Dream on. Not with those pronouns.
Obviously what we want is a lot more guns
Re: Obviously what we want is a lot more guns
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: Obviously what we want is a lot more guns
Why can't you at least pass a law that only allows one gun to be owned at time and make them shotguns? A la Henry.
I mean how hard would it be to create a national database to enforce this?
Now I can hear the standard cry "but the criminals will still get more" but so what, you've got your shotgun and loons like the Las Vegas killer wouldn't have the means to murder so many people or at least not so easily.
I mean how hard would it be to create a national database to enforce this?
Now I can hear the standard cry "but the criminals will still get more" but so what, you've got your shotgun and loons like the Las Vegas killer wouldn't have the means to murder so many people or at least not so easily.
Last edited by Arising_uk on Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Obviously what we want is a lot more guns
Different weapons have different uses.Arising_uk wrote: ↑Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:41 pm Why can't you at least pass a law that only allows one gun to be owned at time and make them shotguns? A la Henry.
I mean how hard would a national database be to enforce this be?
Now I can hear the standard cry "but the criminals will still get more" but so what, you've got your shotgun and loons like the Las Vegas killer wouldn't have the means to murder so many people or at least not so easily.
Shotguns are short range.
And then there's that pesky constitution.
It's all held together by "shall not be infringed."
Look at the physical consequences of those words.
Just words?
Change that to shall be infringed, and start confiscating.
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: Obviously what we want is a lot more guns
You've amended your constitution umpteen times. Still, it does point out the problem of having a codified constitution in the face of a changing world with different problems.Walker wrote:...
And then there's that pesky constitution.
It's all held together by "shall not be infringed."
Look at the physical consequences of those words.
Just words? ...
Re: Obviously what we want is a lot more guns
No, it illustrates the corruption caused by The Great Society, not the intent of the Great Society, but the Progressive corruption of the intent.Arising_uk wrote: ↑Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:56 pmYou've amended your constitution umpteen times. Still, it does point out the problem of having a codified constitution in the face of a changing world with different problems.Walker wrote:...
And then there's that pesky constitution.
It's all held together by "shall not be infringed."
Look at the physical consequences of those words.
Just words? ...
The disease is not guns. There have always been guns.
Guns are the symptom.
Example: Chicago.
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: Obviously what we want is a lot more guns
Most of your gun-nutters are right-wing and anti-progressive(whatever the hell shit this 'progressive' means as it's all Yank to me), you now calling them victims?
Last edited by Arising_uk on Thu Oct 05, 2017 4:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13975
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: Obviously what we want is a lot more guns
I actually agree
Re: Obviously what we want is a lot more guns
I've never actually been able to tell whether I agree with Walker or not.
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13975
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: Obviously what we want is a lot more guns
Re: Obviously what we want is a lot more guns
Don't forget elevator inspectors.Hobbes' Choice wrote: ↑Mon Oct 02, 2017 6:41 pm Fishing, Flying, Hunting, Driving. All require licences in the USA.
Re: Obviously what we want is a lot more guns
This guy knows how to ask questions.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-10-0 ... ant-talk-a
Should we be reading this stuff?
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: Obviously what we want is a lot more guns
Stupid ones for sure. Do you think he likes answers as much?Walker wrote:This guy knows how to ask questions.
#1 How can he tell its a 'suicide note'?
Did it have big writing on the front? "MY SUICIDE NOTE"
Does he really expect your police force to release what could be material evidence to the public so early in an investigation?
#2 And yet there are other clips showing this light flashing before the shooting?
https://www.instagram.com/p/BZwofXcgzh9/
Not exactly Sherlock Holmes is he.
#3 Could it be because it wasn't true?
#4 Is this Jon Rappoport a weapons trainer? As apparently he's completely wrong and an accountant can kill a lot of people with a fully automatic sub-machine gun if he's firing into a big enough crowd from a height. In fact I'm surprised he didn't kill more.
#5 He booked in with 10 bags is how. He also booked in on the 28th of Sept so he could have just brought them up a few at a time from his car.
#6 Apparently he's been collecting weapons for quite a while. Now given in your wonderful country you can go and find a site or even a deserted place to practice firing them you think he wouldn't have practiced?
#7 She knew what band was going to be on at that time.
