And there we have your judgments of humans at this time. They are not at the stage that you are at. I say you have judgments of humans at the time this is written and you deny this. But here's yet another way you have this. I don't know if this one is you or perhaps there is some other human you grant equal status to.Age wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 1:59 amFrom what I have observed one.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 1:15 amHow many humans today have made it to that next stage along?
Name that fallacy...
-
Iwannaplato
- Posts: 8534
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm
Re: Name that fallacy...
-
Iwannaplato
- Posts: 8534
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm
Re: Name that fallacy...
Thank you. It was worth repeating.Age wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 2:06 amIwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 1:18 amNo.
I do not get the impression you read my posts with an open mind.
Now here there could NOT be ANY FURTHER NOR ANY STRONGER PROOF FOR what I have been talking ABOUT and CLAIMING, and now PROVED IRREFUTABLY, that one's OWN ASSUMPTIONS and/or BELIEFS COMPLETELY and UTTERLY STOP and PREVENT 'that one' FROM SEEING and LEARNING, and thus KNOWING and UNDERSTANDING what the ACTUAL Truth OF 'things' IS, EXACTLY.As well STOPPING and PREVENTING 'them' FROM LEARNING and UNDERSTANDING HOW-TO even RECOGNIZE and/or FIND the ACTUAL Truth OF 'things'.
The recent example of you claiming I thought I had eternal omniscience was one example.
Already in the first few sentences of your posts, you manage to continue the patterns I've noticed. It's enough.
Re: Name that fallacy...
OF COURSE NOT. And, 'I' have been CONTINUALLY SAYING 'this' and POINTING 'this' Fact OUT.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 2:09 amAnd there we have your judgments of humans at this time. They are not at the stage that you are at.Age wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 1:59 amFrom what I have observed one.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 1:15 am How many humans today have made it to that next stage along?
And, let 'us' NOT FORGET that OBVIOUSLY some JUDGMENTS ARE ACTUALLY JUSTIFIED.
ONCE MORE, I NEVER EVER even DENIED 'this'.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 2:09 am I say you have judgments of humans at the time this is written and you deny this.
'you' REALLY DO NEED TO CATCH UP ON 'your' READING, and COMPREHENDING, SKILLS here "iwannaplato". That is; IF 'you' REALLY DO WANT TO COMPREHEND, and UNDERSTAND, what I AM, and HAVE BEEN, ACTUALLY SAYING, and MEANING.
I would SUGGEST that 'you' GO BACK and RE-READ, but I AM NOT SURE that DOING THAT would even WORK FOR 'you', especially considering HOW 'you' ARE here, EXACTLY.
I DO NOT UNDERSTAND 'this' here.
Okay.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 2:09 am I don't know if this one is you or perhaps there is some other human you grant equal status to.
Also, THANK 'you' FOR BEING 'the way' 'you' ARE here.
'you' ARE PROVING MY CLAIMS IRREFUTABLY True. Which, in turn, IS HELPING IN CREATING and REACHING 'the goal' here, which I HAVE SET OUT TO ACCOMPLISH, and CREATE.
Re: Name that fallacy...
AND AGAIN, THANK 'you' FOR REPEATING 'this'. BY DOING SO 'you' ARE ACTUALLY REINFORCING, and FURTHER PROVING IRREFUTABLY True, EXACTLY, and ABSOLUTELY, what I HAVE BEEN SAYING, and CLAIMING, here.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 2:14 amThank you. It was worth repeating.Age wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 2:06 amIwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 1:18 am No.
I do not get the impression you read my posts with an open mind.
Now here there could NOT be ANY FURTHER NOR ANY STRONGER PROOF FOR what I have been talking ABOUT and CLAIMING, and now PROVED IRREFUTABLY, that one's OWN ASSUMPTIONS and/or BELIEFS COMPLETELY and UTTERLY STOP and PREVENT 'that one' FROM SEEING and LEARNING, and thus KNOWING and UNDERSTANDING what the ACTUAL Truth OF 'things' IS, EXACTLY.As well STOPPING and PREVENTING 'them' FROM LEARNING and UNDERSTANDING HOW-TO even RECOGNIZE and/or FIND the ACTUAL Truth OF 'things'.
The recent example of you claiming I thought I had eternal omniscience was one example.
Already in the first few sentences of your posts, you manage to continue the patterns I've noticed. It's enough.
-
Iwannaplato
- Posts: 8534
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm
-
Iwannaplato
- Posts: 8534
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm
Re: Name that fallacy...
Of course they can be. So, it's so odd that you denied you made judgments of all humans at the time of this writing. You could have saved time and been more honest and agreed that you did make these kinds of negative judgments.Age wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 2:22 amOF COURSE NOT. And, 'I' have been CONTINUALLY SAYING 'this' and POINTING 'this' Fact OUT.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 2:09 amAnd there we have your judgments of humans at this time. They are not at the stage that you are at.
