Muslims/Mexicans Are Taking Over

[Seleucus]

my block list

Oh, another leftist with Ostrich Syndrome

What the hell are you talking about? I'm literally in an argument with someone in this thread about immigration, because I'm apparently not left enough.

If you think I added her to my block list because I was offended by what she said about muslims or immigrants - things I actually defended her on, and was a catalyst to the said discussion I'm in right now - you're mistaken. It wasn't really to censor her opinions, but more so to censor her spam. And if you know how the block feature works on this site, it's not even that; My quote above was specifically followed up with how much I don't want her opinions censored, so funny you would crop that out. In fact, that was the whole purpose to me making that post.

So somehow, this debacle started in texas, and you took a train to russia.

Add me to our block list too, and report me also while you're at it.

[Seleucus]

What have I specifically said that has led you to project your own twisted ideas onto me? Please repeat the exact words that you found so offensive. Not your wacked out interpretation of what you imagine I said... but what I actually said. Can you do that?

So as expected you've never lifted a finger to do a single tangible thing for Muslim people. It's all just talk. Multiculturalism is just your histrionic ego game. Wow, you're so virtuous.

What do I need to do for them? I simply said I feel love for all. Don't you? Doesn't God, according to Christians? What is your problem? You have not told me (as I've requested) what I've said that you found so offensive -- you just want to keep attacking, like a hateful, mindless asshole. If you can't provide reasoning (other than your own projections and delusions) for the things you say, then nothing you say is honorable or valuable.

So your going to use Christianity to justify your histrionic narcissism?

[Sir-Sister-of-Suck]

Add me to our block list too, and report me also while you're at it.

I think you might as well add me to yours, considering how you're not actually reading what it is I'm saying, anyway.

[Lacewing]

So your going to use Christianity to justify your histrionic narcissism?

I'm done with you.

[Seleucus]

Add me to our block list too, and report me also while you're at it.

I think you might as well add me to yours, considering how you're not actually reading what it is I'm saying, anyway.

I've read through you're comments in this discussion, you're obviously a leftist radical. You're on and on with the usual "racist racist racist, Nazi Nazi Nazi".

Or do you identify as a rightist, you support Trump and the Identitarian movement, you're reading Evola and de Maistre, curious about your ethnolinguistic heritage and the ancient spiritual traditions of you people?

[Seleucus]

So your going to use Christianity to justify your histrionic narcissism?

I'm done with you.

Of course, that's how narcissism works, when someone won't play your ego game with you then it's onto the next victim. This is an oldie but it would do you well to read it, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Games_People_Play_(book)

[Sir-Sister-of-Suck]

I've read through you're comments in this discussion, you're obviously a leftist radical.

What's radical, is your interpretation of what's going on here. I'm actually fighting against what you - or most - would probably consider "the left". You either have some pretty horrible reading comprehension, or just skimmed through the entire thread, saw the word 'nazi', and automatically assumed I'm the type of person who tosses around the word like a hot cake to generalize everyone as a nazi, solely from that, without even looking at the context of why I used it within the example - which was to demonstrate that it's okay to hate a religion like 'Islam', just as much as it's acceptable to hate someones ideology.

It seems that your comprehension is also selective, because I happen to use the word 'nazi' right next to the word 'communism', implying a dis-favoritism to that as well. At this point, I can't tell if you're just trolling. Your analysis of the situation is so far away from the reality.

Or do you identify as a rightist, you support Trump and the Identitarian movement, you're reading Evola and de Maistre, curious about your ethnolinguistic heritage and the ancient spiritual traditions of you people?

That's quite the false dichotomy you've devised.

[Seleucus]

I've read through you're comments in this discussion, you're obviously a leftist radical.

What's radical, is your interpretation of what's going on here. I'm actually fighting against what you - or most - would probably consider "the left". You either have some pretty horrible reading comprehension, or just skimmed through the entire thread, saw the word 'nazi', and automatically assumed I'm the type of person who tosses around the word like a hot cake to generalize everyone as a nazi, solely from that, without even looking at the context of why I used it within the example - which was to demonstrate that it's okay to hate a religion like 'Islam', just as much as it's acceptable to hate someones ideology.

It seems that your comprehension its also selective, because I happen to use the word 'nazi' right next to the word 'communism', implying a dis-favoritism to that as well. At this point, I can't tell if you're just trolling. Your analysis of the situation is so far away from the reality.

I looked through your posts again but it's still pretty clear to me you're way off in left field. I expect what has happened is that the center has shifted so radically far left that even leftists like you now imagine they're conservative.

