Well, I've said this before, but I think it's really true here. There are two basic suppositions that most people are carrying around today:henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Jul 11, 2021 5:25 pmYeah, this place stinks of it.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sun Jul 11, 2021 5:21 pmYeh. The irony, of course, is that if morality is subjective, there's no such thing as a "bad" person. There's only "another" person -- regardless of what they do, so long as "subjectively" they're fine with it.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Jul 11, 2021 4:18 pm 91BE02E6-155C-45BE-BAAD-90B327F77FDE.png
this thread, like many others, isn't really about religion or god![]()
1. Truth and morality are merely subjective language games.
2. The real game in town is seizing the initiative, the high ground, the appearance of goodness and the de-facto power in any situation, and language games are the way we do it.
So there's no means of arbitrating disputes, no common basis of agreement. On the one hand, there are some who still those who believe in objective morality and actual truth, but they are unable to formulate the kinds of arguments that are persuasive to people who, on the other hand, have already abandoned both and now believe it's all about power. Because really, NO argument can be persuasive to somebody who thinks we're just playing power games: there's only win and loss of power; and things like truth-language and morality-language are nothing other than the tools of the power game.