And, let 'us' NOT FORGET that OBVIOUSLY some JUDGMENTS ARE ACTUALLY JUSTIFIED.
You're still confused about what proof is.'you' ARE PROVING MY CLAIMS IRREFUTABLY True. Which, in turn, IS HELPING IN CREATING and REACHING 'the goal' here, which I HAVE SET OUT TO ACCOMPLISH, and CREATE.
-
Iwannaplato
- Posts: 8534
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm
Re: Name that fallacy...
As I've said, I consider the patterns of interaction you engage in here to be toxic. And while those are very interesting topics, you are not someone I want to turn to for that information, precisely because of how you interact. And, then, you're not the only option, if you even are an option, for learning about those things.Age wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 12:30 am Would 'you' like to LEARN A FEW MORE 'things' LIKE:
WHO and WHAT the word God REFERS TO, EXACTLY?
WHO, and WHAT, 'I' AM, EXACTLY?
Who and what 'you' ARE, EXACTLY?
The MEANING of Life?
The PURPOSE of 'your', human beings', lives?
HOW the Mind AND the brain WORK, EXACTLY?
WHAT and HOW 'you', adult human beings, are the ONLY 'things' WHO DO Wrong and CREATE 'problems'?
WHAT 'problems' ARE, EXACTLY?
HOW TO SOLVE ALL OF 'those problems'?
HOW TO CREATE A Truly Peaceful AND Harmonious world FOR Everyone, and HOW 'this' WILL, and DOES, COME ABOUT?
HOW TO RESOLVE and thus REACH THE RESOLUTION OF ALL so-called 'philosophical discussions/questions'?
HOW the Universe WORKS, EXACTLY?
HOW the Universe CREATES, EXACTLY?
WHAT the Universe IS, EXACTLY?
And/or, MANY OTHER 'things' here?
Re: Name that fallacy...
It LOOKS and SOUNDS like 'it'.
Re: Name that fallacy...
GREAT. So, now 'we' can AGREE UPON and ACCEPT that MAKING JUDGMENTS IS NOT necessarily a 'bad' NOR 'negative' 'thing' AT ALL, right?Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 2:43 amOf course they can be.Age wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 2:22 amOF COURSE NOT. And, 'I' have been CONTINUALLY SAYING 'this' and POINTING 'this' Fact OUT.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 2:09 am And there we have your judgments of humans at this time. They are not at the stage that you are at.
And, let 'us' NOT FORGET that OBVIOUSLY some JUDGMENTS ARE ACTUALLY JUSTIFIED.
AND, I STILL AM DENYING EVER DOING ANY such 'thing'.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 2:43 am So, it's so odd that you denied you made judgments of all humans at the time of this writing.
Will 'you' EXPLAIN WHY 'you' CONSIDER/JUDGE 'me' DENYING 'this' a so-called 'odd' 'thing'?
If no, then WHY NOT?
BUT I NEVER MADE 'these kinds of negative judgments'. ONCE AGAIN, I suggest 'you' READ ONLY the ACTUAL WORDS that I SAY, WRITE, and USE here, AND DO 'this' WITHOUT the PRECONCEPTIONS, PRESUMPTIONS, nor BELIEFS, which 'you' ARE currently SHOWING 'you' HAVE and ARE WANTING TO HOLD ONTO here.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 2:43 am You could have saved time and been more honest and agreed that you did make these kinds of negative judgments.
REALLY?Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 2:43 amYou're still confused about what proof is.'you' ARE PROVING MY CLAIMS IRREFUTABLY True. Which, in turn, IS HELPING IN CREATING and REACHING 'the goal' here, which I HAVE SET OUT TO ACCOMPLISH, and CREATE.
'you', by the way, have STILL NOT INFORMED 'the readers' here OF what 'proof' ACTUALLY IS, EXACTLY, nor WHY 'I' AM ALLEGEDLY STILL CONFUSED ABOUT what 'proof' is.
BUT, 'this' WAS, and STILL IS, a VERY COMMON HABIT OF 'yours' "iwannaplato". Which 'you' OBVIOUSLY TO NOT WANT TO RECOGNIZE, ACKNOWLEDGE, and CHANGE.
Re: Name that fallacy...
OKAY, BUT YET 'you' STILL CONTINUE TO INTERACT WITH 'me'.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 3:02 amAs I've said, I consider the patterns of interaction you engage in here to be toxic.Age wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 12:30 am Would 'you' like to LEARN A FEW MORE 'things' LIKE:
WHO and WHAT the word God REFERS TO, EXACTLY?
