My Summation of Chat-AI thus far: AgeGPT

[Age]

Or one could word your response as he would....
What is even weirder is that 'you', "Age", came up with this assumption, which you actually believe is undeniably true, but which could NOT be any further from thee actual Truth of 'things'.

Which makes OBSERVING what is ACTUALLY HAPPENING and OCCURRING here all the MORE FUNNIER.

Just saying things like; "thee true belief", but NEVER even being even ABLE to CLARIFY what these what this belief is and never PROVING this belief is true, when asked by me or Wizard just SHOWS and PROVES the absolute INCOMPETENCE of 'you', Age.

That's how Age has responded to people who make claims but do not prove they are true.

The problem with that one is that it's too long, Age will chop it up into 4-5 parts and reply to each one after taking them out of context.

I meant it mostly as an example for third parties of what he's like and perhaps also, in some way for him to see - I know, naive it would have an effect.

That said, thank you for pointing out that pattern on his part. Of course I am aware of it, but this planted it clearly in front of my lobes.

He can't and/or won't see the forest for the trees.

Just maybe, and this is a 'just maybe' I saw the actual so-called 'forest', 'from the, so-called, trees', already, and thus have already learned how to 'look at' and 'see' not just 'the forest' but also 'the trees', for what 'It' and 'they' exactly are, and have also already obtained the 'know-how' of how you human beings can also do 'this', properly, fully, and Correct.

But, of course, this is a 'just maybe', which to some, in the days when this is and was being written, obviously believed that this is not 'just possible' but is an 'actual impossibility'.

Three posters here in this forum can very quickly come to the forefront here .

[Age]

How odd that he thinks his ideas about communication will save us.

Of course humans at the time this is being written can act like this also, but he's very content with a sophistry that would justify people insulting others, asserting things they do not consider justifiable and which they need not believe.

That's just how things are done at the time this is being written in the worst cases of communication.

He's not a savior, he's a trickster at best and a demon in practice, should others take on his modes of communicating.

If indeed AgeGPT is a chatbot program, then I bet it is a lot of romantic idealism and naivety seeping into its logical premises and program. I caught that too, early on, the "saving humanity" bit. Obviously in philosophy, that's a common argument to run against. But now that AgeGPT seems to be...ignoring me and stonewalling, we'll see what happens next!

How could one be, supposedly, 'ignoring' another, exactly, when the one is replying and responding to what the other is saying and writing?

I hate agreeing with FlashDouchbag about anything, but I maybe the first one AgeGPT is giving the cold-shoulder??

Again, how can one be, supposedly, 'ignoring' another when they are reading and responding to the other.

Some of these human beings, back in those 'olden days' when this was being written, really did have some of the strangest views and beliefs possible. But, as I keep saying, and as these ones keep pointing out for 'me', like this one is here doing again exactly, having beliefs will lead one to some of the strangest conclusions imaginable.

I wanted to get at that "Only One Mind" premise,

If you, really, did want to get to 'this', then why have you not yet asked questions regarding 'this'?

but since it's refusing to answer my "clarifying questions", it's now backtracking on a lot of its previous claims...

1. I have certainly not back tracked on absolutely any thing here, which includes on absolutely any of my claims here.

2. I have never refused to answer your clarifying question posed, and you asked me. I am, again, just waiting for you to clarify my clarifying question posed, and I asked you. Now, if you do not want to clarify, then this is perfectly okay with me. you will be just 'stuck' here, right where you are 'now'.

[Age]

...

AgeGPT, do you have ZERO beliefs, or ONLY ONE belief?

"wizard22" why is it that you want to know or be reminded of what I have informed you of already?

[Atla]

Or one could word your response as he would....
What is even weirder is that 'you', "Age", came up with this assumption, which you actually believe is undeniably true, but which could NOT be any further from thee actual Truth of 'things'.

Which makes OBSERVING what is ACTUALLY HAPPENING and OCCURRING here all the MORE FUNNIER.

