vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Sat Dec 19, 2020 7:58 am
Quite a few people, I'm sure
Your “proof” for that opinion is likely logic, rationality and obviousness. Ha! That’s a laugh. How retro of you. You’re in a new age. Truth is now defined as the proper narrative and you’re a critic of wokism, so your opinion is obviously false just because of that, which makes you ripe for a heaping ration of abusive language.
[quote=Walker post_id=485515 time=1608379699 user_id=11599]
[quote=vegetariantaxidermy post_id=485489 time=1608361080 user_id=8006]
Quite a few people, I'm sure :|
[/quote]
Your “proof” for that opinion is likely logic, rationality and obviousness. Ha! That’s a laugh. How retro of you. You’re in a new age. Truth is now defined as the proper narrative and you’re a critic of wokism, so your opinion is obviously false just because of that, which makes you ripe for a heaping ration of abusive language.
:wink:
[/quote]
Making someone listen to things like "heaping ration" is abusive language.
