The Globalist Agenda - -

[attofishpi]

Queer Starmers

Why complain that I call you homophobic when you write homophobic shit like that?

Eh? What's "queer" got to do with homosexuals? ..boy am I behind the times!

I simply think his policies are queer...ya know, saying you support queers but allowing their greatest enemy on the planet to come on in...jump in a boat of love over here, c'mon Abdul Mohamad Hijab!! : :

[Gary Childress]

I would compare you to a woman who is a classical *push-over*. I am drawing a comparison between the political body and our own physical body. I have said this many times and in different ways but you come across to me as feminine. I recognize that this comes across as insulting, and perhaps another term or metaphor would be better, but in my view the first position I described above is not grounded sufficiently in strong, structured ideas. It is based in idealistic postures and sentimental postures.

Fair enough. Beat your chest and drag your knuckles if that's what you want to do. Hope that doesn't sound "insulting" too you, ape-man.

[accelafine]

My position in all this is to try to get along with the new neighbors. Complaining about it and taking to the streets is not going to solve anything. Besides, my country has been going through this sort of thing since it was "founded". We're all 'mutts' and half breeds here.

I would compare you to a woman who is a classical *push-over*. I am drawing a comparison between the political body and our own physical body. I have said this many times and in different ways but you come across to me as feminine. I recognize that this comes across as insulting, and perhaps another term or metaphor would be better, but in my view the first position I described above is not grounded sufficiently in strong, structured ideas. It is based in idealistic postures and sentimental postures.

And you come across as a pompous, know-nothing twat who's in love with himself.

[Alexis Jacobi]

Be that as it may, my understanding here is that you-plural are incapable of staying on a topic, working through that topic, and arriving at sensible and balanced opinions and views.

My interest is in getting to the core as to why this is so.

Hot rhetoric, calumny, twisted and dishonest rhetoric, in an individual, is a sign of mental and psychological disorder. I submit that this disorder is very common today everywhere we turn. It is nearly a truism to say that all media are corrupt but I think we need to face the fact that we are corrupt. And let’s face another fact: everywhere on this forum, from top to bottom, all conversations suffer because individuals with these intellectual disorders cannot contain themselves at the level of their rhetorical usage.

Putting aside what you may think of me personally, you will get better results if you think through what I am saying.

My involvement in politics and culture — a critical perspective that is taken as “rightwing” — could be said to have begun when I read Ideas Have Consequences by Richard Weaver. A significant part of his work is a critical investigation of rhetoric. And as a cultural critic he maintains that our very culture went off the rails a few hundred years ago and, therefore, has been careening toward “disorder”. If this is so, the disordered individual seeks out a “medicine” to reestablish order within himself. Yes, it is a Platonic view, and Weaver is a Platonist, but for myself a regard his analysis as sound indeed.

Do examine what went on in this thread and I believe you will conclude: the topic of the thread, starting with a set if assertions encapsulated in a video, is not ever actually dealt with carefully or rationally. What happens then? Examine the principle protagonist of corrupt conversation or dialectic, Mr FDP. Ah but here you, Accelafine, could easily note commonality between his method and tactics and yours.

Both of you are (in the sense I use this term and do not misinterpret it) corrupt at a basic level. Why do I say this? Just examine your use of diseased rhetoric! You for example, speaking generally, languish in a pool of ugly, distorting, condemnatory rhetoric.

What is overheated in it, overflows into whatever exposition of ideas that you pretend to. And FDP is subsumed in the same contaminated waters.

These are intellectual diseases, plain and simple. You and a dozen like you ruin the possibility of conversation because your intellectual disease cannot do else but leap out.

You will not, and you cannot, deal straight on with this and will take it oh so personally. But it is not intended as such! It is intended as a broader critique to be thought through philosophically.

As I have always said: I do not give a rat’s ass about your-plural blocks and incapacities or your ultra-immature games and stupidities. No one should.

The important thing is to get to clear stances about •what is going on in our culture•. We are just so many players or participants in a far larger web of entanglements.

Your criticism has zero effect on how I determine to proceed. Make of that what you will.

[Alexis Jacobi]

I deal on this in Chapter 32, Subsection 4b of The 11-Week Email Course, but here I dole it out free. Show some humility and respect!

Those who are internally corrupted, those masters of rhetorical calumny, will do best for themselves when, instead of externalizing and projecting outward their error-based opinions about others, that instead resolve to turn that rhetorical engine against themselves; what they say and what they do.

This is the spiritual or moral function of •confession• and its benefit is internal and curative. Sharp, honest but biting and incisive criticism is brought out against one’s self for the un-sane, destructive things on has done and is doing.

Flash — please proceed

Veggie — you go next

Note: this must be voluntary and sincere and cannot have successful results if it is coerced. Especially when it comes to internment in the Reeducation Camps, if they are to function not as mere prisons but as places of moral healing you must initiate the processes of getting better by submitting voluntarily to the regimen of reeducation.

