The Globalist Agenda - -

[FlashDangerpants]

OK, so we have determined -- you have made it plain -- by your response that there is no way to proceed here -- unless one agree to the interpretation you have established. Is that right?

The entire presentation of the man in his video, and all the points or critiques that he brings up, have no validity whatever, they are all "drivel".

But for you that's expected, you aren't able to write what you really mean because you would get insta-banned.

What you are saying is that, here on PN and in general in all places (?), there are somethings that one might think but that one cannot ever say?

Do you regard that as the extremes of suppression of *free-speech* and as necessary (legitimate)?

If I understand correctly then, your entire rhetorical presentation is essentially an insinuation that behind all critiques of globalism, and I make specific reference to the man whose video heads up this thread, that in reality it is all a covert conspiratorial attack on *Jews*?

Is that true as well for Noam Chomsky's (and the former Left's) critique of globalism as well?

It is true of you, the guy who couldn't even say Hitler was evil, and who cannot say the Holocaust wasn't the fault of the Jews. Unless Chomsky has similar impediments, I don't think it's true of him.

The guy in the video leaves the question of the actual agenda he ascribes to this nebulous ill-defined notion ofgloablism dangling. He does it because he wants people like Atto to ask more questions and go deeper into the rabbit hole. At the bottom of that hole, there is somebody like you.

[henry quirk]

Who Are The Globalists?

Look in the mirror.

What Do They Want?

To close the few remaining gaps in the walls of Black Iron Prison.

[Alexis Jacobi]

It is true of you, the guy who couldn't even say Hitler was evil, and who cannot say the Holocaust wasn't the fault of the Jews. Unless Chomsky has similar impediments, I don't think it's true of him.

The guy in the video leaves the question of the actual agenda he ascribes to this nebulous ill-defined notion of globalism dangling. He does it because he wants people like Atto to ask more questions and go deeper into the rabbit hole. At the bottom of that hole, there is somebody like you.

Ah ha. So this is really what you are on about. It all reduces to what opinion one has of Hitler and the Holocaust?

[Alexis Jacobi]

You provide, FDP, a study of how coercion and thought control function in the present. And, while you demonstrate how this is done, you also show how rhetoric is severely abused. In short you are devious in your methods. I suppose that you concoct justifications for the use of these tactics -- if even you recognize them as such.

At every juncture you have to double-down on spurious assertions, and then to bring in new ones.

So the real topic is not as much whether the presentation of globalism, as defined in the video, is valid and worth thinking about, and more about the abuse of rhetoric by devious players and those whose main interest is to control how others think.

[Alexis Jacobi]

The topic here is not Globalism ... but thought-control and perception-control.

Inadvertently you've done quite well Flash!

[FlashDangerpants]

It is true of you, the guy who couldn't even say Hitler was evil, and who cannot say the Holocaust wasn't the fault of the Jews. Unless Chomsky has similar impediments, I don't think it's true of him.

The guy in the video leaves the question of the actual agenda he ascribes to this nebulous ill-defined notion of globalism dangling. He does it because he wants people like Atto to ask more questions and go deeper into the rabbit hole. At the bottom of that hole, there is somebody like you.

Ah ha. So this is really what you are on about. It all reduces to what opinion one has of Hitler and the Holocaust?

No. But when somebody has the agenda that you have, their whining about the agenda that somebody else has isn't important.

[Alexis Jacobi]

No. But when somebody has the agenda that you have, their whining about the agenda that somebody else has isn't important.

Now you are directing the conversation away from the thread’s topic and to a conversation about my agenda?

Then you must be clear as to what my agenda is, right?

You must be able to make clear, accurate and honest statements about it, I assume.

What is my agenda?

[FlashDangerpants]

The topic here is not Globalism

Now you are directing the conversation away from the thread’s topic

Make your mind up.

[Alexis Jacobi]

You’ve referred to my agenda. You must have a clear idea of what it is. Would you kindly explain what it is?

[Alexis Jacobi]

Note: you portray yourself as a philosophe and yet, when examined, you demonstrate nothing but corrupt method and tactic.

If what I say say is true: I further say that your tactics are common in the body-politic; then I further suggest that this exposes a •disease• within the intellectual — and perhaps the spiritual — self.

To resort to rhetorical falseness is a form of deception. It reflects, or indicates, and exposes something amiss in you.

But you-singular do not really matter. The consequential issue is that the •disease• has penetrated into the body-politic.

You cannot distinguish what is true from what is false, or is it that your will is set against it? And yet you double-down, self-consciously it seems to me, on your corrupt rhetoric. You’re trapped.

You are illustrative of significant and consequential issues that plague our present.

[Alexis Jacobi]

I therefore assess a fine of US$5,000.00 or 2 years in a Reeducation Facility.

[attofishpi]

That might be of interest to you, but for sane people one conspiracy theory is much like any other.

So.

According to you I am a:
- Homophobic
- Transphobic
- Islamaphobic
..insane racist

Why bother to put the the there when you are about to prove that you are those things with something like...

