If age says they're wrong then they must be wrong. Age is always right. Everyone knows that.
Relativity - Aristotle, Galileo, Einstein, Einstein
-
Flannel Jesus
- Posts: 4302
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm
Re: Relativity - Aristotle, Galileo, Einstein, Einstein
Link 'us' to just one example, or as many as you like, of where you believe that I have been dishonest here "flannel jesus".Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 9:41 amIt's so weird how much age talks about honesty while being so dishonest.
If you do not, then what 'we' have here, again, is another prime example of the adult human being, back then, while this was being written, making accusations and claims here while providing absolutely nothing at all for all of 'us' readers to 'look at', and 'discuss'.
-
Flannel Jesus
- Posts: 4302
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm
Re: Relativity - Aristotle, Galileo, Einstein, Einstein
I remember that time you said that any time someone asked you for clarity, you would always do your best to make yourself clear.Age wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:11 amLink 'us' to just one example, or as many as you like, of where you believe that I have been dishonest here "flannel jesus".Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 9:41 amIt's so weird how much age talks about honesty while being so dishonest.
If you do not, then what 'we' have here, again, is another prime example of the adult human being, back then, while this was being written, making accusations and claims here while providing absolutely nothing at all for all of 'us' readers to 'look at', and 'discuss'.
And then within the hour, someone asked you to clarify your position on something, and you did some retarded age thing like say "And thus you could see, back in the days when this was written, that people would ask for clarity on things".
So that was a lie.
-
Flannel Jesus
- Posts: 4302
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm
Re: Relativity - Aristotle, Galileo, Einstein, Einstein
I also remember the time you quoted me, said that my post was humourous, and then said "I was just agreeing with you". That was a lie.Age wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:11 amLink 'us' to just one example, or as many as you like6, of where you believe that I have been dishonest here "flannel jesus".Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 9:41 amIt's so weird how much age talks about honesty while being so dishonest.
If you do not, then what 'we' have here, again, is another prime example of the adult human being, back then, while this was being written, making accusations and claims here while providing absolutely nothing at all for all of 'us' readers to 'look at', and 'discuss'.
Your communication style is more dishonest than honest.
Last edited by Flannel Jesus on Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Relativity - Aristotle, Galileo, Einstein, Einstein
Another sign of just how Truly narrowed and closed some of these adult human beings, really, were, back when this was being written. And, these ones were the ones that were in a philosophy forum. So, you can imagine just how Truly narrowed and closed the others weremickthinks wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 9:45 amScreen Shot 2024-07-16 at 10.34.53.pngWill Bouwman wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 8:17 am... I will stop wasting my time and just tell you to fuck off.
I gave up years ago.
-
Flannel Jesus
- Posts: 4302
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm
Re: Relativity - Aristotle, Galileo, Einstein, Einstein
No, it's the wise that block you. I haven't blocked you because I'm a retard like you.Age wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:15 amAnother sign of just how Truly narrowed and closed some of these adult human beings, really, were, back when this was being written. And, these ones were the ones that were in a philosophy forum. So, you can imagine just how Truly narrowed and closed the others weremickthinks wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 9:45 amScreen Shot 2024-07-16 at 10.34.53.pngWill Bouwman wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 8:17 am... I will stop wasting my time and just tell you to fuck off.
I gave up years ago.
Re: Relativity - Aristotle, Galileo, Einstein, Einstein
What I think anyone will find, if they actually went 'looking' here, is that I have never said that at all.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:13 amI remember that time you said that any time someone asked you for clarity, you would always do your best to make yourself clear.Age wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:11 amLink 'us' to just one example, or as many as you like, of where you believe that I have been dishonest here "flannel jesus".Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 9:41 am
It's so weird how much age talks about honesty while being so dishonest.
If you do not, then what 'we' have here, again, is another prime example of the adult human being, back then, while this was being written, making accusations and claims here while providing absolutely nothing at all for all of 'us' readers to 'look at', and 'discuss'.
On fact and LOL I have actually said the exact opposite.
Could 'your memory's be fallible "flannel jesus"?
Or, do you believe that it is not.
Also, basing an accusation of another on just 'a memory' alone is not the smartest nor wisest thing to do at all. Unless,.of course, one consciously thought, 'I will remember this moment/exactly, that is; 'word for word' because I know or sense that I will use this, at 'later date', when you 'read' what you you wrote here that I said.
And, obviously you were not thinking any thing like this
LOL I never said any thing like this in the so-called 'last hour'.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:13 am And then within the hour, someone asked you to clarify your position on something, and you did some retarded age thing like say "And thus you could see, back in the days when this was written, that people would ask for clarity on things".
you could not even Correctly remember what happened in just the 'last hour', let alone prior to that.
Also, 'your memories' are not 'links'.
If you cannot even go back just 'an hour or do' to link 'us' to some thing that would prove 'your claim and accusation' true, then what is this hiding from or refusal saying about your claim/accusation, exactly?
Here 'we' have another prime example of just how lost, distorted, and/or confused one can, and does, become while they are holding onto 'a belief'.
They can and, literally, do 'read', 'hear', 'see', 'remember' things that do not even exist.
Now, if I actually have told a lie, within just an hour or a few, or even just within 24 hours, then surely you could proof this irrefutably true with just 'a link' to 'it', correct?
Also, do not forget, that your memory, is not actual proof of any thing here.
Re: Relativity - Aristotle, Galileo, Einstein, Einstein
LOL 'what', exactly, was, supposedly, 'a lie'?Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:14 amI also remember the time you quoted me, said that my post was humourous, and then said "I was just agreeing with you". That was a lie.Age wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:11 amLink 'us' to just one example, or as many as you like6, of where you believe that I have been dishonest here "flannel jesus".Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 9:41 am
It's so weird how much age talks about honesty while being so dishonest.
If you do not, then what 'we' have here, again, is another prime example of the adult human being, back then, while this was being written, making accusations and claims here while providing absolutely nothing at all for all of 'us' readers to 'look at', and 'discuss'.
If 'this' is what you believe is absolutely true, then 'this' is, exactly, what you will 'see', 'hear', and 'read' in my writings and words.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:14 am Your communication style is more dishonest than honest.
What this one has been doing here is a prime example how the brain works, in correlation with the belief-system.
Re: Relativity - Aristotle, Galileo, Einstein, Einstein
If this is what you believe is true, then okay.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:16 amNo, it's the wise that block you. I haven't blocked you because I'm a retard like you.Age wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 11:15 amAnother sign of just how Truly narrowed and closed some of these adult human beings, really, were, back when this was being written. And, these ones were the ones that were in a philosophy forum. So, you can imagine just how Truly narrowed and closed the others weremickthinks wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 9:45 am
Screen Shot 2024-07-16 at 10.34.53.png
I gave up years ago.
-
Will Bouwman
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 2:17 pm
Re: Relativity - Aristotle, Galileo, Einstein, Einstein
I'm not sure he's necessarily dishonest. As ever, there are alternative interpretations. My guess is he just doesn't understand what he is saying. He is clearly damaged goods.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 9:41 amIt's so weird how much age talks about honesty while being so dishonest.
-
Will Bouwman
- Posts: 1334
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 2:17 pm
Re: Relativity - Aristotle, Galileo, Einstein, Einstein
Probably the smart thing to do. Every time I think he might not be a hopeless case, he very quickly shows otherwise.mickthinks wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 9:45 amI gave up years ago.Will Bouwman wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 8:17 am... I will stop wasting my time and just tell you to fuck off.