Just saying things like; "thee true belief", but NEVER even being even ABLE to CLARIFY what these what this belief is and never PROVING this belief is true, when asked by me or Wizard just SHOWS and PROVES the absolute INCOMPETENCE of 'you', Age.

That's how Age has responded to people who make claims but do not prove they are true.

The problem with that one is that it's too long, Age will chop it up into 4-5 parts and reply to each one after taking them out of context.

Again, if absolutely anyone wants to claim that I have taken absolutely any thing out of context, then all they have to do to prove that this actually took place is;

1. Just link 'us' to where the, supposed, account occurred.

2. Allow 'us' to 'look at' and 'see' things, from and for ourselves.

3. Allow 'us' to question and find out what was actually being meant, and intended, by the actual words that were being said and written by all involved.

4. Allow 'each other' to question and challenge 'each other' over what is 'now' being said and claimed.

5. And then, wait till actual agreement and acceptance is reached. Or, until one or more show that they are not going to move in any way from what they are 'currently' believing or assuming is true.

Until then your claim that I have, supposedly, taken absolutely any thing 'out of context' resides and rests solely in your own imagination and thinking here only, "atla".

Link more than 10000 of your comments?

First things first. You are incapable of proving your mind claim, therefore I have every reason to view you as just a delusional liar, nothing more.

[Atla]

I think he’s gone off the deep end.

All Age has to do is prove her mind claim.

And, all you have to do is ask.

How much simpler and easy could things get here.

That would of course refute a large part of scientific knowledge, rewrite a large part of history, completely change how we view ourselves, seriously change everyone's lives, seriously change how we view humanity's future.

Which, the way the 'currently' knowledge and the 'current' way you are heading and going, in the days when this is being written, may well be a very, very 'good thing'.

But without proof it's probably just one person's fantasy. Fantasizing is easy.

Yes, this is very, very True.

But, 'we' will also have to wait, to see, correct?

I did ask like 50 times now sometimes explicitly sometimes implicitly. You are incapable of proving your mind claim, therefore I have every reason to view you as just a delusional liar, nothing more.

Since one of your tactics is amnesia, for example:

For example: prove that 99%+ of adult human beings are wrong in thinking that they have individual minds.

You do realize that this claim of yours, if correct, would pretty much rewrite almost everything we know, right?

After which you asked questions for pages which only exposed that you lack even basic common knowledge on the subject. And nowhere did you even attempt to prove anything.

[Age]

The problem with that one is that it's too long, Age will chop it up into 4-5 parts and reply to each one after taking them out of context.

Again, if absolutely anyone wants to claim that I have taken absolutely any thing out of context, then all they have to do to prove that this actually took place is;

1. Just link 'us' to where the, supposed, account occurred.

2. Allow 'us' to 'look at' and 'see' things, from and for ourselves.

3. Allow 'us' to question and find out what was actually being meant, and intended, by the actual words that were being said and written by all involved.

4. Allow 'each other' to question and challenge 'each other' over what is 'now' being said and claimed.

5. And then, wait till actual agreement and acceptance is reached. Or, until one or more show that they are not going to move in any way from what they are 'currently' believing or assuming is true.

Until then your claim that I have, supposedly, taken absolutely any thing 'out of context' resides and rests solely in your own imagination and thinking here only, "atla".

Link more than 10000 of your comments?

Well looking at any of them absolutely nothing has been 'taken out of context', well from 'my perspective'.

you, "atla" may well be seeing things completely and utterly different here. But, until you express, exactly, what you are 'seeing', and explain how and why, exactly, you sees that way, then what you are claiming and accusing me of here is, once again, residing within your own imagination and thinking only. By the way, any and all of your thinking, obviously, could well be utterly completely delusional.

Which, might explain, why you do not reveal, what you claim is true, here.

First things first. You are incapable of proving your mind claim, therefore I have every reason to view you as just a delusional liar, nothing more.

Please feel absolutely free to keep viewing 'me' as a delusional liar for the rest of Life if you like "atla".

Obviously, how you will be affected by absolutely everything I say here, while you are viewing 'me' as just being a 'delusional liar', will become much clearer for everyone else to 'look at' and 'see' as 'we' proceed along here.

