Exposing Liberal Hypocrisy and Conservative Close-Mindedness

[gaffo]

I know what he means by 'liberals' and I agree that they are hypocrites. I don't regard them as liberal though, but I've given up on flogging that dead horse.

here we agree.

[gaffo]

I dunno. 200 years ago most of congress were slave owners. !00 years ago half of them were in the Ku Klux Klan. America has a record of bouncing back from complacency, although it usually takes a civil or world war to wake them up. Let's hope you can find a different way this time.

not hopefull of any civil war. the sheople are too dumb to care today - being corporitized with iphones/etc.

expect no revolution, and so no hope.

just a slow decent toward global autocracy and "corporate capture" of america, and a slow decent to 2nd world status.

by 2100 America and Mexico will have the same standard of living - good for Mexicans, not so much for Americans.

but without an interested and informed american public to demand gov. reform via a viable political party that challenges global corps and breaks the son of bitches up - instead of pander to them like the fcc shit pai/and company - there is no hope for america's future.

[gaffo]

See, Trump is a Republican,

no, he's not.

[gaffo]

I still think that Van Jones made some very good points, though as FlashDangerPants points out, some people are a waste of breath.

Obama, who selected Jones to be a Czar, made some good points, too.

For instance he said, if you like your plan you can keep your plan, and if you like your doctor you can keep your doctor, period.

That was a good point, however those who saw through it, saw it was not a waste of breath.

Instead, it was a lie to fool the gullible, and it achieved the objective.
Those gullible were Democrats.
Not a single Republican voted for the lie.

Do you detect a pattern in history, or because it is not spelled out to your liking and festooned with citations from Dem approved sources, are you blind to the pattern?

we weren't guilible. we saw Obama caved to Health Insurance czar Karen Ignoti - he pussed out.

no single payer. so Obamacare = the same shit we had before.

which was privte shitcare.

new shit same as the old shit. while the rest of the 1st world moved on 50 yr ago with healthcare that works.

[gaffo]

'Reverse racism' is patronising and racist in itself. It's implying that only 'white' people can be racist, since they are inherently superior. ''Progressives'' use the word as a weapon they have little control over, flinging it around mindlessly like a toddler with a lightsabre.
Racism is racism. It's not even possible to be a 'reverse racist'.

Why would that be so? In India non-Indians compain of racism quite a lot. When they return the favour, that is reverse racism, there needn't be a single white person involved in the entire transaction.

As a rule, reverse racism is just racism against the normal flow (which is typically from majority to minority).

the only racism in i know of in india is from the lighter indians toward the darker ones. colorism.

Everybody can be racist, probably everybody is, and that's almost certainly the most Libtard sentence I have ever written. The only difference with whiteys like me is that we get to be racist absolutely everywhere we go, whereas Indians only really get to be the racists in India.

The special advantage I get from being English is that I get to be racist against Americans of all colours, and the f****** French as well.

tell that to the Ugandans in the 1970s.

[gaffo]

'Reverse racism' is patronising and racist in itself. It's implying that only 'white' people can be racist, since they are inherently superior. ''Progressives'' use the word as a weapon they have little control over, flinging it around mindlessly like a toddler with a lightsabre.
Racism is racism. It's not even possible to be a 'reverse racist'.

Why would that be so? In India non-Indians compain of racism quite a lot. When they return the favour, that is reverse racism, there needn't be a single white person involved in the entire transaction.

As a rule, reverse racism is just racism against the normal flow (which is typically from majority to minority).

Everybody can be racist, probably everybody is, and that's almost certainly the most Libtard sentence I have ever written. The only difference with whiteys like me is that we get to be racist absolutely everywhere we go, whereas Indians only really get to be the racists in India.

The special advantage I get from being English is that I get to be racist against Americans of all colours, and the f****** French as well.

Who decided that?? So the white South Africans were 'reverse racists'?

white south africans were never more than 20-percent. so a minority since...........forever.

[Walker]

See, Trump is a Republican,

no, he's not.

By his actions so far, the authorities consider him more conservative than Reagan.

As president Trump is the defacto head of his political party, but he ain't like other high-ranking Republicans in the party.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Why would that be so? In India non-Indians compain of racism quite a lot. When they return the favour, that is reverse racism, there needn't be a single white person involved in the entire transaction.

As a rule, reverse racism is just racism against the normal flow (which is typically from majority to minority).

Everybody can be racist, probably everybody is, and that's almost certainly the most Libtard sentence I have ever written. The only difference with whiteys like me is that we get to be racist absolutely everywhere we go, whereas Indians only really get to be the racists in India.