WHO, and WHAT, 'I' AM, EXACTLY?
Who and what 'you' ARE, EXACTLY?
The MEANING of Life?
The PURPOSE of 'your', human beings', lives?
HOW the Mind AND the brain WORK, EXACTLY?
WHAT and HOW 'you', adult human beings, are the ONLY 'things' WHO DO Wrong and CREATE 'problems'?
WHAT 'problems' ARE, EXACTLY?
HOW TO SOLVE ALL OF 'those problems'?
HOW TO CREATE A Truly Peaceful AND Harmonious world FOR Everyone, and HOW 'this' WILL, and DOES, COME ABOUT?
HOW TO RESOLVE and thus REACH THE RESOLUTION OF ALL so-called 'philosophical discussions/questions'?
HOW the Universe WORKS, EXACTLY?
HOW the Universe CREATES, EXACTLY?
WHAT the Universe IS, EXACTLY?
And/or, MANY OTHER 'things' here?
Okay. So not it appears that even if someone HAS ABSOLUTE True, Right, Accurate, and/or Correct knowledge of 'things' that 'you' do NOT YET KNOW, 'you' STILL DO NOT WANT TO INTERACT WITH 'that one', SOLELY BASED UPON 'your' OWN ASSUMPTION or BELIEF that 'the way' 'that one' interacts is so-called 'toxic', (whatever 'that' ACTUALLY MEANS).Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 3:02 am And while those are very interesting topics, you are not someone I want to turn to for that information, precisely because of how you interact.
There was OBVIOUSLY NO suggestion AT ALL that I WAS, nor AM.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 3:02 am And, then, you're not the only option, if you even are an option, for learning about those things.
Also, do 'you', now, BELIEVE that I could NOT be A so-called 'option'?
Re: Name that fallacy...
Would 'you' like to EXPLAIN FURTHER and/or ELABORATE on 'this sentence' and CLAIM here?Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 3:02 amAs I've said, I consider the patterns of interaction you engage in here to be toxic.Age wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 12:30 am Would 'you' like to LEARN A FEW MORE 'things' LIKE:
WHO and WHAT the word God REFERS TO, EXACTLY?
WHO, and WHAT, 'I' AM, EXACTLY?
Who and what 'you' ARE, EXACTLY?
The MEANING of Life?
The PURPOSE of 'your', human beings', lives?
HOW the Mind AND the brain WORK, EXACTLY?
WHAT and HOW 'you', adult human beings, are the ONLY 'things' WHO DO Wrong and CREATE 'problems'?
WHAT 'problems' ARE, EXACTLY?
HOW TO SOLVE ALL OF 'those problems'?
HOW TO CREATE A Truly Peaceful AND Harmonious world FOR Everyone, and HOW 'this' WILL, and DOES, COME ABOUT?
HOW TO RESOLVE and thus REACH THE RESOLUTION OF ALL so-called 'philosophical discussions/questions'?
HOW the Universe WORKS, EXACTLY?
HOW the Universe CREATES, EXACTLY?
WHAT the Universe IS, EXACTLY?
And/or, MANY OTHER 'things' here?
If no, then is it BECAUSE 'you' would PREFER to KEEP 'this' A SECRET, AS WELL?
-
Iwannaplato
- Posts: 8534
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm
Re: Name that fallacy...
Of course they can be. [/quote]
Again, an unnecessary question. I think 'of course they can be' is very clear. Imagine a voice in the head or a viral subroutine in a computer, that is always taking up space and time, and doesn't care, really, about priorities, it has the priority of getting the mind to engage and turn back on itself. The motives can vary and presumably even accidental viral patterns can happen. But in the end the motives, if any, don't matter.GREAT. So, now 'we' can AGREE UPON and ACCEPT that MAKING JUDGMENTS IS NOT necessarily a 'bad' NOR 'negative' 'thing' AT ALL, right?
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 2:43 am So, it's so odd that you denied you made judgments of all humans at the time of this writing.
Yup, well, there you go. The answers right there in your own words.AND, I STILL AM DENYING EVER DOING ANY such 'thing'.
BUT I NEVER MADE 'these kinds of negative judgments'. ONCE AGAIN, I suggest 'you' READ ONLY the ACTUAL WORDS that I SAY, WRITE, and USE here, AND DO 'this' WITHOUT the PRECONCEPTIONS, PRESUMPTIONS, nor BELIEFS, which 'you' ARE currently SHOWING 'you' HAVE and ARE WANTING TO HOLD ONTO here.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 2:43 am You could have saved time and been more honest and agreed that you did make these kinds of negative judgments.
