Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:27 pm
Non-sequitur doesn't make sense outside of that context. Or at least you'd have to present whatever alternate usage you're employing that you feel makes sense.
Sure it makes sense. That's why I am using it.
The non-argumentative, non-fallacious and non-Philosophical use of non-sequitur
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:27 pm
Non-sequitur doesn't make sense outside of that context. Or at least you'd have to present whatever alternate usage you're employing that you feel makes sense.
The non-argumentative, non-fallacious and non-Philosophical use of non-sequitur
Wagers on whether I'm surprised that you won't attempt to present anything non-evasive?
This is really all just about you getting bent out of shape in the past that something(s) you presented in a philosophy context were basically torn apart with objections. That's why you basically avoid presenting anything. That way your ego can't be hurt that way again.
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:31 pm
This is really all just about you getting bent out of shape in the past that something(s) you presented in a philosophy context were basically torn apart with objections. That's why you basically avoid presenting anything. That way your ego can't be hurt that way again.
Ok, Freud.
Is it your ego you are protecting with non-sequiturs?
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:31 pm
What question do you believe I evaded? What you could do instead is explain why the answer I gave doesn't count as an answer in your view.
I know you have a gold medal in playing stupid. No need to flash it around.
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:31 pm
What question do you believe I evaded? What you could do instead is explain why the answer I gave doesn't count as an answer in your view.
I know you have a gold medal in playing stupid. No need to flash it around.
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:35 pm
Not bothering is an option, obviously.
And yet, here you are. Though you've switched strategies to playing a psychologist now.
I'm not saying me not bothering. As I said, "What question do you believe I evaded? What you could do instead is explain why the answer I gave doesn't count as an answer in your view." If you don't want to bother, okay. <shrug>
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:38 pm
I'm not saying me not bothering. As I said, "What question do you believe I evaded? What you could do instead is explain why the answer I gave doesn't count as an answer in your view." If you don't want to bother, okay. <shrug>
You evaded the question on which I called out your non-sequitur.
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:38 pm
I'm not saying me not bothering. As I said, "What question do you believe I evaded? What you could do instead is explain why the answer I gave doesn't count as an answer in your view." If you don't want to bother, okay. <shrug>
You evaded the question on which I called out your non-sequitur.
You'd need to explain why the answer I gave doesn't count as an answer in your view.
Sculptor wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:41 pm
Yet another desperate attempt to posit a predictable and safe world for a boy who is desperately scared of reality.
Agh, shame pumpkin. The thing that scares you most is words.
You are too scared to say that genocide is objectively wrong.