Questions to Christians

[Belinda]

It was appropriated by idiot puritanical Americans who were too coy to use the word SEX. Just look at the mess it has caused. Now it apparently means some kind of 'sexed soul' that floats around and sometimes lands in the 'wrong bodies'. For Fuck Sake.

'Gender ' is often a euphemism for 'sex' I agree.

I agree also that arguments to support gender dysphoria imply or often imply "some kind of 'sexed soul' that floats around and sometimes lands in the 'wrong bodies'." And I think that gender dysphoria is not random but is dissatisfaction with cultural
type -casting of oneself.

I'll now stop side -tracking the main discussion.

[accelafine]

It was appropriated by idiot puritanical Americans who were too coy to use the word SEX. Just look at the mess it has caused. Now it apparently means some kind of 'sexed soul' that floats around and sometimes lands in the 'wrong bodies'. For Fuck Sake.

'Gender ' is often a euphemism for 'sex' I agree.

I agree also that arguments to support gender dysphoria imply or often imply "some kind of 'sexed soul' that floats around and sometimes lands in the 'wrong bodies'." And I think that gender dysphoria is not random but is dissatisfaction with cultural
type -casting of oneself.

I'll now stop side -tracking the main discussion.

The whole 'gender ID' bs is as 'stereotypcasting' as it could possibly be

[Walker]

Neither.

You have the floor to expound,

I already knew.

but don't make a mess.

Why not?

And, do you say this like you do not?

I say it figuring it's worth at least one lol.

[Walker]

It was appropriated by idiot puritanical Americans who were too coy to use the word SEX. Just look at the mess it has caused. Now it apparently means some kind of 'sexed soul' that floats around and sometimes lands in the 'wrong bodies'. For Fuck Sake.

Using SEX as a verb to replace "sleeping together" may have added to the mess.

If angry folks start yelling "Gender You!" that could get confusing, but it would be a nice satirical commentary.

[Age]

Why does this one believe, absolutely, that what it only views and believes is true is absolutely true.

She may be right though. Nobody knows for certain what human behaviours are sex-linked,and the controversy is further confused by the existence of trans people.

What a ridiculous statement. You think it's 'controversial' to say that rape is 'sex linked'? And there is no such thing as 'transpeople'. Humans are so bloody thick and easy to brainwash. The worst thing about this cult is the inclusion of children in the global con, feeding them the evil lie that they can be 'born in the wrong body'. We aren't 'born into our bodies'. We ARE our bodies. You can't have a 'wrong' body. Children are brainwashing sponges, but adults have no excuse. At least try to make an effort to think critically. You really aren't obliged to be 'nice' to creepy predatory misogynistic male perverts and cheats. Men have always been crossdressing, predatory perverts. The difference now is that it's become something to be lauded and applauded. They are treated as heroes. A 'vulnerable minority' group. The only genuinely and universally 'vulnerable group' is children, and after them women.

Here's a 'vulnerable oppressed' 'transperson'. It's not a fetish at all. I'm sure this school teacher (the photo on the left is how he looks at school) doesn't get any kind of a sexual kick out of this at all...

So..... A person can flip from being part of a 'vulnerable minority' to the LEAST vulnerable class of human, simply by changing his clothes. FOR FUCK SAKE!

So, to "accelafine" fine anyway, you human beings are human bodies.

And, those of you who are 'male bodies' have been cross-dressing, always. Well, again, according to "accelafine", anyway.

[Age]

But, this was not the point.

Hey coach, here’s a tidy explanation which has been known before the word "gender" was appropriated by social engineers fifty years or so years ago.

https://oxfordre.com/linguistics/displa ... 84655-e-43

Here is a, supposed, so-called 'tidy explanation' of 'what', exactly?

[Age]

You have the floor to expound,

I already knew.

but don't make a mess.

Why not?

And, do you say this like you do not?

I say it figuring it's worth at least one lol.

What is 'at least one' in relation to, exactly?

And, what was I even talking about , which has led to this?

[accelafine]

It was appropriated by idiot puritanical Americans who were too coy to use the word SEX. Just look at the mess it has caused. Now it apparently means some kind of 'sexed soul' that floats around and sometimes lands in the 'wrong bodies'. For Fuck Sake.

Using SEX as a verb to replace "sleeping together" may have added to the mess.

If angry folks start yelling "Gender You!" that could get confusing, but it would be a nice satirical commentary.

Whatever the fuck that means. Ok.

[Walker]

It was appropriated by idiot puritanical Americans who were too coy to use the word SEX. Just look at the mess it has caused. Now it apparently means some kind of 'sexed soul' that floats around and sometimes lands in the 'wrong bodies'. For Fuck Sake.

Using SEX as a verb to replace "sleeping together" may have added to the mess.

If angry folks start yelling "Gender You!" that could get confusing, but it would be a nice satirical commentary.

Whatever the fuck that means. Ok.