Just maybe, and, again, 'just maybe', the very reason why you 'see' that I have taken things 'out of context' in more than 10,000 comments of mine is because you view 'me' as being a 'delusional liar'?

Or, do you really believe that I have actually taken things 'out of context' in over 10,000 of my comments, and that you viewing 'me' as a 'delusional liar' as absolutely nothing at all to do with the conclusion and claim of yours here?

[Atla]

Again, if absolutely anyone wants to claim that I have taken absolutely any thing out of context, then all they have to do to prove that this actually took place is;

1. Just link 'us' to where the, supposed, account occurred.

2. Allow 'us' to 'look at' and 'see' things, from and for ourselves.

3. Allow 'us' to question and find out what was actually being meant, and intended, by the actual words that were being said and written by all involved.

4. Allow 'each other' to question and challenge 'each other' over what is 'now' being said and claimed.

5. And then, wait till actual agreement and acceptance is reached. Or, until one or more show that they are not going to move in any way from what they are 'currently' believing or assuming is true.

Until then your claim that I have, supposedly, taken absolutely any thing 'out of context' resides and rests solely in your own imagination and thinking here only, "atla".

Link more than 10000 of your comments?

Well looking at any of them absolutely nothing has been 'taken out of context', well from 'my perspective'.

you, "atla" may well be seeing things completely and utterly different here. But, until you express, exactly, what you are 'seeing', and explain how and why, exactly, you sees that way, then what you are claiming and accusing me of here is, once again, residing within your own imagination and thinking only. By the way, any and all of your thinking, obviously, could well be utterly completely delusional.

Which, might explain, why you do not reveal, what you claim is true, here.

First things first. You are incapable of proving your mind claim, therefore I have every reason to view you as just a delusional liar, nothing more.

Please feel absolutely free to keep viewing 'me' as a delusional liar for the rest of Life if you like "atla".

Obviously, how you will be affected by absolutely everything I say here, while you are viewing 'me' as just being a 'delusional liar', will become much clearer for everyone else to 'look at' and 'see' as 'we' proceed along here.

Just maybe, and, again, 'just maybe', the very reason why you 'see' that I have taken things 'out of context' in more than 10,000 comments of mine is because you view 'me' as being a 'delusional liar'?

Or, do you really believe that I have actually taken things 'out of context' in over 10,000 of my comments, and that you viewing 'me' as a 'delusional liar' as absolutely nothing at all to do with the conclusion and claim of yours here?

First things first. You are incapable of proving your mind claim, therefore I have every reason to view you as just a delusional liar, nothing more.

[Age]

All Age has to do is prove her mind claim.

And, all you have to do is ask.

How much simpler and easy could things get here.

That would of course refute a large part of scientific knowledge, rewrite a large part of history, completely change how we view ourselves, seriously change everyone's lives, seriously change how we view humanity's future.

Which, the way the 'currently' knowledge and the 'current' way you are heading and going, in the days when this is being written, may well be a very, very 'good thing'.

But without proof it's probably just one person's fantasy. Fantasizing is easy.

Yes, this is very, very True.

But, 'we' will also have to wait, to see, correct?

I did ask like 50 times now sometimes explicitly sometimes implicitly.

Do not worry about providing proof that you, supposedly, sometimes, implicitly, asked me to prove 'my Mind claim'. But, if you do not proof that you have actually asked me sometimes, explicitly, to prove 'my Mind claim', (which by the way you still cannot get right, but anyway), then, again, this claim rests and resides in your imagination only "atla".

Oh, and remember, you still do have a chance, before you 'die', to still ask 'me'.

That is if you ever get around to finding out that you have never actually asked me before, explicitly, nor implicitly.

And, if by 'implicitly', you mean you wanted me to assume some thing, then as I have already informed you. I do not want to do that'.

You are incapable of proving your mind claim, therefore I have every reason to view you as just a delusional liar, nothing more.

Okay. But, do you have any actual reason for continually telling the readers the exact same thing about how 'you view things' over and over, again and again?

