Is LARPing as a TradCath ChristCuck better than the Alternative???

[Atla]

I said why: our basic orientation is already wired before birth, that's why many/most heterosexuals and homosexuals are born, not made. But it only becomes more overt at puberty.

Obviously

Your explanation is not rooted in Nature though. Why would animals be born sterile or defective? Wouldn't that mean extinction?

The natural conclusion of homosexuality, if what you say is true, is sterility. Homosexuals do not produce offspring.

If they do, then they're heterosexuals. They're lying. So how much of homosexuality, or sexuality in general, is based on lies??

Homosexuality isn't intended by nature imo, at least not in humans. It's mainly a glitch caused by wrong doses of hormones during some stages of pregnancy.

[Wizard22]

Homosexuality isn't intended by nature imo, at least not in humans. It's mainly a glitch caused by wrong doses of hormones during some stages of pregnancy.

I just don't think that's true.

Have you studied Mammalian behavior before? You should look into wolves, lions, monkeys, gorillas, etc. and compare how sexuality occurs there. Males in packs and herds suffer emasculation by the apex predator or alpha male. This same phenomenon occurs in humans. Mammals perform mock sexual domination, but do not anally penetrate one another (sodomy). So humans are an exception to this rule, and follow-through with penetration. Human homosexuals are categorically different than emasculated males of other species. It's not a "glitch" if the phenomenon of emasculation is present in other Mammalian species, which it is.

So this begs-the-question as to why some emasculated human males are still heterosexual while others are homosexual.

It's as I explained: mental fortitude. There are degrees of mental resilience when it comes to identifying "as homosexual". Strong-minded men are not gay. They are not suggestable. Their heterosexuality is "not in question".

[Atla]

Homosexuality isn't intended by nature imo, at least not in humans. It's mainly a glitch caused by wrong doses of hormones during some stages of pregnancy.

I just don't think that's true.

Have you studied Mammalian behavior before? You should look into wolves, lions, monkeys, gorillas, etc. and compare how sexuality occurs there. Males in packs and herds suffer emasculation by the apex predator or alpha male. This same phenomenon occurs in humans. Mammals perform mock sexual domination, but do not anally penetrate one another (sodomy). So humans are an exception to this rule, and follow-through with penetration. Human homosexuals are categorically different than emasculated males of other species. It's not a "glitch" if the phenomenon of emasculation is present in other Mammalian species, which it is.

So this begs-the-question as to why some emasculated human males are still heterosexual while others are homosexual.

It's as I explained: mental fortitude. There are degrees of mental resilience when it comes to identifying "as homosexual". Strong-minded men are not gay. They are not suggestable. Their heterosexuality is "not in question".

Well that just confirms that homosexuality wasn't intended by nature, but the complicated human mind can turn some heterosexuals gay too.

[Flannel Jesus]

Dude says he knows from experience why people are gay. That's pretty interesting

I can observe a group of monkeys, which you call "humans", and examine their behavior, along with their causes and effects.

I sympathize with you that you cannot. Not all humans are meant to be thinkers though.

Observation and experience are not synonyms. I assume you've had first hand experience of everything you've been talking about

[Wizard22]

Observation and experience are not synonyms. I assume you've had first hand experience of everything you've been talking about

So according to your "logic", nothing can be known about gorillas, because humans are not gorillas, and nothing can be known about lions, because humans are not lions, nothing can be known about volcanos, because humans are not volcanos, nothing can be known about the ocean, because humans are not the ocean...

Why do you even come to philosophy forums? Seriously?

[Sculptor]

Who is abusing children?
https://www.whoismakingnews.com

aaachild abuse.jpg

Gosh - its not drag queens or trans people.

So ask your self why is it that trans and drag is under attack? Could it possibly be that the 1 person in 30k - 100k of population are too small a group to effectively defend themselves?
Could it possibly be the thousands of church workers, hoping to hide their own abuse conveniently find this minority group an easy target to divert attention from themselves?
Could politicians be scapegoating this micro-minority to mobilise ignorance and misunderstanding amongst the great unwashed, so that they can continue to loot the economy?
Surely not!

Data in full

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... 1732993794

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Who is abusing children?
https://www.whoismakingnews.com
aaachild abuse.jpg

Gosh - its not drag queens or trans people.

So ask your self why is it that trans and drag is under attack? Could it possibly be that the 1 person in 30k - 100k of population are too small a group to effectively defend themselves?
Could it possibly be the thousands of church workers, hoping to hide their own abuse conveniently find this minority group an easy target to divert attention from themselves?
Could politicians be scapegoating this micro-minority to mobilise ignorance and misunderstanding amongst the great unwashed, so that they can continue to loot the economy?
Surely not!

Data in full

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... 1732993794

No one is attacking so-called 'transpeople' i.e. men, or 'drag queens' i.e. men. Women just don't want men in their spaces or competing with them in sports. Why is that so hard for you to understand?
Your stupid little graph is flawed. Pretty much everyone on it is a man since most (all?) violent sexual crime is committed by MEN. Idiot!

