What is Dark Energy? FEB 05, 2024. By Chelsea Gohd.

[attofishpi]

..this was the last post B4 an arrogant idiot posted condescending CRAP..


There is an intelligence beyond our own that forms the entire reality we are perceiving. This intelligence manifests throughout all matter, including that which constructs our mind.

My belief is, that it operates from below the Planck scale, imperceptible to us and our instruments of detection. I also consider that what we infer as a cause of dark-energy/matter, the accelerated expansion between galaxies, is as a result of this intelligence, again, operating from beneath the scale we can detect.

[Age]

1. you human beings do NOT have 'your mind/s'.

YOU'RE a human being you stupid fuckstain of a "brain", so fuck off with your batshit crazy condescension to others.

What has the OBVIOUS, here, got to do with what I ACTUALLY POINTED and SHOWED?

LOL you have some of the WEIRDEST ASSUMPTIONS, which you then CONCLUDE ARE TRUE, from which you then write some of the WEIRDEST RESPONSES.

And, LOL ALL OF have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH what I ACTUALLY SAID, WROTE, and MEANT.

[socrattus]

There is an intelligence beyond our own that forms the entire reality we are perceiving. This intelligence manifests throughout all matter, including that which constructs our mind.

My belief is, that it operates from below the Planck scale, imperceptible to us and our instruments of detection.

If quantum physics is "strange" or "meaningless" ...
‘‘Quantum mechanics makes absolutely no sense'' /Roger Penrose/
... then everything is possible

[Age]

..this was the last post B4 an arrogant idiot posted condescending CRAP..


There is an intelligence beyond our own that forms the entire reality we are perceiving. This intelligence manifests throughout all matter, including that which constructs our mind.

My belief is, that it operates from below the Planck scale, imperceptible to us and our instruments of detection. I also consider that what we infer as a cause of dark-energy/matter, the accelerated expansion between galaxies, is as a result of this intelligence, again, operating from beneath the scale we can detect.

AND I HAVE ALREADY POINTED OUT and SHOWN the CONTRADICTIONS and INCONSISTENCIES IN THERE.

I have ALSO PARTLY EXPLAINED what IS ACTUALLY IRREFUTABLY True, Right, Accurate, and/or Correct. Which, OBVIOUSLY, you are NOT CAPABLE OF COUNTERING NOR REFUTING IN ABSOLUTELY ANY WAY.

Now, let 'us' have a LOOK AT, and A DEEPER INTROSPECTION INTO "attofishpi's" first seven words.

'There is an intelligence beyond our own'.

Firstly, there is NO 'intelligence' beyond, nor more, than 'intelligence', itself.

Secondly, even if you human beings did have your, so-called, 'own intelligence', "attofishpi" could NEVER EVER even JUST BEGIN to START EXPLAINING what some so-called 'human being intelligence' is, exactly. (As "attofishpi" WILL PROVE me True, here, ONCE AGAIN.)

Thirdly, there is ONLY 'intelligence', itself. And, when you human beings have evolved enough to WORK OUT what 'it' is, EXACTLY, and LEARN HOW TO start USING 'Intelligence' properly AND Correctly, then, and ONLY then, do things BEGIN to START 'moving along' as they were REALLY and Truly MEANT TO BE.

Now, for those who are INTERESTED and WANT TO LEARN what 'intelligence' is, EXACTLY, and HOW to USE it, properly and Correctly, then let 'us' have A DISCUSSION.

To 'wet the appetite', as some would say, for those who have a 'hunger and a thirst' for KNOWLEDGE, and LEARNING, "albert einstein" was NOT 'more intelligent' than any other human being is. "albert Einstein" just USED 'intelligence', itself, in 'the way' more like how it is MEANT TO BE USED. Although "albert einstein" made quite a few mistakes, and/or errors, which I have YET to SHOW and Correct, "albert einstein" came to 'see' and 'discover' a LOT MORE than a lot of other human beings because "albert einstein" was just USING 'intelligence' MORE than a lot of other human beings do.

[Age]

There is an intelligence beyond our own that forms the entire reality we are perceiving. This intelligence manifests throughout all matter, including that which constructs our mind.

My belief is, that it operates from below the Planck scale, imperceptible to us and our instruments of detection.

If quantum physics is "strange" or "meaningless" ...
‘‘Quantum mechanics makes absolutely no sense'' /Roger Penrose/
... then everything is possible

Yes, God is ALWAYS 'JUST WAITING', PATIENTLY.

And, WAITING for those who ARE Truly INTERESTED, and WANTING, to LEARN, MORE, and ANEW.