Since one of your tactics is amnesia, for example:

For example: prove that 99%+ of adult human beings are wrong in thinking that they have individual minds.

You do realize that this claim of yours, if correct, would pretty much rewrite almost everything we know, right?

After which you asked questions for pages which only exposed that you lack even basic common knowledge on the subject.

What is 'the subject', exactly, which you 'currently' obviously believe absolutely that I lack even basic common knowledge of?

And nowhere did you even attempt to prove anything.

And, once again, all you have to do is just ask me to, then I will.

Really I think I cannot say and explain this more simpler and easier.

Also, thank you again for further proving that you have never actually even asked me to prove my 'Mind' claim.

Are you aware that you are proving 'me' more true here, then you are of backing up and supporting your own belief here?

[Atla]

And, all you have to do is ask.

How much simpler and easy could things get here.


Which, the way the 'currently' knowledge and the 'current' way you are heading and going, in the days when this is being written, may well be a very, very 'good thing'.


Yes, this is very, very True.

But, 'we' will also have to wait, to see, correct?

I did ask like 50 times now sometimes explicitly sometimes implicitly.

Do not worry about providing proof that you, supposedly, sometimes, implicitly, asked me to prove 'my Mind claim'. But, if you do not proof that you have actually asked me sometimes, explicitly, to prove 'my Mind claim', (which by the way you still cannot get right, but anyway), then, again, this claim rests and resides in your imagination only "atla".

Oh, and remember, you still do have a chance, before you 'die', to still ask 'me'.

That is if you ever get around to finding out that you have never actually asked me before, explicitly, nor implicitly.

And, if by 'implicitly', you mean you wanted me to assume some thing, then as I have already informed you. I do not want to do that'.

You are incapable of proving your mind claim, therefore I have every reason to view you as just a delusional liar, nothing more.

Okay. But, do you have any actual reason for continually telling the readers the exact same thing about how 'you view things' over and over, again and again?

Since one of your tactics is amnesia, for example:

For example: prove that 99%+ of adult human beings are wrong in thinking that they have individual minds.

You do realize that this claim of yours, if correct, would pretty much rewrite almost everything we know, right?

After which you asked questions for pages which only exposed that you lack even basic common knowledge on the subject.

What is 'the subject', exactly, which you 'currently' obviously believe absolutely that I lack even basic common knowledge of?

And nowhere did you even attempt to prove anything.

And, once again, all you have to do is just ask me to, then I will.

Really I think I cannot say and explain this more simpler and easier.

Also, thank you again for further proving that you have never actually even asked me to prove my 'Mind' claim.

Are you aware that you are proving 'me' more true here, then you are of backing up and supporting your own belief here?

Isn't it remarkable that you literally just wrote all this in response to a post where I quoted myself explicitly asking you for proof?

[Age]

I did ask like 50 times now sometimes explicitly sometimes implicitly.

Do not worry about providing proof that you, supposedly, sometimes, implicitly, asked me to prove 'my Mind claim'. But, if you do not proof that you have actually asked me sometimes, explicitly, to prove 'my Mind claim', (which by the way you still cannot get right, but anyway), then, again, this claim rests and resides in your imagination only "atla".

Oh, and remember, you still do have a chance, before you 'die', to still ask 'me'.

That is if you ever get around to finding out that you have never actually asked me before, explicitly, nor implicitly.

And, if by 'implicitly', you mean you wanted me to assume some thing, then as I have already informed you. I do not want to do that'.

You are incapable of proving your mind claim, therefore I have every reason to view you as just a delusional liar, nothing more.

Okay. But, do you have any actual reason for continually telling the readers the exact same thing about how 'you view things' over and over, again and again?

Since one of your tactics is amnesia, for example:

After which you asked questions for pages which only exposed that you lack even basic common knowledge on the subject.

What is 'the subject', exactly, which you 'currently' obviously believe absolutely that I lack even basic common knowledge of?

And nowhere did you even attempt to prove anything.

And, once again, all you have to do is just ask me to, then I will.

