Relativity - Aristotle, Galileo, Einstein, Einstein

How does science work? And what's all this about quantum mechanics?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Flannel Jesus
Posts: 4302
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm

Re: Relativity - Aristotle, Galileo, Einstein, Einstein

Post by Flannel Jesus »

Age wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:06 am
If age says they're wrong then they must be wrong. Age is always right. Everyone knows that.
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Relativity - Aristotle, Galileo, Einstein, Einstein

Post by Age »

Flannel Jesus wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 9:41 am
Will Bouwman wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 9:33 am
It's so weird how much age talks about honesty while being so dishonest.
Link 'us' to just one example, or as many as you like, of where you believe that I have been dishonest here "flannel jesus".

If you do not, then what 'we' have here, again, is another prime example of the adult human being, back then, while this was being written, making accusations and claims here while providing absolutely nothing at all for all of 'us' readers to 'look at', and 'discuss'.
Flannel Jesus
Posts: 4302
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm

Re: Relativity - Aristotle, Galileo, Einstein, Einstein

Post by Flannel Jesus »

Age wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:11 am
Flannel Jesus wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 9:41 am
Will Bouwman wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 9:33 am
It's so weird how much age talks about honesty while being so dishonest.
Link 'us' to just one example, or as many as you like, of where you believe that I have been dishonest here "flannel jesus".

If you do not, then what 'we' have here, again, is another prime example of the adult human being, back then, while this was being written, making accusations and claims here while providing absolutely nothing at all for all of 'us' readers to 'look at', and 'discuss'.
I remember that time you said that any time someone asked you for clarity, you would always do your best to make yourself clear.

And then within the hour, someone asked you to clarify your position on something, and you did some retarded age thing like say "And thus you could see, back in the days when this was written, that people would ask for clarity on things".

So that was a lie.
Flannel Jesus
Posts: 4302
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm

Re: Relativity - Aristotle, Galileo, Einstein, Einstein

Post by Flannel Jesus »

Age wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:11 am
Flannel Jesus wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 9:41 am
Will Bouwman wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 9:33 am
It's so weird how much age talks about honesty while being so dishonest.
Link 'us' to just one example, or as many as you like6, of where you believe that I have been dishonest here "flannel jesus".

If you do not, then what 'we' have here, again, is another prime example of the adult human being, back then, while this was being written, making accusations and claims here while providing absolutely nothing at all for all of 'us' readers to 'look at', and 'discuss'.
I also remember the time you quoted me, said that my post was humourous, and then said "I was just agreeing with you". That was a lie.

Your communication style is more dishonest than honest.
Last edited by Flannel Jesus on Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Relativity - Aristotle, Galileo, Einstein, Einstein

Post by Age »

mickthinks wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 9:45 am
Will Bouwman wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 8:17 am... I will stop wasting my time and just tell you to fuck off.
Screen Shot 2024-07-16 at 10.34.53.png

I gave up years ago.
Another sign of just how Truly narrowed and closed some of these adult human beings, really, were, back when this was being written. And, these ones were the ones that were in a philosophy forum. So, you can imagine just how Truly narrowed and closed the others were
Flannel Jesus
Posts: 4302
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm

Re: Relativity - Aristotle, Galileo, Einstein, Einstein

Post by Flannel Jesus »

Age wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:15 am
mickthinks wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 9:45 am
Will Bouwman wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 8:17 am... I will stop wasting my time and just tell you to fuck off.
Screen Shot 2024-07-16 at 10.34.53.png

I gave up years ago.
Another sign of just how Truly narrowed and closed some of these adult human beings, really, were, back when this was being written. And, these ones were the ones that were in a philosophy forum. So, you can imagine just how Truly narrowed and closed the others were
No, it's the wise that block you. I haven't blocked you because I'm a retard like you.
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Relativity - Aristotle, Galileo, Einstein, Einstein

Post by Age »

Flannel Jesus wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:13 am
Age wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:11 am
Flannel Jesus wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 9:41 am

It's so weird how much age talks about honesty while being so dishonest.
Link 'us' to just one example, or as many as you like, of where you believe that I have been dishonest here "flannel jesus".