[attofishpi]

To 'wet the appetite', as some would say, for those who have a 'hunger and a thirst' for KNOWLEDGE, and LEARNING.

No, they tend to say whet the appetite. U daft "super" human.

[Age]

To 'wet the appetite', as some would say, for those who have a 'hunger and a thirst' for KNOWLEDGE, and LEARNING.

No, they tend to say whet the appetite. U daft "super" human.

So, ONCE MORE, 'this' is all that gets commented on. Which just goes to SHOW and PROVE that what I have said and claimed, ONCE AGAIN, can NOT be countered NOR refuted.

[Age]

For those you are not following here, 'dark matter' and 'dark energy' are just made up terms to label a 'thing' that does not even exist, to explain conclusions and beliefs that some people have, here, which are False from the outset.

ONCE AGAIN, people just lead "themselves" further and further astray when they begin with False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and/or Incorrect ASSUMPTIONS, and especially more so when they start BELIEVING that those Wrong ASSUMPTIONS are true.

As can be CLEARLY SHOWN and PROVED True throughout not just this thread but also throughout if not EVERY thread just about EVERY thread within this forum.

[socrattus]

For those you are not following here, 'dark matter' and 'dark energy' are just made up terms to label a 'thing' that does not even exist, to explain conclusions and beliefs that some people have, here, which are False from the outset.

ONCE AGAIN, people just lead "themselves" further and further astray when they begin with False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and/or Incorrect ASSUMPTIONS, and especially more so when they start BELIEVING that those Wrong ASSUMPTIONS are true.

As can be CLEARLY SHOWN and PROVED True throughout not just this thread but also throughout if not EVERY thread just about EVERY thread within this forum.

The Universe (as a whole) consists of dark matter + dark energy (≈ 95%) + ordinary matter (≈ 5%).
These ≈ 5% is a very small amount of mass to create a "singularity" with almost infinite density ....
therefore the "big bang" (the basis of cosmology, astronomy, astrophysics ....)
is Santa Claus's New Year's fairy tales ... (happy new 2025 year, with old scientific fairy tales)

[Age]

For those you are not following here, 'dark matter' and 'dark energy' are just made up terms to label a 'thing' that does not even exist, to explain conclusions and beliefs that some people have, here, which are False from the outset.

ONCE AGAIN, people just lead "themselves" further and further astray when they begin with False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and/or Incorrect ASSUMPTIONS, and especially more so when they start BELIEVING that those Wrong ASSUMPTIONS are true.

As can be CLEARLY SHOWN and PROVED True throughout not just this thread but also throughout if not EVERY thread just about EVERY thread within this forum.

The Universe (as a whole) consists of dark matter + dark energy (≈ 95%) + ordinary matter (≈ 5%).

SO, what is 'dark matter', 'dark energy', and 'ordinary matter', to you, EXACTLY?

WATCH and OBSERVE how these posters, here, do NOT CLARIFY.

These ≈ 5% is a very small amount of mass to create a "singularity" with almost infinite density ....

How MUCH mass, EXACTLY, is NEEDED to create a 'singularity'.

And, SINCE WHEN has 'singularity' been classified as an 'almost infinite density'? And, WHY ONLY 'almost'?

therefore the "big bang" (the basis of cosmology, astronomy, astrophysics ....)

Were you meant to add the words 'assumptions', 'guesses', or some thing similar?

is Santa Claus's New Year's fairy tales ... (happy new 2025 year, with old scientific fairy tales)

I am NOT SURE HOW NOR WHY you went so FAR OFF TRACK, here.

But, maybe if you INFORM 'us' of what your ANSWERS ARE to the CLARIFYING QUESTIONS you were asked, here, then 'we' will BETTER UNDERSTAND 'you', here.

By the way, how 'big' is a so-called 'vast cathedral', exactly?

[Cerveny]

Just as a moving elementary particle can appear as a wave, so too can moving (macro) matter appear as dark. In both cases it is a matter of pulling, of dragging the viscous structure of space, of aether I think :)

[Eodnhoj7]

Could it be argued that dark energy is strictly nothing, and this nothingness is the raw potentiality that allows a thing to move for movement is strictly the occurence and dissolution of a distinction?

[Age]

Just as a moving elementary particle can appear as a wave, so too can moving (macro) matter appear as dark. In both cases it is a matter of pulling, of dragging the viscous structure of space, of aether I think

And how does one pull, or drag, the viscous structure of space, or of aether, exactly?

Also, what even is 'aether', and, 'space', exactly?

[Age]

Could it be argued that dark energy is strictly nothing,

Yes.

[Eodnhoj7]

Could it be argued that dark energy is strictly nothing,

Yes.

I would be interested to see how nothing can be proven....