You were right.henry quirk wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 6:08 pmdon't hold yer breathe that any of the anti-fraudists will even click on the link
American election.
- Immanuel Can
- Posts: 27604
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm
Re: American election.
Re: American election.
The person who knows what "evidence" means (me) is asking the person who doesn't (you) these questions:Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 8:43 pm I need somebody who knows what "evidence" means...or at least somebody who can read.
Why does "the evidence" require explanation?
What is it that you insist OUGHT to be done in the event that all evidence is true?
What are you trying to achieve?
-
commonsense
- Posts: 5380
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:38 pm
Re: American election.
ICcommonsense wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 8:23 pmIt isn’t evidence.Skepdick wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 7:33 pmWhy do you continue to call it "evidence" if multiple courts in multiple states have dismissed it as such?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 4:41 pm The evidence the Left has been saying "doesn't exist" for the theft of the election.
It's aaaaaalll here. Have fun.
https://hereistheevidence.com
Are you suggesting that there is a nation-wide conspiracy in the justice system?
You posted your link at 10:41 AM CDT. By 2:23 PM CDT I had read and digested all I could stand of your link. Where’s your evidence that I didn’t even try?
-
commonsense
- Posts: 5380
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:38 pm
Re: American election.
Evidence is proof, not something to be proved.
Crowdsourcing isn’t evidence.
Phrases in place of complete statements aren’t evidence.
Statements are not evidence just because they are claimed to be evidence.
Crowdsourcing isn’t evidence.
Phrases in place of complete statements aren’t evidence.
Statements are not evidence just because they are claimed to be evidence.
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: American election.
I ain't happy about itImmanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 8:44 pmYou were right.henry quirk wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 6:08 pmdon't hold yer breathe that any of the anti-fraudists will even click on the link
-
commonsense
- Posts: 5380
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:38 pm
Re: American election.
If I’m an anti-fraudist, does that make you fraudulent? 
- Immanuel Can
- Posts: 27604
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm
Re: American election.
A person who refuses to believe cancer is real isn't an "anti-cancerist." He hasn't actually prevented any cancer; he's just prevented himself from knowing of any. And a person who believes there's cancer isn't a "pro-cancerist," or "cancerist." He's a realist.commonsense wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 10:06 pm If I’m an anti-fraudist, does that make you fraudulent?![]()
Last edited by Immanuel Can on Wed Dec 09, 2020 10:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: American election.
yeah, guy, whatevercommonsense wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 10:06 pm If I’m an anti-fraudist, does that make you fraudulent?![]()
-
commonsense
- Posts: 5380
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:38 pm
Re: American election.
I believe “anti-fraudist” was your description. I would have chosen “skeptic” because I’m skeptical that an anomaly exists.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 10:58 pmA person who refuses to believe cancer is real isn't an "anti-cancerist." He hasn't actually prevented any cancer; he's just prevented himself from knowing of any. And a person who believes there's cancer isn't a "pro-cancerist," or "cancerist." He's a realist.commonsense wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 10:06 pm If I’m an anti-fraudist, does that make you fraudulent?![]()
- Immanuel Can
- Posts: 27604
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm
Re: American election.
Skepticism is fine. It's something we all should have. Especially when we're told that the people's choice has been Joe Biden.commonsense wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 11:54 pm I would have chosen “skeptic” because I’m skeptical that an anomaly exists.
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: American election.
I foisted up anti-fraudist, not mannie, and -- yeah -- skeptic is betterImmanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Dec 10, 2020 12:35 amSkepticism is fine. It's something we all should have. Especially when we're told that the people's choice has been Joe Biden.commonsense wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 11:54 pm I would have chosen “skeptic” because I’m skeptical that an anomaly exists.
there are skeptics who say an election wasn't stolen; there are skeptics who say a houseplant couldn't have won the election
as aside: smokin' joe knew/knows nuthin' about the theft (assumin' there was a theft)...he actually believes he won
- Immanuel Can
- Posts: 27604
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm
Re: American election.
I don't know whether or not that will turn out to be true. Smokin' Joe has a long and very corrupt history with the Democrats, and is definitely an insider on their misdeeds...or has been. But in his present mental condition, I don't think the Dems would trust him with anything, so you're probably right...they've probably convinced him he won, and he probably believes it.henry quirk wrote: ↑Thu Dec 10, 2020 1:55 am as aside: smokin' joe knew/knows nuthin' about the theft (assumin' there was a theft)...he actually believes he won
But God bless Texas.
-
commonsense
- Posts: 5380
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:38 pm
Re: American election.
henry quirk wrote: ↑Thu Dec 10, 2020 1:55 amI foisted up anti-fraudist, not mannie, and -- yeah -- skeptic is betterImmanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Dec 10, 2020 12:35 amSkepticism is fine. It's something we all should have. Especially when we're told that the people's choice has been Joe Biden.commonsense wrote: ↑Wed Dec 09, 2020 11:54 pm I would have chosen “skeptic” because I’m skeptical that an anomaly exists.
there are skeptics who say an election wasn't stolen; there are skeptics who say a houseplant couldn't have won the election
as aside: smokin' joe knew/knows nuthin' about the theft (assumin' there was a theft)...he actually believes he won
You are a great and honorable man.
(Not Joking)
Last edited by commonsense on Thu Dec 10, 2020 3:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: American election.
But God bless Texas.
and the other 14 (I think) who've joined with texas in the suit (includin' my own)
and the other 14 (I think) who've joined with texas in the suit (includin' my own)
- Immanuel Can
- Posts: 27604
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm
Re: American election.
17 now, I heard. But good for the Bayou Boys.henry quirk wrote: ↑Thu Dec 10, 2020 3:01 am But God bless Texas.
and the other 14 (I think) who've joined with texas in the suit (includin' my own)
They should. Any cheating obviously dilutes the impact of every vote in the country.