Whatever the gender that means. Ok.

[Walker]

I already knew.


Why not?

And, do you say this like you do not?

I say it figuring it's worth at least one lol.

What is 'at least one' in relation to, exactly?

And, what was I even talking about , which has led to this?

At least one lol relates to the funny bone.

Indeed, what do you think you were talking about?

[Age]

I say it figuring it's worth at least one lol.

What is 'at least one' in relation to, exactly?

And, what was I even talking about , which has led to this?

At least one lol relates to the funny bone.

Indeed, what do you think you were talking about?

So, you do not even actually know nor remember, right?

[Walker]

What is 'at least one' in relation to, exactly?

And, what was I even talking about , which has led to this?

At least one lol relates to the funny bone.

Indeed, what do you think you were talking about?

So, you do not even actually know nor remember, right?

For Genders (v) sake:

Of course I remember the sequence of events because of the written record, but I never knew your thinking, if any, that prompted your actions.

To date at this juncture in the history of the world, rather than make a mess of on the floor that you said you knew you had, you were requested to use said floor to expound upon your subsequent answer of "Neither," and the record will show what you failed to expound upon, which was ...

In other words when you human beings had evolved enough to be able to 'read between the lives', then, and only then, you will begin to see, and understand, the True and whole picture of all-there-is, too.

This is wonderful news.

By evolved, do you mean those who manifest the latent tendencies inherent in everyone, or do you mean those who will possess characteristics beyond the current capacity of humans, because those characteristics have not been developed into form ... much like birds are said to have evolved into the wings unknown to reptiles?

[Walker]

But, this was not the point.

Hey coach, here’s a tidy explanation which has been known before the word "gender" was appropriated by social engineers fifty years or so years ago.

https://oxfordre.com/linguistics/displa ... 84655-e-43

Here is a, supposed, so-called 'tidy explanation' of 'what', exactly?

The word, "gender."

Now that you've been educated as to the proper use of the word, you can go forth and be clear of fewer confused messes.

[Age]

At least one lol relates to the funny bone.

Indeed, what do you think you were talking about?

So, you do not even actually know nor remember, right?

For Genders (v) sake:

Of course I remember the sequence of events because of the written record, but I never knew your thinking, if any, that prompted your actions.

To date at this juncture in the history of the world, rather than make a mess of on the floor that you said you knew you had, you were requested to use said floor to expound upon your subsequent answer of "Neither," and the record will show what you failed to expound upon, which was ...

In other words when you human beings had evolved enough to be able to 'read between the lives', then, and only then, you will begin to see, and understand, the True and whole picture of all-there-is, too.

This is wonderful news.

By evolved, do you mean those who manifest the latent tendencies inherent in everyone, or do you mean those who will possess characteristics beyond the current capacity of humans, because those characteristics have not been developed into form ... much like birds are said to have evolved into the wings unknown to reptiles?

Since you appear, still, curious, and interested, and on second reading I meant those who manifest the 'latent tendencies inherent in every one', but which were 'not latent' when all were born. Those tendencies only become 'latent', or better worded 'dormant', or 'hidden/forgotten', along the way.

See, within every human being is True and absolute 'intelligence', itself. Which every new born has, and uses. However, the ability of intelligence, itself, got 'covered up' when things started being 'looked at' from 'the brain', instead of the Mind, only. Which is where Real and True intelligence exists, or lives.

Once adult human beings evolve past 'looking at' and 'seeing' things from 'the brain only, or mostly, and 'return' to 'looking at' and 'seeing' things from a Truly open perspective again, or through the Mind, only, then they can, and will, start teaching children to do this as well. And, because it is what is 'natural' to the human being, the complete 'paradigm shift' will only take a generation, or two at the very most.

See, in the days when this is being written, older human beings 'look at' and 'see' things through, or from, 'the brain's' perspective, mostly or just about always. Whereas, as new born and younger human beings 'look at' and 'see' things through, or from, the Mind, only.

When older human beings transcend back into doing what they all did, from the beginning, first, that is 'looking at' and 'seeing' things from the Truly always open, Mind, and then, and only then, using 'the brain', or 'past experiences' to 'verify' if what is being 'looked at' and 'seen' is True, and Right, then, and only then, will the human being stage, or level, of Life be evolved past, and on and up to the next stage, and level, of Life.

In other words moving up 'another rung on the ladder', on the 'stairway to heaven', as some would say here.

[Age]

Hey coach, here’s a tidy explanation which has been known before the word "gender" was appropriated by social engineers fifty years or so years ago.

https://oxfordre.com/linguistics/displa ... 84655-e-43

Here is a, supposed, so-called 'tidy explanation' of 'what', exactly?

The word, "gender."

Now that you've been educated as to the proper use of the word, you can go forth and be clear of fewer confused messes.

Will you show where and when, exactly, there are some, so-claimed, 'confused messes' here?

If no, then why not?