preferably one that doesn’t have the capacity to render you of experiencing a mental breakdown.
If Age is a bot, then the problem is not Age, the problem is with the founder of the actual forum.
Re: Bots
You’re only interested in being obnoxious on this forum and inciting conflict and confrontation, that’s obviously why you have created this thread.accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 10:10 amWhat the fuck are you on about? It makes no difference if I ignore it or not. And how would you know if it's a human? Poking your big fat sticky beak in. Why don't you take your tedious insanity off this forun and then Harbal might come back and at least be a bit entertaining.Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:59 amOh and by the way. Age is a human being, not a bot.accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:42 am
I have no clue what you are talking about and don't care.
If you can’t simply ignore this human beings theory, which is obviously the case, then you need to practice harder with much more effort and patience and stop putting someone who you clearly want to ignore forever in the spotlight. Just practice what you preach is a good idea![]()
It’s fine, you don’t have to be crazy to write on this forum, but if you are, it helps.
If you make your problem a thread topic then don’t be surprised if you get people sticking their beaks in.
Oh, I’m so surprised, oh look people are sticking their beaks into a thread I’ve deliberately created for that sole purpose.
Can you be any more obnoxious. Pot kettle person.
- accelafine
- Posts: 5042
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: Bots
You are so think it hurts. Now claiming to be able to read my mind? You can't even read your own mind.Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 10:17 amYou’re only interested in being obnoxious on this forum and inciting conflict and confrontation, that’s obviously why you have created this thread.accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 10:10 amWhat the fuck are you on about? It makes no difference if I ignore it or not. And how would you know if it's a human? Poking your big fat sticky beak in. Why don't you take your tedious insanity off this forun and then Harbal might come back and at least be a bit entertaining.Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:59 am
Oh and by the way. Age is a human being, not a bot.
If you can’t simply ignore this human beings theory, which is obviously the case, then you need to practice harder with much more effort and patience and stop putting someone who you clearly want to ignore forever in the spotlight. Just practice what you preach is a good idea![]()
It’s fine, you don’t have to be crazy to write on this forum, but if you are, it helps.
If you make your problem a thread topic then don’t be surprised if you get people sticking their beaks in.
Oh, I’m so surprised, oh look people are sticking their beaks into a thread I’ve deliberately created for that sole purpose.
Can you be any more obnoxious. Pot kettle person.
Re: Bots
You are so thick.accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 10:16 amYou just claimed that it's a human. Make up your mind you freakshow. And I don't see why I should leave because I'm being harassed by a rogue bot.Fairy wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 10:12 am If Age is a bot, then Age could also be a human who has potentially written its own bot program.
Forum spambots surf the web looking for guestbooks, wikis, blogs, forums and any other web forms to submit spam links to. These spambots often use OCR technology to bypass CAPTCHAs present.
If this forum lacks the technological capacity or capability to eradicate spambots. Then I suggest you find a more suitable forum , preferably one that doesn’t have the capacity to render you of experiencing a mental breakdown.
If Age is a bot, then the problem is not Age, the problem is with the founder of the actual forum.
Bot programs are all written by humans.
I can’t believe I’m having to explain this.