Or do you identify as a rightist, you support Trump and the Identitarian movement, you're reading Evola and de Maistre, curious about your ethnolinguistic heritage and the ancient spiritual traditions of you people?

That's quite the false dichotomy you've devised.

I've been interested in rightism since the end of the US primaries, although my actual awakening out the leftist delusion happened about a year and a half ago when the fact that so many of the tenants of leftism are simply false and not objective finally got through, so I'm just describing where I'm at. I expect if you took part in the authentically rightist philosophy discussion group Know Thyself, that you would agree my description of rightism is apt and you would find yourself as a left winger.

[That forum is not welcome here. AMod]

[GreatandWiseTrixie]

Or do you identify as a rightist, you support Trump and the Identitarian movement, you're reading Evola and de Maistre, curious about your ethnolinguistic heritage and the ancient spiritual traditions of you people?

That's quite the false dichotomy you've devised.

I've been interested in rightism since the end of the US primaries, although my actual awakening out the leftist delusion happened about a year and a half ago when the fact that so many of the tenants of leftism are simply false and not objective finally got through, so I'm just describing where I'm at. I expect if you took part in the authentically rightist philosophy discussion group Know Thyself, that you would agree my description of rightism is apt and you would find yourself as a left winger.

[That forum is not welcome here. AMod]

This is exactly right, and why I'm not a leftist. I'm not really a rightist either, so I'm more or less a alt-lib/anarchist. I could never join the lefts because, they just lie too much about everything, cannot be reasoned, have totalitarian views, and use hysteria/illogic. It's actually a tragedy, I wanted to be a left so bad but, I get in there, I see how corrupt and evil they are, and I just cannot be a part of their general dumb-downed views. It's like a grown adult trying to catch up to lost childhood, so they enroll in a Preschool/Kindergarten, after 5 minutes it just gets awkward, they have to leave. Thats my experience with trying to assimilate myself into the Left. So instead I just watch My Little Pony, to regain those moments, thing about My Little Pony is all of the main characters are older teens or adults, and have depth of character, which is relatable to me, much less awkward than trying to fit in with actual 3rd grader, "lets color with crayons" type of minds.

[Lacewing]

Has this forum gone absolutely fucking mad?

[GreatandWiseTrixie]

my block list

Oh, another leftist with Ostrich Syndrome,

http://liberal.politifake.org/image/pol ... 351743.jpg

Lol if it can't win an argument, it just calls the opponent a nazi, or pedophile, and/or hits the block button. Lol.

Honestly, alot of these people remind me of Imps. Like if you say something they don't want to understand, or disagree with, their brain shuts off and they turn into little flesh-eating monsters.



At times I feel like Abacus Cinch, from that movie where they try to crucify a black person for a crime he didn't commit, and I'm the only one who will stand up for him. Like I litterally made a thread trying to prove Michael Jackson's innocence (Michael Jackson is black) then they gang up on me, twist my words, insult me, threaten me, lie about me and refuse to act like civilized human being to me, exactly like that movie "To Kill A Mockingbird", then say I'm racist of blacks when I'm the only one willing to try to prove a black man's innocence. They are litterally trying to kill a mockingbird, and I'm the mockingbird.

Has this forum gone absolutely fucking mad?

I think so. It seems me and Seleucus are one of the few sane ones here. A part of me wonders if many online-lefts are actually people, or just programmed chat-bots meant to attack me. A lot of the replies don't seem organic, just seems like targetted keywords they formulate a response to, and at times, sometimes they don't formulate a response at all, so they just resort to posting procedurally-generated statements.

[GreatandWiseTrixie]

So your going to use Christianity to justify your histrionic narcissism?

I'm done with you.

Of course, that's how narcissism works, when someone won't play your ego game with you then it's onto the next victim. This is an oldie but it would do you well to read it, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Games_People_Play_(book)

There are 7 types of narcissists, she probably doesn't believe she is a narcissist because she is so deeply entrenched. She is the type of masochistic narcissist who views herself as a kind of sacrificial lamb of humanity, kind of like a pious narcissist. You can tell if it's a serious narcissist by how quickly they hit the block button or drop you from their life when they experience slight hostility from you. I would say Sister of Suck is more of an extreme narcissist, I never directly engaged with her or insulted her, and she put me on ignore.