In Gorgias Plato puts it like this:

Socrates: Then rhetoric is of no use to us, Polus, in helping a man to excuse his own injustice, or that of his parents or friends, or children or country; but may be of use to any one who holds that instead of excusing he ought to accuse--himself above all, and in the next degree his family or any of his friends who may be doing wrong; he should bring to light the iniquity and not conceal it, that so the wrong-doer may suffer and be made whole; and he should even force himself and others not to shrink, but with closed eyes like brave men to let the physician operate with knife or searing iron, not regarding the pain, in the hope of attaining the good and the honorable; let him who has done things worthy of stripes, allow himself to be scourged, if of bonds, to be bound, if of a fine, to be fined, if of exile, to be exiled, if of death, to die, himself being the first to accuse himself and his own relations, and using rhetoric to this end, that his and their unjust actions may be made manifest, and that they themselves may be delivered from injustice, which is the greatest evil.

[Alexis Jacobi]

Study Materials for the following didactics.

Who sees himself in this malformed, eloquent hunchback, hmmmmm?

[henry quirk]

Who Are The Globalists?

Look in the mirror.

What Do They Want?

To close the few remaining gaps in the walls of Black Iron Prison.

Erisian wisdom (an adaptation)...

What is Bureaucracy?

I don't know.

In India they tie elephants to trees using thin cords. An elephant could easily snap the cord, yet they remain tethered in place. Why do you think this is?

*shrugs*

When the elephant is young she is too weak to break the cord. She tries, but eventually she gives up. When the elephant grows up, she does not try to escape her puny bonds because she believes she will fail.

So the cord isn’t the thing keeping the elephant in place. That’s very interesting, but what does that have to do with Bureaucracy?

Bureaucracy is waiting for a red traffic light to go green, in the middle of the night, when no one is coming.

[Alexis Jacobi]

If you won't go to the healing ... the healing will come to you!

[promethean75]

"Those who are internally corrupted, those masters of rhetorical calumny, will do best for themselves when, instead of externalizing and projecting outward their error-based opinions about others, * resolve to turn that rhetorical engine against themselves; what they say and what they do" - A. Jacobi (excerpt from email course study material)

Removed "*that instead" becuz it was redundant.

[Alexis Jacobi]

I need a man like you, Pro-Bro, because the Spirit is telling me it’s time to begin My World Mission.

Study Material, EWEC, Exhibit 1

[seeds]

Hot rhetoric, calumny, twisted and dishonest rhetoric, in an individual, is a sign of mental and psychological disorder.

Those who are internally corrupted, those masters of rhetorical calumny, will do best for themselves when,...

If you, AJ, do not want to be accused of wearing women's undergarments, or of being seen picking your nose and eating the booger, then never ever use the word "calumny" more than once in a 72 hour period.

And just for the record, the same goes for the word "milieu."

Oh, and in regard to this...

I deal on this in Chapter 32, Subsection 4b of The 11-Week Email Course, but here I dole it out free. Show some humility and respect!

...the Chief wants to have a little pow wow with you (and don't bring the wife)...


_______

[Will Bouwman]

Someone's learnt a new word.

Just examine your use of diseased rhetoric! You for example, speaking generally, languish in a pool of ugly, distorting, condemnatory rhetoric.

It's all in the presentation. Here's an example:

...there are actually two distinct poles: one is that all immigration, and indeed *open borders* should be the political policy. That it does not matter who comes, or from where, and that all are welcome...

On the other side of that is a very different view. That a country and a community is a unique creation and, for different reasons, deserves to be respected and protected.

This is a loaded, rhetorically-driven statement.

Hot rhetoric, calumny, twisted and dishonest rhetoric, in an individual, is a sign of mental and psychological disorder.

Time for your irony transfusion, Gus.

[Alexis Jacobi]

Everything I write, Ibn-Wilbur al-Boneman, is riddled through and through with ultra-mega-consciousness. So nothing at all, not even a wingèd amoeba, gets by me.

Amending Michael Corleone’s

“Senator, we are all part of the same hypocrisy …”

I say

“Boneman, we are all part of the same disease…

The issue (and this is surely true for you) is getting clear about how the diseased condition came to be.

Expect no improvement until that realization is constellated.

Though the disease is general human property, it is simply that in Flash and Veggie (and some others) the (intellectual) disease seems far far advanced.

In order to be Warden-in-Chief of the Reeducation Camps I did have to complete the program myself. (I aced it of course.)

[Will Bouwman]

Everything I write, Ibn-Wilbur al-Boneman, is riddled through and through with ultra-mega-consciousness.

No doubt, but it is only the ultra-mega-consciousness you can muster.

[Alexis Jacobi]

One works with what God has provided, Wilbur.