Oh no! Language evolves! Horrors!Walker wrote: ↑Sat Sep 28, 2024 3:29 pmThe word, "gender."Age wrote: ↑Fri Sep 27, 2024 10:23 pmHere is a, supposed, so-called 'tidy explanation' of 'what', exactly?Walker wrote: ↑Fri Sep 27, 2024 9:02 am
Hey coach, here’s a tidy explanation which has been known before the word "gender" was appropriated by social engineers fifty years or so years ago.
https://oxfordre.com/linguistics/displa ... 84655-e-43
Now that you've been educated as to the proper use of the word, you can go forth and be clear of fewer confused messes.
Here the Yale School of Medicine offers its two cents:
This seems a reasonable linguistic evolution. After all, when "gender" referred only to language (per the Oxford link) it was referring to culturally constituted "presentations". So it seems reasonable that just as gender refers to words that are "presented" as masculine or feminine, the word can reasonably evolve to refer to "self-representation".In the study of human subjects, the term sex should be used as a classification, generally as male or female, according to the reproductive organs and functions that derive from the chromosomal complement [generally XX for female and XY for male].
In the study of human subjects, the term gender should be used to refer to a person's self-representation as male or female, or how that person is responded to by social institutions on the basis of the individual's gender presentation.
Whatever one thinks of trans rights, objecting to the current use of "gender" seems silly. The word has a specific meaning, and does its job well. What word would you prefer? "Sex" has a different meaning.
About accelefine's idiotic comment that we are our bodies: I wonder if she objects to operations to repair leaking heart valves, or clubbed feet, or to offer cochlear implants for the deaf. We change our bodies through medical procedures regularly, these days. What about cosmetic surgery in general (which is, perhaps, more analogous)?