Me, I'm more of the attention whore run of the mill Jesus-type narcissist, I want to save the world and help people, but I am still a narcissist attention whore. You can debate with me and I won't hit the block button, I'll just always, win the argument because I refuse to lose, and when I do lose, I always try to lose gracefully. There are different types of narcissists out there, I'm one of the more amiable types. No doubt one of the more evil narcissists will use this quote against me, take it out of context and use it to "prove" I'm a horrible narcissist and crazy, and they are innocent, goodie-two-shoes and a fine specimen of humanity. Most narcissists are victims of shaming and abuse, I mean you can see in some of their vicious, psychotic posts that they just want to hurt you to dump all of that abuse on somebody else. Same with bullies. I mean vegetariantaxidermy litterally just trolls my threads with mean spirited comments, like she is saying "Please love me, look how hurt and angry I am, please see that I am just a hurt soul looking to hurt someone else to deal with my pain."

[Lacewing]

Has this forum gone absolutely fucking mad?

I think so. It seems me and Seleucus are one of the few sane ones here.

You DO seem "as one" in the way you both overwhelm discussion with your self-serving and hate-filled views. It's an effective, even if transparent way for you of drowning out any other realities/views that might shed light on the darkness you seem to like to steep in. Then you're angry that no one will support such madness nor play with you, right? So you destroy as much as you can with blind vengeance, since it doesn't match your vision of how things should be -- which is a worthy description of terrorists too. Regardless of the scale and platform, it is ALL very narrow-minded, hateful behavior that destroys what it touches... in an effort to remake the world in its image.

[GreatandWiseTrixie]

Has this forum gone absolutely fucking mad?

I think so. It seems me and Seleucus are one of the few sane ones here.

You DO seem "as one" in the way you both overwhelm discussion with your self-serving and hate-filled views. It's an effective, even if transparent way for you of drowning out any other realities/views that might shed light on the darkness you seem to like to steep in. Then you're angry that no one will support such madness nor play with you, right? So you destroy as much as you can with blind vengeance, since it doesn't match your vision of how things should be -- which is a worthy description of terrorists too. Regardless of the scale and platform, it is ALL very narrow-minded, hateful behavior that destroys what it touches... in an effort to remake the world in its image.

Seems like you are talking about Muslims not me.
And that is why we should get rid of all 3 abrahamic religions: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.
Get rid of all 3.
Lies and delusions.

[FlashDangerpants]

All you did there was use more words

"Racists talk about arabic people and muslims as though they're the same thing? That's racist!" *Proceeds to talk about arabic people and muslims as though they're the same thing.

Where have I done that? For that matter why would I do that? When I talk of there being over a billion muslims of great variety I can't see why I would want to narrow that down to one sector of a much larger group - it wouldn't serve my point at all well would it?

There's not much point addressing all the stuff you are hanging off that accusation until I see what the fuck you are on about. If you have something though, I'm going to walk back whatever that comment might have been and apologise because it isn't at all what I would ever intentionally state. So there's not much point trying to hang anything else off of that accusation.

Did I write "tenets of islam"? No, I wrote about the common attributes of the people of that religion.

You don't think following the tenets of Islam is a common attribute for Islamists?

Islamists? No not really. Did you mean muslims there or did you really mean islamists?

Yeah, look, you have never tracked across the country picking fruit at a series of farms for months on end I assume (I know I wouldn't do it)

That's a pretty immaterial anecdote. I'm not talking about what would change my or your willingness to work an agricultural job, I'm talking about what would change the collective will of other americans.

You've gone wildly off the topic then. The claim I was addressing was a straight forward statement of false fact that Mexicans actually cause wages to fall for Americans. I'm not talking about that stuff and if you want to go there then you are opening a massively expanded conversation about different stuff entirely.

Mate, you wrote "doing racism a serious disservice of how bad it actually is", and "doing a major disservice to actual racism". Don't be a wanker.Mate, you wrote "doing racism a serious disservice of how bad it actually is", and "doing a major disservice to actual racism". Don't be a wanker.

Is this suppose to make me regret what I said? Because I stand by it. I wouldn't put racism on the same shelf as a hatred based on someones religion, anymore than I would fault someone for hating someones ideology.

That was my response to your petty grammatical quibble, don't be a forgetful wanker.

And you're taking that children of immigrants thing into necessarily immeasurable nonsense. Propose how you would measure that sort of thing so that numbers can be used, and then we can look at whether it's worthy of further effort. I can't imagine where you could possibly start with that. If you can't propose a measuring method then it's sheer stupidity to talk about that subject as a wages effect, because, in all seriousness, if it can't be counted it doesn't count. Don't forget to include how you will measure the benefits of having a larger working age workforce to look after you when you are old and need help getting into the bath though.

But in answer to your question about whether I think children actually have an impact on wages ... only in so far as fatherhood is known to result in working harder and getting paid more. The actual kids when grown and working have the same impact on wages as any other citizen. What effect do you have on wages SSoS?