Let's look at and talk about "age", again.

[Iwannaplato]

So, you have deteriorated 'this far', 'now'.

Oh, I should have praised you for noticing that when I use your empty tactics it is a deterioration. I can only hope you realize the implications of seeing your own game playing as a deterioration.

[Age]

Concluding that I concluded some thing here, based on inadequate evidence, is you, "yourself', once again, doing the exact same thing, by presuming, concluding, and believing some thing is true without without first obtaining and having adequate evidence and proof.

Really?

So, you have deteriorated 'this far', 'now'.

I understand that you may not be able to get the point of what I did there, but since I am not necessarily communicating with you, I am not necessarily concerned about your lack of understanding.

And the Fact that you attempt so hard to deflect away from what I pointed out about your absolute hypocrisy here, says and reveals a lot about you.

Are you ever able to just stay focused on just at least 'one discussion', fully, and see that through, without always having to go on 'the attack of' 'the other', in the hope that you will be seen in some sort of 'superiority perspective'?

[Age]

So, you have deteriorated 'this far', 'now'.

Oh, I should have praised you for noticing that when I use your empty tactics it is a deterioration. I can only hope you realize the implications of seeing your own game playing as a deterioration.

you obviously, once more, MISSED the actual point I was making there.

If you would like to, also, become aware of it, then let me know and I will spell it out for you.

[Iwannaplato]

Are you ever able to just stay focused on just at least 'one discussion', fully, and see that through, without always having to go on 'the attack of' 'the other', in the hope that you will be seen in some sort of 'superiority perspective'?

You are a very poor mindreader.

[Flannel Jesus]

Are you ever able to just stay focused on just at least 'one discussion', fully, and see that through, without always having to go on 'the attack of' 'the other', in the hope that you will be seen in some sort of 'superiority perspective'?

You are a very poor mindreader.

Have you, back in the days when this was written, ever thought to just ask me if I'm a mind reader?

[Flannel Jesus]

Are you ever able to just stay focused on just at least 'one discussion', fully, and see that through, without always having to go on 'the attack of' 'the other', in the hope that you will be seen in some sort of 'superiority perspective'?

Hilarious that people would ask questions like this, back in the days when this was written.

[Iwannaplato]

Are you ever able to just stay focused on just at least 'one discussion', fully, and see that through, without always having to go on 'the attack of' 'the other', in the hope that you will be seen in some sort of 'superiority perspective'?

You are a very poor mindreader.

Have you, back in the days when this was written, ever thought to just ask me if I'm a mind reader?

Once again, for the very 'hard of hearing', and/or for the very 'slow at learning', I am not here, in this forum, to necessarily communicate, better, with you posters here. If this happens and occurs, the so be it and all well and good. But, to keep having to remind you "flannel jesus" that my intended target audience is not necessarily you nor any other poster here, would get tiresome to some.

[Age]

Are you ever able to just stay focused on just at least 'one discussion', fully, and see that through, without always having to go on 'the attack of' 'the other', in the hope that you will be seen in some sort of 'superiority perspective'?

You are a very poor mindreader.

Wow, the 'maturity' shown here.

[Age]

Are you ever able to just stay focused on just at least 'one discussion', fully, and see that through, without always having to go on 'the attack of' 'the other', in the hope that you will be seen in some sort of 'superiority perspective'?

You are a very poor mindreader.

Have you, back in the days when this was written, ever thought to just ask me if I'm a mind reader?

LOL It has already been informed of where and how this accusation of its is absolutely Wrong, and faulty. But, obviously, it missed or misunderstood that as well. Which absolutely totally understandable considering the way it looks at and sees things here, and because of the way that it assumes and believes things as well.

There is no doubt at all that this one will keep believing, absolutely, what it does here.

[Age]

You are a very poor mindreader.

Have you, back in the days when this was written, ever thought to just ask me if I'm a mind reader?

Once again, for the very 'hard of hearing', and/or for the very 'slow at learning', I am not here, in this forum, to necessarily communicate, better, with you posters here. If this happens and occurs, the so be it and all well and good. But, to keep having to remind you "flannel jesus" that my intended target audience is not necessarily you nor any other poster here, would get tiresome to some.

Thank you, it saves me from re-repeating this for those of who are 'hard of hearing', as some would say here.

[Flannel Jesus]

You are a very poor mindreader.

Have you, back in the days when this was written, ever thought to just ask me if I'm a mind reader?

LOL It has already been informed of where and how this accusation of its is absolutely Wrong, and faulty. But, obviously, it missed or misunderstood that as well. Which absolutely totally understandable considering the way it looks at and sees things here, and because of the way that it assumes and believes things as well.

There is no doubt at all that this one will keep believing, absolutely, what it does here.

Hilarious! If it wanted to do what it wants, then it doesn't even think about what it likes and then, LOL, it just gets stuck liking what it wants and licking what it sees.

Isn't it hilarious that people, in the days when this was written, wrote "There is no doubt at all that this one will keep believing, absolutely, what it does here."

[Iwannaplato]

Once again, for the very 'hard of hearing', and/or for the very 'slow at learning', I am not here, in this forum, to necessarily communicate, better, with you posters here. If this happens and occurs, the so be it and all well and good. But, to keep having to remind you "flannel jesus" that my intended target audience is not necessarily you nor any other poster here, would get tiresome to some.

Thank you, it saves me from re-repeating this for those of who are 'hard of hearing', as some would say here.

That saves you from doing that???? How odd: You're not here, in this forum, to necessarily communicate, better, with the posters here. If this happens and occurs, the so be it and all well and good. But, to keep having to remind posters here that my intended target audience is not necessarily you...etc.

To remind us or them of these things is nothing that you are saved from doing by my actions. Be free.

[Flannel Jesus]

Once again, for the very 'hard of hearing', and/or for the very 'slow at learning', I am not here, in this forum, to necessarily communicate, better, with you posters here. If this happens and occurs, the so be it and all well and good. But, to keep having to remind you "flannel jesus" that my intended target audience is not necessarily you nor any other poster here, would get tiresome to some.

Thank you, it saves me from re-repeating this for those of who are 'hard of hearing', as some would say here.

That saves you from doing that???? How odd: You're not here, in this forum, to necessarily communicate, better, with the posters here. If this happens and occurs, the so be it and all well and good. But, to keep having to remind posters here that my intended target audience is not necessarily you.

To remind us or them of these things is nothing that you are saved from doing by my actions.

He wouldn't want to clearly communicate his desire not to clearly communicate, after all.

[Iwannaplato]

Thank you, it saves me from re-repeating this for those of who are 'hard of hearing', as some would say here.

That saves you from doing that???? How odd: You're not here, in this forum, to necessarily communicate, better, with the posters here. If this happens and occurs, the so be it and all well and good. But, to keep having to remind posters here that my intended target audience is not necessarily you.

To remind us or them of these things is nothing that you are saved from doing by my actions.

He wouldn't want to clearly communicate his desire not to clearly communicate, after all.

And he succeeded.

[Flannel Jesus]

That saves you from doing that???? How odd: You're not here, in this forum, to necessarily communicate, better, with the posters here. If this happens and occurs, the so be it and all well and good. But, to keep having to remind posters here that my intended target audience is not necessarily you.

To remind us or them of these things is nothing that you are saved from doing by my actions.

He wouldn't want to clearly communicate his desire not to clearly communicate, after all.

And he succeeded.

What's the criteria for success here? People understanding his desire to not clearly communicate, or people not understanding?

If they understand, then there's the risk that something was accidentally clearly communicated