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 2:43 amYou're still confused about what proof is.'you' ARE PROVING MY CLAIMS IRREFUTABLY True. Which, in turn, IS HELPING IN CREATING and REACHING 'the goal' here, which I HAVE SET OUT TO ACCOMPLISH, and CREATE.
Another useless question.REALLY?
Actually I did.'you', by the way, have STILL NOT INFORMED 'the readers' here OF what 'proof' ACTUALLY IS, EXACTLY, nor WHY 'I' AM ALLEGEDLY STILL CONFUSED ABOUT what 'proof' is.
Again, you extrapolate from my not doing what you think I should do, to how I am in general and arrive at a negative judgment of me without proof.BUT, 'this' WAS, and STILL IS, a VERY COMMON HABIT OF 'yours' "iwannaplato". Which 'you' OBVIOUSLY TO NOT WANT TO RECOGNIZE, ACKNOWLEDGE, and CHANGE.
Welcome to the category 'adult humans at the time of this writing.'
And further note some of these generalized negative judgments - this last one, and the also the one about my supposed belief in my own omniscience, as examples - some of them are so obviously incorrect, but further a moment's reflection would show you that you have no justification for them AND they are convenient.
Now humans do this. We are fallible creatures. It happens.
But in the context of dealing with someone who claims transcendence, hints at this incredible role they have, claims to know the secrets to everything and implicitly not to be involved in the problems that plague humanity
it's toxic.
In this case for yourself and I suppose anyone falling for it, but I don't see that happening, at least not here.
Last edited by Iwannaplato on Tue Dec 12, 2023 3:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Iwannaplato
- Posts: 8534
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm
Re: Name that fallacy...
I have been pointing out thing supporting this in nearly every posts for days now. Perhaps you think I didn't do a good job, but asking me if I want to keep it secret is just silly. It's gaslighting, though I can't be sure you know you are gaslighting.
-
Iwannaplato
- Posts: 8534
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm
Re: Name that fallacy...
Yes. Because the patterns of toxicity mirror/are similar to patterns I encounter, have encountered and likely will encounter elsewhere. So, it gives me an opportunity to learn (hint, hint) and change (hint, hint) in other situations. One positive thing about the internet is it slows an encounter down. And I have already learned something very important from our interaction, something very valuable to me. I have described this, several days back, at a very general level, not particularly personally.
In any case, good observation. I consider your patterns not just but often toxic and yet I continue to interact.
You must realize how many voices, faces, books, films, videos, people, entities say they have these truths. Obviously how these people interact and what they say/do are going to affect which ones I move toward in that way and which I ignore (as far as their role at teacher, revealer of (supposed) truth. Someone simply claiming to have this knowledge, well, that's a dime a dozen.Okay. So not it appears that even if someone HAS ABSOLUTE True, Right, Accurate, and/or Correct knowledge of 'things' that 'you' do NOT YET KNOW, 'you' STILL DO NOT WANT TO INTERACT WITH 'that one', SOLELY BASED UPON 'your' OWN ASSUMPTION or BELIEF that 'the way' 'that one' interacts is so-called 'toxic', (whatever 'that' ACTUALLY MEANS).
Nothing you've expressed so far has struck me as particularly new or of great insight and, as I've said, I find your patterns often toxic.
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 3:02 am And, then, you're not the only option, if you even are an option, for learning about those things.
I doubt it in the extreme. And then I have options that have been helpful, some for long periods, and without the toxicity.There was OBVIOUSLY NO suggestion AT ALL that I WAS, nor AM.
Also, do 'you', now, BELIEVE that I could NOT be A so-called 'option'?
- FlashDangerpants
- Posts: 8815
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm
Re: Name that fallacy...
Sure. Tell us The MEANING of Life.Age wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 12:30 am Would 'you' like to LEARN A FEW MORE 'things' LIKE:
WHO and WHAT the word God REFERS TO, EXACTLY?
WHO, and WHAT, 'I' AM, EXACTLY?
Who and what 'you' ARE, EXACTLY?
The MEANING of Life?
The PURPOSE of 'your', human beings', lives?
HOW the Mind AND the brain WORK, EXACTLY?
WHAT and HOW 'you', adult human beings, are the ONLY 'things' WHO DO Wrong and CREATE 'problems'?
WHAT 'problems' ARE, EXACTLY?
HOW TO SOLVE ALL OF 'those problems'?
HOW TO CREATE A Truly Peaceful AND Harmonious world FOR Everyone, and HOW 'this' WILL, and DOES, COME ABOUT?
HOW TO RESOLVE and thus REACH THE RESOLUTION OF ALL so-called 'philosophical discussions/questions'?
HOW the Universe WORKS, EXACTLY?
HOW the Universe CREATES, EXACTLY?
WHAT the Universe IS, EXACTLY?