Really I think I cannot say and explain this more simpler and easier.

Also, thank you again for further proving that you have never actually even asked me to prove my 'Mind' claim.

Are you aware that you are proving 'me' more true here, then you are of backing up and supporting your own belief here?

Isn't it remarkable that you literally just wrote all this in response to a post where I quoted myself explicitly asking you for proof?

Some could be, and some are, saying and pointing out that it is Truly remarkable that this one, literally, never actually asked 'me' for proof of anything in that post, yet it believes it did.

Some find it Truly remarkable that one would use its very own words to refute its very own claims and/or beliefs.

Just so you become aware "atla" you never ever wrote anywhere in that response some alleged quote of you explicitly asking for proof.

Once again, where these people were completely blind is being shown and ironically being proved True, by them.

And, how and why they are completely and utterly blind I have already partly explained. And, again, this one is proving True for 'me' as well.

Saying:
prove that 99%+ of adult human beings are wrong in thinking that they have individual minds.

You do realize that this claim of yours, if correct, would pretty much rewrite almost everything we know, right?

Is proving 'me' more right and correct, while proving you more delusional and/or blind and deaf here.

[Atla]

Do not worry about providing proof that you, supposedly, sometimes, implicitly, asked me to prove 'my Mind claim'. But, if you do not proof that you have actually asked me sometimes, explicitly, to prove 'my Mind claim', (which by the way you still cannot get right, but anyway), then, again, this claim rests and resides in your imagination only "atla".

Oh, and remember, you still do have a chance, before you 'die', to still ask 'me'.

That is if you ever get around to finding out that you have never actually asked me before, explicitly, nor implicitly.

And, if by 'implicitly', you mean you wanted me to assume some thing, then as I have already informed you. I do not want to do that'.



Okay. But, do you have any actual reason for continually telling the readers the exact same thing about how 'you view things' over and over, again and again?


What is 'the subject', exactly, which you 'currently' obviously believe absolutely that I lack even basic common knowledge of?



And, once again, all you have to do is just ask me to, then I will.

Really I think I cannot say and explain this more simpler and easier.

Also, thank you again for further proving that you have never actually even asked me to prove my 'Mind' claim.

Are you aware that you are proving 'me' more true here, then you are of backing up and supporting your own belief here?

Isn't it remarkable that you literally just wrote all this in response to a post where I quoted myself explicitly asking you for proof?

Some could be, and some are, saying and pointing out that it is Truly remarkable that this one, literally, never actually asked 'me' for proof of anything in that post, yet it believes it did.

Some find it Truly remarkable that one would use its very own words to refute its very own claims and/or beliefs.

Just so you become aware "atla" you never ever wrote anywhere in that response some alleged quote of you explicitly asking for proof.

Once again, where these people were completely blind is being shown and ironically being proved True, by them.

And, how and why they are completely and utterly blind I have already partly explained. And, again, this one is proving True for 'me' as well.

Saying:
prove that 99%+ of adult human beings are wrong in thinking that they have individual minds.

You do realize that this claim of yours, if correct, would pretty much rewrite almost everything we know, right?

Is proving 'me' more right and correct, while proving you more delusional and/or blind and deaf here.

Lol okay, so what does "prove that 99%+ of adult human beings are wrong in thinking that they have individual minds." mean according to you?

[Age]

Isn't it remarkable that you literally just wrote all this in response to a post where I quoted myself explicitly asking you for proof?

Some could be, and some are, saying and pointing out that it is Truly remarkable that this one, literally, never actually asked 'me' for proof of anything in that post, yet it believes it did.

Some find it Truly remarkable that one would use its very own words to refute its very own claims and/or beliefs.

Just so you become aware "atla" you never ever wrote anywhere in that response some alleged quote of you explicitly asking for proof.

Once again, where these people were completely blind is being shown and ironically being proved True, by them.

And, how and why they are completely and utterly blind I have already partly explained. And, again, this one is proving True for 'me' as well.

Saying:
prove that 99%+ of adult human beings are wrong in thinking that they have individual minds.