The special advantage I get from being English is that I get to be racist against Americans of all colours, and the f****** French as well.

Who decided that?? So the white South Africans were 'reverse racists'?

white south africans were never more than 20-percent. so a minority since...........forever.

So?

[gaffo]

...

See, Trump is a Republican, and when he was elected, the Dems immediately began to ramp-up their resistance to the country.

See?

Wow! I do, as if this "resistance to the country" is where your political discourse is devolving to then you're heading at the worst down the civil war route or at best a balkanization of the US, either way the end of the US as a geopolitical force. Not that it would be surprising as your last civil war still festers in your country and this Republic of States has never been a very stable structure for any nation that wished to be a nation. Still, will make for interesting times as China will take the opportunity to take the international centre stage and sadly enough America will be held up as the example of how Liberal Democracy is unsuitable for managing large populations as it couldn't even last a few hundred years.

you show me that Walker with his above quote using "resistance to the COUNTY" - rather than "Trump" - show to me his is a Cultist and nothing more.

just like the Fascist bots 70 yrs ago - worshing the cult of personality - and a very real threat to the survival of a Nation i love and belong to.


cultists are my enemy. and today walker than means you - you Trumpist.

you are no more republican than i am, you would throw the repbulicans under the bus if your God Trump ordered you to.

brainstems are less attractive the human beings, try to become the latter.

[gaffo]

Don’t worry. …

Giving the Supreme Court a conservative majority for the first time in ages is going to help. …

Help who?

all the destitute global corporations "they are people too!!!!!!!".

thanks Citizen United.

now we have the latest SC nominee on record saying "ISP have the right to censor any websites people have access too" - in the name of "free speech" for the widdle poor destitute corp ISP.....................no biggie I can just get access to the internet via another ...oh wait, there is not "other" to get access to the net.

oh well, net neutrality was just a communist 5th collum, shit pai was right in defending the interests of the global IPS's widdle poor not heard speech.

All praise the Corporate Gods!

amen.

thank you shit pie, you are a true american.

[Walker]

The authority of the executive branch of government is being undermined for political purposes, and it's not being undermined by political discussion, gaffo.

I've shown evidence.

You've mouthed off. Sad.

You should get your facts together before you accuse, etc.

*

As far as your cultist crap goes, I don't know what you're talking about. You're speaking from the interior of your own noggin with that one, old fella.

[gaffo]

Hola DP. how have you been?

The infrequently glorious FPD is in largely good health, although some of the stupidity on this site that shitwits are trying to flog as philosophy is causing my anus to bleed. Which hurts a little.

Don Hertzfeldt!

thanks for the reference - been a fan of that comic/artistic genius for 20 yrs now.

[gaffo]

Do you believe that there should now be no need for would-be Presidents to present their finances for audit?

Do you believe that there should now be no need for would-be Presidents to separate themselves from their businesses while in office to prevent conflicts of interest? (Giving assets to your children to mind would not be accepted as proper separation in any company in the world).

Do you believe that Presidents can simply sack any person employed to investigate him?

Do you believe that using state assets to harass Stormy Daniels before her testifying is proper?

Don't talk about liberal hypocrisy when your own is simply outrageous. As I said before, both sides are hypocritical because it's just one of many forms of deception used in power play. We can either play the games, ignore them or expose them.

yep, sadly Cultist tRumpbots have lowered the standards.

from now on - assuming we will have elections - the elected will no longer need to show their taxes, nor show they are not a manchurian candidate.

Rump lower he bar and eroded the Rule of Law in American to ensure future presidents will not longer need to follow rules of law ;-/.

[gaffo]

You don’t know what you’re talking about.
There's no cause to dig into Trump's life.

Trump had a long public career before he was elected.

The people who elected him had a pretty good idea of who they were electing.

They had to.
He was the dark horse.

And, his popularity is increasing. That's because he's proving his mettle.

*

Obama, on the other hand, came out of nowhere.

He wasn’t elected because of his record.
He wasn’t elected because his past was known.
He wasn’t elected on his accomplishments, because he had none.
He wasn't elected because he was vetted by the press.

He was elected on personality, and undefined hopey-change.

He captured the gullible vote.

you are so full of shit it ain't funny tRump is tied to the mob/drug deals while in real-estate in NYC, and who knows what else.

but you don't care your head is too far buried up his ass you are passing out in ecstasy/lack of oxygen - fainting over der fueror.

[Walker]

Those are all facts you quoted, not my opinion.

Your problem, well at least part of it, is with the facts.