[Harbal]

Homosexuality isn't intended by nature imo, at least not in humans. It's mainly a glitch caused by wrong doses of hormones during some stages of pregnancy.

Do we know enough to be able to take everything ino account when we come to the conclusion that homosexuality is just a "glitch", rather than its being a functional aspect of evolution and natural selection? Even if we can't think of any purpose it might serve in any current human society, we don't know that it didn't serve one in our primitive past.

[Atla]

Homosexuality isn't intended by nature imo, at least not in humans. It's mainly a glitch caused by wrong doses of hormones during some stages of pregnancy.

Do we know enough to be able to take everything ino account when we come to the conclusion that homosexuality is just a "glitch", rather than its being a functional aspect of evolution and natural selection? Even if we can't think of any purpose it might serve in any current human society, we don't know that it didn't serve one in our primitive past.

We don't know enough for that of course

[Wizard22]

Who is abusing children?
https://www.whoismakingnews.com
aaachild abuse.jpg

Gosh - its not drag queens or trans people.

So ask your self why is it that trans and drag is under attack? Could it possibly be that the 1 person in 30k - 100k of population are too small a group to effectively defend themselves?
Could it possibly be the thousands of church workers, hoping to hide their own abuse conveniently find this minority group an easy target to divert attention from themselves?
Could politicians be scapegoating this micro-minority to mobilise ignorance and misunderstanding amongst the great unwashed, so that they can continue to loot the economy?
Surely not!

Data in full

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... 1732993794

How many of the child abusers are homosexuals?
What is the prevalence of child sexual abuse among adopting homosexual "couples", compared to heterosexual families?
Why am I asking a retard like you, anything at all?
You're obviously too stupid to understand the data you admit to.

[Harbal]

Who is abusing children?
https://www.whoismakingnews.com
aaachild abuse.jpg

Gosh - its not drag queens or trans people.

So ask your self why is it that trans and drag is under attack? Could it possibly be that the 1 person in 30k - 100k of population are too small a group to effectively defend themselves?
Could it possibly be the thousands of church workers, hoping to hide their own abuse conveniently find this minority group an easy target to divert attention from themselves?
Could politicians be scapegoating this micro-minority to mobilise ignorance and misunderstanding amongst the great unwashed, so that they can continue to loot the economy?
Surely not!

Data in full

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... 1732993794

How many of the child abusers are homosexuals?
What is the prevalence of child sexual abuse among adopting homosexual "couples", compared to heterosexual families?
Why am I asking a retard like you, anything at all?
You're obviously too stupid to understand the data you admit to.

This habit you have of calling your intellectual superiors retards is making you look incredibly ridiculous, just in case you are interested.

[Iwannaplato]

These cause increased levels of sex hormones, particularly testosterone in males, estrogen in females.

You seem to be from another planet. Even before puberty most boys like the girls.
[/quote]As usual he's one of our truly binary thinkers, sort of the mirror image of Peter K.

His own sentence above should give him pause in his on/off version of reality.

Of course puberty leads to changes. It's like if you disagree with some facet of his utterly binary beliefs you're about to tell him the earth doesn't exist and the universe never happened.

It's a very fragile, defensive posture.

Attach anything that moves as if it means the end of all reason and life.

[Iwannaplato]

This habit you have of calling your intellectual superiors retards is making you look incredibly ridiculous, just in case you are interested.

It is amazing how some people can get very similar feedback from people with a range of philosophical opinions and just assume that the criticism has nothing to do with them.

I can understand sticking to one's guns about a minority opinion. Sure. Majorities can be wrong. Even near consensus can and has been wrong.

But to assume you are communicating clearly all the time and that anyone who points out flaws in what you are saying or disagrees with a facet is a retard is really rather amazing.

I have beliefs that I am sure most people here would disagree with. I don't take this to mean that everyone is a moron nor does it mean that if I argued for them only retards would not immediately agree.

It's like responding to Wizard is waking someone up in the middle of a post-traumatic stress nightmare.

Expect screams and flailing fists.

[Wizard22]

This habit you have of calling your intellectual superiors retards is making you look incredibly ridiculous, just in case you are interested.

Posting misleading data is intellectually superior?
Tell me about the prevalence of sexual abuse among homosexual "parents" compared to heterosexual families then, genius.

I want to hear how smart and aware of the world you are...
No, wait, I don't. You've already told me and everybody else.
When I want to go get shitfaced at an English pub full of slags and wankers, clown on you, I'll give you a call.

[Wizard22]

As usual he's one of our truly binary thinkers, sort of the mirror image of Peter K.

His own sentence above should give him pause in his on/off version of reality.

Of course puberty leads to changes. It's like if you disagree with some facet of his utterly binary beliefs you're about to tell him the earth doesn't exist and the universe never happened.

It's a very fragile, defensive posture.

Attach anything that moves as if it means the end of all reason and life.

I have to give you credit.
You're quite gifted at misdirection and posting irrelevant diversions away from the point.
So what is your stance on the actual matter at hand? Is homosexuality "natural"? Where is it found in nature? How? Why?

I presume that you're an ignorant git, like your Hairball buddy, with no real or actual philosophical interest in anything important in life.
Prove me wrong?