He wouldn't want to clearly communicate his desire not to clearly communicate, after all.
And he succeeded.
What's the criteria for success here? People understanding his desire to not clearly communicate, or people not understanding?
If they understand, then there's the risk that something was accidentally clearly communicated
He doesn't necessarily care either way because he's not necessarily trying to improve his communication with the people posting here and they are not necessarily his target audience.
What The Tralfamadorians get out of it is another story.
Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 10:07 pm
What's the criteria for success here? People understanding his desire to not clearly communicate, or people not understanding?
If they understand, then there's the risk that something was accidentally clearly communicated
Did you see the funny post - I am sure he meant it as a joke - where he told me that I seemed absolutely debilitated? Absolutely, LOL.
Nuh uh, you must link me, back in the days when this was written.
He tells me
The fear that this one has here in regards to just answering and clarifying seems to be absolutely debilitating, for it.
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 10:19 pm
Did you see the funny post - I am sure he meant it as a joke - where he told me that I seemed absolutely debilitated? Absolutely, LOL.
Nuh uh, you must link me, back in the days when this was written.
He tells me
The fear that this one has here in regards to just answering and clarifying seems to be absolutely debilitating, for it.
Have you, back in the days when this was written, ever thought to just ask me if I'm a mind reader?
LOL It has already been informed of where and how this accusation of its is absolutely Wrong, and faulty. But, obviously, it missed or misunderstood that as well. Which absolutely totally understandable considering the way it looks at and sees things here, and because of the way that it assumes and believes things as well.
There is no doubt at all that this one will keep believing, absolutely, what it does here.
Hilarious! If it wanted to do what it wants, then it doesn't even think about what it likes and then, LOL, it just gets stuck liking what it wants and licking what it sees.
So, I, obviously, never used the 'like'' word anywhere here, yet this one somehow 'saw' I did, or assumed that that word was what I was talking about and referring to, and so this one has added 'that word' into its response here, as though that word is actually what I was talking about.
This one, once more, could not confused this more here even if it wanted, or 'liked', to.
Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 9:54 pm
Isn't it hilarious that people, in the days when this was written, wrote "There is no doubt at all that this one will keep believing, absolutely, what it does here."
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 10:01 pm
That saves you from doing that???? How odd: You're not here, in this forum, to necessarily communicate, better, with the posters here. If this happens and occurs, the so be it and all well and good. But, to keep having to remind posters here that my intended target audience is not necessarily you.
To remind us or them of these things is nothing that you are saved from doing by my actions.
He wouldn't want to clearly communicate his desire not to clearly communicate, after all.
And he succeeded.
Obviously these two have not been able to read and comprehend what I actually said, and meant, as what I have actually said, and meant, is the exact opposite of what these two have seen, and believes, is true and right here.
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 10:02 pm
And he succeeded.
What's the criteria for success here? People understanding his desire to not clearly communicate, or people not understanding?
If they understand, then there's the risk that something was accidentally clearly communicated
He doesn't necessarily care either way because he's not necessarily trying to improve his communication with the people posting here and they are not necessarily his target audience.
How, absolutely, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect you continue to be here "iwannaplato".
But, in regards to where, when, what, and how, exactly, only some will ever get to find out.
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 10:16 pm
What The Tralfamadorians get out of it is another story.
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 10:02 pm
And he succeeded.
What's the criteria for success here? People understanding his desire to not clearly communicate, or people not understanding?
If they understand, then there's the risk that something was accidentally clearly communicated
Did you see the funny post - I am sure he meant it as a joke - where he told me that I seemed absolutely debilitated? Absolutely, LOL.
Again, you have never 'stopped', to just consider anything else, you are just believing that your own first assumption and conclusion, is the only true and right one.
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 10:19 pm
Did you see the funny post - I am sure he meant it as a joke - where he told me that I seemed absolutely debilitated? Absolutely, LOL.
Nuh uh, you must link me, back in the days when this was written.
He tells me
The fear that this one has here in regards to just answering and clarifying seems to be absolutely debilitating, for it.
This one says and writes the word 'ironic', only, because of its assumptions and beliefs, which obviously to others could be absolutely False And Wrong, and never indicates at all what that word is in relation, exactly, because if it did, then it could be proved Wrong, Inaccurate, and/or Incorrect.
Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 10:07 pm
What's the criteria for success here? People understanding his desire to not clearly communicate, or people not understanding?
If they understand, then there's the risk that something was accidentally clearly communicated
Did you see the funny post - I am sure he meant it as a joke - where he told me that I seemed absolutely debilitated? Absolutely, LOL.
Again, you have never 'stopped', to just consider anything else, you are just believing that your own first assumption and conclusion, is the only true and right one.
Again, you have never 'stopped', in relation to me and my posts, to just consider anything else, you are just believing that your own first assumption and conclusion, is the only true and right one.
Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 11:35 pm
Obviously these two have not been able to read and comprehend what I actually said, and meant, as what I have actually said, and meant, is the exact opposite of what these two have seen, and believes, is true and right here.
Obviously this one has not been able to read and comprehend what we actually said, and meant, as what we have actually said, and meant, is the exact opposite of what this one has seen, and believes, is true and right here.