There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].

Should you think about your duty, or about the consequences of your actions? Or should you concentrate on becoming a good person?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Skepdick
Posts: 16022
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:16 am

Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].

Post by Skepdick »

Terrapin Station wrote: Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:27 pm Non-sequitur doesn't make sense outside of that context. Or at least you'd have to present whatever alternate usage you're employing that you feel makes sense.
Sure it makes sense. That's why I am using it.

The non-argumentative, non-fallacious and non-Philosophical use of non-sequitur
User avatar
Terrapin Station
Posts: 4548
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
Location: NYC Man

Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].

Post by Terrapin Station »

Skepdick wrote: Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:28 pm
Terrapin Station wrote: Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:27 pm Non-sequitur doesn't make sense outside of that context. Or at least you'd have to present whatever alternate usage you're employing that you feel makes sense.
The non-argumentative, non-fallacious and non-Philosophical use of non-sequitur
Wagers on whether I'm surprised that you won't attempt to present anything non-evasive?
Skepdick
Posts: 16022
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:16 am

Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].

Post by Skepdick »

Terrapin Station wrote: Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:29 pm Wagers on whether I'm surprised that you won't attempt to present anything non-evasive?
You mean like you are evading my questions with non-sequiturs?
User avatar
Terrapin Station
Posts: 4548
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
Location: NYC Man

Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].

Post by Terrapin Station »

This is really all just about you getting bent out of shape in the past that something(s) you presented in a philosophy context were basically torn apart with objections. That's why you basically avoid presenting anything. That way your ego can't be hurt that way again.
User avatar
Terrapin Station
Posts: 4548
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
Location: NYC Man

Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].

Post by Terrapin Station »

Skepdick wrote: Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:29 pm
Terrapin Station wrote: Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:29 pm Wagers on whether I'm surprised that you won't attempt to present anything non-evasive?
You mean like you are evading my questions with non-sequiturs?
What question do you believe I evaded? What you could do instead is explain why the answer I gave doesn't count as an answer in your view.
Skepdick
Posts: 16022
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:16 am

Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].

Post by Skepdick »

Terrapin Station wrote: Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:31 pm This is really all just about you getting bent out of shape in the past that something(s) you presented in a philosophy context were basically torn apart with objections. That's why you basically avoid presenting anything. That way your ego can't be hurt that way again.
Ok, Freud.

Is it your ego you are protecting with non-sequiturs?
Skepdick
Posts: 16022
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:16 am

Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].

Post by Skepdick »

Terrapin Station wrote: Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:31 pm What question do you believe I evaded? What you could do instead is explain why the answer I gave doesn't count as an answer in your view.
I know you have a gold medal in playing stupid. No need to flash it around.
User avatar
Terrapin Station
Posts: 4548
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
Location: NYC Man

Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].

Post by Terrapin Station »

Skepdick wrote: Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:34 pm
Terrapin Station wrote: Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:31 pm What question do you believe I evaded? What you could do instead is explain why the answer I gave doesn't count as an answer in your view.
I know you have a gold medal in playing stupid. No need to flash it around.
Not bothering is an option, obviously.
Skepdick
Posts: 16022
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:16 am

Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].

Post by Skepdick »

Terrapin Station wrote: Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:35 pm Not bothering is an option, obviously.
And yet, here you are. Though you've switched strategies to playing a psychologist now.
User avatar
Terrapin Station
Posts: 4548
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
Location: NYC Man

Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].

Post by Terrapin Station »

Skepdick wrote: Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:36 pm
Terrapin Station wrote: Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:35 pm Not bothering is an option, obviously.
And yet, here you are. Though you've switched strategies to playing a psychologist now.
I'm not saying me not bothering. As I said, "What question do you believe I evaded? What you could do instead is explain why the answer I gave doesn't count as an answer in your view." If you don't want to bother, okay. <shrug>
Skepdick
Posts: 16022
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:16 am

Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].

Post by Skepdick »

Terrapin Station wrote: Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:38 pm I'm not saying me not bothering. As I said, "What question do you believe I evaded? What you could do instead is explain why the answer I gave doesn't count as an answer in your view." If you don't want to bother, okay. <shrug>
You evaded the question on which I called out your non-sequitur.
User avatar
Terrapin Station
Posts: 4548
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
Location: NYC Man

Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].

Post by Terrapin Station »

Skepdick wrote: Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:39 pm
Terrapin Station wrote: Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:38 pm I'm not saying me not bothering. As I said, "What question do you believe I evaded? What you could do instead is explain why the answer I gave doesn't count as an answer in your view." If you don't want to bother, okay. <shrug>
You evaded the question on which I called out your non-sequitur.
You'd need to explain why the answer I gave doesn't count as an answer in your view.
User avatar
Sculptor
Posts: 8859
Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2019 11:32 pm

Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].

Post by Sculptor »

Yet another desperate attempt to posit a predictable and safe world for a boy who is desperately scared of reality.
Skepdick
Posts: 16022
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:16 am

Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].

Post by Skepdick »

Terrapin Station wrote: Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:40 pm You'd need to explain why the answer I gave doesn't count as an answer in your view.
Because the premise of the question rests upon a contradiction.
Skepdick wrote: Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:16 pm
Terrapin Station wrote: Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:15 pm Because a world independent of referrers is the majority of what's the case.
Non-sequitur.

How could any referrer be interested in a world without referrers?
Skepdick
Posts: 16022
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:16 am

Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].

Post by Skepdick »

Sculptor wrote: Mon Mar 15, 2021 2:41 pm Yet another desperate attempt to posit a predictable and safe world for a boy who is desperately scared of reality.
Agh, shame pumpkin. The thing that scares you most is words.

You are too scared to say that genocide is objectively wrong.
Post Reply