The things that have caused your feeble mind to ascribe the above to me stem from:-
- my rational fear of Islamic ideology being spread throughout Europe and the UK.
- my request that you explain what a "transexual" is (u didn't\couldn't).
- my revealing that I support Reform UK
- my disdain for Labour and their open borders (ya know, allowing ISIS and Boko Haram to spread throughout UK)

So.

Does any of the above warrant your ascribing those very nasty labels to me?

..but you think Labour has not been conspiring and still is for increasing Muslim votes to gain and hold onto power with more Islamists free to venture upon that little beautiful land (the British Isles)...an evil conspiracy indeed.

Why pretend not to be a conspiracy theorist when it is so obvious that you are one?

Well it's not really so much a theory..clearly by labour rhetoric they DO intend to allow rampant illegal immigration. Do you have a better reason than to cement more Muslim votes?

Incidentally, what I actually think is that you are mentally unwell and easily led down the rabbit hole by cynical abusers.

Really? I think you are mentally deluded since clearly you have no idea that Western culture and democracy is facing its greatest threat since Nazi Germany brought us to WW2. Need I point it out again---increasing Islamic ideology being forced upon us by LEFT wing governments allowing illegal immigration of Islamists into Europe.
WHY R U so deluded to not see this as an issue?

You are weak and easy to take advantage of.

Weak? Europe is weaker on a daily basis. U are stupid and naive. (let's resort to a slagging off match!!)

You've been doing the Great White Replacement conspiracy theory

PROVIDE EVIDENCE. I have no issue with ANY race or skin colour. What is it that makes LEFTY *s like you so RACIST

..You are being encouraged by lame videos to ponder questions about the "Globalist Agenda" but you are too stupid to notice that the video doesn't answer the question it poses,

Pretty certain I already made it clear that I agree with that, it answers nothing. I just thought I'd post to see if others have any answers or at least opinions - seems they do.

... spoiler alert, it always comes back round to the Jews in the end with these guys. And they will tell you that you couldn't be told sooner because all the Jews control the media.

Funny that, a good friend of mine revealed what an anti-semite he is on an intl phone call a few weeks ago, I got so angry I had to hang up.

And by then, after a few months of persuading you that you are special and wise and party to secret knowledge, you are going to lap it up like the weak willed manipulable little drunkard that you are.

I gotta get drunk to put up with the likes of you and give you at least a fighting chance in any debate.

Now is the time when you should totally prove this wrong by telling me how many of your best friends are Jews and that half your family suports The Tottingham Hottenspurs!

I wish I had Jewish friends! Oooonooo - did I stifle your agender to be a bigot brain - now wanting to add "anti-semite" to your list !!

[FlashDangerpants]

..but you think Labour has not been conspiring and still is for increasing Muslim votes to gain and hold onto power with more Islamists free to venture upon that little beautiful land (the British Isles)...an evil conspiracy indeed.

Why pretend not to be a conspiracy theorist when it is so obvious that you are one?

Well it's not really so much a theory..clearly by labour rhetoric they DO intend to allow rampant illegal immigration. Do you have a better reason than to cement more Muslim votes?

In one breath it isn't a theory, in the next you challenge for competing theories.

Go sober up you witless dotard.

[attofishpi]

Why pretend not to be a conspiracy theorist when it is so obvious that you are one?

Well it's not really so much a theory..clearly by labour rhetoric they DO intend to allow rampant illegal immigration. Do you have a better reason than to cement more Muslim votes?

In one breath it isn't a theory, in the next you challenge for competing theories.

Yet you obviously realise you haven't got the intellect to contend with all the other points I raised.

So.

Clearly you are ok with the Islamic invasion per Queer Starmers plan of uncontrolled borders. What did you think of his little chat with London Mayor - Muslim, Sadiq Khan (the guy that refuses to allow the England flag to fly on London cabbies) -- do you think blasphemy laws are on the way?

Or too early as the Islamists need to breed more and get more of their brethren in on little rubber dinghies to UP their vote

Christopher Hitchens warning us ..V..Starmer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hc4K1pFH-8s

PS. What's up, worried someone might call you a racist and/or an Islamaphobe? Grow a pair of bollocks.

PPS. Amazing isn't it? Imagine 80 years ago telling our soldiers that Britain would be invaded by people in rubber dinghies because the British Navy couldn't stop them!!

..talk about a joke. Britain is pathetic because of LEFTY woke imbeciles.

[FlashDangerpants]

Well it's not really so much a theory..clearly by labour rhetoric they DO intend to allow rampant illegal immigration. Do you have a better reason than to cement more Muslim votes?

In one breath it isn't a theory, in the next you challenge for competing theories.

Yet you obviously realise you haven't got the intellect to contend with all the other points I raised.

I kept it simple because the conspiratorial theorising thing is the point of the whole "globalist agenda - -" thing . Your drunken feelings of inadequacy don't interest me.

Queer Starmers

Why complain that I call you homophobic when you write homophobic shit like that?