What is Dark Energy? FEB 05, 2024. By Chelsea Gohd.

[Cerveny]

Just as a moving elementary particle can appear as a wave, so too can moving (macro) matter appear as dark. In both cases it is a matter of pulling, of dragging the viscous structure of space, of aether I think :)

And how does one pull, or drag, the viscous structure of space, or of aether, exactly?

Also, what even is 'aether', and, 'space', exactly?

Aether is the substrate from which space / Universe is made. The Universe is a growing crystal of aether. It grows from the Future. Interface between Future and Past is Presence - quantum world, quantum “fire”. I think:)

[Age]

Could it be argued that dark energy is strictly nothing,

Yes.

I would be interested to see how nothing can be proven....

Okay.

[Age]

Just as a moving elementary particle can appear as a wave, so too can moving (macro) matter appear as dark. In both cases it is a matter of pulling, of dragging the viscous structure of space, of aether I think

And how does one pull, or drag, the viscous structure of space, or of aether, exactly?

Also, what even is 'aether', and, 'space', exactly?

Aether is the substrate from which space / Universe is made. The Universe is a growing crystal of aether. It grows from the Future. Interface between Future and Past is Presence - quantum world, quantum “fire”. I think:)

Space is not made from something else, but anyway I asked you what is 'aether', and, 'space', exactly.

[Cerveny]

….
Space is not made from something else, but anyway I asked you what is 'aether', and, 'space', exactly.

I asked you what is 'space' exactly ;) How can you claim something about the Space if you don't know what it is?

[attofishpi]

Could it be argued that dark energy is strictly nothing, and this nothingness is the raw potentiality that allows a thing to move for movement is strictly the occurence and dissolution of a distinction?

Personally I think the 'dark energy' is what operates below the Planck scale and provides our perceivable REAL IT Y...in fact, I believe it could be GOD.

[Eodnhoj7]

Could it be argued that dark energy is strictly nothing, and this nothingness is the raw potentiality that allows a thing to move for movement is strictly the occurence and dissolution of a distinction?

Personally I think the 'dark energy' is what operates below the Planck scale and provides our perceivable REAL IT Y...in fact, I believe it could be GOD.

It could be synonymous with the eastern concept of Tao.

[Age]

….
Space is not made from something else, but anyway I asked you what is 'aether', and, 'space', exactly.

I asked you what is 'space' exactly How can you claim something about the Space if you don't know what it is?

Why are 'you' CLAIMING that 'I' do not know what 'space' is, especially considering you just PROVED that you do not yet know what 'space' is, exactly?

you have also not yet informed the readers of what you think or believe 'aether' is, also

[Age]

Could it be argued that dark energy is strictly nothing, and this nothingness is the raw potentiality that allows a thing to move for movement is strictly the occurence and dissolution of a distinction?

Personally I think the 'dark energy' is what operates below the Planck scale and provides our perceivable REAL IT Y...in fact, I believe it could be GOD.

But that is NOT what God is, exactly. As I have ALREADY INFORMED you.

[Noax]

Just as a moving elementary particle can appear as a wave, so too can moving (macro) matter appear as dark. In both cases it is a matter of pulling, of dragging the viscous structure of space, of aether I think

It could be synonymous with the eastern concept of Tao.

Could it be argued that dark energy is strictly nothing,

Yes.

OK, all this I sort of expect from these respective posters. The next one not quite as expected.

Personally I think the 'dark energy' is what operates below the Planck scale and provides our perceivable REAL IT Y...in fact, I believe it could be GOD.

Take a random effect that one doesn't understand and just slap the 'god' label on it? I quite assure you that dark energy is in no way responsible for most of the effects normally attributed to gods.

[attofishpi]

Personally I think the 'dark energy' is what operates below the Planck scale and provides our perceivable REAL IT Y...in fact, I believe it could be GOD.

Take a random effect that one doesn't understand and just slap the 'god' label on it? I quite assure you that dark energy is in no way responsible for most of the effects normally attributed to gods.

I wonder if you had direct empirical observations of what this GOD entity is capable of for the past 27 years, permitting you to comprehend many of its attributes, whether you would permit yourself to theorise about from whence it operates?

[Eodnhoj7]

Just as a moving elementary particle can appear as a wave, so too can moving (macro) matter appear as dark. In both cases it is a matter of pulling, of dragging the viscous structure of space, of aether I think

It could be synonymous with the eastern concept of Tao.

Could it be argued that dark energy is strictly nothing,

Yes.

OK, all this I sort of expect from these respective posters. The next one not quite as expected.

Personally I think the 'dark energy' is what operates below the Planck scale and provides our perceivable REAL IT Y...in fact, I believe it could be GOD.

Take a random effect that one doesn't understand and just slap the 'god' label on it? I quite assure you that dark energy is in no way responsible for most of the effects normally attributed to gods.

Oh more critical judgement of others, what I expected from this poster.

[Age]

Just as a moving elementary particle can appear as a wave, so too can moving (macro) matter appear as dark. In both cases it is a matter of pulling, of dragging the viscous structure of space, of aether I think

It could be synonymous with the eastern concept of Tao.

Could it be argued that dark energy is strictly nothing,

Yes.

OK, all this I sort of expect from these respective posters.

Okay, this response is sort of expected, from this one.

The next one not quite as expected.

Personally I think the 'dark energy' is what operates below the Planck scale and provides our perceivable REAL IT Y...in fact, I believe it could be GOD.

Take a random effect that one doesn't understand and just slap the 'god' label on it? I quite assure you that dark energy is in no way responsible for most of the effects normally attributed to gods.

LOL

'Dark energy' is just a label that has been 'slapped' on to some thing, which people do not even know exists or not, let alone understand AT ALL. Much like how the 'God' label has been 'slapped'on to what was NOT YET known, and understood.

[Age]

Personally I think the 'dark energy' is what operates below the Planck scale and provides our perceivable REAL IT Y...in fact, I believe it could be GOD.

Take a random effect that one doesn't understand and just slap the 'god' label on it? I quite assure you that dark energy is in no way responsible for most of the effects normally attributed to gods.

I wonder if you had direct empirical observations of what this GOD entity is capable of for the past 27 years, permitting you to comprehend many of its attributes,

So, what are some of Its attributes, exactly?[/quote]

whether you would permit yourself to theorise about from whence it operates?

Where It operates from, exactly, is NOT just from the one and only place that you imagine.

[Cerveny]

…
ONCE MORE, ADDRESSED TO ABSOLUTELY NO one.

Now, the QUESTION of THIS THREAD IS:

What is 'dark energy'?

Would ANY one else like to PROVIDE an ANSWER?

What we see in galaxies is not "dark matter", but a vortex of viscous (imperfect) solution of matter in the aether -> towards the future:), I think... BTW, infinitely large or infinitely lasting things do not exist, that would be against, let's say..., nature :)), I think... @Age, please, sorry, you don't have to answer

PS: Space without aether is not physics but mathematics :(

[Age]

…
ONCE MORE, ADDRESSED TO ABSOLUTELY NO one.

Now, the QUESTION of THIS THREAD IS:

What is 'dark energy'?

Would ANY one else like to PROVIDE an ANSWER?

What we see in galaxies is not "dark matter", but a vortex of viscous (imperfect) solution of matter in the aether -> towards the future:), I think... BTW, infinitely large or infinitely lasting things do not exist, that would be against, let's say..., nature ), I think... @Age, please, sorry, you don't have to answer

PS: Space without aether is not physics but mathematics

Is this sentence meant to make sense?

If yes, then HOW, exactly?

What is 'space', and, 'aether', to you, EXACTLY?