attofishpi wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2024 4:24 am
I have provided some text from the evil ideology and I am disagreeing TOTALLY with its contents as having anything aligned to DIVINE instruction.
By posting its content, you are possibly promoting it. You don't know beforehand how the reader will interpret your post. That is why there is a general consensus that you should not repeat or link to content that you dislike.
attofishpi wrote: ↑Tue Dec 10, 2024 4:24 am
To the contrary, Quran is logically flawed in many ways.
Appx 666 years after Christ, it is obvious that Mor_Ham_Mad (another that insists don't eat PIG) stole ideas from Judaism & Christianity to insist he had the final say on the Abrahamic based religions.
Islam Islame, Mor Ham Mad TOTALLY contradicts the teachings of Christ. The Quran is a text of obvious deceit and lies that fails on the most basic scrutiny - its claim to represent the DIVINE instructions of GOD, as stemming from Abrahamic religion, since it contradicts the very basis it claims to represent.
Look carefully at what the term "contradiction" mean. If it is possible to conclude a proposition and its very opposite from the statement at hand, then the statement is contradictory.
"Stealing ideas" is not contradictory. On what grounds would it be?
Concerning the teachings of Christ, the Quran does not refer to the Christian gospels and does not recognize them as legitimate. That would be a minimum requirement to claim that the Quran contradicts them.
The Quran only relies on what it mentions by itself about the teachings of Christ. What Quranic verse about the teachings of Christ contradicts what other Quranic verse?
If you want contradictions about the teachings of Christ, then you do not need to look any further than standard Christian doctrine:
Jesus is the son of God.
Jesus is God himself.
So, Jesus is the son of himself.
Jesus is mentioned praying to God.
So, Jesus was praying to himself.
If you are hunting for contradictions, then you will find truckloads of them in the Christian doctrine. You won't find that kind of aberrations in Islamic doctrine.
Christianity is simply not closed under logical consequence, while Islam certainly is.
This problem was famously raised by Martin Luther during his trial in front of the emperor in 1521, in Worms, Germany:
Luther: If you can show me through scripture and reason that I would be wrong, then I will retract what I have written.
Prosecutor: The Bible itself is the arsenal whence each heresiarch from the past has drawn its deceptive arguments.
It is obvious who was right and who was wrong in this court case.
Since Christian doctrine is not closed under logic, the prosecutor of the Church was entirely right to point out that propositions obtained through scripture and reason are generally illegitimate in Christianity.
Luther was clearly wrong because he based his argument on his failed attempt to close Christian doctrine under logic.
This court case also definitely seals the inferiority of Christian doctrine and the superiority of the Jewish and Islamic doctrines, which are effectively closed under logic.
A doctrine that is not closed under logic is always inferior to any other doctrine that is.
Christianity is also inferior to Buddhism. In fact, Christianity is inferior to every other religion. The fact that Christianity is not closed under logic, makes it inferior to everything else. It is simply not a serious religion. It requires the believer to abandon logic. Seriously, how can that be acceptable?