Yes, interesting that I had a little synchronicity today since I watched a rabbi (i think) talking about God with relation to Judaism, and I did find it a tad confronting. He really insisted that God was pretty much for the Jews and Israel - NOT a God for humankind in general.Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Tue Mar 15, 2022 8:32 pmHope you do not mind that I answer you here. It could derail the other thread.attofishpi wrote: ↑Tue Mar 15, 2022 8:03 pm Just out of interest, how would you define the God of Judaism and the God of Christianity? How would the definition differ I wonder?
I think that to answer you we'd have to talk about the nature of conceptions as distinct from, say, real things. How Jews define God is in many ways pretty distinct from how Christians define God and these differences -- different conceptions -- have been more acute and sometimes less acute depending on the historical moment.
The God of Judaism, I guess I'd have to say, still supports all the notions of what God wants and requires and for this reason, within traditional Judaism, Jews still must and do observe all the rules of halacha that they can and take it all very seriously. Their God has not ever, shall I say, abandoned them or traded them in for others who were given the mantle, as it were, to direct God's projects. So traditional Jews remain within that old form and, according to their logic, exist under God's blessing. This notion and this conception has everything to do with a Jewish concept of Jewish history. It is an exclusive project not an inclusive one.
The Christian God, or the God-concept if you go along with me, is different in numerous senses. One is that God Himself wiggled out from under the notion that the Jewish God was exclusive to the Jewish tribe. In this version God Himself left Judaism 'desolate' as a result of the naughty deeds that took place lo the many years during those dar days in Jerusalem. The Jewish concept of God *flew the coop* as it were and wandered off in a substantial huff. He traded in his former maleficent protégées for others who, He seemed to assert, understood him better (or perhaps *what He had become*) and He expanded his terrestrial domain.
I am being somewhat but not altogether facetious here, uncertain as I am how much of a sense of humor God does have. I could get into some trouble you know . . .
However, you are stating expectations of God as per faiths, but not actually defining God. What IS God?
From my experiences of God the closest glove that fits in a nutshell is Panentheism. Indeed, although I am a Christian I so far see no contradiction to any monotheistic religion to the notion of Panentheism.