I seriously doubt this is true but if it was there are nutters in all large gatherings.
#8
10:05pm: First shots fired by the suspect
10:12pm: First officers arrived on the 31st floor and announced gunfire coming from above them
10:15pm: Last shots fired by the suspect
10:17pm: First two officers arrive on the 32nd floor of the hotel, where Paddock's room was
10:18pm: Security officer tells the officers he was shot and gives the exact location of the suspect's room
10:26-10:30pm: Eight additional officers arrive on the 32nd floor and begin to move systematically down the hallway, clearing each room and looking for injured people
10:55pm: Eight officers arrive at the stairwell in the opposite ends of the hallway nearest the suspect's room
11:20pm: The first breach was off and officers entered the suspect's room, where he was seen lying on the ground
They got there in 12 minutes but he'd stopped firing so they followed procedure.
#9 Because he knew he was likely to die and wanted to leave her better off?
#10 Because he sent her there as a holiday presumably a pretext so she wouldn't be involved.
And no, she apparently had no idea what he was going to do.
#11 wtf? Some other wacko conspiracy theory?
#12 Because ISIS aren't stupid and neither is the FBI, unlike this 'journalist'.
#13
#14 Do you think millions of dollars through real estate deals might give one a clue?
#15 I take it this guy never leaves his basement. As if he did he'd know how large festivals are conducted nowadays.
#16 He had good musical taste?
So only trump supporters and republicans can like country music? What a bigoted knob.
And here's the real reason why he has 'news' blogged all this stuff.
Sure if you're a conspiracy nutjob with a right-wing agenda and one with no empathy or compassion to the victims or their relatives in their time of grief.Should we be reading this stuff?
![]()
Congratulations! You have managed a new low.
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13975
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: Obviously what we want is a lot more guns
Does anyone still think Americans are sane? Every time this happens (and it's a lot) the pro gunners claim it was all fake and a conspiracy by the few normal people to take their gunny wunnies off OF OF OF them. Imagine all the fake funerals, fake grief, and all those actors having to hide out for the rest of their lives, or assume fake identities and all the intricate web of deceit that entails. (And yes, there are videos saying the gunfire sound was a recording, and that there were no bullets found on the ground blah, blah, blah....)
Apparently having a 'flabby physique' is strong evidence that the latest shooting was a 'false flag' because of course people with 'flabby physiques' can't possibly use guns (must be why the US always loses against lean and fit village guerillas). Hmm, and here was I thinking you only need a couple of working fingers and even without that you could probably think of some other way to operate them (they would have to be made idiot-proof for obvious reasons).
Apparently having a 'flabby physique' is strong evidence that the latest shooting was a 'false flag' because of course people with 'flabby physiques' can't possibly use guns (must be why the US always loses against lean and fit village guerillas). Hmm, and here was I thinking you only need a couple of working fingers and even without that you could probably think of some other way to operate them (they would have to be made idiot-proof for obvious reasons).
Re: Obviously what we want is a lot more guns
That’s rich, coming from you.Arising_uk wrote: ↑Thu Oct 05, 2017 6:19 pmStupid ones for sure. Do you think he likes answers as much?Walker wrote:This guy knows how to ask questions.
The authorities say he must have had help.
Are they wacko conspirators? And low?
Re: Obviously what we want is a lot more guns
Imagine all the fake reasoning, incoherence, venom and hate. It isn't hard to do.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Thu Oct 05, 2017 6:31 pm Does anyone still think Americans are sane? Every time this happens (and it's a lot) the pro gunners claim it was all fake and a conspiracy by the few normal people to take their gunny wunnies off OF OF OF them. Imagine all the fake funerals, fake grief, and all those actors having to hide out for the rest of their lives, or assume fake identities and all the intricate web of deceit that entails. (And yes, there are videos saying the gunfire sound was a recording, and that there were no bullets found on the ground blah, blah, blah....)
Apparently having a 'flabby physique' is strong evidence that the latest shooting was a 'false flag' because of course people with 'flabby physiques' can't possibly use guns (must be why the US always loses against lean and fit village guerillas). Hmm, and here was I thinking you only need a couple of working fingers and even without that you could probably think of some other way to operate them (they would have to be made idiot-proof for obvious reasons).