If you do not, then what 'we' have here, again, is another prime example of the adult human being, back then, while this was being written, making accusations and claims here while providing absolutely nothing at all for all of 'us' readers to 'look at', and 'discuss'.
I remember that time you said that any time someone asked you for clarity, you would always do your best to make yourself clear.
What I think anyone will find, if they actually went 'looking' here, is that I have never said that at all.

On fact and LOL I have actually said the exact opposite.

Could 'your memory's be fallible "flannel jesus"?

Or, do you believe that it is not.

Also, basing an accusation of another on just 'a memory' alone is not the smartest nor wisest thing to do at all. Unless,.of course, one consciously thought, 'I will remember this moment/exactly, that is; 'word for word' because I know or sense that I will use this, at 'later date', when you 'read' what you you wrote here that I said.

And, obviously you were not thinking any thing like this
Flannel Jesus wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:13 am And then within the hour, someone asked you to clarify your position on something, and you did some retarded age thing like say "And thus you could see, back in the days when this was written, that people would ask for clarity on things".
LOL I never said any thing like this in the so-called 'last hour'.

you could not even Correctly remember what happened in just the 'last hour', let alone prior to that.

Also, 'your memories' are not 'links'.

If you cannot even go back just 'an hour or do' to link 'us' to some thing that would prove 'your claim and accusation' true, then what is this hiding from or refusal saying about your claim/accusation, exactly?
Flannel Jesus wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:13 am So that was a lie.
Here 'we' have another prime example of just how lost, distorted, and/or confused one can, and does, become while they are holding onto 'a belief'.

They can and, literally, do 'read', 'hear', 'see', 'remember' things that do not even exist.

Now, if I actually have told a lie, within just an hour or a few, or even just within 24 hours, then surely you could proof this irrefutably true with just 'a link' to 'it', correct?

Also, do not forget, that your memory, is not actual proof of any thing here.
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Relativity - Aristotle, Galileo, Einstein, Einstein

Post by Age »

Flannel Jesus wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:14 am
Age wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:11 am
Flannel Jesus wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 9:41 am

It's so weird how much age talks about honesty while being so dishonest.
Link 'us' to just one example, or as many as you like6, of where you believe that I have been dishonest here "flannel jesus".

If you do not, then what 'we' have here, again, is another prime example of the adult human being, back then, while this was being written, making accusations and claims here while providing absolutely nothing at all for all of 'us' readers to 'look at', and 'discuss'.
I also remember the time you quoted me, said that my post was humourous, and then said "I was just agreeing with you". That was a lie.
LOL 'what', exactly, was, supposedly, 'a lie'?
Flannel Jesus wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:14 am Your communication style is more dishonest than honest.
If 'this' is what you believe is absolutely true, then 'this' is, exactly, what you will 'see', 'hear', and 'read' in my writings and words.

What this one has been doing here is a prime example how the brain works, in correlation with the belief-system.
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Relativity - Aristotle, Galileo, Einstein, Einstein

Post by Age »

Flannel Jesus wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:16 am
Age wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:15 am
mickthinks wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 9:45 am

Screen Shot 2024-07-16 at 10.34.53.png

I gave up years ago.
Another sign of just how Truly narrowed and closed some of these adult human beings, really, were, back when this was being written. And, these ones were the ones that were in a philosophy forum. So, you can imagine just how Truly narrowed and closed the others were
No, it's the wise that block you. I haven't blocked you because I'm a retard like you.
If this is what you believe is true, then okay.
Will Bouwman
Posts: 1334
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 2:17 pm

Re: Relativity - Aristotle, Galileo, Einstein, Einstein

Post by Will Bouwman »

Flannel Jesus wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 9:41 am
Will Bouwman wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 9:33 am
It's so weird how much age talks about honesty while being so dishonest.
I'm not sure he's necessarily dishonest. As ever, there are alternative interpretations. My guess is he just doesn't understand what he is saying. He is clearly damaged goods.
Will Bouwman
Posts: 1334
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 2:17 pm

Re: Relativity - Aristotle, Galileo, Einstein, Einstein

Post by Will Bouwman »

mickthinks wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 9:45 am
Will Bouwman wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 8:17 am... I will stop wasting my time and just tell you to fuck off.
I gave up years ago.
Probably the smart thing to do. Every time I think he might not be a hopeless case, he very quickly shows otherwise.
Post Reply