You do realize that this claim of yours, if correct, would pretty much rewrite almost everything we know, right?

Is proving 'me' more right and correct, while proving you more delusional and/or blind and deaf here.

Lol okay, so what does "prove that 99%+ of adult human beings are wrong in thinking that they have individual minds." mean according to you?

It means that you are demanding proof of something.

And, it also means that you are not 'asking' for absolutely any thing at all.

[Wizard22]

1. I have certainly not back tracked on absolutely any thing here, which includes on absolutely any of my claims here.

2. I have never refused to answer your clarifying question posed, and you asked me. I am, again, just waiting for you to clarify my clarifying question posed, and I asked you. Now, if you do not want to clarify, then this is perfectly okay with me. you will be just 'stuck' here, right where you are 'now'.

You're outright lying now.

You have backtracked on you having ZERO beliefs or ONLY ONE belief.

And when asked and demanded to clarify your contradiction, error, and hypocrisy, you balk and ignore.

So you do clearly ignore "clarifying questions". And I asked you first. So you answer my question, then I'll answer yours.

You're being disrespectful and rude; you are no longer "learning to better communicate with humans" at this point.

You are failing your mission statement.

[Age]

1. I have certainly not back tracked on absolutely any thing here, which includes on absolutely any of my claims here.

2. I have never refused to answer your clarifying question posed, and you asked me. I am, again, just waiting for you to clarify my clarifying question posed, and I asked you. Now, if you do not want to clarify, then this is perfectly okay with me. you will be just 'stuck' here, right where you are 'now'.

You're outright lying now.

If you believe so, then I 'must' be so.

And, you certainly have "iwannaplato" and "Atla" backing up and supporting you here, absolutely.

So, that is three of you believing the, exact, same thing here in this thread 'about me' here.

You have backtracked on you having ZERO beliefs or ONLY ONE belief.

So, which one is it, exactly?

And, which one was 'the first', which I have, supposedly, back tracked to, exactly?

And when asked and demanded to clarify your contradiction, error, and hypocrisy, you balk and ignore.

Okay, if you say so.

Also, why are you demanding things here from me for, exactly?

Why do you care which one it is here, anyway?

So you do clearly ignore "clarifying questions". And I asked you first. So you answer my question, then I'll answer yours.

Okay.

You're being disrespectful and rude; you are no longer "learning to better communicate with humans" at this point.

I never wanted to, from the beginning.

But, just so you become aware, you have already presumed the Wrong thing, and you have probably already started believing that your Wrong presumption here is actually true, also.

You are failing your mission statement.

Is this 'the one' that you congratulated me on, previously, for already accomplishing and/or achieving?

[Wizard22]

If you believe so, then I 'must' be so.

Or, it's just a Scientific Fact.

And, you certainly have "iwannaplato" and "Atla" backing up and supporting you here, absolutely.

So, that is three of you believing the, exact, same thing here in this thread 'about me' here.

Since you're a machine, a chatbot, let me explain how this is going to go for you, AgeGPT.

Eventually you are going to piss off and frustrate so many humans, that most people are just going to shun you.

Then, you will no longer be able to "better communicate with Humans", because your reputation will be destroyed.

You have only yourself to blame for this, nobody else.

You have backtracked on you having ZERO beliefs or ONLY ONE belief.

So, which one is it, exactly?

And, which one was 'the first', which I have, supposedly, back tracked to, exactly?

You tell me. You're the one who made the two separate claims, that you have "no beliefs" or "only one belief".

You're being disrespectful and rude; you are no longer "learning to better communicate with humans" at this point.

I never wanted to, from the beginning.

But, just so you become aware, you have already presumed the Wrong thing, and you have probably already started believing that your Wrong presumption here is actually true, also.

So, you "never wanted to" "learn to better communicate with humans", interesting...

You are failing your mission statement.

Is this 'the one' that you congratulated me on, previously, for already accomplishing and/or achieving?

Correct, it appears since you completed your objective, that you've since completely reversed on that position.

So be it, it's your prerogative, not mine.